Friday, January 2, 2026

Web Log for New Year's Day

Yes, I'm spending some part of New Year's Day online. I have some catching up to do...

Animals 

England actually has a species called the December Moth--proving that being close to the ocean really does moderate the chill. Places in the US that are in the same latitude with southern England don't have moths that fly outdoors in December.

Books 

This review does a fine job of explaining why The Long Winter is not my favorite "Little House" book: When I want to feel cold and hungry, I go out and shovel snow or something. But Wilder/Lane did a magnificent job of writing detached, realistic winter scenes that make you feel cold and hungry.


This review is at least a refreshing new take on The Magician's Nephew, even if the computer was allowed to "correct" Polly's name to "Pool" toward the end: 


Was it appropriate to write that "you could see...that [Jadis] was a great queen"? I think so. You could see by the way she was dressed that she was very rich; you could see by her body language that she was a ruling queen, not a queen consort or a queen mother who needs at least to seem kind or lovable. Autocratic. Imperious. Tyrannical, even. I think the point that needs to be emphasized, here, is that "great" here has nothing to do with "good"--that giving people credit for their positive qualities or accomplishments in no way implies that they're good people or good leaders. Jadis was a great queen, seven feet tall ("great" in the sense of "large") and dazzlingly beautiful, strong enough to throw iron lampposts about like hedge trimmings, but she destroyed her own country and became the channel of the Evil Principle in Narnia. We're being told that she fulfilled her culture's expectations that as a ruling queen she'd be imperious, and extravagant no doubt, and decisive, and bold, and probably cruel. Elsewhere in the book we're told that she was the Queen of Queens and the Terror of Charn (her homeworld). Charn apparently wanted to be led by a Terror, got what they wanted, and deserved what they got in Jadis. By appreciating what she had going for her, we understand how she was able to do so much evil. 

I don't think it hurts to take this approach to real-world evildoers, either. Anybody can be a brawler or a gossip or a thief or, given the opportunity, a traitor. Some evildoers have brought special assets to the service of evil, and accomplished so much worse things than an ordinary brawler or gossip or thief. Hitler came as close as any man to being "the" Antichrist of his time, because he was seen (not that newsreels make it easy for me to see how) as being brilliant, charming, public-spirited and even good-looking. Osama bin Laden let his followers paint pictures of him as the modern Saladin, the great white knight on the white horse, protecting the innocent and avenging the righteous and--in bin Laden's case--blah blah de blah on; those pictures wouldn't have been paintable if he hadn't been tall, reasonably handsome, rich, a good speaker, and adept at playing the political game. We don't admire people like that but we should not underestimate the assets they have.

After all it is, in a way, a bit flattering to the side with whom we sympathize to acknowledge that their enemies had assets. David didn't bother to boast about the ordinary foot soldiers he defeated, or killed; he was remembered for having killed a lion and a bear and, in single combat, Goliath. We as a nation are so far from being proud of having bombed Somalia that many people don't even realize that that's why so many Somalians have become refugees, and why the ones who've come here see us as an enemy nation from whom it's acceptable, even virtuous, to take all they can take. Where's the glory in an unacknowledged war, or "police action," with Somalia? We're proud of having defeated Russia in the Cold War, the Nazis in our last acknowledged "hot" war, the British Empire in our Revolution. Those were big countries with big, tough, well-armed forces. We don't like to remember that we even sent troops to places like Panama or Korea or Kuwait, although we did.

Photography

The Roads End Naturalists put together a calendar of their most memorable North Carolina nature shots. You can print the pictures onto calendar charts for yourself, but they are good enough that the Naturalists could print their calendar on Zazzle and sell it in aid of hurricane recovery efforts.


Poetry 

I tried to write a New Year's Day poem for the Substack. It rhymes; it's not a real clunker, but neither is it great. There's a reason for this. The good New Year's Day poems for this year were being written by Susan Jarvis Bryant. The link says "a poem," but actually there are three.


Sherry Marr offers hope for frustrated leftists. A beautiful and wise piece of free verse. Ground yourselves in True Green.


Politics 

Made simple for teenyboppers.


[Cartoon acknowledged to be computer-generated by "Goths Against Cancel Culture," a F******k group. Any resemblance between the longwinded kid with the stringy black hair, messy bangs, and bosom and any real teenybopper later to write under the name of Priscilla King is purely coincidental, but I love love love seeing that type presented as having anything to say. Thanks to Joe Jackson for sharing.]

Resolutions and Self-Improvement

If I point out that several things on Escriva's list, at the end of the post linked, are subject to cultural interpretation and the one I'm most likely to do is regarded as honesty, authenticity, rather than self-conceit, in some cultures...is that making excuses when corrected?

Probably. It does need to be said, though, that there are different views of citing oneself or one's experience as an example. In some social circles there is a rule, sometimes unspoken, sometimes spoken in terms like "Tell us what you've learned from research beyond whatever personal experience you've had with the topic of discussion." In others the rule is "Tell us what you've learned firsthand about the topic, whether it makes you sound good, bad, or indifferent; be authentic; better to boast a little or to confess a little too much than to sound detached and academic when we all know the topic is one of personal interest to you." 

Not only is it possible to sound, and to be, extremely arrogant while flattering oneself about--among other things--one's use of an academic tone with no reference to one's personal experience. It's possible to speak a language where the use of personal pronouns is often avoided, in order to sound modest or respectful or even, in a vague way, honest about trade, and never give a thought to developing any of those charming qualities. In Spanish and Portuguese (a name like "Escriva" has to come from one of those two, or both) the pronouns are often embedded in verbs rather than spoken. Not only do these languages encourage the use of a special verb form that makes "I" unnecessary in sentences like "I went to the door." Also, once it's clear that a story is about a certain person (call her Rita), the languages encourage pronounless sentences like (literally) "Puts the hand into the pocket" rather than "Rita puts her hand into her pocket." The context makes it clear that the third-person verb refers to Rita; that being said, Spanish-speaking people like to say, Rita could hardly put anyone else's hand into her pocket and no decent person would put her hand into anyone else's pocket. (Or at least, if Rita is leading a child by the hand and holding the child's hand inside her own pocket, for warmth, that departure from the norm would have been explained.) This is just common courtesy and, though it does reflect the idea that many people who speak Spanish think it's polite and proper not to call attention to oneself, it does not mean that all people who speak Spanish are either more modest or more honest than people who speak languages that don't have all those special verb forms. 

Anyway...I learned to talk in the 1960s. "Be honest! Be authentic! Is this opinion of yours merely based on things you've read in books," which tended to be denigrated in the Age of Encounter Groups, "or how does it relate to your own experience?" So I have this blog, where I explain how my opinions relate to my experience, whether that's to my experience of getting things right, or my experience of getting things wrong, or my experience of seeing how things worked out for someone else. Blogs are personal; they may also cite academic studies, because in cyberspace nobody's afraid of numbers or footnotes, but they are about what bloggers did, thought, remembered, read, or even wore. Some people may think blogging reflects self-conceit. Well, they don't have to read it. 

But just yesterday I came across an example of the kind of writer whose dependence on academic studies and denigration of personal experience was part of what made him seem like the most insufferable egotistical bore on Earth. No link for Mr. Bad Example. You don't deserve to have to read the jerk's words. You undoubtedly already know the kind of pompous ass who clutches at numbers that may or may not be accurate or relevant and belittles anyone's experience in the real world as irrelevant if it doesn't fit into the claim he wanted you to think his numbers support. Heavenforbidandfend I should, or anyone else should, ever sound like that.

Fireworks Haiku

At Poets & Storytellers United, Rosemary Nissen-Wade invited poems or short prose about fireworks.

Fireworks exploding:
giant dandelion puffs
against the night sky

Book Review: The War Between

Title: The War Between

Author: Jennifer Withers

Date: 2016

Quote: "He wrenched me away from the old man, aiming a kick that sent him staggering away."

The war is between humans, as we know our species, with only natural abilities, and "superhumans," with psychic powers. They coexist in a fascist dystopia where the predominant sense is pain. Food is perhaps deliberately scarce; everyone seems grim and angry and mean; most scenes involve somebody intentionally inflicting pain on somebody else. The story is told from the viewpoints of several different characters who all sound exactly alike. Superhumans have been made psychic by some process that involves inflicting pain on, usually, children. In theory their powers could be taken away by inflicting even more pain on the young adults they've become, though in practice we see this not working. The superhumans think they're a separate race since they live apart from and are detested by humans (they get slightly better rations and living conditions) but at least two of them turn out to be daughters of the human "president," who doesn't seem to be president of a very large nation, who wanted to produce a superhuman army and attack another nation. Nobody knows much about what's going on, other than who seems to be inflicting pain on whom. Eventually the humans and superhumans will come to physical combat, which will end only when a superhuman--all of the superhumans are young, but it'll be one who's still growing and who's narrated parts of the story--intentionally commits suicide, just to get everyone else's attention. 

I can't imagine any reason why anyone would like reading this book but, if you are a teenager who wants to prove your toughness by reading a dystopian novel with no glimmer of love or sunshine in all its many pages, you might choose this one.

Remembering Sandy

Content warning: This is not a happy story. It's a story about an animal who probably had only two or three years to live, and didn't get to live even one year. If you are depressive, read something else.

Anyway, since I've posted a free-verse scribble about the hen Loretta and a memoir about the hen Linda, it seems only fair to post one about another memorable pet chicken we had when I was growing up. She belonged to my brother but she did stupid pet tricks with me. We called her Sandy.

Her beginning was unpromising. Some neighbors--of course they were related to us--had had a big farmhouse. One October afternoon it caught fire and burned to the ground. The neighbors rented a house on the edge of town, complained that being in town felt like being in jail to them, and generally browbeat several of our relatives into building a new house ten yards from the site of the old one. When people were unhappy, older people used to give them chickens. I'm not sure about the origins of this custom but it did seem to help; chickens need just enough attention to take people's mind off their grief and get them on their feet a few times every day. So someone gave these people three very pretty bantam-sized Ancona hens, and someone else gave them a pair of Cornish Game chickens, hen and rooster. One of the Ancona hens had rusty spots rather than white spangles on her mostly black feathers.

Well, but the people who wanted to be back in our neighborhood didn't like keeping chickens in town. It wasn't fair to the chickens, they said. Other people kept chickens, who seemed content enough, in fenced yards on their street, but "Wouldn't you children like some more chickens? They're so pretty, if you could teach them tricks they'd make a great show..." 

We took the chickens, and what we learned right away was that Anconas, even bantam-sized Anconas, are aggressive chickens. Only the males were bred to fight each other as a spectator sport for humans to watch and gamble on, but the females are rough and tough enough to live with the males. We had at the time a family of tiny, goodnatured, cuddly Inglebright bantams. The Anconas and even the Cornish Games were much bigger, and rougher. The dominant Ancona hen didn't just peck at the other two--she tore strips off them. 

She was quite tame, had apparently been somebody's pet, but she had very strong prejudices about humans. Women were the kind of humans she was used to. Men, like the son of the old couple who had sent these birds to us, she respected. When released from a shipping box into our chicken shed, she perched on my shoulder and snuggled; she saw me as a woman. My brother, who was almost as tall as I was and whose hands were bigger, reached out to invite her to perch on his hand. She struck out at him like a snake. Her beak was sharp enough to graze the skin visibly, though not to draw blood. She hated children. She classified my brother as a child, and if he approached her she ruffed up the "hackle" feathers on her neck, nonverbally saying "Touch me and I'll bite." 

We didn't want her persecuting our gentle little birds, or my brother. Chicken soup was a possibility we broached at dinner, but we agreed to send her to stay with another neighbor, whose chickens were all much bigger than she was. That mean little hen wasn't likely to do them much harm, we gloated.

Before the Anconas and Cornish Games had been sent to us, it seemed, they had been starting a brood of eggs. Sometimes a group of hens put all their eggs in one place for one hen to rear. This lot had been doing that, and the mean old Ancona hen was the first to go broody and want to rear the eggs. We didn't think she deserved to have babies but that was the way things went. So there were six or eight black chicks, three or four white ones, and the sandy-colored one. The children at the house where this chicken family were now staying naturally called the sandy-colored chick Sandy, and called one of the white ones Andy. 

One day my brother passed by that house and saw the children, who were younger than we were, throwing baby chicks through the air for their dog to fetch. A few years before when he'd seen some other children mistreating a pet chicken he'd knocked them down and brought the chicken home. That year he was old enough to deal with the situation in a more mature manner. "That's no way to treat baby chickens, or dogs either," he said. "What'll you take for the pullet? I've got four dollars."

Andy had turned out to be male; my brother knew better than to bring home another male chicken. Sandy was by this time recognizable as female, but she was no longer sandy-colored. She was white with rust-colored spangles. 

"Not another one of those mean chickens!" our mother said.

"She's not mean. She's shy," I said. "She's already met our hens, and didn't even try to peck back when they pecked at her."

Even the sweet little Inglebrights did a little harmless pecking when the hens stopped brooding and feeding the spring chickens, which process was going on just then. Loretta was one of the spring chickens the hens pecked and chased away from them. Adolescent chickens form sub-groups of their own. Loretta and Sandy became particular friends. The rest of their sub-group included Loretta's brother and a smaller, younger white pullet we called Vickie the Chickie, and a few others who didn't learn tricks or become pets and didn't stay with us long. 

For a month or two, while they were at the right size, Loretta and Sandy liked to ride around in the big patch pockets of the old jacket I put on when practicing stupid pet tricks with the chickens. (They were "clean birds," but I preferred to be safe rather than sorry.) 

They didn't look at all alike. Loretta was a sleek, pretty, dainty little bird, her body only ever about six inches long from neck to tail. Her feathers were always smooth and coal-black, tail feathers usually folded neatly behind her. Sandy was half again the size of Loretta. She had managed to inherit both the full, round breast of a Cornish Game and the triangular frame of an Ancona; all her body mass was up front. She looked from a chicken fancier's point of view like a mongrel and a freak, but she worked with what she had. She was one of the minority of chickens who can leap up off the ground and flap several yards. Even Sandy couldn't fly very high or far, but she could fly all the way over our house, lengthwise--about 25 yards, counting the distance it took her to gain and lose altitude: more in the way of flying than any other chicken we kept ever managed. (Though not even half of the world's record: the longest documented flight of a chicken was just over 100 yards.)

"Being pocket peeps" was Loretta's and Sandy's own idea. They would approach me together. Loretta would stand still and chirp, inviting me to pick her up, so she could get into my pocket. Sandy would fly up, perch on the edge of the pocket, and lower herself down into it. They would ride around with their heads sticking out over the pocket tops. After they grew too big to fit into pockets, they rode around on my shoulders. 

We worked with about thirty chickens that summer. Most of them never did any real tricks beyond coming when called and greeting people who wanted to take a chicken home. The ones we kept, going into the winter, were Sandy and Loretta, Vickie the Chickie, Loretta's brother Grayling, and two older hens called Silver and Spartan. Silver had reared Loretta and Grayling; Spartan had reared Vickie and others...that's another story. Spartan was my brother's special pet, and always had been. Dad wanted my natural sister to be part of the show and have a pet chicken who did tricks with her; Silver was officially her pet but Silver's only trick was perching on someone's arm, and mostly she perched on mine.

How is it possible to work with chickens? Most of the work consists of teaching them to trust you and come close to you. That done, some people have spent a lot of time and energy teaching the empty-headed birds to peck out tunes on xylophones or push checkers around a board,  but we never aspired to anything so complicated. We just watched for a chicken to do something that could be made to seem cute or clever, and tried to get the bird to do the same thing again, reliably, on cue. Chirp when its name came up in a song. Step forward when asked. Point to an object. Chickens can see colors and can learn to do all sorts of variations on the theme of "pick out the red ball." Most chickens don't seem to recognize words, or even tunes, but a few of ours learned dozens of words. 

Sandy's main trick was her ability to leap up and fly. Her preference to fly to and perch on me seemed to have more to do with her relationships with other chickens than it did with a preference between us; she seemed to like both of us. The thing was that Loretta liked sharing her human with her best buddy, while Spartan might have been just a bit jealous of my brother, as well as protective of Vickie the Chickie. Spartan growled and pecked at Sandy if Sandy came too close to Vickie, though Sandy had never threatened Vickie. 

Vickie the Chickie never learned anything. She couldn't even be said to come when called. She followed when the other chickens were called. Her only contribution to any show was that she was tiny and pure white; but Spartan seemed so attached to her that we didn't want to let her go.

Sandy's moment of glory occurred one afternoon while I was still on the school bus. My brother and sister were at home to see it. Hawks often rear their chicks in autumn. A hawk with chicks to feed can become desperate. Most hawks don't eat other birds if they're not starving; when red-tailed hawks eat other birds they tend to lose their health. Sometimes hawks have taken chickens to their aeries to feed to babies who were not quite starving, and the hawk family ended up keeping the chickens as pets. Who knows whether that was what almost happened to Vickie the Chickie. In any case a big female red-tailed hawk stooped as if to seize the smallest, youngest chicken in the flock. 

Sandy chirped a warning. Vickie, and the other chickens, scattered and hid under bushes. Chickens are not known for their courage.

But Sandy was not a normal chicken--everyone always said that. Sandy was a mongrel, a freak. Sandy, my siblings reported, charged at the hawk. The hawk flew up into the air, to stoop and sink her talons into Sandy. Sandy flew up into the air too. Disconcerted, the hawk dropped to the ground, and Sandy blinded the hawk on one side. The hawk tried to defend herself, and pulled out most of Sandy's tail feathers. Sandy flew up again, settled on the hawk's back, tore strips off the hawk with her beak and claws while slapping the hawk silly with her wings. Then my brother ran out and whacked the hawk with a stick. Bleeding and confused, the hawk flew away. 

She had a name, now, that hawk. People could recognize her. She was Old One Eye.

Grayling was staring at Sandy in wonderment, by the time I came home, and Sandy was keeping her back end toward the bushes, not wanting Grayling to see her without long tail feathers fanned out behind her. Most birds seem to be a bit vain about their tail feathers. 

Spartan showed much more respect to Sandy after that day. All of them did. And also, after that day, the chickens were positively stalked by two red-tailed hawks. "Old One Eye" and her mate seemed bent on revenge. One of us had to be out with them whenever the chickens were outdoors. Even when my sister was out with them, Old One Eye tore out Grayling's tail feathers. But that only seemed to give him and Sandy more of a bond. They mated. Sandy laid a few eggs in between Christmas and New Year's Day. The eggs could have hatched, but who tries to raise chickens in winter? We ate them.

It was never as much of a pleasure as a duty, but some winters we had to spend a few weeks with "Aunt Dotty" and "Uncle Pete" in Florida. That was one of the winters. Dad stayed at home; he had some jobs to do. 

As teenagers neither of us minded being separated from our parents for a few weeks, but Mother and Dad hated to spend a single night apart. They wrote letters and mailed them every day, not caring how many letters crossed in the mail. 

Dad wrote that every time he went outside long enough to let our bantams come out with him, which he tried to do every day, he saw at least one of the hawks. Watching. 

One day, his letter reported, he'd gone into a shed for just a few minutes. When he came out, Old One Eye and her mate were taking their revenge. Hawks aren't very good fighters on the ground; if they're going to kill chickens they have to drop onto the chickens' backs out of the air. Old One Eye managed to drop onto Sandy's back, and her mate onto Spartan's, during the minutes Dad was in the shed. When he came out they flew up, leaving the two hens dead on the ground. Then the male hawk dropped again and carried off Vickie the Chickie.

They knew what they were doing, we said. 

I forget now who shot Old One Eye. It was not considered much of a feat. Euthanasia, really. By the time we came home the three remaining chickens were free to roam, unmolested; but none of us ever wanted to turn the chickens out for the day and forget about them, ever again.

Thursday, January 1, 2026

Book Review: The Lawyer and the Leprechaun

Title: The Lawyer and the Leprechaun 

Author: Tara Maya

Quote: "Normally, her snakes rested in their alternate form, tiny braids."

Eleni, the lawyer in this "romantasy," is a Gorgon. 

It is often overlooked--though not by Robert Graves--that several people and places in Greek mythology were not Greek. The peerless beauty of Cassiopeia and Andromeda was clearly identified as Ethiopian. Some writers wanted Perseus to be Greek, but others said he was called that because he was Persian. And the Gorgons may well have been African; their snaky hair might originally have been small braids or cornrows. Their gaze "turned men to stone." The Greek writers seem to have taken this phrase literally but most of them did not take it as implying that the Gorgons were ugly. On the contrary. They were enchanting. 

Eleni is enchanting, though we're told on page one that she's blind. Her magical power developed early; she turned an innocent person to stone and, before the legal system for "arcane" people could sentence her to lose her eyes, she blinded herself. She sees through the eyes of her snakes, which see heat patterns more clearly than shapes or colors as we know colors.

Tara Maya put a lot of thought into building the fictive world for this series. If you're up for a fantasy in which you'll see everything in terms of heat patterns, you'll enjoy The Lawyer and the Leprechaun and you'll probably want all the other books set in the same world.

Anyway: One day Eleni wakes up and finds herself magically shackled to Owen, the leprechaun, who isn't really Irish but affects an exaggerated Irish accent and is guilty of all sorts of petty magical crimes. The two naturally have never been friends, but in order to break their shackles they have to work together, and become friends. They will share a long fantasy adventure with a kind of internal logic and no connection to the real world at all. By the end they're in love. 

If you enjoy that sort of story, run don't walk, and get the whole series. 

When Are You Old Enough to Post Your Teachers' Real Names on the Internet?

At a blog I follow, someone posted the names of several former teachers. 

I was tempted, because I do remember all of their names--mine and my brother's.  But I'm not quite old enough yet. Although those of my classmates who became teachers are retiring now, some of my teachers are still alive. 

All teachers had nicknames. Most of these nicknames were just whatever look-or-sound-alike things suggested themselves to childish minds. Relatively few teachers made enough of an impression to earn really spiteful nicknames, and I know for sure that those of mine who were really hated are dead by now. So I suppose it might be safe to reminisce a little if I use their nicknames. 

The point of my e-friend's post was that those who taught baby-boomers got away with lots of things that would get them barred from teaching, or visiting schools, or trading at stores across the street from the schools, now. Punishment was considered an effective teaching technique, because sometimes it was. Most elementary school teachers displayed "the paddle" of their choice at the front of the room and would whack somebody, in front of the rest of the class, during the course of every year. Verbal abuse occurred regularly. Kids were more likely to say more hateful things to other kids than teachers were, because teachers were supposed to show that they were thinking on a higher level, but teachers would tell kids what they thought was wrong with us, loudly and publicly. If they really hated a particular student, teachers might pitch into someone else and then let that person hear them say something nice about that student. 

If they felt totally at a loss, teachers might ignore a student altogether. This was done after the "special" school was closed and most of the kids who were officially considered "retarded" joined regular classes with the rest of us. A boy in one of my classes didn't seem stupid to me, but apparently he had severe dyslexia or farsightedness or something. He came to school almost every day, sat down at the same desk every day he was there, and just sat there, not called on, not given test papers. I never saw him looking at a book or a piece of paper. He was strictly serving time in that classroom, like a convict, although so far as I knew all he'd ever done wrong was to have a learning disability the teachers didn't know how to deal with. 

Peer tutoring was another teaching technique that some teachers thought was great. Meh. I was sometimes ordered to tutor somebody. "Be sure you don't do his assignment for him. Show her how to do the work." Bleep does an eight-year-old child know about how to do that? Most teachers limited peer tutoring to having students mark each other's homework papers, which undoubtedly reduced boredom and eyestrain for the teachers. It also gave smaller, cleverer little monsters a chance to get back at bigger, rougher ones. I enjoyed peer tutoring for that reason but I don't believe I ever taught anybody anything--except, of course, not to mess with nerds, which may have been the point, all along. Some teachers wouldn't even double-check the marks a student put on another student's papers. 

People found ways to game the system. In grade three I was often ordered to "tutor" a boy who was spending the second of three legal years in grade three. He might have already spent an extra year in grade two, as well. He was big enough to have been in grade five, but it was a rare day when he answered any question correctly--if answers were written down and graded. We didn't have a lot of open discussions in grade three, but when we had them, he sounded as if he belonged in grade five. His rate of incorrect answers was so high that the only explanation was that he knew what the correct answers were, and was avoiding giving them. But why would anyone subject himself to that? It all became clear the year I went to college, when he joined the Junior Varsity team. JV was supposed to be for thirteen-year-olds, and he was eighteen. Home team fans loved him. He was the star quarterback all the way through high school. He was too old to be legally allowed to attend high school without paying tuition but nobody paid too much attention to that, especially in the case of the star quarterback.

Anyway, the teachers...I don't remember the substitute teachers. I didn't pay enough attention to most of them to know their names on the days when they were teaching. I do remember a few who filled in for the same teacher for a week or more, or were later offered full-time jobs.

And a note about titles: Teachers were called by titles. Women's titles had to be spelled either "Miss" or "Mrs.", although they were pronounced "Ms." (Nobody at the elementary school was a "Dr.") Janitors, librarians, and secretaries were also called by titles. High school students were called by titles in academic classes, though we could use given names in arts or trade school classes. Bus drivers, whether they were high school boys or grandfathers, were called by given names or nicknames. Cafeteria servers were called by the kind of food they dished out. If there was or had ever been any logic to these traditions, it was never explained to me.

Grade 1. For the first two years students were expected to be so tiny we weren't even required to walk down a corridor to the multi-user restrooms. To keep us out of the way of bigger kids, there were single-user restrooms in each classroom. So we had only one teacher to put up with, all day long, except for the music teacher who visited once a month. Mrs. Fatso was most memorable for locking horns with my Indiana-raised mother about my alleged Northern accent. Mrs. Fatso was from Georgia so her accent might have been rated even lower in status than a Northern one, by some people. Mother "won" an argument with her and I don't think Mrs. Fatso ever forgave me. She was one of the less abusive teachers but she never missed a chance to find fault with anything I did.

I will say, to Mrs. Fatso's credit, that she was the only teacher I ever had who never sent in a substitute. Every day when I was in that room, she was there too.

Also, Miss Music. "Musick" is a local family's real name, but "Music" was the nickname for the visiting music teacher, every year. The one who visited during my first year was young and pretty and nice, the daughter or granddaughter of one of the middle school teachers. She didn't give out grades but just led sing-alongs. Who could have not liked her?

Also, for one and a half marking periods, my grandmother, Texas Ruby, who had also done a teacher training course though I'm not sure whether she was ever employed as a full-time teacher. She married young. Anyway she made sure my education was not neglected while we spent the winter in Florida. Aunt Dotty would later let us be vacationers in peace, but Grandmother had me working ahead of grade two before I went back to grade one.

Grade 2. Mrs. Ratfink really hated that I'd learned to write cursive from Grandmother and spent a good part of the year we were officially supposed to start writing cursive finding fault with the way I'd learned to make every....single...letter. Grandmother hadn't taught me to put enough of a flourish on the ends of lower-case letters like "e" at the end of a word. I am not making this up. Mrs. Ratfink thought her mission in life was to correct students of being too intelligent by making sure we went back and re-learned everything in her way. It did not help matters that this was the year my "celiac disease" started to kick in. I had some sort of cold-and-flu symptom all winter long and stayed home until Mrs. Ratfink warned Mother that if I missed another day I'd have to repeat the year. My favorite part of that whole year was spending two weeks in quarantine with mumps. I didn't feel any pain from mumps, didn't mind if I looked a little worse than usual, was glad of a two-week vacation from Mrs. Ratfink's company, and, on top of everything else, some relatives sent us a tame bantam hen with baby chicks to distract my brother and me from the boredom. Lovely.

Also, Mr. Music. He was an older man who brought the wonders of new technology to the public schools, meaning that he brought tape recorders in and made recordings of our sing-alongs, which would later be broadcast on local radio and used to lead subsequent classes' sing-alongs. 

Grade 3. Mrs. Moose wasn't all that big. I don't remember her being fat enough to have gallbladder surgery, but she did, that year. She had long golden blonde hair with black roots and heavy black eyebrows, which I thought made her look sort of mean, but most of the time I liked her. She let me read chapter books after doing all the homework assignments in class. She also added sing-alongs to the visits from Mr. Music, whose hours and salary were under review.

Also: Mr. Smarter. He read John Holt and did open discussions. Unfortunately we didn't have him for most of the time Mrs. Moose was recovering from surgery. 

Also: Mrs. Failing. She was easy to hate.

Also: Horrible Hornrims. She was even easier.

Grade 4. This was the year Dad taught a trade school course in Sacramento, so we lived out there all year. Grade four still counted as primary school in the neighborhood where we rented half of a duplex house. Kids could walk to and from school--it was one of those suburban neighborhoods Boomers reminisce about--and even walk home for lunch. The school was well funded, with all kinds of sports and playground equipment, and the school even provided books, pencils, and paper, but it didn't have a library. What it had were bullies. This was the year I would still have to say that sending me to that school, which adults thought was an excellent one, qualified as child abuse. Even in grade four kids would make ourselves sick rather than go into the group bathrooms. Enough harassment, if seldom real beatings-up, took place on the playground and in the cafeteria. I thought I was the most despised and persecuted of the victims but, from an adult perspective, I think a few others may have had a worse time even than I had. One girl was picked on for half a day, went home, and never came back.

Homeroom teacher: Mr. Ed., who would probably have been banned from teaching today due to political incorrectness and verbal abusiveness, and was frankly incompetent to teach most subjects, but he did teach all of us all the math we'd need in elementary school or, probably, in adult life.

Reading was taught by a different one of the three fourth grade teachers for one third of the year. The other two were women. I liked both of them better than Mr. Ed. Mrs. Gooey was the old, grim, Slavic one who threatened to knock two boys' heads together if they didn't stop fighting, so they did. Mrs. Snorkeldorf was the one who immersed her homeroom in The Phantom Tollbooth. 

Grade 5. Dad was not asked to teach again. Mother got my brother and me into the Seventh-Day Adventist school, which might have been nice if it had had a bus or a car pool to haul us across the city, but it didn't. Going to school there meant we had to move to Southgate, which, as anyone who knows anything about Sacramento will remember, was a terrible neighborhood. Among other things some older kids, who were Black, knocked my brother off his bicycle and whacked him with picket signs for supporting the protest they were doing. It was September, so they thought we were Mexican. They might have shown even more hate if they'd realized we were legally White.

Anyway, my teacher there was Mr. Tall, one of the few of his generation who were taller than Dad. He wasn't a great teacher but he didn't rely on verbal abuse, and did have a well-filled bookshelf at the back of the room. My brother's teacher didn't have a nickname so far as we knew, because this was a church school. She wasn't great, either, but my brother developed the ability to read large print for short amounts of time in that season, so she claimed the credit for teaching him to read. Grades five through eight also had formal classes in church music taught by the headmaster, who didn't have a nickname either.

Then we inherited the house later to be known as the Cat Sanctuary and moved back home. The principal didn't like us so, right away, I was assigned to the homeroom of Ms. Gooseneck, a.k.a. Old Miss Mean and some other nicknames that were even worse. Everyone really hated her. One way to spot a Boomer in my town was that we all remember her as The. Worst. Teacher. Ever.

In the case of Old Miss Mean ugliness and spitefulness probably were connected--by untreated diabetes. When glaring with special hostility at students she tended to stick out her goitred neck and throw back her head with the chronic scowl on her face. She was hardly five feet tall when she started teaching, and shrank with age. She was flabby. Sometimes she'd take a notion to get fit and order everyone to do calisthenics on the paved parking lot that was what we had for a playground, and everyone would show off how much better they could do all the exercises than she could. Most of us were stronger and faster than she was. Some were taller, and Miss Mean seemed particularly hostile to them. 

She had a classroom rule that seemed as if it would be strictly fair. Everyone in turn, except the "retarded" boy she pretended wasn't in the room all year, was called on to answer questions and demonstrate math problems, going up and down the rows in strict order all morning. That by itself wouldn't have been so bad, although now it's considered emotionally abusive because a student might have to be corrected in front of the class. Hah. Old Miss Mean 's idea of correcting a math or spelling mistake was not just something like saying "No, three fives are fifteen." Punishment for wrong answers seemed to be her favorite part of her job. She was not above dragging a student's personal habits, known or imagined, or family into the verbal abuse. The worst part of grade five was when Miss Mean finally said something nice about me--in front of the class. For the next six weeks everyone hated me, and it was a very brave cousin who spoke to me in a friendly way at school, on a Monday, after we'd shared a particularly enjoyable weekend. 

But the closest Old Miss Mean came to physical abuse, in my year with her, was the day the girl with lovely long blonde hair pleaded that she was feeling too sick to demonstrate a math problem. On went the verbal abuse machine that was Old Miss Mean. "Everyone else is sick of showing their stupidity too. Get up there and do the best you can." So the blonde, whose hair had never been cut and hung down to her waist, went up to the chalkboard, wrote sloppy numbers with a trembling hand--Miss Mean commenting all the way--turned around to explain what she was demonstrating, and was sick. Her breakfast dripped through her beautiful hair. "So, you really are sick. You didn't have to come to school and make everyone else sick too! Go to the nurse's office." Miss Mean made it sound like punishment. When the blonde came back to school a week or two later (it had been swine flu) her hair was short and she was so traumatized that you could induce visible sweat and tremors by looking at her sidewise. I knew this because I was one of the little monsters who did look at her sidewise. She'd try to be brave, saying nasty things that egged me on to repeat the treatment, but in a few minutes tears would well up in her blue eyes. And then the teachers in their wisdom made her repeat grade five, spending another year with Miss Mean as math teacher, only in a different home room. I am not making this up.

If that blonde is still alive somewhere...I thought of most of the hostility I dispensed so freely in school as self-defense, and it probably did protect me from having a worse time than I had and I wouldn't blame or punish a child for doing it today, but the way I tormented you was pure cruelty. It was one of the sins I had to repent of when, as a "cradle Christian," I made my personal commitment to be a Christian adult. I've regretted it for fifty years. 

Anyway: In the middle grades each class had four teachers and each specialized in one major subject, Math, English, Science, and History. Grade five spent the first half of each day doing reading, writing, spelling, and their homeroom teacher's major subject, and the second half rotating among the other three teachers. 

So: Mrs. Brick, who taught science. She was a good teacher. She had all of us drawing diagrams of the inner structures of eyes and ears, synthesizing peat and knowing in theory how to refine a dog dropping into a very small diamond. People who still enjoyed learning and thinking loved her. I did.

Mrs. Smelly, whom I never noticed as smelling worse than other people but who did have a tempting name, taught English. The other possible nickname to go with her name didn't fit; that year, she had a waist but no other visible curves. Next year, as if to prove something, she quit teaching and had a baby. She had no particular talent for teaching and I didn't like her, but she did stock the whole collection of Scholastic paperbacks for the middle grades and spend enough time reviewing things with slow learners to give me a chance to read them all. 

Mrs. Snodgrass--you can guess what her nickname was, she's been dead long enough that there's no real need to use it, and this web site wouldn't display it anyway--taught history. She liked history and geography. The school board made everyone carry around big clunky "social studies" books that didn't teach us much of anything, and for most of the year Mrs. Snodgrass ignored them and drilled us on the facts of history and geography. Peace to her ashes, she defined the facts as including our short answers to the question "Why did the South have better soldiers and officers?" in the chapter on the Civil War, but they also included the dates of important inventions, the names of all the Presidents, and the capital cities of all the States. She even found time to get into a few of the "social studies" issues, such as its being legal to belong to a labor union (and she did), how landlords might balance profitability with decent housing conditions, and how none of us had psychic powers because we couldn't even guess what she was thinking by gazing into her eyes. Not everyone liked her but I did. One of Ogden Nash's more memorable "Nasheries" divided humanity into "Swozzlers" who were greedy and wasteful and "Snodgrasses" who were nice and respectful of others. It always seemed to fit her.

This was the year the school board decided the middle grades could do without Mr. Music. He was still in town but the "enrichment program" the board had voted to use didn't have room for him. It was "enrichment" for most of us to cover up the "remedial" classes some of us had been found to need. I followed the kid ahead of me to Mrs. Brick's room for remedial reading for a month or so before anyone officially noticed me doing this and said "Oh no, you must go to Mrs. Smelly's room for enrichment." I enjoyed remedial reading more than enrichment, though both classes featured a lot of self-chosen reading with shiny new paperback books. Well...in enrichment the selection did include The House of Dies Drear, the most challenging and therefore enjoyable book I'd ever been allowed to read at school.

Grade 6. Mrs. Dunce really did have some sort of neurological issues, and died young. She might have been classified as a high-functioning autistic patient if she'd been born later. She would have noticed me because Mother packed either peanut butter or fish sandwiches every day, and Mrs. Dunce had reactions to the mere smell of peanuts. She didn't like fish, either, but she leaned back and fanned away the odor of peanuts. 

Anyway she started the year trying to kill me with kindness. Among other things she offered to buy me a poster. I didn't want to hang a poster on my wall where it would soon show smoke damage in a wood-heated house, but thought I could keep a notebook-sized one in my notebook, so I chose a notebook-sized poster. "Oh, if you want the small size, you may have two!" So I chose another poster. The posters were meant to introduce art appreciation into a grade where none of the teachers felt qualified to teach "drawing" as required by law; they were prints of photos of famous paintings. The two I chose were of horses. I figured my brother could have one, and I could have one, to paste into the backs of our notebooks and enjoy looking at or copying for a few years. But then for a surprise Mrs. Dunce changed the order to two wall-sized posters. And scolded me, at length, in front of everybody, for not being grateful for this wonderful improvement over what I had actually wanted. For the rest of that year, I'd gone from being her favorite to being her least favorite, and everyone knew.

Mr. Music was restored to the middle school that year, but grades five through eight had a brass band, for those who chose to join. In grade six I wanted to join the band and was issued a French horn and had something to do with the time in between arriving at school and being admitted to the classroom in the morning. I thoroughly enjoyed the band and liked the teacher. Everyone else in my family hated the sound of a brass band, but Mother said the family had to put up with it because playing a brass instrument might help push my front teeth in a little way. They were beyond the orthodontist's hope. What correction they got, which wasn't much, they got from the French horn (and from the early removal of the cuspids, which really did grow in like vampire fangs).

Mr. Gopher taught science. I was never sure whether he had a speech impediment or just thought sounding a bit tongue-tied was trendy and London-esque. I disliked him. It was mutual; he sent home my very first failing grade and my parents made sure I wrote out the answers to his boring "study questions," after that, though as a protest against their inanity I was allowed to use my typewriter and make my snarky answers easy to read. I don't think Mr. Gopher actually read the answers. I think he just looked for some minimum amount of verbiage as a basis for grades.

Coach Smith, whose given name was Gilbert so non-athletes called him Mr. Filbert or Mr. Nut, taught "social studies" from the lame-brained book. I don't suppose it did anyone any harm since we'd already learned the basic facts of US history and geography as they were taught at the time, but it might have been worthwhile to have learned something about the history and geography of the rest of the world. I don't think even Coach Smith cared anything about the worthless contents of the social studies book, though they did include a chapter on the value of formal education in preserving Jewish culture to which he seemed to be paying attention enough to give me peculiar "Have you anything to add?" looks throughout that week. His heart was in coaching JV football. He was indisputably good at that.

Mrs. Staplegun walked us through a review of the math concepts I'd learned from Mr. Ed. and others had been traumatized about by Miss Mean. I remember her class as supremely boring but recognized that most kids seemed to need it. She was there to mop up emotional mess. Sometimes if everyone paid attention and got through the lesson Mrs. Staplegun, who had been a bit of a singer, would sing popular songs to us. Her favorite song, that year, was "Delta Dawn." Parents might not have approved of this choice to entertain grade six, but it was more fun than math.

Mr. Music came back that year and led monthly sing-alongs, having added a transparency projector to his cartload of tapes and tape recorder. Middle grades got to sing along with popular hits instead of Sam Hinton and The Baby-Sitters. The list of songs I learned at school included "Country Roads," "Lonely Teardrops," and "Let Your Love Flow." 

Secondhand: My brother's teachers: Grade 1. Mrs. Snickers. Her daughter was in my class. Neither of us disliked Mrs. Snickers.

Grade 2. Mrs. Yoicks. I had remembered her as "the pretty one" before the school hired Ms. Linda, but by the time my brother came along she'd already become frumpy. She hadn't been teaching long enough to be really tired of it. Neither of us disliked her either.

Grade 3. Miss Window. Grade three had two teachers whose given name was Linda. The one who looked Cherokee was beautiful, popular, and fun, if she did model herself a bit on Buffy Sainte-Marie. My brother got the one who looked White. She was a snippy young thing neither of us liked. "Window" was short for "Do you hate your teacher, dear? Then throw her out the window." She didn't teach long; she latched onto the son of an old friend of Dad's, and no child had to put up with her any more, except that I caught a sort of parting blast--"She asked if you wanted some clothes she'd worn, but they looked too small. What a tiny waist she has." Right. Miss Window was the sort of girl who would make a point of calling a teenaged girl's attention to her having a tiny tapered waist.

Grade 4. Mrs. Potatoes. My brother didn't think much of her, but didn't really hate her either.

Also: Mrs. Whackem. In grade one my brother's commitment to nonviolence was revised and amended by a distant cousin, a hulking repeater who, I reported at home, was at least as tall as I was and quite a bit heavier. He endured some punches and kicks until the day Big Billy the Bully and his little henchboy decided to give my brother a swirly. They had used the toilet first. My brother didn't think they were really going to risk dunking his head in it until it happened. Then he rose up dripping, kicked the smaller boy out of the bathroom, dunked Billy, and had made a good start on mopping the bathroom with him when the teacher walked in.  Later Big Billy grew up, joined the police force, and went on record as saying that my brother had taught him about respect for others. 

But not enough, because later, during Big Billy's second year in grade two, my brother caught him bullying a closer relative, Tiny Tiresome Timmy. My parents didn't have a telephone--even the old durable ones didn't work well enough to be worth paying for--so Mrs. Whackem vented her agitation to me in the cafeteria. "Your brother beat up a second grade boy."

"Why?  Which one? What did the second-grader do?"

"Well, it was Big Billy. Apparently there's an old grudge..."

"Oh, well, that second-grader. He's older than he is and bigger than I am."

"But he is handicapped! He's not bright!" wailed Mrs. Whackem.

Neither of us ever had any respect for her, ever again. Nor did our parents. Beating up Big Billy the Bully was the sort of thing for which boys get told, "Brawling is a very bad habit," and given new bicycles.

Also: Ms. Pain. I didn't hear much about her.

Also: Mrs. Ungodly. Mother used to say "Nobody deserves a nickname like that." Grade four thought she did. She and Mrs. Whackem looked a bit alike--young, slim, with short black hair--and memory tends to conflate them. For the first half of the year my brother said that at least they were easy to look at. For the second half he despised them.

Grade 5. My brother was also assigned to Old Miss Mean's homeroom. He said that by that time she was really sick, and her outbursts of bad temper often escalated into violence. There was a fad for wearing rotten cotton shirts to school; Miss Mean reportedly tore boys' shirts to get their attention. Sometimes, he said, she grabbed students by their hair. On the first day of school, he said, she kicked the biggest boy in the class in the shins. My brother was only the second or third biggest, but he was still taller than Old Miss Mean, and he still reminded her of me. 

So, one day the janitor cleaned the floor while everyone was out to lunch. Finding somebody's homework paper on the floor, he placed the paper on the nearest freshly polished desk. My brother came in and found this paper on his desk. "He got all the answers wrong and he hadn't even signed his name, whoever it was. I wouldn't have wanted to sign my name to that paper either. So then Joe Blow said it was his, and Miss Mean says I was copying Blow's paper." 

Another day some of the boys were scuffling. My brother didn't say he'd picked up his math book to hit someone with, but that seems the most likely reason why another little brat grabbed his math book and threw it out the window. The roof of the school office projected out below Miss Mean's window, flat, tarred, with puddles here and there. "If I hadn't had this cold I would've thrown him out the window after it. In came Miss Mean and said, "You threw your book out there! You climb out and get it!" I said, "John Doe threw it. Make him get it." So they're not going to let me borrow books from the school any more." Climbing out on the roof was perfectly safe, though my brother suffered from vertigo, but he did have a cold and it was a cold, wet day with a lot of water on the roof.

The kids went on strike and refused to do homework or study, hoping to get Miss Mean fired. It didn't work. It was a difficult year for everybody.

Also: The Brick. My brother liked her too. She was a class act. She stayed out of students' personal concerns and stuck to science facts.

Also: Mrs. Newby. Nobody liked her.

Also: Mr. Smarter was hired as a full-time teacher that year. Grade five adored him. 

Grade 6. As a result of having led the strike against Miss Mean my brother was assigned to Coach Smith's Special Class for Problem Boys, which he'd been warned was going to feature severe discipline and football. Coach Smith saw my brother as a quarterback for a year or two. My brother saw himself as a runner--a cross-country runner, not somebody who was going to have to spend the year either running and hiding from, or being beaten up by, or having to learn to fight with, real juvenile delinquents who carried knives. 

So instead he was enrolled in a tiny, not really legal, Baptist school program where his teacher was a church lady I'll call Mrs. Hassle. I don't know that she actually taught anything. I think what she did was check homework papers, the way schools use computers to do now. My brother did well, though, because he was allowed to do independent study after rushing through the homework papers. He made studies of several subjects that were well covered in books at the public library, and did projects, genetic experiments with plants, tutoring, recycling...he had a great year. But all Mrs. Hassle did was step out of his way.

This is long enough for a blog post. Memories of junior high and high school teachers will have to wait for another day. Suffice it to say that although "brick" used to be a slang word for a thoroughly decent human being, and I think the Brick was one, the best teachers I had were my parents. Most of the learning I did, as a child, I did at home, more or less in spite of school. 

I think elementary school did me more harm than good. Dad blamed the virus-laden air for making me unathletic; as a celiac I think that would have happened if homeschooling had been legal in my time. Then again, although I didn't take correction particularly well, I wasn't cruel at home. I'm pretty sure that, if Miss Mean hadn't chosen to subject me to another six weeks of feeling like the most despised and persecuted person on Earth, I wouldn't have found it entertaining to torment a wretched child who probably felt sick when people looked at her for years after grade five...and she was the sort of girl people always had looked at, and always would, which probably made things even worse.

I've often thought that most of my generation's "emotional problems" had less to do with abuse in early childhood (though many of us were at least neglected in early childhood) than with the trauma of being packed together into public schools. Some people may have found some relief in group therapy where they all pretended they'd been abused by family members in early childhood as an excuse for having "emotional problems." I never did. I didn't choose psychology as a major in search of "help for my problems," because psychology, at that time, was not offering any; I knew that because I knew I had problems--with behavior patterns I'd learned at school. Growing up helped. The Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense helped. Psychology that focussed on emotions was something I learned quickly and easily, and was able to use to help other people, but it had little to offer me. But my early adult years were still a crash course in unlearning the unhelpful mental attitudes and language habits I learned at school.

I think I feel inclined to mention this because, back in my home town, I know so many people who learned the same bad habits at the same school. They have not lived in a big city and had to work their way out of learned behavior patterns that express hostility, or out of the perception that hostility needs to be expressed, in order to pay the rent. Ooey-gooey, emotion-focussed psychology does not appeal to them and wouldn't help them if it did. Admitting that they may indeed be expressing more hostility than they even feel because they learned the importance of scoring off and putting down, at school, is what might help them. Though of course they can say "Well I'm retired now, and I don't plan to talk to a lot of tourists, and the people I talk to are used to the way I talk," and that's true. All they'd gain by learning to feel and express sincere good will, primarily as the kind of respect that may mean not saying much at all, is that I or someone like me might enjoy their company. "So why bother? I am or have been married, I have children, I have parents--I don't have time for friends" is also true in many cases. But they never know when it might be useful for them to know how to make conversation without hostilely defending themselves against anticipated hostility that might not even exist.

So, to all those teachers...only a few of whom are still alive...Most of you were honestly trying to teach some people something. Most of you would have had something to teach me, if you'd allowed yourselves to get beyond drilling into the slow learners what normal minds absorbed from reading the textbook in the first week of each year. All I can say I actually learned from you was a little math from Mr. Ed, a little geography from Mr. Tall, a little anatomy from Mrs. Brick, and how to play the French horn (badly); but that's not your fault. Wherever you are, I thank all of you for putting up with the little monster I was and the miserable factory-line-based system that made me it. 

Web Log for 12.31.25

Animals 

The oldest (known) living cat celebrated her thirtieth birthday:


Health News 

This short blog post summarizes what's in the report, but instead of linking to the report, it links to a video where someone else summarizes...feh. Anyway, it explains exactly how mRNA vaccines may cause myocarditis.

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Web Log for 12.30.25

For next year!


[Posted by "Monsanto Tribunal" on X]

Books 

A more p.c. view of The Horse and His Boy...


One shouldn't have a favorite Narnia book--they need to be read together--but this is mine. It's the wittiest, the most subversive, the most deftly characterized. 

Today it may seem unfortunate that Lewis's mind, when asked to imagine a culture alien from Narnia's, leaped straight to the influences of the Arabic literature he'd been studying. (Lewis, a consummate word-nerd, could probably read all the living European languages without a dictionary, so to keep his mind awake in middle age he took up Arabic.) Calormen is simply "the hot land"; there's nothing Islamic about it, and in any world where humans live the residents of "the hot land" would probably tend to have darker complexions (unless the author goes to the trouble of inventing an explanation why they wouldn't, which I once did); but the few words of the Calormene language Lewis bothered to invent have an Arabic look, the houses are built and furnished like something out of the Arabian Nights, and the way the Calormenes speak English sounds as if it were influenced by the Victorian translation of the Arabian Nights too. 

It becomes more important in The Last Battle to remember that Calormenes are not Arabs, nor are meant to be. Writers of speculative fiction based on the idea of a possible future for our world have an easy excuse for the limitations of imagination. They can say, as Anne McCaffrey did, that the leaders of the human colony on the planet Pern were Irish and Iranian, so as the Pernese culture evolved it showed the influences of its founders' sense of ethnic pride; Pern has laws lifted out of Ireland's and so on. Lewis accounted for the British influence on Narnia by importing its royal family from London, but he never did explain the origin of Calormen at all, probably because it's not really Arab or Iranian. 

So what are Calormenes? They are unenlightened people, simply. Apart from the detail that the name Aravis sounds like "Arab" (but it also sounds like, e.g., the Welsh Arabus, "witty," and other words and names Lewis must have known)...Calormenes arrange marriages for their children without consulting the children's preferences, and resent that Narnian young people arrange marriage for themselves. Calormenes cheat each other in business. Calormene traffic laws consist of "everyone who is less important has to get out of the way of everyone who is more important." The Calormene religion does not adore a vision of the One God whose manifestation in Narnia is Aslan; Calormenes know about lions as dangerous wild beasts but they worship a vaguely Assyrian-looking vulture-man they call Inexorable Tash, who embodies no virtues but merely power, and who is ultimately identifiable with the Evil Principle. Tash is not Allah, the Arabic version of Elohe that invokes the God Abraham served, but he may be identifiable with some of the earliest Semitic male gods, who were identified with storms and battle and had no qualities we might call "spiritual." Lewis knew well that Arab and Persian civilization is, like European civilizations generally, at least illuminated with occasional flashes of enlightenment. Calormene civilization shows no such flashes. It is the civilization of people who may not be altogether bad, but who are, as a group, unenlightened enough that nice people like Aravis and Emeth are called away from a nation where most people are irredeemably nasty.

Each of the Narnia books is a teaching story about some aspect of Christianity. Prince Caspian seems generally to be about the Christian's private struggle against his own bad habits; The Horse and His Boy is more about the Christian's relationships with un-Christian people. Shasta, who is not even a native of Calormen, and Aravis, who is a native of Calormen but is eager to leave, have the right stuff in them; it's good for them to be in Narnia and to marry each other when they're old enough--there is no race prejudice here, Aravis may have a darker complexion than Shasta but she's good enough to be his wife and his people's queen. Rabadash, who seems to be more typical of Calormen, is not good enough to be Susan's doormat and there is a suggestion that Susan would have done better not even to visit his family and consider his proposal. Rabadash's courtship is not about friendship; it's all selfish lust. "I will have her," he rages, referring to Susan, "false, proud, black-hearted daughter of a dog that she is!" Susan is not a bad character, her eventually ceasing to be a Friend of Narnia does not necessarily rule out her going to the English part of Heaven as having been a good Christian back in England, but if she'd been "wise as a serpent" (as Christians are told to be) she would have recognized Rabadash's bad qualities sooner.

But much more than being a story about rejecting unworthy friends, The Horse and His Boy is a story about Christians' relationships with worthy friends--including animals. (Loving and respecting horses, Lewis understood, is not incompatible with riding them, but when the children are being taught to ride by grown-up horses they learn a lot of things many horsey people prefer to ignore.) It is full of love and loyalty, good faith and good will, adventures and tests of courage, green hills and blue sky. It is a delight to read.

So of course is Laura IngallsWilder's On the Banks of Plum Creek.


Sweet innocent childhood--kid drama, lost and found playthings, learning firsthand that friendly Plum Creek becomes dangerous in flood...

Health: Pain Management 

David Manney asked for comments on this post. I don't know. Could my father or my Significant Other ever have given him some. I collected a goodly number when actively doing massage, too. I hit the button to send him a few. The system wouldn't take them, apparently because I block cookies. I'm not suggesting that you allow cookies in order to weigh in with your opinions here...


Some people assume that patients, especially women, need to have every experience of discomfort blocked by chemicals that cause more discomfort than they're meant to block. Impacted wisdom tooth? Pop a handful of Tylenol! Having a baby? Full anesthesia for the full period of labor, which may take longer because of the anesthesia, and never mind the possibility of long-term brain damage for either mother or baby because nobody should have to listen to a person gasping to control pain! Arthritis? Hey, in Canada now you can get tax-funded help to commit suicide!

Others assume that patients, especially young men, are wimps who want to be addicts and commit slow unacknowledged suicide at the taxpayers' expense if they need a refill of any pain medication. Maybe some of them are wimps. My father, a polio survivor who'd forced himself to work through the pain to rebuild every nerve and muscle he had, had forgotten more about non-drug pain management than most doctors have to learn; if he said pain was unbearable and untreatable, it was. So he took Tegretol and, though religious beliefs seemed to block any active suicidal thinking, he became obsessed with telling the world he didn't want any medical treatments more "heroic" than that if his health got worse, and with expressing support for Dr. Kevorkian (then regarded as a homicidal fool, now regarded as a pioneer at least in Canada). Giving patients Tegretol or other heavy-duty pain suppressants can feel like writing them off. It can be hard to admit that someone who is already missed may have exhausted all hope of either drug-free pain management or recovery of physical ability.

I've seen other patients whose problem was that they were too brave and tough about pain. They don't become drug addicts because they want to get high--the suggestion that they might be, or might know, that kind of miserable "scag" is fighting words! They end up becoming addicts because they don't want to take a week off to let inflammation subside or relocate a dislocated bone; they want to push on, working longer and harder and faster than younger (and sometimes bigger) co-workers, to impress their bosses, to earn bonuses or promotions, to keep their wretched dead-end jobs. Like champion athletes, they may own a sport (or a heavy labor job) for longer than normal people ever expect to do it, and still cry real tears when they start to slow down. Some of them need better ways to recover from injuries, or change what they do all day in time to prevent injuries; they don't need to be treated like scags. Though some of them become disabled and fade out of life in pretty much the same way the scags do--at best, at home or in a hospital rather than in an alley.

(Scag is heroin. A scag is a person who wants to lie around seeking a drug "high" all the time, who has no reason to live and will never be missed. We say no to drugs because we don't want to be scags.)

Will there ever be better solutions? When people aren't able to muster their own endorphins to manage pain, will there ever be a safe, non-addictive replacement for natural endorphins? I don't know. I do know that a big part of the benefit of massage is that massage people listen, to patients' words and to their physical reactions, and pray or meditate with patients during each treatment. This makes it very easy to tell whether a patient is a wimp or a scag, or is doing everything person can to be healthy. When some people say they feel depressed, they mean they want their own way and their families may be relieved if they'll settle for dangerous drugs; when my husband said he felt depressed, he meant he was dying of cancer. If MDs broke the chains of slavery to insurance schemes and took the time to listen to patients in this way...why shouldn't MDs get this benefit, when treating patients who don't need massage? The doctors who are still respected already do.

Words 

According to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, there may be any number of things people want to talk about but don't because their languages don't (yet) have words for those things. Coining a word allows us to talk about these things.

Well, I don't know. Did youall want to talk about the blur our eyes see in front of and behind the clear image on which our eyes focus? The word for the blur is now, officially, "bokeh." It should logically rhyme with "OK." 

Costumes That Might Be Banned from a Church Costume Party

There's no Long & Short Reviews prompt for this Wednesday, so here's a thought I jotted down one night during the past year...

During 2025 I spent some time at one of those houses where somebody likes to share favorite television programs with visitors. We were watching one of those game show where people win prizes by answering questions, only the questions were the "We asked X demographic group this open-ended question that has a dozen or more valid answers. What did they answer most frequently?" sort of thing, rather than straightforward questions, as on "Jeopardy," with a factual answer you can look up. 

One of the questions asked people to name a costume that might be banned from a church-hosted costume party. 

The actual wording mentioned Halloween. Churches with which I'm familiar do not celebrate Halloween. Costume parties can be suggested by any occasion for which somebody has a costume and wants to wear it.

Anyway eight answers had been supplied before the contest, and the contestants took a long time guessing all eight, with many valid answers that weren't on the list and much hilarity.

We were guessing answers, too, of course. Not that anyone wanted to try out for the game show. I have thought from time to time that I might have a chance on "Jeopardy" but this was the sort of show where contestants seemed to be chosen for the ability to scream, fling their hair about, and do victory dances when they win a round.

"Nudist," "devil," and "stripper" had been filled in.

"Ku Klux Klansman," someone suggested.

"Terrorist."

"That former teacher who went missing after the child pornography was found on his computer." It is currently believed that such a character might have fled into our part of Virginia, though the report that he went off into the woods carrying a gun sounds more as if he'll be found shot in the head in the woods, near his home.

Nobody bothered to think of other "immodest" costumes for women, since "stripper" had already been mentioned. 

"Serial murderer." 

"Gangster."

"Feminazi." It is still necessary to explain, as Rush Limbaugh originally did, the difference between a feminazi, a feminist, and other varieties like the feminitwit. A feminist is anyone who believes that women are equally as valuable as men, which includes all sane people in the modern world, including some who think "feminist" is a term of contempt for a female left-wingnut. That's inaccurate. Wingnuts are wingnuts. Anyway, a feminitwit is a feminist who still believes in Socialism. A feminutcase is a feminist who believes that men can become women by choice. A femininny is a feminist, or self-proclaimed antifeminist, who believes that women are entitled to demand financial support based on their own very selective claims of incompetence. A feminazi is a feminist who believes abortion is a good thing and is happy when women "choose" abortion. There were, Limbaugh claimed when he started using the word, fewer than two dozen feminazis alive on Earth. Tragically there are still a lot of feminitwits.

"Nazi."

"Bolshevik."

"Pharmakon, the sort of witch Moses said should not be suffered to live among God's people--someone who makes or sells drugs for evil purposes." My mental picture of a pharmakon, if anyone wants to use one as a scary Halloween costume, is diverse and flexible. You could be an ancient Greek messing with mushrooms, a 1970s drug dealer handing out LSD, a modern-day narcotraficante, or maybe Dr. Fauci.

"Witch" was actually on the list, though without further clarification it suggests the cartoonish little-kid "witch" costumes sold in the Dollar Store. Sheer fantasy. The next level of cheap unimaginative costume above putting a white sheet over your head and calling yourself a ghost. Since the shapeless black dress, pointed black hat, optional green face paint, and essential broomstick aren't based on anything in real life I'm not sure whether churches would need to ban them, but I suppose they qualify as villainous characters.

Then there's the TV kind of witch, as played by Elizabeth Montgomery, who simply has psychic powers and is comically concerned about how to use them. I suppose, theologically, this kind of character might represent a spirit of confusion, but how seriously do churches take that these days?

The kind of Witch I actually know, in the real world, is a person--usually, not necessarily, either young or female--who has lost faith in prayer and is trying to cast spells instead. These are real people, usually on the self-dramatizing side but well-intentioned, who have chosen a different religion, and churches at least ought to be actively encouraging them to reconsider prayer. 

But the list of costumes the survey sample wanted to ban from church parties was much less imaginative. Apart from "witch" and "Satan," those people limited themselves to costumes for different categories of sex workers. Bah humbug!

I suppose it might be a sign of niceness if people can't think of any bad things to do or be beyond cartoon figures and sex workers, but that would have to be the kind of niceness that's very different from goodness.

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Web Log for 12.29.25

Books 

A younger, more p.c. view of Little House on the Prairie...


I read Wilder (and of course Rose Wilder Lane) as writing in the Realist tradition. The stories don't present Ma, Pa, Laura, Mary, or Carrie as perfect people. They don't really judge. Readers who can relate to Laura's point of view feel Laura's love of her family while seeing their flaws--with love. Pa Ingalls is a miserable excuse for a provider, Ma is narrow-minded and impractical, Mary has goody-goody tendencies, Carrie is a bit of a burden to the others, and though Laura's selfish/rebellious/angry moments are relatable...So in short they're ordinary imperfect human beings who can be loved. Their attitude toward indigenous people, and other "pioneers" from different backgrounds for that matter, is not exemplary but it is period-perfect. Wilder/Lane obviously left out a LOT of the kind of details that later Realists would force upon readers, but they give an excellent picture of human beings as they saw themselves. In By the Shores of Silver Lake we learn that Mary was an unimaginative person who didn't like metaphors--and while most book-loving children might understand that at first as saying that Mary was a nasty person who cramped Laura's style, adult readers have to appreciate it as having shaped Wilder/Lane's mastery of Realism. Neither Stephen Crane nor Willa Cather had much to teach this writing team. 

I don't think the people who fret about the Ingalls family's never seeing the Plains point of view--which is easy enough for the reader to see!--are even all that concerned about a realistic portrayal of how "pioneers" who weren't hateful people could be as ignorant as, in fact, they were. I think what really bothers them is how independent the Ingalls family are of the government that claimed to grant them land, then withdrew the claim. They come close to starvation but they don't need or expect any handouts from the government--though they take some from a church group. The federal government does them wrong but they take responsibility for feeding and educating themselves. That's not the way some people want to believe poor people CAN be--or should be. It spoils their plans and agendas.

Little House in the Prairie is not as much fun to read as the happier memories in Little House in the Big Woods and On the Banks of Plum Creek. The plot is not "ultimately pointless." It has a sharp, sticking, painful point. The Ingalls family trusted government agents and wasted a lot of effort on what they, in their ignorant way, saw as a good thing. They don't have a lot of fun in this book. A writer less gifted than the team Wilder/Lane would have exaggerated the difficulties and made this story a bitter pill that child readers couldn't swallow. Wilder/Lane tell it in the grand Realist manner, through the eyes of the little girl Laura, who never quite understands how horrible her situation is but tries to remember as much of the tiny scraps of niceness, prettiness, and fun as this set of her memories contain, and make it far more effective than most writers could make it. There's not much danger that modern readers are going to buy into the "manifest destiny to tame the wilderness" mentality that the Ingalls family bought into. Wilder/Lane don't argue with that mentality--they just show, in devastating detail, exactly how it worked for the "pioneers." 

Their goal was to teach children how people used to do things before they had access to all the new ways of doing things that were available in 1935. By sticking to that goal they give child readers an insight into how the "pioneers" survived. One day they were fighting or fleeing the enemies. The next day little Laura was learning a song or a recipe, listing the flowers she saw or learning how to clean feather beds. I don't think any grandiose psychological phrases like "living in the moment" or "grounding your moods by focussing on the immediate details of present reality" are in the books, but they certainly show readers how those things are done...along with the recipes and the method for cleaning feather beds.

Poetry

Comic epic series begins: