Sunday, April 26, 2026

Napowrimo 26: Climate Change

The National Poetry Writing Month challenge for today was to write a poem about writing poetry. 

I stand by the one I wrote more than seven years ago...

"
Some poetry’s bad, Heaven knows,
Yet all poetry’s different from prose.
Bad Poetry’s bound
To patterns of sound
(Though these may not accord quite with those).

It roams through every dialect on Earth,
Stretches rhythms for all that they’re worth,
Chooses subjects prosaic,
Becomes a mosaic
Of thoughts Good Poems never give birth.

What Bad Poetry never will do
Is claim, “I’m so much wiser than you,
If you say I’m not great,
Yourself you denigrate”—
Bad Poetry’s honest and true.

It will freely admit that it’s Bad.
Grandiosity it’s never had.
If it chance to beguile
You into a slight smile,
It may open your mind just a tad.

(Copyright Ⓒ Priscilla King, 2018. Used by permission 😊 )

But the point is to write a new poem each day, so I found an alternative list that invited poems about "loneliness and other impossible situations," "a situation that seems impossible but that you could solve if you wanted to." 

There are situations that are difficult to solve satisfactorily, that could be solved quickly in a way that would probably create worse problems than the original situation. 

Voting for a candidate you don't like personally who's not likely to be of much use on any of the issues that matter to you, who was running against a candidate you don't like personally who's not likely to be of much use on any of the issues that matter to you and who also wants to join other people's war

(That's bad enough, so let the majority of Americans who've been in this plight since 2024 consider: being appointed to office by a candidate nobody likes personally, who's not letting you do what your constituent base want you to do, who disagrees with you on several political issues and is probably trying to get you to resign, while you have a personal agenda that requires you to stay where you are.)

Staying with a job that doesn't pay well, but that you enjoy, instead of switching to a job that you'd hate, that wouldn't pay well either, and that you probably wouldn't keep because the reason why the job's open is that the company has hired and fired thirty-eight people for the job already and it's still April.

I live where I want to live. I do many of the things I've always wanted to do. I've not been able to do some other things I've always wanted to do because I am, as my home is, under attack. I have, as my whole neighborhood has, a personal enemy--a land coveter who doesn't even have the fortitude to make offers that would be turned down, who sneaks around trying to ruin people's enjoyment of good land in what used to be a Christian community. After the cat poisoning episode a young man, allegedly a son from what may have been an earlier marriage in another State, was supposed to be watching this Bad Neighbor. Supposedly he's been staying on the other side of the hill and doing nothing worse than spraying poison into the air--not to "protect crops" (he's not planted a crop, nor claimed ownership of a cow, for years) but to make as many neighbors feel as unpleasant as possible. Actually, of course, he slowed down for a season and then resumed the harassment, I think because at this point in his life it's become what he does, who he is...he has to know he's not going to get any more real estate in this neighborhood. And at least he's lost the ability to shoot small animals and leave them in the road. But nasty people never get too old to spread the kind of crazy talk that fascinates people who don't have enough in the way of lives. Rodents don't travel in groups of half a dozen mixed mice and rats of different species, to invade a house that doesn't offer them even water, without some human help; and dumping rodents into basements has been one of this Bad Neighbor's favorite pranks for at least thirty years. And the Cat Sanctuary had rodents in mixed half-dozens this winter; I caught two of different species in one trap, one night. Giving the Bad Neighbor what he wants might solve the problem of being harassed by him, but would certainly create enough other problems that are even worse that it's not a "solution" some of us can even consider.

And then there are public problems, everybody's problems, some of which are soluble if people would just deal with the solutions...

Climate change. It's primarily local. We need leadership,
Of course we do, but not the kind for which globalists clamor.
Leadership by example, we need. Taking the power trip
Out of government, let the elected wield trowel, shovel, hammer.
Let them walk to work every day; let them meet with the electorate
In the road. Let the pavement break up and the roads go to grass.
Cars are good, for the frail and pathetic whose stiff old bones hesitate
To walk on the ground. For the vigorous, let the fad pass.
Let the telecommute be the norm for white-collar employment.
Let the walk to the market become the place where people meet.
Let it be de rigueur, socially, to walk and show enjoyment
Of the flowers and butterflies we notice while on our feet.
It's a hard sell, I know, but it would cool down, without a fight,
Even cities where people cling to their cars as to a right.

Book Review: A Journey of Faith

Title: A Journey of Faith

Author: Sylvia Price

Date: 2025

Quote: "Dean will be staying here at the inn for two weeks."

Melinda was born and brought up Amish. Most people in the Eastern States and Canada have at least heard of the Amish denomination as the most conspicuous of American Protestant church groups. They preserve a close-knit community by pooling their resources and practicing a strict rule of frugality that goes back to eighteenth-century Germany. Oldfashioned clothes, horse-drawn buggies, and houses without electric lights identify the Amish. Tourists try to photograph them, and Amish people traditionally turn their heads away because their rule of modesty discourages posing for pictures, but they trade with tourists willingly enough, selling farm produce and home crafts. They are known for raising good produce and making good quilts, furniture, and other home crafts they sell. Nearly all Amish people are of working-class German origins with very little crossbreding with any other European tribe; many still speak "Pennsylvania German" in their home. 

("Pennsylvania German" dialect can still be understood, with varying degrees of difficulty, by people who grew up in modern German. The Pennsylvania German words used in this novelette are kept to a minimum and sound similar in English, modern German, or Pennsylvania German, but they're spelled phonetically rather than like their modern German equivalents.) 

Why do most Amish youth choose to be baptized into their parents' church? It's not obligatory. In fact they traditionally get about a year of Rumspringe, "running around," before they're asked to decide to join the church or move out into the non-Amish world. They usually opt to stay with their friends and relatives, even though, by now, the pool of potential mates is shrinking.

Amish people cannot marry non-Amish people and stay in the church. If they leave the church, they are supposed to be shunned by the Amish community. The community could use a bit of fresh DNA but the only way their church's rule allows them to get it is in the very rare case when a non-Amish person chooses to be bound by all of the rules, from radical nonviolence to wearing traditional German peasant clothes. (Not the sometimes colorful and extravagant festival costumes that were chosen to identify different towns, back in German, but the plain, drab work clothes that haven't changed all that much in going on four hundred years.) Although the Mennonites, Brethren, Hutterites, Bruderhof, and more distantly the Quakers are "Peace Churches" that formed during the same period of religious reformation as the Amish church did, Amish people don't marry members of those more liberal denominations. 

I looked this up, after reading the novel. I wanted to know. Years ago, when my brother's class had to write research papers about the Amish (more or less like the fictional class in https://priscillaking.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-terrible-term-paper.html ), a question none of our sources answered was whether the Amish ever have accepted a convert. It's almost  unheard-of for anyone to want to join the Amish. It requires learning a new language for pity's sake. (Even to people from Germany, Pennsylvania German is a new language.) So nobody mentioned whether it had ever happened. Google now reports that it is possible, and has happened, but it is extremely rare. Nobody would join the Amish after spending two weeks at an Amish bed-and-breakfast, however charming. 

Though easy to trade with, the Amish are, according to their rule, difficult to get to know personally. They'll listen to specifications and tell you all about their wares, but they're not supposed to make friends outside the church. 

So in this novel we're supposed to believe that a good Amish girl like Melinda, whose new-adult energy is committed to following the rules and fulfilling her obligations to her community, is going to hang out talking to a non-Amish man called Dean Dominguez for two weeks? Letting herself be tempted to put her quilts on a web site? And her family are going to let her? 

And Dean Dominguez is going to decide he wants to be Amish?

I'm sorry. My suspension of disbelief broke down. This is a sweet romance, and something like it may  even have happened in the Canadian Mennonite group Price knows; a rogue Amish person and sympathetic non-Amish person might compromise and join the Mennonite church. (Mennonites traditionally dress almost like Amish people, with subtle variations for easy group identification, but their rules don't demand quite as much frugality--they can go to college and use computers. Also, Mennonites in the US and Canada usually speak English at home.) But it's not something that's supposed to happen in the Amish church. In a longer story that unfolded over a longer time frame I could believe Dean and Melinda could become an Amish couple, but in two weeks... ?????

Let's just say that the "happy ending" of this romance promises some turbulence ahead. 

Napowrimo 25: Mist

The National Poetry Writing Month Challenge for the 25th of April asks for poems that " use at least three metaphors for a single thing, include an exclamation, ruminate on the definition of a word, and come back in the closing line to the image or idea with which you opened the poem".

I had to sleep on it.

The mist that hangs above the long-dry land:
Sail of a ship still anchored out at sea,
Bridegroom who reaches out to shake bride's hand
Retiring to his room on wedding night,
Green fruit that never ripens on a tree.
Alas that green land reaches such a plight!
The mist still hangs above the long-dry land.

Friday, April 24, 2026

Bad Poetry: Desserts

This post combines the prompt at Napowrimo.net ("something magical and strange that happens at night, and could be a dream, but feels lifelike") and the one at Poets & Storytellers United ("something about desserts, or just desserts"). The dream is one I really had. The rest of the story also happened, but later.

In a dream I held out a plate to take
A slice of the very most fanciful cake
Ever. Little beads of sugar ran round and round,
Colored or gilt. The top was a mound
Of icing and candies. "Vanilla?" I said,
Taking a bite. "Why--it's just cold cornbread!"

I went to the kitchen, and there I made
A salad of fresh fruit in circles arrayed:
Green grapes and tangerine, strawberry slices,
June apple, banana, and raspberries; spices
Not needed, just a few squeezes of lemon
And sprinkle of sugar to please all the women

Expected for luncheon. And please them it did.
It pleased my palate, too. Only one dear old kid
Wanted no fruit but cookies just out of a box.
This was good; it left just enough. Fruit salad rocks.
None of it was left over. I thought I could eat
The whole thing by myself, but I'm glad, now, they beat

Me to that salad's finish. Some food treats are best
Enjoyed when there's just enough for all the rest
And those six perfect bites give delight that's unique,
Not compared with the leftovers eaten all week.
That way memories of the best dessert you ever made
Stay piquant and perfect, and never do fade.


Photo from Google, where it's credited to Natasha's Kitchen. Google has dozens of photos of fruit salads that aren't mine...enough to inspire any cook, whatever may be in the kitchen. Any good fresh unsprayed fruits, alone or together, are likely to become a great, memorable summer dessert.

Book Review: El Principio de Dilbert

Book Title: El Principio de Dilbert

Original Title: The Dilbert Principle

Author: Scott Adams

Translator: J.M. Pomares

Publisher: Granica

Date: 1997 (Spanish), 1996 (English)

Length: 338 pages

Illustrations: cartoons by the author

ISBN: 8475777821

Quote: "Los trabajadores mas ineficientes son trasladados sistematicamente alli donde pueden causar menos dano: la direccion de la empresa."

In theory the Spanish edition ought to be reviewed in Spanish, as on Amazon it is, but out of respect to the Spanish language, as well as the English-speaking readers, I'm writing this blog in English. Readers whose first language is Spanish are, however, invited to advertise their translation skills by translating any blog posts they consider worth the trouble.

The Peter Principle stated that workers are promoted to their level of incompetence. The Dilbert Principle (in English) stated that incompetent workers are promoted to the place where they can do most harm: management.

The statement was made, of course, by what a Granica employee describes on Amazon as "the classic American story of an introvert engineer and his megalomaniac dog." (Actually, in the bizarre reality of the cartoon series, Dogbert does own the company; that's why the pointy-haired jerk can't fire Wally, Alice, and Dilbert.)

Beyond the middle-aged-boy-and-his-dog motif, the popularity of the Dilbert series comes from its interactive element: the cartoons illustrate complaints real office workers e-mailed to Scott Adams about real office policies and politics. The book isn't just a collection of cartoons, although most pages include one or more cartoons. The book also includes lots of e-mails, edited for brevity and privacy, but more or less in the correspondents' own words.

Drawings and e-mails are connected by Adams' philosophical reflections, which are as snarky and funny in Spanish as they were in English. All people are stupid--some times, about some things. This stupidity is a source of wealth for satirists. At the end of the book Adams does, however, offer the "F5 conceptual model" for businesses that want to minimize corporate stupidity; F5 stands for "fuera a las 5" (out of the office by 5 p.m.). Toward this goal, the first heading is "APARTARSE DEL CAMINO" (get out of the way--don't bother with policies that dictate conformity, and don't try to organize creativity). So what can the manager do? Fire jerks, teach efficiency by example, and try to ensure that everybody learns something every day.

Introverts have to love the Dilbert series...it shows how annoying the "people persons" (extroverts) some companies have tried to promote really are, to the people who are worth their salaries. For this reason alone, El Principio de Dilbert would be warmly recommended even if it weren't also (a) instructive and (b) hilarious.

Whether your first language is English or Spanish, this book is easy to read without continual reference to the other copy or to the dictionary. Business vocabulary words in both languages are almost identical...and reading this book bilingually is a painless way to learn them. Try to find a place where chortling won't distract others. This book might not be considered ideal for reading in an actual cubicle.

Web Log for 4.23.26

What's left of it. I've  been writing all day, making up for lost time. Checking the'Net at last at 6 p.m...Id and then the computer became fractious. Microsoft is not legally forbidden to annoy people by "rolling out updates" the minute the ideas cross their twitchy little micro-brains, then realizing that these "updates" contained errors and "rolling out" more interference with people's use of their own property until they think they've got it right. 

We need a law. Call it the Internet Triage Law:

1. "First-party input" comes from the owner(s) through the computer keyboard. It must always be obeyed instantly. If it's not what the owners wanted, that's the owners' problem.

2. "Second-party input" comes from sites specifically recognized by keyboard commands, but not their sponsor organizations, and must be allowed to transmit responses to the computer owners' messages. Second-party input would include web searches, forums, comments, posting to hosted blog sites, videos, etc.

3. "Third-party input" comes from anyone else, including the sponsor organizations of sites computer owners visit and interact with. (The specific Blogspot blog you visit would be a second party; Google would be a third party.) Third-party input is suspect because it comes from a third party and must never be allowed to interrupt computer owners' use of their computers. Ideally it would be held for 24 hours of automatic scanning by the FCC to identify anything that might compromise the use of a computer, such as spyware. No third party should be able to see anything we type that is not visible to the general public without producing verification of payment of a minimum of 10 cents per word seen or $5 per picture seen.

'The louder the Microgoons bray that that's impossible, the faster they need to be held accountable for getting it into effect. 

Environmental  

This would not be primarily Glyphosate Awareness. Glyphosate breaks down pretty fast in water. Some of its residues could be sucked up into clouds and redistributed as rain, but they would soon cease to be be glyphosate. Some other "pesticides" are more durable and might recirculate endlessly through nature's cleaning system...


Music 

(If nothing else, this section does show how many pages I visited and didn't feel a need to share...a music video, then a plain text link, alternating on and on.)

The Ventures.


The Lovin' Spoonful.


Steely Dan.


Gerry Rafferty.


Tom Petty



Seba Campos.


Led Zeppelin. I would not have listened, much less danced, to a recording like this when it was new. It took years of wear and tear to reduce my hearing to a level where I can enjoy it.


Kiss. Note that among baby-boomers this song is now good for rueful laughs about when and how we discovered the limits to our crazy teenage energy, but when the song was new even teenagers thought it was terrible because some people really did take drugs and give themselves serious brain damage...


Kids I knew would have been less hypersensitized to this one, although our parents wouldn't have been. Some of my schoolmates developed real drug addictions, but those of us who had had premarital sex and not become premature parents all said they could do without any more sex for a long while. 


Thelonius Monk.


Avishai Cohen.



REM. Much mentioned in Dave Barry's Book of Bad Songs. Hoot! I thought the Weavers actually made it sound pretty good, but this version....


Peter, Paul, & Mary.


Wes Montgomery.


Toto.

Thursday, April 23, 2026

Napowrimo 23: Cardinals Return to Privet Hedge

Finally catching up with a National Poetry Writing Month Challenge prompt on the intended day...Today's prompt dared poets to write a villanelle that ends with a question.


(Photo from Google, which credits Gardening Know How: male and female cardinal in privet bush. Cardinals' sex roles are less strongly stereotyped than some birds'. Males are much more colorful and conspicuous, but females show some color when they want to. Males are much noisier, but both sexes sing, often in duets. They mate for life, and both parents rear the young.)

Cardinalis virginiensis, the Cardinal bird, lived in Virginia before privet (Ligustrum spp.) was introduced. But the birds became year-round residents rather than summer visitors as privet hedges became common. They are unmistakably attracted to privet berries, which most species, including humans, can't eat. Many cardinals still winter in Central America, where they eat other berries (and compete with farmers), but the birds continue to bring "cheer" and be "pretty birdies" in North America where their territory includes a privet bush that holds on to its berries until spring, or until cardinals eat them, whichever comes first. Privet does not actually spread much, nor is it difficult to control its spread from seeds and roots in your yard. What makes privet so invasive is that cardinals and a few other native birds and mice drop its seeds wherever they fly...and, where privet has spread, cardinals have followed. At one time naturalists actually used Richmondena as a name for the birds because Richmond was as far north as they would go. Now these fruit-loving, weather-tolerant birds live in New Brunswick.

Some people hate privet. They have no reason to hate it; the bushes are hardy enough to choke out some other plants but, if you'd rather have the other plants, all you have to do is cut the privet sprouts down close to the ground; the root may die right then and there, or it may oblige you by sending out another rhizome and sprouting somewhere else, and if that still doesn't suit you, you can cut those sprouts too. It's easy. Privet sprouts are slim little things you can cut with garden shears.  Privet trimmings are good for toasting marshmallows over a fire; they're too sappy to ignite while a marshmallow is toasting and thin enough to dry out and burn well after the marshmallow is cooked.

Some troll even expressed a wish that Mark Gelbart would breathe deeply of privet blossoms and choke on allergic reactions. This is just pathetic. Nobody's allergic to privet blossoms. They release an intense, sweet, delicious odor for a few evenings in May and do no harm whatsoever. People who have allergy reactions in May need to investigate the "pesticides" being sprayed on nearby gardens. Lots of people have allergy-type reactions to glyphosate. Almost everybody has some respiratory system reaction to dicamba. Some other "pesticides" are known to trigger really violent coughing and sneezing fits. But a person who sneezes while passing a privet hedge is a person whose allergies, probably to chemicals, have been aggravated to the point of being "allergic to" every kind of dust and pollen on Earth; such a person should try to find a place to stay indoors and recover.

Sadly, perhaps, privet has a lifespan. Although it does not attract insect predators and the few American animals who can eat it actually propagate it, privet is vulnerable to infection by fungi and nematodes. In a hundred years or so a stand of privet is likely to die out naturally. Cardinals and other songbirds will probably keep the species alive, but not in the same place...however useful privet may be in the places where it's been planted, to control soil erosion and build up soil that can support native plants.

I love my privet hedges because, during the fifty-one weeks of each year when privet is not bearing sweet-smelling white flowers, it "blooms" with cardinals. How can anyone not love a bird that bobs around the windows, in the dead of winter, singing "Cheer! Cheer! Cheer!" Brave flying flowers, that I could gallant it like you and be as little vain...

Brave birds who nest among privet's blossoms white,
Do you spread north because of heat's increase?
Do you count humans as a boon or blight?

When winter reminds us of our life's twilight
Your calls of "cheer" and "pretty birdy" please,
Brave birds who nest among privet's blossoms white.

Other birds, including chickens, like a bite 
Of privet berries dropped among plants and trees.
To you, are humans' chickens boon or blight?

I love the scent of privet's blossoms white
Mixed in with violets, roses, poplar trees,
Brave birds who spread the privet's blossoms white.

In summers when heat beats as if for spite
But no more than it's done for centuries,
We humans ask: have we been boon or blight

To this green planet where we seek the Light
For so few days before our sure demise.
Brave birds who nest among privet's blossoms white,
Do you count humans as a boon or blight?

Napowrimo 22: Self-Talk

For the twenty-second day of National Poetry Writing Month, the challenge was to write a poem in which a speaker is in dialogue with perself.

Self, how pedantic shall I be?
(Long past, on Linguist List, folks sought
The first use of "Self..." sophistry
In literature. I could have taught
Them: Dwain Reed, in a Nashville song
(Was it in 1971?),
Used "I said to myself, 'Self...'" Long
Before his time, most of his con-
Structions were used by simple folk
In the Blue Ridge Mountains. Should I go
Back to that post, at its end poke
Data--from twenty years ago?)
"Life is too short. The linguist who
Put up that post is long retired.
Address the question: who should sue,
Or who should call to have whom fired,
When Black students demand the 'right'
To write, speak, paint, and chant vile slurs
On all (even their own mothers) White
Americans..." The mind's eye blurs.
Whatever fun distractions be,
Life's far too short to be p.c.

Napowrimo 21: Names and Nicknames

This National Poetry Writing Month Challenge calls for poems about the names and nicknames of either the writers, or something in Nature.


Lymantria dispar is the Destructive Disparate moth. Females, almost but not quite as big as Leopard Moths, are built to lay eggs and die, usually in about the same place, within a few hours. Males are built to fly long distances in pursuit of females. When a male dispar finds a female who has not already mated, he doesn't seem to mind that she'd make two of him or that she had an extra week--or two!--to enjoy being a caterpillar. The photo above, from Butterflies and Moths of North America, shows a dispar couple.

Big as she is, my truelove encompasses
More protein than she's made of. When we mate
The froth we leave behind on the bark masses
More than the two of us together. Great
Amounts of air rush in, plump out each wall,
Leaving our babies ample room to grow.
We drop off of the spongy mass. You call
Us spongy moths, and so we are. Quite so.

Some used to call us Gypsies, like a tribe 
That spread northwest from India through Britain.
"A slur on Gypsy people," thinks the scribe?
Speak for yourself! On my behalf is written:
The nickname "dreaded Gyps" implies a scam;
We've made no deals with humans, Sir or Ma'am!

Napowrimo 20: White Swan

The National Poetry Writing Month Challenge invites participants to write a poem about an animal that is mentioned in myths and legends, that can be seen as a metaphor for some aspect of human life; and, also, to include a spoken phrase in the poem. (At Napowrimo.net there's an example of a free-verse "poem" in which a black swan is seen, unrealistically to say the least, as a metaphor for a perfectly normal man who feels embarrassed by going postsexual. Pooh!) 


Photo from Google, attributed to Wye Marsh Wildlife Centre. Swans of different species don't seem to crossbreed but they can form foster family groups. Mute Swans, which aren't endangered and are sometimes considered invasive nuisances in North America, have sometimes been induced to earn their keep in nature parks by rearing endangered Whooper and Trumpeter chicks (cygnets). As with humans, young adult swans often fly off with their own mates and never see their parents again, but swan foster families' loyalty seems to last as long as the young birds stay near their parents.

Fun fact: Mute and Trumpeter Swans have the same size range, but Trumpeters are more often at the larger end of the range. However, male swans (cobs) are usually bigger than females (pens), so Zeus, whose fatherly overprotectiveness earned him a sexless life with a foster daughter as a companion, was just noticeably bigger than his foster daughter.

These park swans' story can be read as a metaphor for several different things in human life. Meh. It is what it is. It's not a very cheerful story so depressive readers might want to read something else now.

The swan called Leda seems to like
The cob, her mate. When people hike
Around the lake, they always see 
At least one of them. The islet she
Chose for their nest is far away 
From all the other isles as may
Be found in this small lake. The swans
Swim blithely with their little ones,
One fore, one aft, around the lake. 
They seem to pose when visitors take
Their pictures. Both are gentle, tame;
Mindful of sandwich ends and fame
They waddle, awkward on the land
As graceful in the water; stand
Close up, and let their necks be stroked
While snorking crumbs till almost choked.
--At least, that's how they did behave,
Before the cygnets hatched. Now they've
Gone quite mad with protectiveness.
The ducks and geese think they're a mess
And shun the swans, who were their friends
Last winter. With hatching, friendship ends!
"Just go away!" they always hiss
At friends one might have thought they'd miss
All through those long days on the nest.
The swans know that they have been blest
With a large brood, if not their own,
And, proud as monarchs on a throne,
Methodically attempt to kill
All who might make the cygnets ill
By breath, effluvia, touch, or bearing
Parasites that, by microbe-sharing,
Could harm a cygnet. Leda's not
Too strong herself. She limps a lot.
The cob Zeus in majestic ire
Lowers his head if any nigh her.
A friendly gosling wants to play
With cygnets, as with ducks it may.
Zeus really wants to drown the baby,
And he'd drown us, too, don't mean maybe,
If we swam ten yards from his brood.
He is not mean. He is not rude.
He only wants to keep his charges
Safe from whatever carrier barges
In close beside them. But too late;
The toxins lurk in his own mate.

Next year on the same lake we see
Zeus swimming in swan-majesty
Beside the last unmated chick
His Leda reared, before being sick
And dying where the water grew
Unfit to host more than a few 
Of birds that overpopulated
The lake, the year they copulated.
He will not reproduce again
And, so, good-tempered he'll remain.

Mostly Music Link Log for 4.22.26

Tuesday, 4.21.26, was a beautiful day but not a happy one. One of those drive-by spray poisonings intended to ruin people's days had been done during the night. I woke up with acute, rather than chronic, Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder, taking in about one-third of a breath each time. This is very tiring. I walked to the closet, picked out a dress that had room for my swollen body, and immediately felt as if I needed to sit down and rest for about half an hour in order to have the energy to put on the dress. By the time I reached the road, leaning on a stick to rest about every fifteen paces, it was only about an hour after I should have been in town. I was telling myself that the only errand that really had to be accomplished was voting, so I had till seven o'clock. Fortunately some friends gave me a lift to the polls, and  by that time I was actually starting to feel better--slowly. Then I learned that the extended family had almost lost someone who's only about fifty years old. I'd been more or less braced to hear bad news about the older generation, but Generation X, the little kids I used to baby-sit, have NO business having heart attacks. It's too draining for your elders. 

He didn't even look fifty, right? Sturdy but healthy-looking shape, black hair, unwrinkled face. He probably didn't want to pass for thirty, as a local politician, but he could've done. He did jobs that kept him on his feet. But he'd been one of those linemen everybody loves, during years when the state road system and private property owners everywhere were being told that new herbicides like glyphosate were safe and effective, so why pay anybody to prune the vegetation along roads when you could just spray it away. That's the only noticeable risk factor for any kind of premature disease condition he and his wife had. They were sober; they were health-conscious; they'd chosen good healthy ancestors. They should have had a health care plan like "I'll start paying doctors when I'm eighty"; it should have worked.

When I came in about half the day was left. I spent it online, but nagging people to vote and admiring the few cute and cheerful individual posts that made it through X's disgusting algorithm, not link hunting.

Then on Wednesday, 4.22.26, an old sick patient who sometimes gets up and drives around drove up to interrupt my day. I let him, because I knew from experience that driving around in less polluted air would improve the way I was feeling, which was still very low. I came in with more than half of normal breathing capacity, about sundown.

"Election" as Referendum, or What We Were Voting About on Tuesday

A state court has already ruled the gerrymandering unconstitutional, without even bothering to scrutinize the mail-in votes that made up that critical 2% of the vote...Wouldn't it be fun to watch state courts overrule everything Governor Ghostface tries, until she goes back to New Jersey, where she came from, in despair? 

But then, how would Republicans ever learn to vote against anyone who disrespects bloggers, much less tries to campaign on an accident of physical appearance that just happens to recall She-Devil to mind and solidify feelings that the Worst of Winsome was much nicer than the Best of Abigail...and then proceeds to assert that the candidate not endorsed by our actual police force will sic her crooked-rogue-cop friends on people who don't vote for her. Rs need to know that they cannot just shrug and say "No one could possibly vote for a person who ran a campaign like THAT." Ds already do know that anyone who campaigns that badly has to be planning some kind of election fraud, and they organize and make sure the election's not close enough for the fraud to work. 

Having to do it honestly does take longer, no doubt...but, given the looniness of today's Left, it should still be easy. 


Medical Care 


(Ganked from theviewfromladylake.blogspot.com; Lens traces it to somebody called @daphotosopher on F******k.) 

Why shouldn't people who don't need medical care chip in to help pay the bills of people who do? Privately, of course, most of us do, and should. But when helping out turns into a system that collects money from people who may or may not have it to spare, by force, and holds it out to the medical and insurance systems saying "Here it is; see how much of it you can spend," you can be sure the cost of treatment will expand to exceed the funding available. We keep medical care efficient by keeping the insurance industry out of it. It's one thing to pay a surgeon $350 an hour for knowing how to do a coronary bypass operation, and it's another thing to pay for $200 plastic basins and $500 not-exactly-prescription meals. We have to hold things down to the level of "Pay the real cost, and not one penny over..." As long as that's done, then I personally would consent to a special annual tax to help people who had made honest efforts to pay their own medical bills, and still owed more than they could pay, at the end of each year...as long as the hospitals had to wait, and couldn't pay for anything irrelevant or inflated, e.g. insurance gambling schemes that somehow make those who run the schemes rich.

Music 

Apache Christian church with songs, prayers, and I think a short sermon. I think the little choir has a delightful amateur down-home sound. Anyway it's interesting to hear "Amazing Grace" and "Glory to His Name" sung in an Apache language. (One of them anyway...the Apache nation was a coalition of several small groups that used different, though "related," languages.)


Parov Stelar. This song was actually composed as a descant to be sung with "Riders in the Sky," by a European whose English wasn't great, so it contains the phrase "Hell a ride." Since that's not a phrase an English-speaking person would say, for years I thought it was "Telluride," as in Colorado, and wondered what story about that town I'd missed.


Greg Kihn.


Tom Petty. Down on the state line I saw a homemade ad, one of those neon signs with boxes of huge plastic letters and numbers people stick on, that claimed that some product "and Tom Petty will never let you down." It has suddenly become heresy to admit that during the man's lifetime I didn't recognize his name, hadn't heard most of his songs, and didn't like the ones I had heard. By "ones" I probably mean one song that one of my sisters found hilariously stupid. In the actual 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s other singers and bands ruled the radios. As a result Tom Petty's digitized music strikes the ears of baby-boomers, I suspect, as new music of our time, a change from the Beatles and Stones and Eagles hits we used to listen to, and it's become boomer bait. But he did write some good songs, I have recently learned, and he was a real virtuoso of the electric guitar..


What fun somebody must  have had mowing this into a field. Zen meditation music.


Walter Wanderley, "Brazil's Organist." In Brazil it seems the organ is not confined to churches. This is a toe-tappy samba.


Neil Young plays one of his own more pensive pop songs on the organ. Hey. Clicking on any link in any Link Log here is optional. 


"The Spotnicks."


Neil Finn.


Handel's Messiah...no, not immediately after the pop songs above. Back-story is, however, that Handel revised some dance tunes he'd written for the happier choruses in the Messiah. This one sounds positively giddy up to its morning-after ending. For hundreds of years choir directors have been telling choirs, "Yes, you've gone astray--do you have to look so happy about it?"

Belated Post: A Few Happy Memories

Wednesday's Long & Short Reviews prompt invited reviewers to share a few happy memories. 

Well...I wrote a long poem about living in a funny old house that had been built on a dare bet, early in the twentieth century. These memories come from the first summer I lived there, the first summer I remember as really being different from the rest of the year. Earlier memories are unreliable--there were beach scenes, but at the beaches we visited, the sun shone warm in winter. But now I was almost six and paid some attention to the Calendar & Almanac on the wall.

We moved into the house with its kitchen on stilts in April. I was just starting to learn the names of flowers: hyacinths and daffodils, dandelions, violets, strawberry and fruit tree blossoms, clover, buttercups, forsythia, iris, vetch. The house on stilts didn't have a flower garden but did have a vegetable garden with a strawberry bed.  

It had cleavers.


Photo from Google, which credits a site called Treefool.com. 

I first noticed cleavers as a plant that stuck to my clothes. Plants were supposed to stick in the ground as you walked past them, but cleavers seemed to want to pull up its roots and trail after me. I didn't like that. It was not the way a proper plant ought to behave! I wasn't really scared, nor could I say cleavers' raspy little hairs hurt my leg, but I ran around the house calling for someone to get it off. I didn't want to find out whether cleavers had any other surprises in store, like leaping up my arm, if I tried to pick it off myself! If it could "cleave to" me as it was doing, what else might this plant do?

After that first day I've liked cleavers. It is a lazy plant that likes to lean down along the ground rather than standing up straight. It propagates by cleaving unto things and getting itself moved to new sites where it can re-root and multiply. Depending on where it grows, some people pick it green and eat it like spinach (the stiff hairs wilt away when cooked), and some dry it and add it to mint or Chinese tea as medicine. Either way, it flushes excess liquid out of the body fast, producing instant weight loss and the profuse sweating that often breaks a fever. I've had four occasions to use cleavers as a febrifuge in my lifetime. It served me well.

Other flowers, plants, and trees I learned to recognize that summer: the inconspicuous flowers of maple, oak, willow, pine, cedar trees; white honeysuckle vines, Lonicera japonica, an invasive nuisance we pull up; jimsonweed and horse-nettle; mayapple; green tobacco, which used to be many farmers' main cash crop; poison ivy, which was abundant along the front path at the house on stilts, and easily avoided. 

I learned how to "set out" plants that I'd dug up by their roots, to see whether they'd grow in new places. Some did, some didn't. I had no talent for sensing what a plant would need, the way I read that George Washington Carver had had.

I was learning quite a bit from old schoolbooks, a few of which seemed to be available in every house we visited, occupied or not. Of course some of what I was learning was out of date. The "true stories" tended to stop in the 1930s. At least one book actually referred to the World War as "Recent Events." I read about Carver and Walter Reed, Glenn Cunningham, Douglas Macarthur, Katherine Cornell, Marian Anderson, Helen Keller, Anna Pavlova, Maude Adams, as people who seemed to be still active at the time the stories in old readers were written. Many readers had stories about Glenn Cunningham; none of them even mentioned Roger Bannister or Abebe Bikila. Nor did they mention movie or TV actors since, in the Golden Age of Hollywood, screen acting was considered a lower art form than stage acting. I was encouraged to read the schoolbooks more than the newspapers. There was some concern, among adults, about what a five-year-old who liked to read ought to be allowed to read. Schoolbooks were often recommended specifically to keep very young readers away from the sensational, potentially nightmare-inducing things reported in the news.

The house on stilts was just across the road from the house where its builder lived with his wife. They had been born a little before the turn of the century. They were distantly related to Dad's mother but nobody ever explained to me exactly how; they were family friends, anyway, and honorary relatives.  Dad's mother's family name has been called a Cherokee name by some who use it, traced back to Scotland or France by others; in any case Grandma's mother, never photographed, was always said to have looked Cherokee, but this family's looks, like their name, had come straight from the English Border country. I think all of the fourteen children, and all of their children, had blue eyes. The builder now spent most of his days lying down as if he were waiting to die. I'm not sure what chronic disease he had. He had lost a thumb at the base, and would flex his thumb joint and show the little nub of a stub behind a little white scar that fanned out away from his carpal bones. His wife was very small and thin and active, and always reminded me of Granny Clampett on "The Beverly Hillbillies." She did much of the farm work, and liked it; she didn't have to worry about weight control. She always wore skirts long enough that she could bend over in the garden, and sensible shoes, and was always followed around the place by free-range chickens. She sold the milk from three or four free-range cows and the eggs from three or four dozen hens. 

Her flock also included four roosters. They had a clear pecking order with a big Rhode Island Red, logically called Big Red, at the top and a young White Plymouth Rock called Gitout at the bottom. I liked Gitout because he was the underdog, tried to make him a pet, failed. He had spent his whole life being scolded, pecked, and chased away; didn't believe that anyone wanted him to be where they were, and didn't care if anyone did! Then in strutted a young, slim, really rather small but long-legged, black and white rooster, a crossbreed of Old English Game and White Leghorn. He didn't look big enough to beat even Gitout in a fight, but he beat all the roosters in the neighborhood, easily, reliably enough to earn the name of "Old Faithful."

I've written elsewhere of how we acquired the title to three young Game hens. The alpha female Game hen was Old Faithful's mate. She lived with us this summer. Next spring was when she attacked Dad and then made friends with me. The other two Game hens were nobody's pets, almost feral birds who laid several big brown eggs, roosted in trees at night, and were killed by predators when they were two or three years old. 

In this summer it never occurred to me to be afraid of chickens, though small children see chickens differently than adults do. One day Big Red, confident and lazy, got close enough that I could have reached out and touched him. I'd learned that chickens didn't like to be patted, and didn't try. A snarky male relative sang out, "Go on a little closer! He won't bite! Are you afraid of that old red rooster?" I was actually thinking that Big Red might not be strong enough to carry me around like a pony, but he was certainly big enough.

In this summer I spent enough time with Dad's first cousins, Grandfather's brothers' children, to start to recognize individual names and faces. They belonged to a church that valued plain speech. It was not yet a source of embarrassment that I was allowed, even encouraged, to call them by their given names at home. In town I knew that sounded as if we children respected them less than we did people in town, and in fact we not only loved them but respected them more than any mere storekeepers or teachers. But it was the custom. In some families, I was just beginning to learn, children called their parents "Sir" and "Ma'am." Mine wouldn't have it. "I'm not in the Army any more! Don't remind me!" Dad said when I said "Yes, Sir." 

A female cousin came in to help Mother with the housework for an hour or so every morning, and sometimes baby-sat us; my brother and I called her whatever-her-real-first-name-was, just as if she'd been our sister. She was paid for this but there was no sense of a "servant class" in local custom. The young people who did extra farm and household chores outside their own household, and the older people who paid them, were usually cousins; when the extra chores were done and paid for, the only difference in their social status would be age--and sometimes the people who were paid to help someone with a disability might be older than the patient. I believe it was the custom in most families, as in ours, to talk as if the friends and relatives who came in to work were just "coming to see" their employers because everyone enjoyed each other's company. In fact everyone did enjoy each other's company. 

A lot of hypocrisy and outright lying has long been observed in Our Southern Way of Life. The church that valued plain speech deserved credit for recognizing and rejecting some of the empty "courtesies" but also deserved blame for perpetuating others. Encouraged to say what we thought, even vent our dissatisfactions, at home, my brother and I were also expected to work out for ourselves which relatives followed which set of rules of etiquette, which ones were amused by our chatter and which ones preferred that we be seen and not heard. The church that encouraged people to reject titles, even "Aunt/Uncle/Cousin" as attached to the given names of adults by children, also encouraged people not to tell others when they were offended but just stop speaking to them because they were supposed to know when they'd said or done something "wrong." According to their rule, the cousins would tell other people a person to whom they were non-speaking was still their friend or relative and they still loved the person, but they were no longer close, and they didn't want to talk about it. You wouldn't know whether the person had displayed "bad" taste in clothes, or was refusing to pay a large debt. Often the person wouldn't know what had gone wrong, either, and people stayed estranged for years over trivial reasons. When this happened the only chance of reconciliation, even among this set of relatives, seemed to be when someone made a particularly weepy "testimony" in church.

Their church was one of the charismatic ones. There are still several churches in the general category my parents called Pentecostal, in and around my town. There are different denominations in that sub-category of Protestants; Apostolic, Church of Christ, Church of God, a lot of mini-denominations with long names, sometimes a single congregation that meets in one small abandoned store calling itself a separate denomination. These congregations used to distinguish themselves with strict but slightly different rules; typically the women at least claimed they never cut their hair, however long or thick their "crowning glory" might be, and the men had short hair on their heads (if any) and no facial hair, and so on. Their meetings were characterized by long singing and prayer sessions during which individuals might feel moved to cry and confess "sins" (of thought and "feeling"), hug each other's necks, speak in "unknown tongues," or make even more bizarre displays of fervor. One sober and sedate old person was pointed out as the one who, at age eighty, jumped over all the benches up and down the sanctuary. My brother and I were never allowed to visit such churches but we were taught to respect them as legitimate ways some people expressed sincere faith.

Neither were we taught, although we could see easily enough, that denominational differences often had something to do with income. The local Pentecostal churches tended to be friendlier to farm families, who often had no disposable income, than the Baptists, Methodists, and Presbyterians who met in the big buildings in town.  The big churches in town were friendlier to people who had jobs in town and put money in the plate every single week. This was the kind of denominational distinction my father hated, and would denounce at length, given a chance. Baptists' beliefs about the Bible were closest to ours, and the Baptist church hosted the Scouts and other children's social activities; Baptists could also be snobs. But Dad didn't think we children needed to be preached at about that topic. Children deserved scolding and sermonizing only about things children did: breaking and spilling things, talking back or not answering, bickering, not learning things, losing track of what their fathers were talking about...

Not having due sympathy for orphans. There was always some question about which of the organizations were actually feeding them. Americans taught Somali people how to do fraud the modern way. On the radio and television preachers would tell people about their ministry to starving orphans, and when someone went to investigate, no evidence of any charitable work in the country they'd been blathering about would be found, but the preachers would take long vacations in luxury yachts. Still, the world was full of hungry orphans. Poster children for charitable appeals abounded. Anything a child might complain about could always be answered with "Look at this girl/boy just your age who doesn't even have food to eat." Really satisfactory children, in Dad's mind, would have wanted to send everything to the orphans. I think it perturbed him that as we grew older we became more interested in toys and, despite reading books with titles like Kim, a Gift from Vietnam, didn't really want to adopt any foreign orphans, not that we could have afforded one anyway. Foreign orphans never did have much because there were always a lot of foreign officials in the way, all of them always thinking that anything really good you had sent to an orphan was really meant for them. I have read, as an adult, that they didn't mind not having toys because they were taught to "play" at helping do the work around the orphanage and, with due encouragement, soon learned to get the work done. I hope so.

Anyway some relatives were very close to each other, and some were non-speaking, and some enjoyed the drama of their social lives, and some felt perplexed and hurt by people they didn't think they'd given any real reason for non-speaking....Sometimes they talked about it in front of us children. Sometimes I listened to what they said. Mostly I didn't. It was none of my business and I thought the whole thing was silly. If we had a problem with something someone said or did, we said so, talked through the problem--not always in the most pleasant tones and terms--and eventually worked things out. Some of the relatives non-spoke to my parents. Some are non-speaking to me, to this day. I don't waste much attention on it. The conversation of the non-speakers never seemed as if it would have been greatly missed. I only read about, did not actually know, couples who lived together while non-speaking to each other for forty years or more. 

I did not yet go to school or know the rule that was supposed to apply there: You didn't have to like or hang out with a relative, but you had to show loyalty and not let people bully or sneer at one. In practice not much bullying, not even the nonviolent kind, went on at the school I was looking forward to attending next fall. Primary school kids would declare themselves enemies, but rarely come to blows or say anything obnoxious enough to attract the attention of each other's relatives! 

A school wardrobe for me was a topic of concern for Mother. "Anything with bluejeans" was the general dress code. All I really needed were a few sweaters and T-shirts but, while little children's clothes were supposed to be handed down from larger to smaller children, Mother wanted to make some positive contributions to the pool. From time to time I was called indoors for fittings. "Aunt Dotty" spent a weekend with us and brought in a batch of dresses, including my favorite turquoise and teal one-piece jumper-style, which I wasn't allowed to wear for long before its miniskirt started to look too mini, and a pink gingham dress with fleecy poodle-shaped patch pockets on a slightly longer skirt, which I didn't particularly like but was able to wear into grade three. Poodle motifs had been Out but came back In, from time to time, like saddle shoes, in the 1970s. At six I didn't pay enough attention to clothes to mind being used as an unpaid model for Mother's sewing design and remodelling skills.

Children were supposed to spend more time outdoors than indoors. I was a bookworm who used to be told to go out and get some sunshine because I could always read by electric light; this house now had electric lights. In practice there was not a lot of electric-lighted reading time for children in summer. Anyway Mother, or Dad when he was at home, or the cousin who couldn't get enough of our company, often took me and sometimes even took my brother for walks to visit other relatives' little farms. I got to know all the horses and dogs, all the milk cows if not the beef cows, and those of the cats and chickens who had names, by their names. Nobody had sheep, which graze too close to the ground and don't do well on steep slopes. That summer nobody had goats, either, although goats eat honeysuckle and weeds, and do very well on steep slopes. Dolly was the mare--not a heavy "work horse" type, a laid-off police horse--children were allowed to ride, two or three at a time, around her owners' farm. Bud, the gold-and-white Lassie-type collie, and Red, the hound-and-setter mix, were the first dogs I learned to like and pet. Of all horses I've known I think Dolly may have been the one I liked best; of all dogs, Samantha, who came along ten years later. Both belonged to neighbors, not to me.

I named a few animals, myself, that summer. My mother had had a school friend whose name was probably Thurleigh, but Mother didn't know how she spelled it and thought it ought to have been "Thirlie." I liked that name and was allowed to bestow it on a tame bantam hen whose owner hadn't chosen a name for her yet. 

I also liked the name "Maude," in honor of that dear old mare with whom I'd completely failed to bond last year, and was allowed to give it to one hen, but when I thought it might be a good name for a cat I was told that it was a human name. Miss Maude, the human, belonged to a family that disclaimed any connection with the owners of Maude-the-mare, were of course second cousins, but lived on the other side of the hill! Many animals answered to names that had been commonly used for humans but weren't being used by any human their owners knew. Giving the name of a human friend to an animal was considered an insult to the human. The cat was called Calico. 

The oldest mare in the neighborhood, Suzy, gave birth to her last foal that year; she lived just about exactly long enough to wean him off milk. One of my picture books said that few horses lived beyond age 30--Suzy was thirty-one. She had been named by someone else, and my Great-Aunt Susie had moved away with her husband forty or fifty years ago, so the mare being called Suzy was all right. Dolly was brought in partly because she might have had milk to share if needed. Dolly's foal was a mule, so he wasn't entitled to any name but Jack. I named Suzy's colt Star.

Cats and chickens seemed to be taken less seriously than other animals. They were smaller. Individuals didn't usually live long. Every farm needed a few but most farms usually had a surplus, so, if you didn't have as many cats and chickens as you wanted, someone would probably give you a few. Neither cats nor chickens were expected to be intelligent enough to learn their names if anyone bothered to hang a name on them, so many of them never had names, though a good female might be worth keeping for all the five to ten years she might live. If they were ill or injured you could save some time by killing them at home rather than taking them into town for the vet to kill. Sometimes, not often, when there were too many cats or chickens to feed or give away, people killed them just to get rid of them. Chickens at least could be eaten. I liked cats, as a child, but didn't have a pet cat until I was thirty. I grew up more of a dog person. Or, more precisely, a chicken person. I do like horses but have never felt up to the challenge of living with one on a full-time basis. 

I spent more time reading than playing with toys. The toys I'd mostly ignored in California had been packed into big metal storage drums, shipped, and stored in Grandma's basement. (Both of my grandfathers had died while we were in California. With the insurance money Grandma had moved into a house that was still small, but was bigger and newer and nicer than the one where she'd lived with Grandfather.) Dad went into town to work around the end of the month. On the last day of his work week he came home in a taxicab with cartons of surplus food. On other days he walked home, stopped to see Grandma, opened a barrel, and brought home a toy. So the toys trickled in by ones. Neither of us children cared particularly about the first few dozen toys. Two summers later, when we  had a big box full, I enjoyed the Lego blocks and Play-Doh and bonded with a stuffed animal. This summer, what I remember about the toys was floating the big plastic baby dolls, as well as the battleship, down the creek. Crayons were a little more appreciated; I liked scribbling and coloring. The only toy I really missed when  I didn't have it with me, during our nomad years, was a rocking horse. I was getting too big for them, and broke down a couple of bodies on the last one (they said it was built to hold weights over thirty pounds; they lied), but I did like rocking on them.  

My happy memories from this summer were "I" more than "we." My brother was not yet a real buddy, much as he wanted to be. Though he was walking steadily and had outgrown biting and breaking things, his company still interested adults a lot more than it did me. Children can learn good manners but they can't really think beyond the ends of their noses enough to be "nice," considerate people. This was the summer when I mostly ignored my brother. Next summer I got into being a girl as a way to reject and exclude the poor little kid, who, at least, had enough spirit to play along and enjoy being a boy. The summer after that I started, sometimes, hanging out with him. 

Toward the end of this summer comes a memory that is not particularly happy, though it didn't hurt me and therefore didn't feel particularly sad either. One morning I woke up, looked out the front window, and said, "The neighbors' house is on fire." It looked just like pictures of a house on fire in books.

"Are you sure? You shouldn't joke about that kind of thing."

"I'm sure. Come and see."

Mother took a look and ran to the door to see that Dad was already going out to call the fire department. The house on stilts did not yet have a telephone, nor did the neighbors' burning house. I think someone who lived between us and the store might have had a phone but I don't know whether Dad found a phone owner at home, or had to call for help from the store.

A fire engine, a real big red one like fire engines in books, came up the hill. Then it went down again. The house was still on fire. I watched this from the window, dispassionately, as if watching television. Mother and Dad fought the fire hard, as did some other neighbors. All they could do was contain the fire. The house burned to the ground. The old couple had to move in with some of their children while waiting to collect the insurance money and rebuild. 

"But they didn't use the hose or ladder, and they didn't put the fire out," I said when Mother came in, smoky and ash-smeared.

"They said the creek wasn't deep enough for their pump to work and there was nothing they could do. They work for the town and only have to fight fires if people are on the town water system. So they went back into town."

I did not grow up thinking of firemen as heroes. From where I'd been I'd seen a lot of things the men could have done, with or without a pump: moving things out of the house, passing buckets to slosh on the flames. Mother had done those things. Real Men did that sort of things for Mother. 

Meanwhile there was a dairy to run. I was not yet big enough to milk cows; Mother and Dad did that. I grew up thinking that dairy cows had a pretty good life; everything cows could be imagined to want. They roamed around grazing where they liked, or rested in the shade chewing their cud, all day. Morning and evening they were called to the barn for dishes of sweet grain, and milked. Cows actually like being milked and will bellow and look for their humans if the humans are late. They never had to be tied up; they seldom even had to be called. I thought they were ugly, messy, clumsy animals who were treated better than they deserved, at six. I liked cows better when I grew older and they didn't seem quite such a monstrous size. At six I said I hated them. "Cow" was a term of abuse for a human. Still, the milk and eggs paid the old people's expenses while they were living in town.

I think, by the end of the summer, my parents were getting free rent and some money for living in that house. It was a comfortable arrangement, anyway. Short-term, though. Another set of relatives had to be considered. When we went to Florida for the winter, it was to negotiate how we were going to move into the wheelchair-friendly house where Grandmother could live with us.

Book Report: The Great Destroyer

Title: The Great Destroyer

Author: David Limbaugh

Author's web page: http://davidlimbaugh.com/

Publisher: Regnery

Date: 2012

ISBN: 1596987774

Length: over 500 pages with over 100 pages of endnotes

This review was written from a library copy of the book. The quote I would have selected, by way of recommendation for The Great Destroyer as a new book, was the introductory promise that this book can become "your one-stop shop" for facts, figures, and quotes if you get into a debate about Presidential Election 2012.

If you'd been keeping up with election news, most of the stories were familiar. You could skip enough to scan the whole book, and remember what you were likely to want to look up in it, in a week or less. You could decide, after scanning it, that a library copy was enough. Now, of course, the book is an historical artefact for your collection.

Limbaugh doesn't pretend to be impartial. President Obama was the "great destroyer." Limbaugh, a Republican (of course), picked the deadliest quotes, including Joe Biden's faint praise for China's abortion-pushing policy. He also offers a stunning array of statistics about how Obama's bailouts, stimuli, and proposed Obamacare disaster have affected our national economy.

The Great Destroyer contains about four times as many facts as The Amateur, and although it's less insightful, it's more comprehensive than Never Allow a Crisis to Go to Waste. If you could read only one campaign book, this was the basic book that would make up for inattention to the headline news.

Napowrimo 19: Florilegium

Day 19 of the National Poetry Writing Month Challenge invites poems about a florilegium--an oldfashioned book of the "language of flowers." Since several of these books have survived and they don't agree on much, this list is recommended.



(Photo from Google, which says this double row of mixed azalea bushes is one of the attractions at Mount Ikoma.)

How could profligate
profusion of prolific
bloom mean temperance?

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Book Review: Life 101

Book Title: Life 101

Authors: John Roger and Peter McWilliams

Date: 1991

Publisher: Prelude Press

ISBN: 0-931580-97-8

Length: 400 pages

Quote: "We call this book Life 101 because it contains all the things we wish we had learned about life in school but, for the most part, did not."

In the 1980s, stores near my school sold a book of practical advice for young students. I don't remember whether Life 101 was in its title, or subtitle, or blurb-on-the-jacket. I remember that it discussed things like changing tires and cleaning filters, and other things people renting their first furnished rooms needed to know.

Many years later, I found this rather large paperback book and wondered whether it was an expanded version of that practical little book I remembered. The simplest way to review Life 101 is to say that it wasn't.

What the McWilliams brothers have to offer is a philosophical outlook on life that was popular with New Agers and the human potential school of psychotherapists in the 1980s and 1990s. By 1991 a backlash had begun. Some Christian groups had pronounced the McWilliams' philosophy heretical; I'd already reality-checked it and found it unhelpful.

"Accept reality." Why is that not helpful? First of all, this phrase uses the word "accept" in an incorrect way. To accept something literally means to pick it up in your hands, as when you pick up a package at the post office and take it home. Neither a situation, nor a person, nor "reality" can be accepted in the literal sense, so what is "accept reality" supposed to mean, and why can't the person speaking use the verb that fits whatever is in his or her mind? The McWilliams brothers are using "accept" as an alternative to "deny"; they're advising readers not to live in denial, like a sick patient who may actually believe that he's gone back fifty years in time and that the grandson to whom he's speaking now is the brother who died forty years ago, or like an alcoholic who won't admit that she drinks too much. The average person reading Life 101 is probably not living in denial. The reader of this book may be more interested in changing tires than in trying to change his or her emotions, but probably perceives reality about as efficiently as the rest of us do.

Several words that describe things most of us do, relative to "reality," would fit this context better than "accept." What about "acknowledge," "perceive," "face," "consider," "evaluate," "understand," or "be aware of"? Those words didn't sound "dynamic" enough for the philosophy the McWilliams brothers are preaching. Preachers of this philosophy wanted a word that seemed to mean something active and cheerful. And why was the subjective emotional tone of the word so important? Because what they were actually about to say was something like "Just tell yourself you like whatever's on your mind, because I'm emotionally enmeshed with your moods but I don't intend to do anything to help with your actual situation."

In a word: unhelpful. I think Life 101 is likely to be most useful to the critical reader who wants to write a study of "Lies My Therapist Told Me, or Feel-Good Ideas That Leave People Feeling Bad." Life 101 is a great source of the quotes, the oh-so-insightful bad puns, and the whole popular philosophy of the 1980s. It is valuable for studying this period in historical perspective.

If you're looking for advice you can use in your life, this web site recommends that you read the Bible.

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Napowrimo 18: Rubaiyat

Why was it called The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam? Because the poetic form used, both in the original verses, apparently, and in the English version, was called a ruba'i. One ruba'i, two or more rubaiyat. The essential feature of a ruba'i is four lines, of which all but the third rhyme. 

So the National Poetry Writing Month Challenge for the 18th of April was to write a ruba'i, or rubaiyat. A light, easy form, good for the poetic brain that may be feeling tired by now...

These are the prettiest days of all the year.
The sky is cloudless, azure-bright, and clear.
The lengthening sun calls from the land each day
More leaves, and each day greener they appear.

Some want to be out sailing on the Bay;
Some still wait for the warmer days of May;
For all things have their season and their time,
But these days are the prettiest, I say.