Showing posts with label California. Show all posts
Showing posts with label California. Show all posts

Friday, July 24, 2026

Book Review: Silver Linings

Title: Silver Linings

Author: Christine Pope

Date: 2025

Publisher: Dark Valentine

Quote: "At least a decade had passed since the last time I'd seen a unicorn out here."

Sidney is the heir to a family secret that's caused her mother and grandmother to become Missing Persons, her father to disappear out of their lives: The forest they own, near Eureka, California, contains a portal through which mythical animals come from other worlds to visit. Unicorns, it seems, sense humans' intentions and don't actually care about virginity. They were still appearing to Sidney's grandmother before she vanished; they're practically Sidney's pets, when they show up. 

Ben met a discouraged older man in a bar, where the man dropped a photo on the floor. It was signed by Sidney. From the photo Ben could tell that the woman photographed was the man's daughter and that he'd find her attractive. So he goes out to Silver Hollow to find Sidney and offer to help with anything she's doing, if possible. He can tell Sidney's the type of woman who's only interested in a man who can be a real friend and partner in her life.

The forest is being threatened by a corrupt logging company. Ben and Sidney can work together on something: organizing community resistance to logging. The unicorn can help.

I've read better fantasy novels. I've read worse. This trifle may amuse you, may inspire your own activist work...and, of course, it's meant to sell you a series of novels that answer the questions that haven't been answered at the end of this one. Where are Sidney's mother and grandmother? Why did they go there? Will Ben and Sidney get married? There are three more volumes so far. 

Sunday, May 10, 2026

Book Review: For the Love of the Grind

Title: For the Love of the Grind

Author: Sara (Bei) Hall


Photo from Google.

Publisher: St Martin's

Date: 2026

ISBN: 9781250404299

Quote:  "I'm grateful to have found running. This is what I have been made for."

As a teenager, Sara Bei ran so much faster than the other girls that the coach made her run with the boys on the cross-country team. At Stanford, she made such an impression on the other champion runner, Ryan Hall, that they became personal friends and married after graduation. As adults, they've continued to run for more than twenty years, putting them among the longest-lived athletic couples in human history. 

This is Sara's story; she mentions Ryan Hall and the children they've adopted enough to show that she does have a home life, but avoids telling their stories. Her story is mostly about races run, injuries incurred, treatments indicated, and recoveries made. Readers learn about athletics and general health. We get to peek into the runners' world of training, racing, and squeezing in time for a little bit of a personal life. We get to share Hall's first feeling of empathy when she sees runners unused to wet track conditions hiding under every possible shelter on a wet day, followed quickly by triumph: "This will be my secret weapon." We hear the whine of envy as people tell the Halls that watching them run is a joyful experience, and others insinuate that it's a "selfish" career...as if preaching or singing were less of a mix of obsessive training, intense discipline, lapping up emotional support from a crowd, and radiating emotional support back to them.

The Halls are Christians who wanted to be missionaries and have built a house in Ethiopia with missionary intentions. This book walks the very thin line between giving Christian readers enough of a "testimony" that they don't forget to pray so that Christians won't worry about that, and not alienating readers from other faith traditions with a heavy evangelical message. Sara Hall reminisces wryly about debates over Santa Claus being a replacement for Jesus for little children, tells us that (although Little Debbie cookies are made by a bakery that's part of a church college community) she turned down a contract to endorse the brand after having had to run in lower-tech shoes that showed the right brand and deciding she didn't want to put sugary cookies in the children's lunchboxes, but she keeps these stories short and maintains a focus on what works for top runners...everything from diet and training through the magical thinking athletes tend to indulge in when competing with other people who diet and train as rigorously as they do. (Focus on the runner ahead of you, pace yourself to pass that person, imagine energy flowing out of person and into you as you pass...) 

Her commitment to faith and family, and intentions to help other Ethiopians in and beyond the athletic culture that has swept that country, always shine through. Sometimes I wonder how it's possible for the underdeveloped extrovert brain to have any spirituality. I think, despite moments of rebellion (she ate a "magic" mushroom, legally and with proper supervision, in Oakdale! And it felt "spiritual" to her!), this book shows how that works in practice. (In Hall's church the classic four personality types, often called by oldfashioned names that describe their typical weak points, are affirmed as "dominance, influence, steadiness, and conscientiousness." Hall is told that she excels in "influence," meaning that she's seen as an extrovert.) Hall doesn't do Christianity the way I do or the way most church ladies do, but she does it the way her unique brain and body are built to do. 

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Book Review: The Changeling

Title: The Changeling

Author: Zilpha Keatley Snyder

Date: 1970

Publisher: Atheneum / Scholastic Book Services

ISBN: none

Length: 232 pages

Illustrations: drawings by Alton Raible

Quote: “[A] changeling comes when some other creatures, gnomes or witches or fairies or trolls, steal a human baby and put one of their own babies in its place...when the babies are just a few hours old...Aunt Evaline and I think I might be a wood nymph or a water sprite.”

Martha is the shy, quiet baby sister in a family of high achievers. Ivy is the creative, idealistic baby sister in a family of tough guys and alcoholics. The Changeling is the story of their friendship, which lasts all through their school years and culminates when the girls have to find out who really committed a crime (a mean girl in their class has accused them).

It’s chick-lit; what Snyder’s son categorized as a “sad story about girls” when he demanded that she write Black and Blue Magic, a funny story about a boy. It doesn’t really fit into the stereotype of what children in any particular grade ought to be reading; too slow-paced and emotional for most middle school readers, too chaste and simply told for most teenagers. (Even in grade ten, Ivy and Martha don’t seem to think their lives need any romance.) It can be read as Snyder’s reaction to the elitist bigotry of which some Americans hadn’t even become ashamed in 1970: adults think Kelly, who belongs to a “nice” middle-class family like Martha’s, would be an appropriate friend for Martha, but Kelly is thoroughly hateful; adults think Ivy would be a bad influence, but she’s as good a friend as a little girl can be.

It is, however, the reality-based story behind Snyder’s venture into fantasy, a few years later, in Below the Root. Some readers may find these stories interesting enough to compare and contrast and consider how Snyder had developed as a writer during the years between these two novels. In The Changeling Ivy invents, Martha co-writes, and they act out as a dance, the story of the Tree People; in Below the Root the story reappears as an independent fantasy adventure. Both novels contain embedded anti-drug messages. Which way of embedding an anti-drug message in a story works for you?

For me The Changeling is also useful as a study of the two healthy introverted traits that frequently appear in females. The physical traits that produce LBS and HSP personalities hadn’t been scientifically identified yet, but it’s obvious that Martha, who is neither stupid nor hypothyroid but consistently “slower” than her siblings, has a long brain stem and Ivy, who tells stories and becomes a dancer, has high sensory perceptivity. By now my sister has managed to find educational picture books about introversion for preliterate children. Verbally talented introverts may still prefer to read a story about the adventures of two school-aged introverts, rather than a picture book aimed at younger children. So, although The Changeling was among Snyder’s slower-selling books and may not be easy to find, it’s still worth buying for an introverted little girl. 

Or for yourself, if you were once an introverted little girl (or boy) and still enjoy a simple story that’s not about adultery or murder. Like most novels aimed at child readers, it’s not complex enough to draw adults back again and again, but the plot takes enough turns to get an adult through a few hours of down time. 

Friday, January 16, 2026

Folsom Childhood Blues

(A DVerse writing prompt earlier in the week asked for poems inspired by the song "Folsom Prison Blues." That link-up has closed, so this post is being linked at https://dversepoets.com/2026/01/15/its-open-link-night-and-our-live-session-is-just-around-the-corner/ .)

Los Anglos generally think that Johnny Cash owned that song, and he certainly did sing it well, but a fun fact (that I actually learned later, in college) was that it was written for and recorded by Freddy Fender, who had been in the Folsom Prison for longer than it took to do a concert. I wanted to give this post a link to the Fender version, which los Mexicanos y los Indigenes in California consider the classic version. I did not find such a link. Here is a version by Los Hermanos Mendoza that comes closer to Fender's version than to Cash's.


The town called Folsom, California, has more attractive features than the prison. It has Folsom Lake and various parks and trails, not all of which lead to the lake. It has a library, schools, stores, hotels and all. It has a business district, now considered historic, where my mother once leased a shop. It has residential streets like this one, where we didn't live, but our street looked more like this than like any other public-access photo on Google; the street had four lanes, and the house we rented for almost two years was made of red bricks. My brother was born in Folsom.

All images came from Google.)


Folsom, California, is a pretty place.
If you are a child, it's best that you not show your face.
Gravel's all lots of people have even in front yards.
Play in the back where you're safe and fenced and barred.


Playing with the gravel, look up at the fence.
Ten-foot square on either side is all the land she rents.
The fence is made of redwood like trees that touch the sky.
Somewhere trees are still living; you might get there by and by.


Grass in front of this house will raise welts on your skin.
Sun will make your nose bleed. You might as well stay in.
Worst thing in the front yard is the traffic roaring through.
Drink and drive, smash people's cars just like they might smash you.


(One way to tell that that's not Mother's car is that she never parked hers across a cul-de-sac like that. It was sitting inside our driveway when the drunk driver ran out of the road and smashed it.)


The haze of all those cars' exhaust hangs in the morning air,
Corrodes the brains of people who had not one cell to spare.
Oh I want to get out of Folsom while I am still alive.
If we stay here any longer I might never see the age of five.


Well, the baby is behind bars just so that he doesn't fall.
Even baby likes to smash his bottles on the wall.
(That's why babies' bottles are made out of plastic today.)
Oh get us out of Folsom town, and take us far away.

(To be fair, a lot of people liked living in Folsom, and still do. But I don't think those people were four years old. If they were, they hadn't lived on a farm when they were three years old.)

Monday, October 6, 2025

Book Review: Time and Mr Bass

Book Review: Time and Mr. Bass

Author: Eleanor Cameron

Date: 1967

Publisher: Atlantic Monthly / Little Brown & Company

ISBN: none

Length: 247 pages

Illustrations: drawings by Fred H. Meise

Quote: “They had left Basidium at precisely four in the morning, earth time, as they always did, and it was now six in the morning when the space ship came down on Welsh soil.”

In Eleanor Cameron’s “Mushroom Planet” series, space aliens who seem to have evolved from fungi have settled and lived incognito for many years in damp, cave-riddled, fungus-friendly Wales. “Cameron” is not a Welsh name. It comes from Scotland. My legal name isn’t Welsh either, and nobody seems to have cared to try to find out whether the Jones cousins were related to Welsh or English Joneses. So although I’ve never been sure whether this series is more of a celebration of Welshness or an ethnic slur, neither am I sure whether I have a right to object if it’s a slur. Relatively large heads on relatively small bodies are observed in some Welsh families but this certainly does not indicate that these individuals evolved from fungi. 

What I have a right to observe is that Cameron lived and wrote in Marin County, California, which is also damp and fungus-friendly. She put lots of fun fungus facts into this series.

Maybe I’m just prejudiced about the subgenre of science fiction in which children solve problems beyond the powers of adults. I think this blatant attempt to flatter child readers is more offensive than flattering. Stories where the child is the one small enough to slip through the crack, or pure-minded enough to ride the unicorn, or bored enough to poke about and discover the secret, don’t bother me. Stories where the aliens go to the children first for help, and children too young to drive motorbikes are allowed to drive spaceships, do bother me. I felt that way when I was six years old, and I feel that way still.

The fad for stories like the Mushroom Planet stories, in which the parents of the little space cadets are too clueless even to notice that their kids are having all these wacky adventures, peaked around the time my generation were hearing all about the supposed “generation gap” that kept us from really liking or understanding our parents. Which was absolute rot. Did I, did my brother, did our friends, disagree with our parents? Of course we did. Did most of us plan eventually to leave our parents and marry people closer to our own ages? Of course we did. Did that mean that, while we were single and living with our parents and dependent on our parents for money, we felt “more loyalty” to mere school friends than we felt to our parents? Exactly how stupid did the people propagating this propaganda think we were?

There were some compromise stories, at this period, where the child protagonists might have idiot parents or simply absent parents, but they had normal child-adult relationships with some other older person. I think this was the appeal of Batman and Robin, whose relationship later became suspicious because they weren’t positively defined as relatives, or Speed Racer and Racer X, who were safely identified as brothers. I liked stories where the children had interesting parts, but were able to work as a team with a parent or parent-substitute. Kids weren’t going to be the only ones in the space colony who could solve a simple science or logic problem—duh!—but kids could help their parents, more plausibly than they could be the ones to help aliens...I think, even at age six, I might have been just a tiny bit wary about this notion of kids secretly helping aliens.

Well, some people hate elves and fairies, too, and I enjoyed them. Many people, including SARK (Susan Ariel Rainbow Kennedy), have loved the Mushroom Planet books. Many people are as willing to suspend disbelief in spaceships children can drive as they are in time travel, thought travel, or the idea of a Mushroom Planet. I will say that, if you’re one of those people, this is a high-grade, well-written mix of science, science fiction, and fantasy.  Lots of fun facts about fungi are woven into hilariously unlikely adventures. 

Sunday, September 14, 2025

Book Report: Some Assembly Required

Required Reading for All Pro-Lifers

Book Title: Some Assembly Required

Author: Anne and Sam Lamott

Publisher: Penguin / Riverhead

Date: 2012

ISBN: 978-1-59448-841-2

Length: 272 pages

Quote: "The best thing--besides how unbelievably perfect Jax is, not to mention alive--is to watch Sam be a father."

Anne Lamott's first nonfiction book was Operating Instructions: A Journal of My Son's First Year. A little earlier than anyone expected, the son whose infancy was described in that book was able to collaborate with Lamott on Some Assembly Required: A Journal of My Son's First Son. (On the inside back cover, dreadlocked blonde Anne Lamott tries to look as grandmotherly as possible.)

If you're a hardcore conservative fundamentalist type of Christian, you might say that "this," meaning premature grandmotherhood, is what Anne Lamott's liberal (in both senses--ecumenical theology and left-wing politics) approach to Christianity leads to.

If you're any kind of Christian, however, you'll have to love the way Lamott fights the urge to nag and scold her grandson's parents, forces herself to treat them as adults, and focusses on loving her grandson. And her church. And other religious people with whom she spends time during baby Jax's first year (which includes a tour in India). And Jesus.

What's not to love? As in Operating Instructions, this is an intimate, woman-to-woman book about a baby. It's hard to imagine a whole book about a baby that would not be full of moist and smelly medical details. Both of Anne Lamott's baby books bounce easily up and down, like mountain goats, from the spiritual heights ("explaining the Nicene Creed") to the cerebral ("If you try to protect [children] from hurt, and always rush to their side...they won't learn about life") to the earthy ("Is dung an element?"), and back, often within a sentence: "When I was teaching Sunday school, Jax...emerged...having opened up a little container of baby-junk-food sweet-potato bits...he had so much drool on his hands that they were sticking to him." This is Lamott's trademark, the style of writing that's put her among the bestselling Christian writers in the English-speaking world. There are those who prefer a more abstract, less earthy sort of Christian book.

However, what I've said about Lamott's other memoirs, in general, applies to this one. If you want to do something "pro-life," other than bringing up your own children, Anne Lamott can show you how it's done. No harangues. No guilt trips. Just gratitude that Jesus lives in the hearts of people who, approximately twenty years ago, promised a mixed-up young woman that they'd help her raise a child who had been produced by her sleeping with someone else's husband in exchange for drugs. And they did. And she did. And she became rich and famous by writing about it and now has money to give back to those who slipped their change into her pockets at church when she was young and poor.

I had to post something about this book here. Should have done it sooner, in fact, because Some Assembly Required was one of the first books on this site's official Amazon Wish List. Some dear, kind privacy fanatic out there made it possible for me to enjoy this book and tell youall about it. Thanks to you. Thanks to Anne and Sam Lamott, too.

Friday, June 27, 2025

Book Review: She's Having a Baby

Title: She's Having a Baby 

Author: Suzanne Jenkins 

Date: 2019 

Quote: "They hiked for miles with Mike still over Devon's shoulder, to a rescue truck from a different squad." 

This is volume 1 in a series about the lives and loves of San Diego fire fighters. Mike and Devon are lifelong friends. Both are badly burned in a fire. Devon survives. Is it right for him to marry his best buddy's widow? 

Need one ask? It's a romance novel. Other characters and plot lines develop but this book is mainly about how Devon marries his buddy's widow; or, if you can stand to watch a woman giving birth in a bathtub while waiting to be taken to the hospital, you can stand anything and might as well marry her. It's about brave, goodhearted people who subject themselves to a lot of emotional stress and find relief in a lot of emotional sex.

Enough details about romance, sex, and babies are spelled out to attract bad things to a computer, so if you buy this series, buy printed copies.

Thursday, August 29, 2024

Book or Art Film Review: The Lost Era Transcripts

This review was written when the e-book was finished. It's being reposted now that the movie has been released and is available for screening. This is a valuable piece of California history and also a feast of visual art, from pretty nature scenes to horror pictures. 


Title: The Lost Era Transcripts

Author: Peter Wade Hampton

Editor: John W. MacLean

Date: 2023 (movie, blog)

Quote: “Someday, Pete Hampton will be recognized as one of America’s great artists. I am going to have a role in making that happen”. 

Pete Hampton grew up at a peculiar time in southern California's history: a time when relatively generous amounts of rain had encouraged more diversity of wildlife than most people see there, and relatively few people had crowded the wildlife out. He painted his memories, not always with perfect accuracy, but with a determination to preserve the sights he'd seen. He documented what southern California looked like without smog, traffic, and billboards. 

As his book makes clear, Hampton was an anxious, nightmare-ridden child, and in his case nightmares seemed to be part of a manageable psychotic condition. He saw and loved the beauty of nature, and wanted to discourage people crowding in and urbanizing places where a few humans could coexist with that beauty. If he gained any other wisdom from what he'd seen, however, he failed to write it down. Maclean tells us that a publisher had wanted to publish his book, then backed out of it--possibly due to timing, but also possibly because the story doesn't end with Hampton outgrowing his nightmares. He still had them during his last illness; he died old, but raving in nightmares. People who think a story ought to provide an encouraging message, "This was an unpleasant situation; this is how the character(s) made it better," will be disappointed.

But, for Hampton, the story wasn't about him. It was about the time and place that deserved to be remembered, so far as possible preserved--even if his memories of that time and place were all wound up together with his nightmares. 

So he left behind a manuscript linking pretty nature paintings and nightmare paintings. I don't think the nightmare paintings are very disturbing to adults of steady nerves and clear consciences. They feature a lot of cartoonish monsters. He was a little boy; he'd heard nothing about the real horrors of war, even the "good" but horrible one in the 1940s. 

He left a younger artist friend (MacLean) the task of making his manuscript publishable as a book or a movie. The technical details were apparently quite tedious, but MacLean did the job well. The Lost Era Transcripts has become a documentary movie. When I offered to view the movie MacLean, charitably remembering my absurdly low visual attention span, sent a link to the manuscript in blog form, each chapter visible online as a blog post. The hand work of scrolling and clicking helped me focus on a book that's long on color pictures and short on words. 

It would make an excellent big heavy glossy gorgeous coffee-table book, for all who want their coffee tables to display an interest in California history, ecology, artists, dreamscapes, or any combination of those things. It would be expensive to print and might have to be published privately, or by a university, as a limited edition; but for art lovers these lively, quirky paintings would be worth their price. Hampton's heirs might even consider selling limited editions of frameable prints of individual paintings, full-sized or close. 

https://www.thelosteratranscripts.com/2020/05/the-lostera-transcripts-story-and.html

Tuesday, August 20, 2024

Book Review: Money Ain't Nothing

Title: Money Ain't Nothing

Author: Jason Blacker

Date: 2017

Quote: "I hadn't worked in a while and I sure could use the money."

Anthony Carrick is a burnt-out private investigator. In this short e-book he's called to investigate a suspicious death, uncovers one of those triangles of sordid young lust that get people murdered, and talks the surviving two members of the triangle into a confession by lunchtime. 

People who like Sam Spade and similar fictional detectives might like Carrick; he's a bad example of lifestyle choices that make people "old" before they're forty, but he can turn a phrase. If you like him, he reappears in longer, more complicated stories you can buy.  

Thursday, August 15, 2024

Book Review for 8.13.24: Chinawoman's Chance

Title: Chinawoman's Chance

Author: James Musgrave

Date: 2018

Publisher: E,M,R.E.

ISBN: 9781943457311

Quote: "May those who see us, love us; and those who don't love us, may God turn their hearts; and if H don't turn their hearts, may He turn their ankles so we'll know them by their limping."

That quote was too good not to share. Unfortunately, this book is not a feel-good read.  Not only does it feature a series of gory murders, it also deals with Victorian San Francisco, a time and place whose racism appalled people (like Mark Twain and Ambrose Bierce) who'd grown up with slavery. In Thomas Sowell's history of how people have treated other people like trash and owed them money, around the world and throughout history, San Francisco's exploitation of Irish and Chinese immigrants--and setting them against each other--still stands out.

The story uses real people as characters in ways that are admittedly contrary to fact. There was a real Clara Foltz, one of the first female attorneys to practice law in California. There was a real Ah Toy, one of the first Chinese women to get into San Francisco, a courtesan who claimed in her own defense that she trained "her girls" to be entertainers, not prostitutes. In real history they never worked together, Clara Foltz never showed any interest in Chinese immigrants, and there's no evidence that the two proto-feminists ever spoke to each other. But if you read about the plight of the Chinese immigrants and thought "Somebody ought to have stood up for some of them in court," you might think, "Wouldn't it have been cool if Clara Foltz and Ah Toy had joined forces to defend an innocent Chinese-American?"

In real life, nobody defended them. They had no rights. They were not technically slaves  in the American system (in the Chinese system several of the women were), but neither the men nor the women were considered citizens or prospective citizens either. They developed their own tong system for law enforcement, because in the White courts, if a Chinese immigrant was murdered, well, that was one less competitor against Irish immigrants or even Anglo- or German-Americans, many of whom became desperate for work when they failed to strike gold in California. Most of the Chinese men were obligated, and most of the women sold outright, to come to America; they hadn't chosen to be in San Francisco yet they found themselves actively hated for being there. "A Chinaman's chance" meant the smallest imaginable chance, just barely more than no chance at all. The White capitalists who brought in Chinese laborers did not want them to succeed or prosper; they wanted them to work cheap and then go home empty-handed.

So here is a series of seven bloody murders, solved by the two proto-feminists as a team, culminating with a shoot-out reminiscent of Silence of the Lambs. For those who want a dystopian story that'll make them cry, this might be a good choice. It's grim and gritty, with a daffy urban missionary and a crooked politician among the prime suspects. A Chinese man is blamed for the first murder of an Irish girl, because he was seen talking to her and the Irish community frowned on that. What the Irish community weren't told, and didn't care to find out, is that the same murderer had previously killed six Chinese women, and no White person cared. Foltz guesses who really "done it" but she'll have to handle literal dynamite to get the proof.

Historically, it's full of anachronisms, mostly in the way people talk. Victorian Americans did pride themselves on avoiding "ugly words" and saying things like "the excrement rolls downhill," but they didn't have the word "racism," either. (They had "racialism." They thought it meant a good thing, a healthy pride in one's ancestors and their culture.) They did have words for the racism in San Francisco at this time. Without looking it up I've always been under the impression that this was the origin of the cliche "disgrace to the human race." Musgrave subjects us to relatively little of the hatespews, religious bigotry, and misogyny that fill real historical documents of this period, althoug probably enough to curl the modern reader's nose...but then he has Foltz fulminating about "patriarchy" where the original Suffragists said "oppression and slavery." 

Though many people in Victorian San Francisco claimed to be Christians, Musgrave shows us no example of a real, radical Christian--though the need for urban mission work was desperate. I'm sad to say that the reason why I saw so little of San Francisco, during my parents' nomadic years, was that my parents always said they never met any noticeable sincere Christians there, either. So, whether Musgrave is indulging in anti-Christian bias or documenting historical fact is hard to say. The city really was notorious for every kind of vice, crime, and corruption, not for anyone sincerely trying to be a good influence. Probably there were urban missionaries out there and, as with the flaky one in this novel, their good intentions were not accompanied by any great success.

Book Review for 8.5.24: Mojave Crossing

Any time it rains, not even to mention any more dramatic form of Weather, my part of the world is subject to power outages. We really need to break up the whole idea of an electric power grid, to have each household tapping into its own battery storage system rather than frying people's computers all over the county when one pole collapses in one mudslide. I currently have a sad little queue of five electronic devices waiting for the right sort of vehicle to drive up so they can go off to see the wizards, the wonderful wizards of Compuworld. Anyway, during one of these power outages, in July, there was enough sunshine for me to be able to read a paperback novel. Here's the review.

Title: Mojave Crossing 

Author: Louis L'Amour

Date: 1964

Publisher: Bantam

ISBN: 0-553-27690-8 (2001 reprint)

Length: 148 pages

Quote: "Seemed like trouble dogged my tracks wherever I put a foot down, and here was I, heading into strange country, running into a black-eyed woman."

Tell Sackett doesn't tell us his whole story all at once. He left Tennessee to join the Union Army and continued going west. His aversion to the black-eyed woman, travelling under the name Dorinda Robiseau, at first seems to spring from his self-identification as "tall and homely." Later he mentions a woman called Ange who's waiting for him. He doesn't think Dorinda Robiseau is using her original name, he tells us, but he's heard names that sounded stranger than that.

Dorinda is not the ideal trail buddy. She doesn't tell a party of men from town that Tell has gone for water, or that the horses and gold she's watching are his. When they get to a settlement, Dorinda considerably ahead of Tell for obvious reasons, Dorinda seems to be close to an older cousin of Tell's, who tells Tell that she's one of "the great courtesans" who have no feelings about men, who are all about money, but he doesn't care. In one scene Dorinda begs Tell to travel further with her, and "I will love you as you've never been loved." In her next scene she points Tell out to his enemies. She's not a sex worker; she's not even the sort of adventuress "courtesan" was being used to imply. She is a Piece Of Work. 

And Tell's another. Only at the end of the book does he reveal why Dorinda, adventuress though she is, has such intense and mixed feelings about him. I don't want to spoil all the suspense, but let's just say that Tell deserves the sort of trail buddy Dorinda's shown herself to be. 

There are the obligatory number of bad men who have to be killed. However, the challenges of travelling across Southern California at this period gets more attention than the fight scenes. Louis L'Amour tells readers what fun he had tracing Tell's course across what became Beverly Hills and Hollywood. If you've ever wanted to visualize that part of California free of its "people-lution," you'll enjoy Mojave Crossing.

Monday, February 12, 2024

Book Review: Sleepless Morris

Title: Sleepless Morris 

Author: Audrey Walker

Date: 2020

Quote: "I cough as another car passes by, blowing dust and fumes onto me."

Detective Morris is on the trail of some very clever, sneaky, and vicious criminals. He's taking all the dust and fumes and grime and garbage into his aging self, moving his longsuffering family from one "safe house" to another, trying to keep his junior partner, Shelby Griffin, safe in the office where the Fictional Los Angeles police department need her. 

Er. Um. This short novel, though complete in itself, is a prequel to an ongoing series of adventures of Shelby Griffin

It violates one of the rules of detective stories that you probably need to be Arthur Conan Doyle to mess with: Detective stories end with a safe, satisfied detective and a criminal behind bars. Detective stories are supposed to be cozy and reassuring in the end, because criminals are caught and justice is served. Detective stories are not supposed to feature detectives who get beaten up in the pursuit of Mr. Bad Man only to confront the immediate retribution of his heir--say a daughter, Miss Bad Girl, all inflamed by having been exposed to feminism without having developed a conscience, out to prove that she can be an even more brutal gang leader than her father was.

It will take a woman detective to defeat Baddie Collins' horrible daughter, in this series. Shelby Griffin can't be kept out of the conflict. The question is whether Morris, or his family, can survive.  Morris suffers, in this book. Lots of pain. Will he really die by torture to protect Griffin? Not entirely. He has a wife, whose name he mentions but whom he doesn't speak to in this story, to protect as well. 

This is not a cozy, cheering mystery nor does it end with a detective promoted, admired, and purring by his (daily cleaned and checked) fireplace. It's a good choice if you want to build your sense of sympathy for the good police officers Out There, as it might be after having had to deal with a not so good one.

Monday, January 15, 2024

New Book Review for 1.10.24: The Bassist Gets Snowed In

Title: The Bassist Gets Snowed In 

Author: Carla Krae

Date: 2022

Publisher: Willowick

Quote: "What kind of moron came up to the mountains in a leather jacket, a sweater, and jeans? He had a guitar case, too."

And he just couldn't bear to let the snow ruin that guitar case, having driven up into the mountains in an old vehicle, which of course broke down, in a pre-Christmas blizzard. The kind of moron who does that is commonly called an Angeleno. (They don't have good heat in their rides, either, because air conditioning is more important in Los Angeles. There are related species in Florida and Texas.) 

The kind of moron who takes pity on a man's guitar case, lets him sleep inside the house, and finds him too attractive to allow him to sleep alone, is commonly called a young widow. I despise them. They give all young widows a bad name. Much as we hate sleeping alone, we do not all throw ourselves at any male that passes by. Many young widows have self-control. I met twenty-some other men and waited through a month of strictly business acquaintance before I kissed the other man I've kissed since becoming a widow. I mention this to explain why I find characters like Jen, in this novel, annoying.

But it's a romance, so instead of taking advantage of the young widow and fleeing back to the big city, telling all his band buddies about his lucky escape from the desperate widow who took advantage of his vulnerability on the night of the blizzard, they keep on spending weekends together, tearing off each other's clothes first and then calming down and going out on dates like civilized adults later, for most of a year and then marry each other. That sort of thing happens in romance novels.

Lavish and what some may find off-putting references to body parts means this novel is officially recommended to adults only. I'll go further. Only to readers who have been married long enough to feel a need to spend time remembering their first half-dozen nights of married love. 

Friday, September 1, 2023

Book Review: Outland

 Title: Outland

Author: Mary Austin

Date: 1919

Publisher: Boni & Liveright

ISBN: none

Quote: “There were some other landmarks I was quite as sure of at the time, but the creek makes so many turns here I could never find them again.”

I downloaded this book from Gutenberg.org. If you’re online, you can read, print, or download it too, paying only printing expenses. If you’re not, I’ll print a copy for you at cost.

It’s a fantasy—not the “high” Tolkien variety. Mona, the narrator, and Herman, her fiancé, go for a walk in the woods and encounter two mysterious tribes of primitive people who are quarrelling with each other over a legendary buried treasure. Taken hostage, they get to know the tribesmen just well enough to regret what happens to them in the end.

Though Austin describes her “Outlanders” in ways that suggest that they strayed into North America from Europe, she gives them customs, like the memory-erasing potion, drawn from Native American traditions.


Sunday, August 27, 2023

Book Review: Rivers of Gold

Title: Redeeming Love

Author: Francine Rivers

Date: 1997

Publisher: Multnomah

ISBN: 1-59052-513-2

Length: 464 pages

Quote: “Angel moved out of his embrace and looked up at the stars. It made her uncomfortable when he started talking about God.”

One of Francine Rivers’ literary inspirations for this historical romance was the odd fact that “Angel,” not a particularly popular given name in the mid-nineteenth century, was a common street name used ironically by prostitutes. In that context it suggested the youngest, prettiest, and/or blondest “white slave” in a house. “Michael” was not a very popular given name at this period, either; names taken from the Old Testament or the keywords in Bible texts, which were popular with the early Puritans, tended to identify people with ultraconservative religious groups in the nineteenth century. Rivers’ character, Michael Hosea, was not brought up in that sort of tradition so his name suggests that he chose it after being disinherited, identifying with a religious group rather than his family, though no such group is named in the text. Anyway, he feels called by God to rescue the most wretched prostitute who ever kept her health in the Gold Rush to San Francisco. Her street name is Angel. Only toward the end of a melodrama worthy of its period, during which Michael offers Angel three or four alternative names that don’t quite fit, will Angel tell him her original given name.

Angel’s pathetic mother “loved” someone else’s husband and was banned from “Christian” society for getting caught—refusing to abort or sell the “by-blow” of their doomed romance. If not quite the period of greatest prejudice against women in legitimate employment (but close), the 1830s were still a period of extreme prejudice against “bad” women, i.e. single mothers. Angel’s mother came to a miserable end with only one friend, a male “guardian” (in the nineteenth century women who weren’t living with their husbands or fathers had to have legal “guardians,” like children) who was “not bright” enough to do more harm to Angel’s mother than she did to herself. This man, whom Angel was taught to call Uncle Rab, apparently believed he was accepting money from a rich “gentleman” who wanted to adopt a daughter.

Oh yeah. Right. He was selling Angel to a sadistic pedophile who, among other things, deliberately set her up for a night with her own father.

In 1850, surely the peak of the French Socialist ideal of strict gender roles, Angel wouldn’t have been considered attractive if she’d been physically or mentally capable of taking care of herself. Though her slavery was not enforced by official law, she was for all practical purposes the slave of her evil guardians, whose street names (all Angel was allowed to know about them) were Duke and Duchess. They weren’t married to each other and didn’t admit being acquainted. Duke trained his little Angel to hate sex until she looked old enough to interest normal men. Escaping from his house, she reached San Francisco and was promptly recruited by Duchess, who promised her twenty percent of her earnings and paid less, in exchange for “protection” by a goon called Magowan. He’s not otherwise characterized as Irish and was probably given the only Irish name in this novel because it seemed more plausible than just calling him “my goon.” It didn’t take Angel long to learn that Magowan’s job description included breaking the bones of any of Duchess’s “girls” who asked for their money.

But, before Magowan started beating Angel up, she’d met Michael, who felt called to pay for time just to tell her that he felt God had called him to offer her marriage as a way of escape from her horrible life. Though Angel turned him down, he was in the neighborhood in time to stop the beating when it started, give Duchess all his money to “buy” Angel, and haul her off to his farm with only a dislocated shoulder, four broken ribs, a cracked collarbone, and a concussion. Understandably, Angel does not bond with him; she stays long enough to learn some housekeeping skills and goes back to San Francisco, paying his hostile brother Paul with a quick, overtly hateful sex act for a lift into town. But San Francisco is still too uncivilized to offer much of a market for housekeepers. Angel goes back to work as a prostitute on slightly better terms. But Michael Hosea still “saw her...as the nameless child who had been broken and was still lost.”

This, apart from the basic fact of its being a credible imitation of a Real Victorian Melodrama, is my main criticism of the book. Romance readers like to feel sorry for a sweet, pathetic “child” who’s been led or pushed into sinning, suffering, and repenting. If you want to shed sympathizing tears over Angel’s emotional reactions to every kind of abuse Rivers can either describe or leave to your imagination, and identify with the friends who help her finish growing up, Redeeming Love will give you opportunities to do that. If you like a big fat romance novel with lots of ups and downs, separations and reconciliations, and the sound of a real local legend about it, Redeeming Love is for you. But Rivers insists that her novel is a remake of the biblical book of Hosea, and it's not.

In the biblical book of Hosea, there’s nothing special about the names of Gomer (“the end,” “complete,” “finished,” a name for what tired parents hope will be the last baby) the daughter of Diblaim (“raisin cakes,” probably his stock in trade) except that they’re the names of working people, not especially religious. Gomer is simply a party animal. Slavery was legal in ancient Israel; most female slaves were domestic drudges, but some probably were prostituted; Gomer, however, sells herself for liquor and luxuries, buys more of those on credit, and becomes enslaved only by running up debts to support her party lifestyle. Scholars often think the names of her children describe her marriage to Hosea. Her first child is called Jezreel, a town name that was sometimes used as a man’s name, translated as “God will scatter (the Canaanites out of this city, making room for the Israelites).” Then she gives birth to Loammi, which was not a normal name but the words for “not my people,” and Loruhamah, which was also not a standard name but the words for “no mercy.” People hearing children introduced as “God will scatter, no mercy, not my people” would have wondered what those names meant. Though Hosea explained with a warning sermon about the sins of his nation, many people still believe that he must also have suspected that at least Loammi and Loruhamah were not his children.

Then Gomer left Hosea, not because she was a slave or because his relatives disapproved of her, but just in pursuit of more of her idea of fun—wine and revelry. She was popular, according to the second chapter of Hosea’s book, “beloved of her friends,” not a pathetic friendless outcast. Her other men were not followers of the One True God or believers in Committed Monogamous Relationships. She and Hosea weren’t rich. Hosea may or may not have realized that his wife’s prostitution was funding their vines and fig trees, maybe even his barley fields, until he realized that the woman was participating in the rituals of the Baal-cult with her other men. It might have been the public shame of her idolatry, rather than the private humiliation of her adultery, that caused him to throw her out. At this period married couples did not necessarily live in one house—rich people might occupy their different properties, while poor people might still be living in separate tents—so it was up to each one to deliver the products of their labor to each other. Thus Hosea records himself telling the children, “Plead with your mother, plead...lest I...set her like a dry land and slay her with thirst.” He tried to sober up his wife simply by cutting off her supply of wine. She left. And it didn’t take her long to drink her way down from self-prostitution to slavery.

And there their personal story ends. Before his listeners or readers got restless, asking “What has this to do with us?”, Hosea moved on to his prophetic messages about public affairs, which were what he was paid to proclaim, write, and publish. He used the apparent failure of his marriage as a metaphor for how God must feel toward straying, sinning believers. The metaphor served him well enough that preachers continued to use it for centuries. Jesus blessed it by identifying Himself as the Bridegroom of Israel. Though many people want to believe that the success of Hosea’s book had something to do with people’s seeing hope illustrated in Hosea’s reconciliation with Gomer, no such scene is included in the book or in any contemporary book. We are eloquently told that he wanted to forgive her as he assured people that God would forgive them, if and when they sought forgiveness. Hosea deserved a happy ending, if ever a man did. But addictions are not cured by romantic love alone, and we can’t be sure that that reconciliation ever happened.

The Bible writers did describe some characters in such ways that we can imagine their sins to be mere reactions to hurt feelings, behavior patterns that love might actually have straightened out. Tamar, whose (strictly limited and actually legal) act of prostitution was blessed with mention in the bloodline of the kings of Israel and thus of Jesus, was one of them; she was clearly motivated not by lust for sex, money, or alcohol but by economic necessity. Shimei, whose treasonous “cursing at” King David was pardoned, might be another one; he might have been motivated by a conservative mind, a loyalty to poor mad King Saul. Zacchaeus, the “little” tax collector who didn’t dare try to find a place in the front of the audience but climbed a tree in order to be able to see Jesus, undoubtedly suffered from shame, guilt, and insecurity. The Samaritan woman at the well, whose name the pious disciples probably never found out, and the woman who washed Jesus’ feet with her tears, whose name they probably withheld from the record at her children’s request, are two more characters who are often chosen as examples of people whose sins stem from “hurts” that Jesus could “heal” through love alone.

But our sinful natures are not merely the products of loss or lack of feelings of being loved, much as some people might want to believe they are. They are primarily the products of selfishness, stubbornness, and wilful stupidity. Gomer did not leave Hosea because he didn’t love her, because she thought her other men did, or because she was too badly “hurt” to accept love; she left him because she wanted silver and gold and flagons of wine. She was not a “wounded child”; she was a drug whore. There may be a wounded child within every drug whore, but comforting that “inner child” alone has yet to break the addiction.

That is what inspired Hosea’s declarations of love. Hosea had the ability to buy Gomer, after she’d sold herself enough times that her price had dropped to a level he could afford, and bring her home and stop giving her wine. As a prophet of God he had the ability to forgive her and love her as an example of God’s forgiving love for sinful people. But he could only realize the reconciliation he was offering after Gomer accepted it and chose to change her behavior, and we don’t know whether she ever did. .

Rivers offers her readers that happy ending, but the way she gets to it is a work of sentimental fiction, with little resemblance to Hosea’s book.

For people who like long melodramatic romances—which I don’t, actually, apart from Jane Eyre, Gone with the Wind, and JubileeRedeeming Love is the kind of thing they like. There were in fact women who organized missions to help other women in the nineteenth century, and the end of Redeeming Love reads as if it were fictionalized from one of their stories. There’s even a stomach-settling sprinkle of real feminism in Angel’s last trip to San Francisco. I would just like this novel a great deal better if Rivers had left the book of Hosea out of it, and admitted that a true prophet probably understood his own wife’s sins better than Leo Buscaglia could do.

Then there’s the final confrontation with Duke. It won’t satisfy those looking for revenge porn, but it does seem likely to thrill and encourage those looking for hope that they’ll be able to defeat their demons in a thoroughly Christian, nonviolent way. Mere feminism, uninformed by faith, would want to see Angel collect all the money he owes her. I think readers will agree that the triumph Rivers gives her, instead, is worth all the gold in California. 

Tuesday, August 15, 2023

Book Review: Land of Little Rain

Title: Land of Little Rain

Author: Mary Austin

Date: 1903

Publisher: Houghton Mifflin

ISBN: none

Quote: “The county where you may ahve sight and touch fot hat which is writte lies between the high Sierras south from Yosemite—east and south over a very great assemblag eof broken ranges beyond Deaht Valley, and on illimitaby intot he Mojave Desert.”

I downloaded this book from Gutenberg.org. If you’re online, you can read, print, or download it too, paying only printing expenses. If you’re not, I’ll print a copy for you at cost.

Mary Austin wrote several novels and is usually remembered for her poetry. (She dared to be trendy, writing poems patterned with thoughts but not sounds, like the translatiosn of Native American poems she had studied.) Gutenberg.org has made several of her books available again, and after comparison, this is the one of her e-books I like best. It’s a nonfiction account of the stories Mary Austin collected in the Southwest—“Western”adventure stories, Native American stories, and Austin’s own stories of what she saw—coyotes, cattle, quail, buzzards, wildflowers. Frantic topophilia.

Austin’s intended audience were “armchair travellers,”and if you like a book that takes your mind on a tour of a different time and place, this is one. If you’ve never been through this part of the continent you may recognize places and wildlife from the old “Bonanza”TV series; no Cartwrights, who were later inventions, but canyons (Austin wrote “cañon”) and bighorns, chamiso and Shoshones. If you don’t care for the melodramas, shootouts, and boy-clique orientation of “Western”movies and TV shows but enjoy watching them for the landscapes and horses, this book is for you.


 

Sunday, January 8, 2023

Cell Phone Stupidity in California

I'm not sure what to say about today's topic, Gentle Readers. 

Sunday's e-mail brought news of a plan being seriously proposed, in Southern California, to put more cell phone towers right in people's private yards. (The e-mail didn't mention whether all of these people live in private houses, or live in apartment towers, which would be even worse.) 

Earthquakes are going to destroy California some day, but for now, most of the time, most of the earthquakes are only a nuisance. What actually kill Californians and destroy their homes are fires. Every year they have fires that, as the state's become more densely populated, threaten more homes and harm more people. 

Some of those fires start from cell phone towers.

If I were going to put up a cell phone tower in California I'd want it to be surrounded by half a mile of treeless desert in all directions. I'd want fences to keep tumbleweeds out of that desert.

Yet, to enable more of the annoying stupidphone culture everyone hates so much, these people want to put cell phone towers in the places where the burned-out shade tree used to be? In schoolyards, on the baseball fields? 

I don't know what they were thinking. I don't know what they were drinking. I don't know how they propose to fund this, or what alternative funding plans the correspondents mentioned. 

I know that as a taxpayer I do not want my income tax dollars spent to fund anything cell-phone-related, because the cell phone industry has already died of greed and deserves no form of support from anyone.

I know that...as a human being I, personally, am not really affected by the destruction of houses in California, but I have emotional feelings about it. I have a feeling that I'd be less of a human being if I didn't have those feelings. I don't want Californians or their homes to burn. And I don't think Californians do, either, when they're sober. Even if, when they've had a few, they sit around discussing with their neighbors how much nicer some other neighborhood was when it was desert, they have to know that fires spread.

I think Californians would be better off if they limited their use of cell phones to the kinds for which they pay per minute, which teaches them to use cell phones just to meet face to face for the actual conversation. That way they wouldn't need so many fire-hazard cell phone towers, and although increasing population would increase the damage fires do, at least the total number of fires would not increase.

Here are excerpts from the e-mail: 

"

On Jan. 10, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (Board) will vote on changes to Titles 16 and 22 of the L.A. County Code. If the proposed changes pass, wireless facilities will be installed without any prior notice, public hearing or opportunity to appeal — without fire or safety scrutiny and without regard to critical environmental protections. 

We need you to stand up for our allies in L.A. by urging the Board to vote NO on the proposed changes and to safeguard due process rights.

"

"

Tell the L.A. County Board of Supervisors to safeguard due process rights by voting NO to the proposed changes to Titles 16 and 22 of the L.A. County Code. Complete the form below, submit a public comment here (agenda item 59) and call their offices to demand the following protections:

  • Safeguard Due Process Rights: The radiation emitted from cell towers is not safe for humans or the environment. Therefore, the placement of antennas is a matter of urgent public interest. Cutting off debate, eliminating public input and ignoring environmental laws (including CEQA) is unjustified...
  • Protect Us From Telecom Wildfires: In the last 15 years, there have been four major Southern California wildfires initiated, in whole or in part, by telecommunications equipment. Cell tower fires are electrical fires that firefighters cannot fight until the grid is cut, which can take up to 60 minutes. Cell tower placement close to homes or schools may not allow enough time for escape in the event of a fire. The proposed revisions enable cell towers to be too close to homes, schools and daycare centers.
  • Stick to Facts: In case of emergency, should there be a loss of electricity, 911 calls would depend solely upon the macro towers that receive backup power per the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Order. The claim that hundreds of new small cell antennas are required for 911 calls is false and should not be used as an argument for the amendments.
"

The numbers and acronyms above should mean something to Angelenos. They don't mean anything to me. It's not appropriate for me to comment on yourall's county boards' agendas.

It is appropriate for me to say this much:

1. California readers, you have two days to burn up the Internet with this issue. Keep those phone lines jamming. Blitz your officials' e-mail in-boxes with short, polite, link-free, hand-typed e-mails that the robots won't block. Print your messages and stuff them under the door. If you can organize small groups of responsible adults to pack into the meeting hall until someone mutters about fire hazards, when you can politely and reasonably say "Fire hazards! That's what we're here about! We want you to vote out some fire hazards!", do that too

2. All readers, please join my town in shutting down the stupidphones. Let the companies know that, if you continue to carry a cell phone, it needs to have a small screen that displays letters and numbers only, no pictures, no Internet, no fancy apps. If you own a stupidphone, don't drop it on the ground or into water, because it will ooze toxic chemicals. Keep it in a drawer and use it as an emergency flashlight only.

3. If you anticipate using someone else's stupidphone or computer, carry an electronic stylus. Never touch a screen with your hands. It's ugly and unsanitary and it encourages snoops to build spyware that traces people through fingerprint scanning, which is an unwarranted search in violation of people's constitutional rights.

Wednesday, March 16, 2022

Book Review: Esperanza Rising

Today's book review is brought to you by three of the most photogenic beagles on the East Coast. The Petfinder pages for some of these dogs are unreal. "Send us a begging, pleading letter and maybe we'll get back to you at our convenience to discuss selling you a pup that resembles the picture for $500"? Who do these shelter people think they are? Whom are they saving these allegedly homeless beagles for--Fauci? The fact that I rejected some pictures from consideration, because the pages looked so phishy, in no way implies that the purported rescuers of the selected dogs are legitimate or will not be collecting and selling any information you give them. Nor does it imply that they won't try to charge fees more appropriate for, say, 18-karat gold jewelry than for stray dogs. Anyway beagles are cute.


Zipcode 10101, New York
: Copper is described as a four-year-old, forty-pound male who's already been neutered and vaccinated, good with other dogs. He is available for "foster" care or adoption. His Petfinder page is https://www.petfinder.com/dog/copper-54805537/ny/ozone-park/heavenly-angels-animal-rescue-ny1047/ .


Zipcode 20202, Washington, D.C.: Shelby is described as also being about four years old, a 32-pound female in search of a permanent home. "Her $350 fee includes vaccinations and spaying" so it might not be outrageous; ask your vet about the cost of those operations for a dog found in a less expensive neighborhood than Potomac. Her Petfinder page is https://www.petfinder.com/dog/shelby-54956952/md/potomac/petconnect-rescue-md250/ .


Zipcode 30303, Atlanta: At the county shelter, all the staff have found time to post about little "Bagel Bite" is that she's a small female puppy. Small size could mean large price since the veterinary care is still ahead. They have other beagle puppies, a younger litter so small that most of their photos haven't even been posted yet, and adult and senior dogs as well...my guess is that this shelter will be very reasonable about letting you pick one of a wide selection of future Best Friends. Contact Bagel Bite's caretakers at https://www.petfinder.com/dog/bagel-bite-54976201/ga/atlanta/fulton-county-animal-services-ga217/ .

Meanwhile, back at the Cat Sanctuary, the Bad Neighbor succeeded in killing some kittens with his poison spray. Other things can go wrong with kittens besides glyphosate, but no, it's not only a coincidence that kittens who seemed healthy before I felt a glyphosate reaction beginning were dead a few hours later. I went out to bury one baby kitten and when I came in one of its litter mates had crawled out of its warm nest and died. 

During the cold snap four of Serena's kittens (she gave birth to six, four born alive) and two of Silver's (she gave birth to five, all premature, one dead, one gruesomely defective) came into the warm room, and I didn't leave. Serena is hostile to the idea of being in a cage but she and Silver behaved perfectly in the office, staying with their babies and venturing out only to summon me for valid reasons. I didn't want to jeopardize this relationship of love and trust by confining the cats where they couldn't feel desperate and look for their own solutions to any problems that might have arisen. So at the other end of the office I brooded over the kittens almost as much as the cats did. Today was warm enough for the kittens--only five, one of Silver's didn't make it--to be returned to their original nest where the cats can come and go. So I finally ventured out again. It wasn't raining when I walked down to the road, but started raining after I joined a car pool and is raining heavily as I type. It had rained earlier in the morning; I'm praying that the rain had washed the glyphosate vapor out of the air so there'll still be five living kittens when I come home. Their eyes aren't open yet but they're starting to crawl around and sniff at their mothers' tracks when left alone. 

The good news, if there is any: All animals that have been studied can react to glyphosate, but dogs seem to be the species least likely to show immediate unmistakable symptoms. (Which is why those corporate labs found it so profitable to extrapolate their estimated safe level of exposure for humans from what seemed like a nearly-safe level of exposure for dogs. Big mistake. Humans in my part of the world show a range of reactions much more similar to rabbits'.)

Now, today's book:

Title: Esperanza Rising

Author: Pam Muñoz Ryan

Date: 2000

Publisher: Scholastic

ISBN: 0-439-57617-2

Length: 253 pages of text plus 9-page historical note and 2 pages of discussion questons

Illustrations by Joe Cepeda

Quote: “‘Your uncles are very powerful and corrupt,’ said Alfonso. ‘They can make things difficult for anyone who tries to help you.’”

Esperanza was a happy little rich girl up into her teen years. Then her father died, and her uncles wanted Esperanza and her mother and grandmother to go away and let them take over her father’s land. So they went to California and became poor laborers.

This historical novel is written to be accessible to middle school children. There’s a hint, but only an age-appropriate hint, of a sweet romance between thirteen-year-old Esperanza and sixteen-year-old Miguel. In Mexico, although they were close, her father’s being his father’s employer put “a river” of social prejudice between them. In California both are poor, and looked down on by everyone outside the labor camp where they live, so they’re free to...enjoy holding hands and thinking about their future.

They won’t always be poor, any more than they’ll always be teenagers, Muñoz Ryan wants us to know. This is a fictionalized reconstruction of her grandmother’s story; the tendency for grandmothers to tell grandchildren about their Teen Romances, if any, when such romances involved the children’s grandfathers, may tell us what Esperanza’s and Miguel’s future will be, but Ryan never specifically tells us so.

Efforts have been made to market history to specific ethnic groups only. This, I think, is a mistake. History is for everybody. Esperanza Rising deserves a place beside Caddie Woodlawn, Johnny Tremain, or Little House on the Prairie. Let middle school students choose their own favorites and their ability to cross gender, ethnic, and regional boundaries may surprise teachers. Sometimes even teenagers like stories that work like windows rather than trying to work like mirrors. 

Thursday, May 24, 2018

Dear Stanford Students: Why I'm Not a Vegan

Dear Stanford Students...

Of all the paid survey sites I’ve found...Yougov has separate sites in other countries that operate by other rules, but Yougov US is the best survey site. They don’t collect personal information; they don’t use up your cell phone minutes or allow anyone else to do; they don’t sell your contact information to spammers; they don’t waste your time, as many sites do, loading screen after screen of personal questions and then telling you you’re not in the right demographic group to take the actual survey. Your Yougov demographic information is stored and used to filter surveys so you only open surveys for which you get points. They’re legitimate; if you don’t shop much it can take months to earn a giftcard, but they do deliver those cards. (I took one to Michaels again last week.) If you’ve not already joined Yougov, you can join all by yourself, but both you and I get points if you join using this link.


Because they don’t exploit and abuse respondents, or demand information that respondents are going to falsify, Yougov is trusted by polling companies too. When I saw that Stanford students were using a Yougov survey to do a research project, I was chuffed. Yougov has arrived!

The actual project, however, left me with more to say than a survey form has room for, and I think it’s worth a post.

First of all, I don’t know whether a confrontational, judgmental approach was what the students intended. If it wasn’t, they must be awfully young students, and I recommend that they read Business Speak before they next communicate with full-grown adults.

Fun fact: Elgin didn't like the original cover of Business Speak and reworked the second edition into (almost) a different book, to go with its different title.

The survey began by asking participants to watch a very icky live video of the slaughter of animals for meat.

Fair disclosure: I’ve never been the one who went out and killed the steer or the rooster, but many’s the time I’ve cut up and cleaned his body. I know where meat comes from. If it’s fit to eat, it comes from a young healthy animal who was enjoying life before he was killed, probably by someone he’d always considered a friend. If the animal was not killed by a close friend at his home, however, he probably spent his last days in a filthy, crowded slaughterhouse, where he was undoubtedly exposed to contagious diseases and probably overdosed with antibiotics, may have been injured in a fight over crowded standing space, and was probably fed hormones at doses that probably made him feel sick. He wouldn’t be used for human food if he’d reached a stage where cancer became visible, but he may have had cancer. Slaughterhouses use machines to kill animals; they’re supposed to be humane and efficient, but if the animal wiggles about they may be inefficient and disgusting. And, in another shocking disclosure, all babies are made by adults doing things adults have told you not to do or think about.

After watching the video the survey proceeded to ask how often respondents eat different kinds of food, including the meat of which we’d just watched the ugliest moments of the commercial production. Then it asked whether our plans to eat those meat products had changed as a result of watching the video. If not, why not?

This is very similar to the “How could you...” vap discussed in Business Speak (new link for a newer edition). It’s a valid question, and since the questions pop up on a computer screen there’s no obnoxious spoken intonation to identify the “How could you” verbal attack. The words “how could you” weren’t actually used. Nevertheless, the effect of the survey was a lot closer to “How could you do such a horrible thing!” than to “If you (or ‘some people’) intended to do X, how could you/they address or accomplish Y?”

Partly that was because the survey included a few teenybopper questions like “Are you aware of the concept of eating less meat as a way to protest the disgusting, unhealthy, inhumane practices of the commercial slaughterhouses?”

Oh, children...I can’t imagine a literate adult not being aware of that concept. It’s older than I am; I’m only about fifty. When I was a child we never bought chicken at the grocery store. We ate chicken at family gatherings, where one of my older cousins would go out and call one of his tame animals into the back yard and kill it. We didn’t buy chicken from people who weren’t as kind to their fowl as we were. “Why Your Daddy Turned Down the Job at the Commercial Chicken Farm” used to be a bedtime story my mother told my brother and me.

I’ve phased in and out of being vegan. My body does not absorb protein from wheat; some years it seems to be getting enough protein from rice and beans and peanuts, some years not. Currently I buy chicken, turkey, and sometimes fish, when I can afford them, for the bonding ritual of Sharing My Own Food With the Cats. Often the cats eat kibble and I eat beans or nuts. I don’t complicate my life with any commitment to be a full-time vegan, but I have vegan days.

Because I’m one of those who find it easier to follow a McDougall-type diet (more complex carbs, less protein, minimal fat) than an Atkins-type diet (more protein, fewer carbs, lots of fat), I could be tempted to agree with Dr. John McDougall that a plant-based diet is The Way (for everyone) To Go. Research shows that either a McDougall diet or an Atkins diet is better than the restaurant-food diet advertisers want to sell us, either may work for some people, and neither works for all people. Grandma Bonnie Peters has been happily “McDougalling” for many years but some people say they become listless and depressed when they go vegan. I refer those people to Dr. McDougall, who will tell them to go ahead and have a fat-and-protein “feast” once or twice a month if they feel the need, but if I’ve learned one thing from the celiac gene it’s that humans are diverse. We are not all designed to eat the same things.

These recipes will lure carnivores over to the vegan table. And I can tweak this diet, easily, into something that works for me--though it's not cheap. I feel no need to lay a guilt trip on those who say they can't.

Human bodies run on different types of fuel. A majority of humans can digest wheat efficiently, as long as it’s natural wheat, not soaked in glyphosate, as most wheat sold today has been. A majority of humans can digest cow’s milk efficiently only in early childhood. The minority genes for the opposite of these traits occur separately, but in an overlapping area, in Britain and Western Europe. The “strong form” of the celiac gene fairly well proves descent from certain specific families in Ireland. There are also genes for about half a dozen specific patterns of alcohol intolerance, of which the most common is found in a majority of both Irish and Native American populations, suggesting that those ethnic groups weren’t separated as widely for as long as many people think. Some people think there are genes for fat tolerance, too. Some have even found correlations between food tolerance and blood type, and recommended four different types of diet...Much remains to be learned. I feel perky on a low-fat vegan diet, and so do all the people I’ve known well who’ve tried one. That’s no guarantee that other people will.

However, what we know about Stone Age cultures suggests that more humans are likely to have evolved to live mostly on plant products than to need a high-protein, high-fat diet. The explosion of “eating disorders” in the mid-twentieth century reflected several things; one of them was that many bodies instinctively rejected the high-protein, high-fat diet that had been “scientifically” recommended to American families based on the proportion that worked best for rats. Most of our metabolisms are not that much like rats’.

What I believe is really unhealthy is our cultural tolerance for Food Bullies who think everyone should eat the same thing. If people want to make it their mission to change the way Americans eat, I’d recommend that as the problem they should tackle. How can we become a culture where a conversation like,

A: “No, thanks.”

B: “Why not? It’s good! It’s good for you! Much healthier than that stuff I’ve seen you eat...”

—generates universal agreement that B should not be allowed to eat at the same table with other humans. People need to tune out this kind of obnoxious “peer pressure” and pay attention to what works for their bodies.

I don’t like bacon. I’ve observed living hogs and felt that, like possums, hogs are animals I don’t care to touch, dead or alive. I’ll agree that pork fat, like cat urine, smells yucky in its natural state but yummy when it just starts to burn, when some of its chemical components carbonize. The rich aroma of sizzling bacon doesn’t make me want to eat it, any more than the rich aroma of charring cat cage liners makes me want to eat those. If you enjoy bacon, fine. You can have my share of it. Just don’t ask me why I don’t want it, because I don’t want to become the sort of person who talks about this kind of thing at the breakfast table, and I will.

My body is my own. Your body is your own. None of us should ever allow anybody to tell us what to eat. Information about nutrients generally, and food contamination alerts, and recipes, are fine...but don’t even think about telling me how bad something that doesn’t make me sick is “for me,” and how I should be eating something that does make me sick, instead, even if it works for you.

A primary reason why I’m not a full-time vegan is that I do belong to one of those Irish families that have the gene for full-blown celiac sprue, which is even yuckier than it sounds. I can’t eat anything containing any form of wheat, or any kind of cheese, without being sick. Any exposure to glyphosate makes me sick. As a result the list of things I can safely eat has become very short, in recent years, and I’m not about to add any optional boycotts to a list of dietary restrictions that’s already unnecessarily, and non-negotiably, very long.

Ask anyone who’s been successfully living with the celiac gene during the past twenty years, and I’m sure you’ll get the same answer. If the people who raise food we can eat, without immediate physical distress, also run an abortion clinic so they can burn fetal tissue on their backyard grill and dance around it howling “Hail Satan,” probably most of us are going to continue buying from them. It would be nicer to buy more food from a nice local farm, but since Big Government has handed Big Agriculture enough regulations to strangle all the ones we used to know, we’ll probably continue buying from the Satanists. That’s just a fact of life these days.

I liked this book. I recommend it...to non-celiacs. I also blame it for 90% of all the unhappiness in my childhood, which came from constantly trying to eat things I was not built to digest and consequently feeling sick.

I first read Diet for a Small Planet in grade two. I learned all about how, if everyone on Earth could eat bread and cheese, there’d be enough for everyone who was alive in 1970 to eat bread and cheese every day. Nice theoretical thought! The fact is that everyone on Earth can’t eat bread and cheese. The majority of humans worldwide can’t eat dairy products, and celiacs can’t eat wheat products. For me bread and cheese is poison. I might as well try making lunch out of D-Con sprinkled with Sevin Dust. And I’m sure you food bullies would just love to discuss how bread and cheese affect my body right at your lunch table. Not.

I went to a Seventh-Day Adventist college. They used to serve those Worthington and Loma Linda soybean loaves and sausages and so on, at almost every meal. I ate those things. I liked them. In those days the soy wasn’t saturated with glyphosate and I had no idea that the wheat was what was making me so ill. It was the 1980s; we thought minor illness was psychosomatic and the cure was to deny it and push yourself to act perky. I denied, I pushed, I acted perky, I crashed and burned. I had mononucleosis for most of two dang years and, having been in Michigan when I got that disease, I hadn’t even kissed anybody. Mono is caused by a virus, and the strain that contaminated a batch of vaccine (that I didn’t need) against a trivial disease (that I’d already had) in Michigan was a particularly nasty virus, but I’m sure that that “healthy” wheat-based diet contributed to my “chronic mononucleosis, opportunistic hepatitis” experience.

I have lived through a lot of unnecessary pain that was caused by allowing anyone outside my own body to tell me what I “should” eat. At least I’ve learned, thoroughly, that there is no single diet for the whole planet. People are different. People absorb different protein in different ways. People have evolved to live in different places where different foodstuffs grow. I can safely eat some things, like (unpoisoned, non-GMO) peanuts, that are poisonous to some people. Some people can safely eat some things, like wheat, that are poisonous to me.

North America has long been, and is still, a place where delicious, nutritious vegetables grow well. Our problem is that big industrial-model farms want to nurture pest species by monocropping and try to control them by spraying poison on them. Possibly Americans would eat more vegetables if we hadn’t had reactions to the poisons humans have added to those vegetables. I like garbanzos, but since they’re often planted in glyphosate-drenched soil in rotation with wheat, I can’t eat very many garbanzos very often. I love strawberries, but since they have no peel to speak of and soak up poisons sprayed into the air like little sponges, I have to plan around the possibility of being sick for a few days after eating strawberries. I like corn, but when it’s been genetically modified to be more like wheat so that it can be saturated with glyphosate, I know better than to expect corn to like me.

Animals eat poisoned plant-derived food, so meat isn’t safe either...but generally the ratio of glyphosate to food is still considerably lower in meat than it is in grains and beans. In recent years, as farmers have been encouraged to spray this particular poison right on food, Americans who like vegetables are being conditioned to avoid vegetables, and eat more meat, by our own bodies.

I inherited the “strong” form of the celiac gene. I have that in common with approximately one of every ten thousand people of Irish descent and, for all practical purposes, nobody in any other ethnic group. A “weak” form can be traced back to other parts of western Europe, including Iceland and Italy, but it’s still a minority gene. Since glyphosate spraying and GMO crops have become common, though, we’re reading that one out of five, one out of four, even one out of three North Americans, not necessarily even those of Western European descent, are having celiac-like reactions to wheat, soy, and other glyphosate-soaked foodstuffs. Those people don’t always have any idea what’s making them sick, nor are their symptoms necessarily easy to identify as celiac-like. They just know they’re chronically hungry, chronically malnourished, chronically dyspeptic, and if they switch from eating more meat to eating more grain they’re much more of those things. 

I do not like this diet plan at all, but it works for some people.

So we have the Atkins Diet. Reading an Atkins Diet menu makes me queasy but some people choke down their turkey sandwich with mayonnaise and milk for lunch and then their beef jerky for a snack and then their porkchop for dinner, and they feel better than if they’d eaten a peanut butter sandwich with strawberries, a V-8 for a snack, and a big salad full of sunflower seeds for dinner. I imagine that that would not have been the case before 1990 but it is the case today. Even people who enjoyed being vegans before 1990 are getting sick after enjoying a delicious, comforting, vegan meal like Mother used to make, today.

No doctor, Euell Gibbons didn't even follow the special diet he needed, didn't live very long...but his "wild foods" are what I eat a lot of these days. If you live in the country and can trust your neighbors, these are a few things it's still safe to eat while Irish.

I don’t buy a lot of supermarket vegetables these days. I eat what grows in my own garden, much of which are not supermarket-type vegetables; they’re exotic native plants only Euell Gibbons and fans used to eat, but my mother happened to be a Euell Gibbons fan. I have a patch of violets in the not-a-lawn. When they bloom, I think “How pretty!” and then I think “How tasty!” I eat about half my violets. That’s my fresh vegetable for the day. Violets are so vitamin-rich that a whole bowlful would cause a Vitamin C overdose, which isn't dangerous, but people for whom I've cooked health food feasts have been alarmed by one.

I used to enjoy all the vegetables in the supermarket, though. I do not have childish tastes. I like raw or barely cooked veg; I like the different flavors, bitter, earthy, watery, pungent, and the crunchy textures. I miss them, now. But the last time I feasted on fresh corn, which was a big annual celebration for the old-time Cherokee, I was sick. The last time a farmer gave me some fresh juicy vine-ripened tomatoes, oh goodness gracious they were good, but I was sick. I am a human not a vulture, but the last time I ate chicken, even if that chicken led a miserable life, it passed through my body in peace and did not make me sick.

Stanford students...I picture them with their fresh young faces, pearly teeth, long glossy black or blonde hair. Who knows what Isaiah meant by saying “Ye are gods,” or what Jesus meant by quoting him, but there is something of what the ancient Roman Empire called divinity, the goddess of youth, Juventas, about that splendor of youth and health. Many of Earth’s population, past and even present, feel something like worship when they look at you. Many people want to do anything you ask them to. So whyyy do so many of us mean, grumpy older people not join your protest against the meat packers?

I’ve not even mentioned, nor do I want to go into, the political reasons some of my correspondents would have put first. I don’t think they’re particularly worthy reasons. Old Socialist drivel about separating people from family farms, homes, land, and animals, does tend to mix into some people’s embrace of a vegan diet; but not others’. I do notice some vestiges of Old Socialist religious thinking in Stanford’s course catalogue—home of the economics class titled “Love as a Force for Social Justice”!—and suspect the students’ young minds-full-of-mush have been corrupted a little bit, but wotthebleep, Stanford minds can get over a little corruption once they’re exposed to reality. I do think the students need to concentrate more on how individualism built the once-provincial United States and collectivism destroyed the once-mighty Soviet Union.

That is, technically, a separate issue. If Khrushchev or even Hitler said it was raining, that, by itself, did not necessarily cause it to stop raining. Even though socialism as a national policy is unsustainable, from time to time a socialist does get something right. A vegetarian diet could be one of those things. Many Americans eat far more meat than their bodies need, and feel better if they eat a well balanced vegan diet for up to two years at a time. (Vegetables don’t contain enough Vitamin B-12 for most humans’ needs but healthy humans manufacture their own Vitamin B-12 in the process of digesting grain.)

So here are my three positive recommendations to the Stanford students:

1. All life thrives at the expense of other life. Humans have the physical traits of animals that need a mix of plant-based and animal-based food. When we slice into vegetables they register an electrical shock that is probably more like pain than pleasure. So a productive discussion of cruelty to other living things needs to accept that we humans are predators. We kill other living creatures. The question is whether we mistreat them before we kill them. Try a focus on restoring the ideal of small communities made up of individuals who raise their own animals and vegetables. Emphasize how much longer, healthier, and happier cows’ and hens’ lives are on a small family farm than in a big commercial meat factory. In the twentieth century we as a nation went considerably too far in the direction of centralizing too many things. Your focus should consistently be on decentralizing, on small, on independent, on well separated. Cows are miserable when hundreds of them are packed into a barn or lot; they’re happy and healthy when two or ten of them are browsing through a few acres of grass.

2. If you are less than 100% sure that someone else is 100% unaware that something he or she is about to eat has been poisoned with something that’s 100% fatal, don’t question other people’s food choices. Ever. Try not to look.

3. Naturally, even if a totally socialist education had made you ashamed of it, you’d like to see everyone eating California-fresh vegetables—beautiful California children that you are. I do like that about you. So, focus on getting those vegetables glyphosate-free, and otherwise unpoisoned, so that everyone can safely enjoy eating them.


I've yet to read this one, but the evidence just keeps piling up--the title says it all.