Friday, March 27, 2026

Book Review: The Missing Bride

Title: The Missing Bride

Author: Zanna Mackenzie

Date: 2015

Quote: "If I do manage to complete my apprenticeship...the agency will offer me a job."

Amber, an apprentice for a private detective agency ("We're not the police. We're better than the police"), is assigned to find out who kidnapped the bride-to-be just before a big expensive wedding. 

At least it's a twist on the usual mystery and the usual romantic comedy. I don't know what to say. For those who like this kind of plot, I suppose this is the sort of thing youall like. I did not get into it or suspend disbelief, but that's me. 

Thursday, March 26, 2026

Meet the Blog Roll: Laura McKowen

Moving down the blog roll, I paused to delete a couple of links to sites that used to be writers' blogs but have evolved into publishers' marketing pages, which is all right if the writers are putting their time into writing books, good for them, but it means that no blog posts are actually showing up on the blog roll and the sites are only taking up space that keeps new blogs from being added. I am likely to want to buy new books by e.g. Louise Erdrich, whose Birch Bark Blog has grown into a full-sized publisher's site for the new Birch Bark Books imprint. This new site is easy to find on Google. It is no longer an individual's blog.

This brings me to Laura McKowen. Her Substack is now hidden behind a paywall. She's not updating the web site that's on my blog roll. I still follow her, sort of. I'll mention her here because some people may want to follow her Substack. 

I am not and have never been even in her intended audience. Knowing he had alcoholic genes, my Irish and Cherokee father kept our home alcohol-free. I grew up with stories about what happens when people who have alcoholic genes use alcohol other than the way nature clearly intended it to be used--as cleaning fluid.

A beloved elder "had two more brothers that died back in the 1930s. They would beg outside bars, dig in garbage bins and drink whatever kind of alcohol or take whatever kind of pills they could find. They started drinking beer with friends, and what it did for them was make them so sick they wanted anything at all to make them feel better for a little while. They were in bad shape before they died. They were like old men. Neither of them was even thirty years old. Seeing how they died at least turned the two younger brothers in the right direction, but you can see how much damage they've done themselves." Both of the younger brothers were sober men with disabilities that showed when they talked; neither ever married or had children. 

An elder I never knew had had a long healthy life, with grandchildren, before some loss or illness unknown made her want to alter her consciousness. "She's in a hospital, on a locked ward. They talk about 'hitting the bottom'--she went down fast and hit that bottom hard. Most of your cousins just forget about her. Well, she sort of adopted her husband's family and forgot about us for a while, before you were born. Anyway A and B go out to see her when they can." 

A man who served in the same war with my grandfather, though they didn't apparently work together as buddies, didn't go down quite as fast. Apparently he'd been the neighborhood drunk for years. People felt sorry for him, but the story they told about him was just too good not to share. "Some neighbors found him lying on the ground. He said 'Are you dead too?' He must have been so sick he thought he'd died...and A said, 'Get up, [name]! You're not dead! If you were dead you'd see the fire!'"

Then of course there was the man from whom we rented a house, at times, before inheriting the house where I live now. Things he had done for beer money had included throwing lighted sticks of dynamite into the river to kill a lot of fish, some of which he then netted and sold. He seldom got up any more, but would draw a hand out from under the sheet to show visitors the first joints of two remaining fingers, and the stub of bone inside the "webbing" that had been the base of a thumb. He could still expand his hand; you could see a little knob at the inside edge of the hand move the "webbing" in and out. "What I got for dynamiting fish," he said. "It's not fair to the animals. Never fish with dynamite." He had been a carpenter, even a "house carpenter" who built wooden houses, and the ones that have not burned down are still standing. After the fishing incident he did some unskilled labor. His sober wife, who still worked though I was bigger and taller than she was by age ten, got a pretty good widow's pension for twenty-some years after he died; they were about the same age. 

And there was another old man who always hailed my brother and me as "boys." Probably he could see the difference, Dad thought; he was just saying he intended to treat us the same way. He was the only man we actually knew who'd ever been a coal miner. (We knew an old lady who'd been a coal miner's daughter; she was "the one from Appalachia," accepted that identity with pride, organized car pools to go back for visits. It was not disreputable to be a coal miner if you lved in Appalachia.) The way this neighbor had become a coal miner was that he was a mean drunk and, though he used to be strong and hardworking, nobody wanted to work with him. He was known for going home drunk and beating his wife. She was relieved when he got work in a mine fifteen or twenty miles away, and rejoiced when he moved on to one fifty miles away. During Dad's school years the man "got saved" and became a total abstainer from alcohol. He was still bad-tempered and disreputable, Dad said. "He was mean to his kids--they all left as soon as they could and never came back. You should say hello if he speaks to you, and it's all right to take a lift if he offers you one, I suppose, but try to steer clear of him. If he needs any help I'll do the visiting." Mother added: "Remember that song Ernie Ford used to sing? Coal miners were proud of being rough and mean. Nice people didn't want to know them." Oh, people in the towns that never had coal mines, in the Appalachian Mountains, just love people who think we all had connections with the coal industry. Only after gerrymandering put mining towns into our state delegate's constituency did we discover that, "If you think coal is ugly, look at poverty." 

I've never felt inclined to drink cleaning fluid. I have friends and relatives and readers who struggle to remind themselves that for them, too, alcohol is cleaning fluid. Most of us in my home town have Irish or Cherokee ancestors, or both. For about three out of four Irish people and three out of four Cherokee people, a dominant gene for alcoholism makes the rule "One drink, one drunk." Responsible use of alcohol means don't ever drink it. In other ethnic groups alcoholic genes that produce different patterns of alcoholic behavior are recessive, but for us, social rules based on the idea that there's anything normal or healthy about drinking alcohol are harmful rules that have been deliberately used against us. (Those rules have been used to discriminate against the alcoholic minority in those groups, too.) We are best off when we reject those customs altogether; when even the Communion wine served in thimble-sized cups at church is unfermented "new wine," a.k.a. Welch's grape juice. People who feel a need to imbibe stuff that weakens their grip on reality are not the kind we want doing responsible jobs. Alcoholism is one category of "disability" that can and should remain potential rather than actual, without ever limiting anyone's opportunities in life.

In short; I believe Jesus turned the water into wine at Cana, but if He'd been present in the body at a wedding here and someone had brought wine, He'd be more likely to turn the wine into water. Maybe into soda pop, which, we in the Southern States have a right to affirm with pride, has displaced wine as a party drink in our culture. So let it remain. Let stupid German ideas about a real man not actually being an extrovert, but having built up a high tolerance for  alcohol as the depressant that acts first on the conscience and produces temporary extroversion, rot in the grave with Hitler. God gave sober Americans the ability to defeat beery Germany for a reason. We should celebrate the superior merits and achievements of our AA-friendly culture; we should help European visitors discover how much healthier and more productive they, too, can feel when they learn to drink coffee or soda pop or, at least when they're in parts of the US where water has not yet been made nasty, plain water, with meals. Maybe they could even stop destroying their cultural heritage with their never-ending tribal wars. European civilization would be a fine idea, if tried...but that's not the point of this post.

I have reasons to believe that I inherited alcoholic genes, but I've never tested the hypothesis. In the diplomatic community a lot of drinking went on. My husband was a heavy drinker when we met. I said, "I don't want to live in a house where alcohol is drunk." Ours was a house from which some expensive bottles were taken to parties, or to his big house in Maryland where up to six couples could stay in guest suites if they were too drunk to drive home, but if my husband reached for a glass I said, "If you're drinking, I'm driving," so most of the time we both stayed sober. Though he was not an alcoholic and said that some of those parties were only fun if you drank fairly heavily at them, he liked being sober enough to spend less time at those parties. He credited sobriety and daily meditative walks, in fact, for what turned out to have been remission from cancer, during the years when we celebrated that it hadn't been a more common and treatable kind of cancer. I never tried to nag him out of drinking. He had one friend who was a mechanic; when that friend came out to do maintenance on the car they'd drink at least one six-pack out in the yard. My husband was the one who noticed that he felt better on weeks when that had not happened. And that it's not necessary to have physical Irish ancestry to laugh out loud, or even sing out loud, in the company of Irish-Americans.

Laura McKowen is a recovering alcoholic who decided to publish books that are no longer anonymous. They're not case histories; they're about things she learned from life experience, going beyond the basic alcoholic story, that may be helpful to other people who are or are not alcoholics.

The "anonymous" twelve-step groups have produced books. Unfortunately, anonymity means that any details that might make a story fresh or funny have been cut out. People tell the same story over and over. 

My name is (kindergarten name or "street name"), and I am an alcoholic (or addict). (Number of years or even months) ago, I was drinking or using (whatever). I passed out and forgot to come to work a few times, like fifteen or twenty times, so my employer told me not to come to work any more. That made me feel bad, so I reached for relief in a bottle of booze/pills. The next thing I remember is waking up in the hospital feeling terrible. (Optional: They told me I had done something I was lucky to have survived.) (Optional: I had destroyed my own (body part/s).) While I was still in rehabilitation, I joined this group. I knew I had to replace my addiction to alcohol/drugs with an addiction to the group and I'm so thankful to have met such congenial people. When I feel like reaching for the bottle, I call my recovery buddies and, if we can't get to a full group meeting, we have a meeting of our own in somebody's house. (Optional: I know I will never work as a (surgeon, pilot, teacher) again but I am just glad to be alive and employed as a (dishwasher, salesman, massage therapist). I am just taking my life One Day At A Time...

It's a good story, but in these groups' "Big Books" it may be repeated fifty or a hundred times. For the person who needs to be reading and telling that kind of story, it's good to read it over and over and find that the same general process worked for the surgeon, the teacher, the truck driver. For the rest of us... well...

This web site has its own anonymity policy. Knowing that all blog hosting sites fund themselves by tracking our "interests" and selling our profiles to advertisers, we never mention anyone's real-world contact information. So all I'll say about the person who recommended Laura McKowen's blog is that person really worked a twelve-step program as a spiritual discipline during the last ten years of per life. One thing that person did was to recommend Laura McKowen's blog, and books as she wrote them, both to people at an earlier stage of recovery and to people who don't feel a need to get drunk or stoned.

Because McKowen's message is not limited to "just replace the physical/emotional addictions to substances with a purely emotional addiction to your group, call meetings when you feel tempted to drink or use other drugs, and take it one day at a time," but goes on into insights into work and family life and spirituality, I think sober women will appreciate her writing too. It's no longer available free of charge. If you have a disposable income, you might find her writing worth supporting.

Book Review: Claws Clues and a Deadly Detour

Title: Claws Clues and a Deadly Detour

Author: Pandora Gale

Date: 2026

Quote: "[B]est stay in your room tonight. Inn gets...restless."

When her car broke down, Crowe thought she heard a psychic voice calling her to go to the inn in town and help someone. When she lay down in her room in the inn, she dreamed about a big fluffy Maine Coon cat being locked up because people were calling him "the Phantom Cat" and associating him with human trouble. So she uncages the cat and immediately there's a murder for them to solve. 

The cat is in the lead. He has psychic powers. In his past he was worshipped by humans who called him Lucifer. He doesn't like most humans or wish them well. He likes scaring the guilty into confessing. I think this book was written with more comedic than satanic intentions, but it's the kind of book that used to trigger "satanic panic." 

If you read Lucifer as an animal who' s been abused by Satanists rather than an old school witch burner's notion of a familiar demon in animal form, you might want to read the rest of a series about Lucifer and Crowe. I wouldn't spend money. The cute, whimsical, funny part of this series is going to be a phobia trigger for someone you know. There are better cozy mysteries.

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

Book Review: Vision of the Heart

Title: Vision of the Heart

Author: Mary Crawford

Publisher: Diversity Ink

Date: 2015

ISBN: 978-0692619605

Quote: "We all made a pact to continue to be nurses as long as we could stand with walkers."

But Julia developed macular degeneration first. During the time frame of this story she still sees large shapes and colors, but is classified as legally blind. This is a short e-book in which Julia pushes herself to go to a reunion. Instead of reinforcing her belief that she's become useless, she finds ways to stay active in the nursing field.

It's fiction, but the Author's Note makes clear that it's autobiographical to some extent too. It's not a romance--Julia is happily married with grown-up children--but it opens a series of romances about the younger people in its fictional world. 

Everyone who works with computers daily, feeling the tension between "Looking at blinking boxes is hard on our eyes" and "To a considerable extent computers can replace our eyes," is likely to be interested in this book.

A Genre I'd Like to Read More

This week's Long & Short Reviews prompt is "A Genre I'd Like to Read More of in the Coming Year." 

That would be nonfiction.

Nonfiction does not fit into the Book Funnel's marketing mold, which is one great thing in its favor. 

My tastes flipped, during my reading lifetime. As a child I was most interested in fiction, and various adults used to try to push me to read more nonfiction, to which I used to respond by choosing the most frivolous topics available. Books written to teach things to children tended to be dumbed-down and preachy and aimed at boys. Children's novels had a better chance of being interesting and aimed at least partly at girls, and sometimes piqued my interest enough that I even looked up a topic and read nonfiction about the topic, to find out what the characters in a novel were talking about.

As an adult I found it to be the other way round. Novels written for adults can be very good, but are generally pretty bad. In the twentieth century the consensus of literary critics' opinion was that genre fiction--romances, mysteries, "westerns," and many critics added science fiction--was garbage. So what were the rules for novels that were not considered garbage? Some critics liked a lot of travel; some liked a "cross-section of society," with something like DEI in the selection of characters. Depressingly few, and nearly all of them were female, wanted the female characters to be believably human. Serious literary fiction was usually about adultery, or murder when everybody knew who'd done it; it focussed on the male experience and usually involved a lot of alcohol and tobacco, and had the general mood of a dirty ashtray. The critics always paid tribute to authors who could write about war, but they were more interested in authors who, like themselves, had been unfit for service.  \


Cartoon by James Thurber, who was actually one of my favorite twentieth century male writers.

Mostly the male writers and their characters lived in places where women lived too, and had active relationships with women; in the twentieth century any hint of sympathy for homosexuality would cost a book sales, even after the left-wingnuts of then took up homosexuality as a cause and actively marketed it to, e.g., graduate students in literature or psychology. But the successful male writers tended to write about their relationships with women as if they would rather have been homosexual. They wrote like a lot of pathetic aging graduate students, all sitting around in someone's basement wearing black shirts and getting drunk, terrified that marriage would lead to responsibility and gainful employment and would destroy their creativity. In most cases, if they had lost all interest in writing books, from the viewpoint of English Literature that might have been a good thing.

This attitude had, of course, already spawned the beginning of the 1960s and 1970s outbreaks of Loony Left feminism, as defined by divorcing men (sometimes they were those male writers, sometimes the audience for the male writers), having abortions, using bad language, wearing polyester leisure suits instead of dresses, not admitting it if they liked children, screaming in the streets at political demonstrations for this and that, picking up disgusting diseases because in the thinking of those days people who weren't married and weren't seriously religion were supposed to summon the stork as soon as they'd shaken hands, writing convoluted arguments about how a sexual act to which they had consented at the time was really a form of rape because male privilege, and sitting around in someone's basement wearing polyester pantsuits and getting drunk. Some women who got into that lifestyle were depressed, for what then seemed the obvious and sufficient reason that it was a depressing lifestyle. Meanwhile women of less extreme views made great progress just by being less depressing to have around than the Loony Left.

One sign of this progress was that literary critics were forced to stop raving about fiction in which male characters' idea of success was to sleep around without ever getting married, and acknowledge the merits of novels in which women achieve what they want to achieve without, or in spite of, men. Literary critics could now celebrate novels like The Color Purple as being much better than novels like I'll Take Manhattan, in which the twenty-something chick saves the family business from her evil uncle by taking a loan from the young Donald Trump. 

What the literary critics carefully avoided saying, Joan Aiken, whose father the literary critics admired, was able to say: Adults writing for adults usually rely on stereotyped characters and predetermined plots. Fiction for adults only occasionally reflects any real "creativity." Adults writing for children often mix up the stereotypes and twist the plots in ways that add humor and freshness to their fiction. As a result a novel for children, about how the protagonist survives the first term at a school with a tradition that nobody speaks to new students, or qualifies to be a prairie schoolteacher at age seventeen, or just wins the championship game, can be more interesting and realistic than a trite tale of adultery and murder for adults. 

Or even a good tale of adultery and murder for adults. Macbeth is a classic fictional reenactment of real history that gave new phrases and even new words to our language, but what it really tells us is that murder is a bad idea. Er, um, we knew that. 

But nonfiction liberates writers from having to worry about making characters recognizably different from stereotypes, and allow them just to describe what happened. Nonfiction written for adults is much more varied, realistic, broad-ranging, etc., than novels written for adults are. Good nonfiction does have a plot; it tells a story about how one unique event happened, or how several similar events have happened, or how a writer set out to find out what happened. Good nonfiction is fun to read even if you're not researching that specific thing that happened. Good nonfiction doesn't have to be as "creative" as James Herriot's veterinarian stories to be well worth reading, for information or for entertainment, and when the information in good nonfiction goes out of date, good nonfiction still has value as history and as entertainment. Good nonfiction is what blogs would like to be when they grow up. All bloggers can benefit from reading good nonfiction books.

Some examples of what I mean, or what I'd like to discover:

Cleveland Amory, The Proper Bostonians

John James Audubon, Birds of America

Sue Bender, Plain and Simple

Elisabeth Bumiller, May You Be the Mother of a Hundred Sons

Euell Gibbons, Stalking the Wild Asparagus

Jonah Goldberg, Liberal Fascism

Booton Herndon, The Seventh Day

Tony Horwitz, One for the Road

Zora Neale Hurston, Tell My Horse

Shirley Jackson, Life Among the Savages

C.S. Lewis, The Four Loves (or The Five Loves)

Alison Lurie, The Language of Clothes

Jessica Mitford, The American Way of Dedth

V.S. Naipaul, A Turn Through the South

Kathleen Norris, Dakota

P.J. O'Rourke, Eat the Rich

Vance Packard, The Waste Makers

Henry David Thoreau, Walden

James Thurber, My Life and Hard Times

Mark Twain, The Innocents Abroad

Tuesday, March 24, 2026

New Book Review: Healing Hearts

Title: Healing Hearts

Author: Violet McBride

Date: 2026

Quote: "The second wave hit harder than the first--hard enough to rip the roof off my cafe."

This is a woman's romance. What does Terry look like? She looks like someone who really listens to a child, and like someone who visits an injured employee in the hospital, and like someone who's never had much money and is dodging a bill collector after the storm damaged her cafe. Even in the chapters narrated by Daniel, the father of the child to whom Terry listens, we see Terry's good character more than her pretty face or perfect figure. I'm not sure I believe it, but I like it. Women would like the men we marry to see us that way.

Anyway: Terry and Daniel don't like each other on sight, but "enemies to lovers" is a cheap grab at a popular plot element. They're not enemies; they just meet under unpromising circumstances, when Terry sees Daniel as an impediment to getting her injured employee into the right part of the hospital. Terry feels some urgency about that because, after Natasha is taken care of, she has to find a place to stay other than her wrecked building. Helpful townsfolk deliver her straight to Daniel's house. He has a room, and could actually use a housemate, because his wife died in a motor accident a few years ago. He has plenty of money and hardly any time, because he is a doctor.

When we see Daniel's little boy chattering happily and Terry really listening, we know the father won't take much longer than the son does to fall in love with her. Because both Daniel and Terry are basically nice people, their emotional wounds clean and simple, the story moves quickly.

If you like a clean, wholesome romance where most of the kissing goes on offstage, you'll like Healing Hearts

Petfinder Post: Furry Friends and the Philosophy of Love

Why do we love our pets?

Obviously the almost unconditional love dogs, cats, horses, and most chickens show to anyone who brings them food treats regularly is not the only attraction. We don't love all animals alike. We admire specific qualities in the individual animals we know. We love the big police dog who scares away evildoers while being just a playful puppy at heart, and the tiny Chihuahua who sits at our feet begging to be picked up, and the lap cat who always purrs and cuddles, and the tough old alley cat who occasionally deigns to sniff the hand that feeds him, in different ways, just as we love different friends and relatives. 

And what do we love in our friends (human and otherwise) and relatives? 

I was thinking about this yesterday. First the chap who does odd jobs for the neighborhood came into town. Nobody was paying him to do anything; he had errands to do, and thought he'd stop and see whether any money could be made along the way. I couldn't go anywhere, I said, because I'd promised to work for someone. Someone who didn't show up, and didn't show up, and finally rolled up the road at 2pm to say it was too late to do the job he'd planned for the day. 

As an independent contractor I have a very simple fee system for odd jobs.  Fifty dollars a day for scheduled work, a hundred dollars for those who want to pop in when they feel like it and see whether I have time to work for them. Because popping up at the last minute is always more trouble than doing a job as planned and scheduled. Always. Without exception. No matter how much I need the money, or enjoy the work, or even enjoy your company. I do enjoy the company of most of the people for whom I work, but they are a lot more enjoyable when they show enough respect for themselves and for me to make plans and stick to them.

This thought led me to further reflections on the difference between the way introverts naturally, instinctively make friends by showing respect for other people, and the way extroverts try to force friendship by grabbing for control of everyone's moods.

I've been reading, seriously, a trilogy of novels by a Christian who re-visions a man--not Jesus, but a great saint who chooses to serve as a reflection of Jesus--who does what Jesus did, in a modern, mostly Christian society, and, well, the difference is that we no longer crucify people, so this man gets shot. I'm reading these stories with this controversial premise because the author's e-mails have convinced me over the years that she's a serious Christian who wants to provoke serious self-examination in churches and individuals. 

In the novel, the people who take the place of Judas and Caiaphas are a family who seem sad more than bad, at first. They were a typical suburban nuclear family: father, mother, son, daughter. Then the mother died. None of the other family members can be blamed for the fatal car crash but, over the years, they've all dumped their bad feelings on each other and failed to make peace afterward. They've formed habits of emotionally abusive conversation that bring out their most unpleasant feelings, under the influence of which they make the bad choices that eventually lead to a conspiracy to murder a friend. Yes. If we take our emotional moods seriously, they can lead us to make bad choices.

So, should Christians, or people of good will generally, try to fix our emotional feelings so that they don't lead us to make bad choices? I don't think that's the best approach. Psychotherapists have traditionally fed attention to buried emotions, to help people who have buried emotions and memories come to terms with what is really troubling them and making them "neurotic." For some people who have in fact buried emotions and memories, that approach has been helpful. For most of us, who remembered all of the major emotional crises in our pasts, who may have "uncovered buried memories" of things that obviously did not happen after using drugs that are known to generate pseudomemories congruent with the damage the drugs do to the sensory-motor nerves, it's not helpful. Someone who really has managed to suppress all memories of having had painful surgical operations as a baby or having lost a parent at age six might really need to feel the emotions that come with those memories (or even with present-time reimaginings of what they might have been) to feel emotionally whole. For more of us, however, the emotions that went with everything from that bad case of flu we had at age four, on up through the school friend telling other people the big secret we told person in grade eight, all the way to the person who thinks person can get away with the ludicrous lawsuit person has filed against us now, have never been buried. They've been felt and faded out of our awareness. Dragging them back up to try to feel those emotions all over again does not fix them, nor does it stop us feeling fear, anger, or grief in new situations. We can't fix our emotions because they're not meant to be fixed. Like our physical sensations, they serve a purpose; they bring things to our attention, and then they fade away, replaced by more current "feelings" about the new conditions around us. 

Both sensations and emotions can, of course, be "false," as symptoms of unhealthy conditions, in and of themselves. We feel pain when our sensory nerves deliver the message that our bodies are being damaged. We feel angry when our unconscious brains deliver the message that a situation is harmful and needs to be changed, anxious when the message is that the situation is harmful and we need to flee, depressed when the message is that the situation is harmful and can't be improved by anything we might do. Any of those messages may be inaccurate. Pain may be felt as if it were coming from the foot the surgeon just cut off, not because anything is now being done to the foot, but because the nerves are recovering from having been cut. Anger or anxiety may be felt as if a situation were harmful when it's not. Even happiness might be "false"--when we receive what feels like good news, and it's not true. 

It's not easy for most young people, but it is a valuable life skill to develop, to route all "feeling" messages through the logical part of our brains. Think through those "feelings." Identify the facts and deal with them. Merely thinking about the facts will usually do a lot to distract us from unpleasant feelings. The facts may be very unpleasant and the unpleasant feelings may be there to stay for a long time. A broken leg is not going to win any athletic awards for at least a few months. A departed friend is gone forever and, no matter how many other people we like on how many different levels of friendship, But learning to focus on the facts can reduce the intensity of the pain we feel.

The young sometimes fear that learning to focus on the facts will push them prematurely into the future, making them the dreaded Older Person Who Has No Feelings. The physical process of "feeling" does involve hormones. The hormones that dominate most young people's attention are released into the blood at different levels on different days, and those levels drop significantly with age. The hormones associated with other things, like pain, food, nature, music, sleep, and doting on grandchildren, seem to be more reliable. People who have learned to Fix Facts First and let Feelings Follow can consider a situation, conclude that the relevant facts are very nice, just as they are, and choose to wallow in pleasure. Women in the generation before mine might not have admitted they wallowed in the pleasure of sex, and their denial may even extend to not liking the phrase, but most of them did unmistakably wallow in the pleasure of being grandmothers. 

The trouble is that some unfortunate people, namely extroverts, want to imagine that whatever other people are feeling is all about them. They are the center of the universe! (They think!) Someone else may have a tooth cracked right along a raw, bare nerve--dental surgery is not always perfect--but that person has no right to be more conscious of per tooth than person is of ME AND MY WONDERFUL SELF! 

Part of the twentieth century's attempt to make civilized society over as a support group for people who, in previous ages, probably would have been considered idiots if they survived at all, has been this obsession with good feeling at the expense of good will. It's become positively predictable that people writing about the benefits of kindness, nowadays, urge people to grin and chatter like monkeys rather than advising them to show good will through voluntary behaviors like paying debts, being on time, and doing good work. 

"Smile! It makes people feel good!" Oh, those poor people these writers seem to know. What ever would they do without these writers to manage their emotional moods for them? In previous centuries writers on etiquette advised people not to smile or laugh without explaining what they were laughing at. That advice may not sound as cheerful, but it seems to me more helpful, than the exhortations to try to force a "smile." In the first place a forced smile doesn't even look like the real thing. Then there's the genuine smile or laugh that, if not shared or at least explained, looks like a heartless laugh at someone else's distress. And then there's the fact that it's not my business, not even my place, to "make" you feel anything, nor is it appropriate for you to eset out to make me feel anything. Nobody likes being manipulated. 

People who are in fact friends tend to smile and laugh easily when they are together. If they were taught not to laugh without explaining what they were laughing at, as C.S. Lewis observed, "some pretext in the way of jokes is usually provided." but the jokes didn't need to be "good" enough to make people laugh when they weren't rejoicing in the company of friends. Or, if a friend is just a bit selfconscious and might think we were laughing at, e.g., her clumsiness with her new prosthetic leg, there might be some pretext in the way of an explanation: "It was the way you said 'beach.'  I've missed you and going to the beach with you so much for so long. It's good to see you back here." 

I enjoy smiling and laughing with friends as much as anyone else does but I'm annoyed by those exhortations to the ignorant to try to be a manipulator rather than a person who is really worth knowing--someone who pays debts and arrives on time and drives responsibly and doesn't litter and generally shows respect for self and others every day. I need no more monkeylike grinning and chattering in my life. Monkeys aren't even my favorite exhibit in the zoo. If you want to be someone at whom I laugh in sheer delight, saying, "It's so good to see you again," don't take monkeys or even television actors as role models. Take men and women of good character.

Responsibility, which can be expected only from adults, and respect for others, which is normally shown by children and animals too, are part of the good character of anyone a self-respecting introvert wants for a friend. The other things we like about our friends vary. To people of High Sensory Perceptivity every close relationship probably feels different from every other close relationship. If we have six sisters, there might be two or three for whom we have very similar feelings--"the little ones" who came along after we had emotionally or even physically moved out on our own; the ones with whom we grew up are as different from one another as A from B. 

And so it is likely to be with animals. Animals who aren't real pets may seem interchangeable. Some people don't give names to chickens; most people don't give names to wild animals that share their homes. Some people don't give names to cats. Almost all people give names to horses and dogs. It seems as if the differences among bigger animals' "personalities" are more easily noticed than the differences among smaller animals. 

I suspect this applies even to large animals that don't have a great deal of "personality," like cows. I remember a year when my parents boarded a total of four cows, two or three at a time. They weren't pets but each one seemed to be a distinct "person." 

For those who pay attention, it most definitely applies to cats. Serena, who was born a dominant female, and her daughter Silver, who has put up with Serena all these years because she's not at all dominant, are a nice complementary pair. One factor in Silver's having been such a dutiful daughter was probably that for several years, while he was alive, Silver had a real pair bond with the senior cat I called Sommersburr; after he died Silver went to live with another social cat, and when he, too, disappeared Silver came home. She lived with different humans and became accustomed to different arrangements; this has led to some behavior that seems almost like delayed adolescence. Both cats are middle-aged ladies by now, usually polite and decorous, but not altogether above mischief and silliness.

"Where's Serena got to? Oh there you are," I'm likely to say, not every single day but probably on more than half of our days. Serena blinks slowly at me, a gesture that seems to indicate trust and affection. "I love you, Serena," I say, blinking back.

"Gurk," Serena may or may not actually say. It's a sound she makes, not a mew or a meow. It means "Let's have a good fast game."

I may or may not run a few yards up and down the road, or trail a stick around the yard, for Serena to chase. It means "I like you enough to try to tell you I like you in your preferred love language."

Most readers of this web site already live with animals who exchange messages of good will, trust, affection, and yes, even family love with them regularly. Some of you blog about them; some don't.  I count several of your animals as e-friends: Mudpie, who started the whole Petfinder photo theme at this web site. Suzy and Toots and Old Buddy at the Meow. Mr. Baby Sir. Link Linker the Stinker. Loulou and her friend the alley cat. Louis the kayak cat, who recently bequeathed his place to a younger Maine Coon cat. Rolf the Campus Cat. Abby Lab, heir of Barkley. Winston of the Scottie Chronicles. And (may he rest in peace) Valentino the handsome hound. They're all privileged pets, Internet celebrities, spokes-creatures for good causes. Then there's Javier Reinoso's social cat colony in Venezuela, which everyone should follow and support to whatever extent their finances allow...

https://x.com/reinosoj2 (the social media posts)

gofund.me/7634249f  (the GoFundMe page)

They are all hungry, homeless, deeply lovable social cats who live in peace, on small rations of food, on city streets. Sometimes there are dozens of them. They don't have humans to help groom their coats. They seem to do that for one another. I worry about cat colonies of this size. Social cats are by far more interesting than normal cats, but they are more vulnerable to contagious diseases because they live in family groups who share food and may sleep in heaps. Donations can help buy food to maintain strong immune systems and vaccines against FIV, FLV, and rabies. 

So why, you may ask, do I subject these readers to appeals on behalf of animals they can't adopt? Because there are things we can do for the animals we can't adopt. We can help boost their signals by reblogging their stories and sharing their photos on social media. We can even, after careful investigation of a rescue organization, pre-pay part of the adoption fee to make it easier for people to offer them homes. 

Mudpie started it with a blog post about a cat her human couldn't adopt. Heather, who was Queen of the Cat Sanctuary before Serena, encouraged me to keep it up. (She didn't really engage with the animal photos but she did purr and cuddle on my lap while I was writing about them.) Serena...developed more tolerance for the laptop computer when she was ill enough to spend days indoors, but it's still more a thing she indulges me in than a thing she actually does with me. She does, as Heather did, seem to hope all these shelter animals find good homes, a good long way from here. For although social cats, like dogs, are able to increase hunting success by hunting as teams, they still instinctively avoid crowded conditions.

Here are some photogenic animals seeking homes in the Eastern States, guaranteed by people who've lived with them to be easy to love.

Zipcode 10101: Tiramisu from NYC 


Tira mi su is Italian for "pick me up," often used as a name for a sweet snack, also a name for a friendly kitten. Tiramisu likes to be picked up and petted. Five months old in February, she's only just ready to take over a home of her own. She's not been around children, but she behaves well around other cats and dogs.

Pickles from NYC 


https://www.petfinder.com/dog/pickles-e7eefcbc-2600-4b8f-aeab-67c38a798dac/ny/new-york/linus-friends-fl1765/details/

He's a lap dog. Chihuahuas don't need much more space than cats--they can get adequate exercise as indoor pets--and they can live as long as cats do. Pickles is described as just a puppy. He's not yet house trained and they don't know how well he behaves around children, but he gets along with other dogs and cats. He likes to play and explore and snuggle up to his human for a nap, and has been known to lick people's toes. That would be a deal breaker for me, but somebody Out There will love it.

Zipcode 20202: Cordelia from South Carolina by way of DC 


They say she's a small, quiet, young cat, probably as big as she's meant to be, looking for a place where she can feel safe. She can ride along with someone from South Carolina who drives up and down the coast weekly, or you can come there to meet her. 

Alice from DC 


There is still an oldfashioned animal shelter on Oglethorpe Street. Alice is there. Go ask Alice and she'll tell you she wants a good home. She's still a puppy who needs training. She is described as goofy, eager, and affectionate.

Zipcode 30303: Shiraz from Chattanooga 


This kitten is a future Queen Cat. They don't insist that she be adopted along with a loyal subject who doesn't need a great deal of attention, but it would probably be a good idea. Shiraz is described as sweet and sassy. She'll snuggle beside you for a nap, and let you know when it's time to play. She does well with other cats ,dogs, and children, if they've been taught to show due respect.

Sasha from Pennsylvania by way of Atlanta

The adoption fee is ridiculous and the organization sound a bit control-freaky, but the pup is adorable. Ten weeks old when photographed, Sasha is thought to be a mix of Labrador Retriever and German Shepherd. Those are large breeds, as indicated by her size in this baby picture. Her ideal home has a big yard with a high fence. Obviously Sasha has a lot to learn. A ten-week-old dog is a baby and can't be considered "trained" in any sense of the word. Really she ought to be with her mother. But she's described as bright, goodnatured, affectionate, eager to please. She could grow up to be an awesome dog.

Monday, March 23, 2026

Web Log, or Do I Mean Status Update, for 3.22.26

More of a status update than a web log. 

So where are the hot'n'juicy links? some readers are thinking. I feel their thoughts coming up through the keyboard. Actually I see them in the computer's report on what people are reading. 

Well...I've got into this pattern, lately. I allocate some time to reading the blog roll and e-mail. Every day I check the e-mail for anything real, y'know, hand-typed by a person I actually know. Then I read the e-mails that the Proton view flags as computer-generated and/or generated by a computer other than the one whose address they're using (meaning Book Funnel), which is 99.9 percent of the e-mails, from the top down for the time allotted. I read 10 to 20 e-mails per day. I receive 100 to 200 e-mails per day. There is clearly a problem; it would help if Book Funnel stopped spamming people who want to promote actual books and writers. Anyway, although I'm still on mailing lists for various news and writing sites, 97% of the e-mail comes from people who want to (1) sell me books, (2) send me review copies of books, or (3) nag me to post the reviews of the e-books they e-mailed to me last winter, which, if sent by e-mail, are probably still sitting in last winter's unopened e-mail. I don't receive a great deal of news links any more.

And very few of these people are even e-mailing about my books. 

"Your books? I've not seen your books in Books-a-Million lately...?" No; the ones that have been there have been under other people's names. I have written more than three dozen books by now. Some have been revised and published under author names and titles other people chose. Some are still waiting for a satisfactory publishing deal. Some are the "Special Products" this web site offers, the PDF or printed compilations of blog posts; technically they've been distributed rather than published since they've not been sold in stores, but those first-book-manuscript contest judges count them as having been published since they want to give the prizes to 25-year-olds. 

You can, of course, commission books. You knew that, didn't you? You can commission books you want to revise and publish as yours; you can commission books as souvenirs or special reports from me; you can even commission books you want to help publish as mine. They can be fiction or nonfiction, on almost any topic that has or has not been addressed in the blog posts as writing samples at this web site. They could contain gorgeous full-color pictures like some of the more recent posts at this web site, but while posting digital photos on a web site is "fair use," printing them in a book that is published for sale costs money. They can be poetry, recipes, humor, short stories, novels, or research. I enjoy the research most. 

You can even commission term papers or dissertations. Of course, although it's legitimate and traditional to use other people's term papers and dissertations in your own research, meaning you can use many of the same quotes and footnotes, you will want to rewrite the papers so they sound like you and throw in references to things discussed in your class and things you found in your school library. How else is the professor going to know you wrote them? You will receive term papers that got A's, or would have got A's, somewhere. If you just give them to your professor as I write them, you'll probably get an F and possibly be expelled, because the professor will know they are my writing not yours. It's up to you to ensure school papers can get A's at your school.

And this is the week you need to vote: Do you want this web site to have a Zazzle page? If we have one, the Zazzlers whose work is displayed may get more money from each sale; Zazzle's offering extra commissions to people who add Zazzle store pages to their sites. And my Zazzle page will sit modestly on the side of the screen and not interfere with your scrolling, as the Zazzle page at the Mirror does. And you should be able to see the digital mock-up of whatever you're buying, customize it, and order it by clicking on pictures at the page. And you will have to buy some merchandise that is decent quality for whatever it is, T-shirts or tennis racket covers or postcards or matchbooks or fabric--Zazzle prints lots of different things--but is, at least by Gate City standards, heinously overpriced; you will have to pay in advance for mail-order products and deal with any problems in the mail-order process yourself. Zazzle, like Amazon, generally delivers satisfactory products in a reasonable time. Nobody is perfect.

Microsoft 

It was a beautiful morning...and then Microsoft destroyed the afternoon by trying to force people to buy more Microsoft products. No, you can't use your Chrome browser! We want to show you the wonders of Microsoft Edge! The first mosquitoes of the season hatched this afternoon, too. 

MICROSOFT EDGE IS NOW BANNED FROM THIS HOUSE. Nobody is allowed to use Edge for any purpose unless Microsoft is well and truly humbled, probably by an act of Congress, such that Chrome runs without a hitch, without a blink, without a noticeable "update," for TEN YEARS. 

Boost Linux today, boost Linux today,
Oh, let's all go out and buy Linux today,
Because Microsoft are thieves, so let's make them pay!
Let's go and buy Linux today!

Anyone with the skills to reproduce what Microsoft Windows ME did, and to deliver complete web searches the way Google and Yahoo used to do, could submarine Microsoft and become a gazillionnaire. I mean you, Nephews. And the sooner the better.

War 

I hate war, as such. Any and all war. There have to be better ways of settling disputes.

I also hate when people express opposition to war in ways that amount to propaganda for the other side. 



Cartoon by Henry Payne for NationalReview.com; shared by Joe Jackson at TheViewFromLadyLake.com. 

If the wind off that plane were to sweep those clueless cheerleaders into the cold salt sea, wouldn't it serve'm right? We declared war. We need to finish it. By finish I mean win. And then we need to stay out of any other wars. And yes, I think it might help if we stopped electing men, at least for long enough to break the habit of killing foreigners just to flog our failing economy back to life.

Iranian readers, if we have any: I'm sorry about all this. Obviously I was not consulted. You should not claim to become Christians unless you really intend to be Christians. Be what you are. Do what the rest of the world do. Surrender, stop building bombs, and guilt-trip us into building all the shiny new schools and hospitals you can use for the next thirty years. 

New Book Review: Murder Magic and Muffins

Title: Murder Magic and Muffins

Author: Stella Glass

Quote: "[T[his secret kitchen looked like a magical storm of violet sparkles. Witches are so showy, especially to each other."

 Matilda, an active part of her family's bakery business, guesses who killed two men in different places at the same time with considerable help from her telepathic cat Bundough. There's only one real suspect so I can't say the plot kept me guessing, but cozy mystery fans may think the Baxters' bakery is cute and cozy enough to make up for a too-easy plot. 

It's a series, or part of one. Some people will want to collect Matilda's further adventures.

Butterfly of the Week: Riley's Graphium

Graphium rileyi is a rare and obscure species about which very little is known. Named in 1950, it's not on every list of butterfly species. It is least uncommon in Guinea, also found in Cote d'Ivoire, recorded as very rare in Ghana and Liberia. If scientists continue to count rileyi as a species, African students have a golden opportunity to become famous by learning about it. It may be reclassified as a subspecies or variation, or found to be a hybrid between other Graphiums, probably ucalegonides or fulleri.

As a result this butterfly is so rare that I couldn't even find a free photo of it.

It is in the group of tailless, or "swordless," Graphiums that are sometimes called Ladies, and it is sometimes called the Blotched Lady. Like "White" and "Red," "Blotched" describes the wings--in a relative way. Actually all the Ladies have a resemblance to one another.

Most search results for this species consist of lists on which the name is mentioned. Carcasses are not advertised for sale. Although several scientific papers mention this species, most merely confirm that it was found in a certain place. 

It is regarded as somewhat endangered simply because it's rare, though the IUCN Red List of endangered swallowtails doesn't even acknowledge this species' existence.

A scant entry for Graphium rileyi is found on pages 101-102 of 


It contains the only photos of this species a Google search yielded. The wings of the museum piece shown were brown and white, darker above than below.

Sunday, March 22, 2026

Link Log Weekender for 3.20-21.26

Another weekend was not spent link hunting. I did find two longish informational videos that seemed link-worthy. Neither is new; both were new-to-me so they might be new-to-you as well.

Economics 

This podcast is serious enough and long enough that, IF THE PODCASTER HAD DUE RESPECT FOR HIS AUDIENCE, HE WOULD HAVE TYPED OUT HIS WORDS. It demands a ridiculous three hours of your time. Your browser's not set up to play videos that long and will probably crash after an hour or two. But he does summarize, from George Soros's own book, why Soros says he's not a Marxist even while doing Marxist things toward Marxist goals, why he's consistently made such bad choices, and why so many other Jewish people loathe him and deny that he deserves to be counted as Jewish. (Soros admittedly thinks he is "a god" and is his own chief idol.) The podcaster says in his own defense that reading Soros's book would take even longer and be more boring. He is undoubtedly right about that.


Food 

The history of Kellogg's Corn Flakes...The Kelloggs were among the founders of the Seventh-Day Adventist church. In their time their books were marketed by the church along with Ellen or James White's. The results of their medical experiments fed Ellen White's book, The Ministry of Healing. However, John Harvey Kellogg's opinions were his own and he was eventually excommunicated from the SDA church. Most SDA's know that story but they may have forgotten Kellogg's relationships with his younger brother William and with Charles Post. 


(Although they do frown on extramarital sex, most Seventh-Day Adventists say that a good marital relationship is one of the blessings of life we're meant to enjoy. Then again, when I consider Seventh-Day Adventist men...) 


Book Review: The Cry of Her Heart

Title: The Cry of Her Heart

Author: Ora Smith

Publisher: Lighten

Date: 2020

Quote: "But your protector pays for your chastity."

In 1632, being the wrong kind of Protestant was a crime in England. Peninnah is in the Clink Prison, a real place, where prisoners were charged high prices for everything--including freedom from sexual abuse, not to mention time at a window facing the street where prisoners are allowed to beg for money to pay the high cost of being locked up. She can't afford to pay not to be raped. Somebody, she learns, is paying at least that price for her. 

Over the months in prison, during which she holds the baby after another prisoner dies in childbirth and develops some sympathy for the one woman on the women's side of the Clink who seems to belong in prison, Peninnah learns who her "protector" is. She had a crush on Robert Linnell, years ago, but he married another woman, She learns that that woman is dead. Her heart leaps, but she reminds herself that he wasn't interested in her when she was clean and pretty. Now she's dressed in rags and, unavoidably, infested with lice, and on page one she let her long red hair be chopped off as close to the scalp as possible to pay for a chance to beg.

All she can do is pray. When she finds Robert on the men's side of the Clink, she realizes that he can do nothing more than pray, too. This is the historical record, not a novel written to please modern readers; the main characters don't control their destiny in the way we might want them to do. It's up to God to hear the cry of Peninnah's heart. 

In historical fact, she thought God did. 

This is one of a series in which Ora Smith fleshes out what's known about Christian women of the past, including Pocahontas Rebecca Rolfe. The reality of their lives isn't always nice or politically correct. This book contains synopses of the books that came before it, so readers can decide which stories they want to read. 

Recommended to readers who are ready for historical novels that are more fact-based than the usual romantic stories.

Friday, March 20, 2026

Web Log for 3.19.26

Not a lot of links this week. I have been reading new books. I had planned to spend some time link hunting on Friday, then rushed out to take a last-minute job in the real world. I had found another link to add to this log on Thursday; Google seems to have lost it. 

Attention Google: Page views are away up again and, while actual readers are welcome, even if they are in Ukraine or Russia, youall should check on the 26,000 "other" views.

Glyphosate Awareness 

The Coca-Cola Company discontinues what was its "healthiest" product...


...Because people stopped buying it. And why did we stop buying it? Because ("How did wheat get into orange juice?" I wondered in 2007) it was made from real oranges. Including the peels and "navels." Which retained glyphosate, presumably sprayed on the fruit as an artificial ripening agent since orange trees shade out most of the "weeds" around them. Real orange juice became toxic. The health-conscious were better off drinking Mello Yello.

If they'd only used glyphosate-free oranges, the concentrated juice you mixed with water, making it easier to carry home and store, would probably still be a bestseller today. 

Book Review: Love Me Again

Title: Love Me Again

Author: Stephanie Morris

Date: 2022

Quote: "Thankfully, she'd been known as the successful coffee shop owner for the past ten years. That was better than being known as the woman no one wanted to date."

And the reason why no one else wants to date Naima is that she's never got over her ex-boyfriend, Tucker, even though she dumped him. And now he's back in town. It's a romance so you might think you know where this must end.

If you read this e-book on Book Funnel, though, you might be wrong, because what's in the Book Funnel is not the complete book that includes the end. I hate when Book Funnel allows that. 

Thursday, March 19, 2026

Grandma Bonnie Peters' Gluten-Free Recipe: Garbanzo Salad, Soup, or Spread

Garbanzos are most often planted, in the United States, as cover crops in between wheat growing seasons. Because wheat is the hardest of all crops to weed, the one that gave people the idea of trying just to poison the field so weeds couldn't grow, garbanzos tend to be loaded with pesticide residues. 

Before glyphosate many people formed a prejudice against garbanzos, thinking they were allergic to these "chick peas" themselves. Since 2010 a different set of people may have thought we were allergic to garbanzos and to so many other things. The good new is that the majority of those people aren't even allergic to wheat. They have been reacting to glyphosate. 

When garbanzos have not had chemicals sprayed on them, and not grown in chemical-poisoned soil, they've always been a good healthy food, full of nutrients, to which very few people are allergic. They do need to be fully cooked, which takes a few hours, and used in a diet that includes plenty of water. Like all legumes they react with the acid in our bodies to form gas bubbles that are harmless, but annoying, if we're not well hydrated.

Grandma Bonnie Peters started cooking gluten-free vegan food before 2010, and never adjusted to the horrible new reality that the diet that had restored her health had become toxic in its own way, with glyphosate. All the vegetables in this recipe tend, even today, to be full of glyphosate. 

We still need a ban on this poison. Chemical companies are still fighting tooth and nail to prevent our getting one. We need to fight back. Identify farms that use glyphosate. Publicize where those farms are located, so that everyone can refuse to buy anything from those farms. In the local area, everyone should also avoid speaking to, or touching, or working with, or trading with, or meeting in any social group, the farmers who are still bitterly clinging to glyphosate. If people agree to do this consistently there will be no need for violence or for additional government regulations. 

The Bitter Clingers to Glyphosate are not decent human beings. We stop treating them like human beings. They have become things--walking vats of toxic waste. They have no place in human society. Make them know it, and within a year they should be begging people to accept payment for holding their "farms" for the seven to ten years the land will need to recover from the Vicious Pesticide Cycle, while the Bitter Clingers move to basement apartments in cities and do menial work that feels penitential to them, and pray daily that people will show more empathy toward them than they have shown toward other people. 

If and when this strategy works, then this recipe will stop being a sad memory and become an actual recipe we can use, as it used to be.

Gluten-Free Vegan Garbanzo Salad, Soup, or Spread all begin with the same ingredients:

2 heaping cups cooked garbanzos (2 15-16-oz cans)

1 bell pepper

2 carrots

2 celery sticks

2 T chopped parsley, or more

½ cup chopped English walnuts

Optional seasonings: salt, pepper, lemon juice, onion, garlic, etc., as you like, but taste the dish before seasoning. It’s flavorful all by itself.

Method for Gluten-Free Garbanzo Salad

Clean and chop the raw vegetables. Toss with nuts and garbanzos. Serve on plates lined with lettuce. Garnish with radishes when they’re in season. Pass salt, pepper, lemon juice, and/or mayonnaise. 

Alternatively, break up green leaf lettuce, romaine, or other salad greens; toss them with the salad, and serve in bowls.

Method for Gluten-Free Garbanzo Soup

Heat the garbanzos in a generous amount of water and/or broth, adding the chopped peppers, carrots, and celery while bringing the liquid to boil. Simmer until the vegetables are soft. Sprinkle in parsley and nuts.

Method for Gluten-Free Garbanzo Spread

Cook the garbanzos, but leave the other vegetables raw. Grind everything, including the parsley and nuts, with a few spoonfuls of broth in a blender or food processor. Season as you like. Lay a piece of rice bread or corn bread, or lettuce, on a plate. Carefully spread the vegetable mixture thickly over the bread, and eat with a fork.

Truly gluten-free bread, by definition, doesn’t make the kind of sandwiches you can hold in one hand and eat while doing something else. Some gluten-intolerant people can use bread thickened with potato and tapioca starch; some breads of this type can be used for sandwiches. Gluten-tolerant people can, of course, spread the mixture on wheat bread. 
 
GBP advertised vegan meals, and she herself was one of the people who thrived on the no-added-fats school of vegan cuisine. She would never have added even a teaspoon of oil to any of these dishes. I don't think they need oil either, but some people might  want to add a teaspoon of flaxseed oil for essential fatty acids or sesame oil for flavor. Some gluten-free people might even spread this vegetable spread on a piece of boned and flattened chicken.

New Book Review: The Lingering Dead

Title: The Lingering Dead (formerly Souls of the South)

Author: Philippa Wozniak (formerly Louise Philips)

Date: 2026

Quote: "Sometimes...a house chooses its owner."

Although it's a reissue, what I received was an advance reader's copy of a shiny new edition of this book. 

This is a ghost story. The humans who are alive in the 1930s, when the story takes place, are being moved around by the humans who died during or after the Civil War. If that kind of stories completely destroy your suspension of disbelief, read something else. That's what's not to like about this book
Otherwise it's a classic Southern Gothic story with a sweet, sassy heroine who's in danger of various kinds, sometimes rescuing herself, sometimes being rescued by a handsome hero, and a present-time Miss Louisa who is benign and a ghost Miss Louisa who the present-time Miss Louisa insists is up to no good, and a tangled line of inheritance. Is Ted a Yankee with more money than good sense, who might buy the cotton mill but won't be able to run it, or is he the long-lost rightful heir? The living characters don't know. The ghosts do. And what about the woman who may or may not have been killed before she was placed on the bed beside Ted in the hotel room? 

You'll laugh at the cliches. You'll like Savannah and, as it becomes clear that she's not who she seems to be, enjoy her quest to find out who she really is. You might even manage to like Ted, who seems less conceited than many heroes of romance. If you're not put off by the active ghosts, you'll probably enjoy this book.

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

Web Log for 3.17.26

I was seeing green yesterday morning...and then by evening I was seeing white. This post will try to bring greenness to all those who are still seeing white: 


[photo from Google]

Books 

A golem story for adults. Warning: it'll be more intense than the golem story for kids this web site recently reviewed, which was pretty emotional. 


To my surprise, it's not published by Raconteur, a new, apparently digitally based, press with a mission of reviving the tradition of entertaining books written for men by men--clean adventure stories and comedy and so on. I don't expect to write for Raconteur myself, unless they open a women's division for realistic romances and historical novels, but I do follow their Substack. So many other publishers are still intentionally discouraging White men who aren't willing to write about sexual kinks, I think male writers should be aware that there's still a publisher just for them.

Food 


Shared by Neithan Hador.  Lens says the "Veggiewise Floats" vegetable tray was designed by Jennifer Guerrero, who once, in the past, had a blog post explaining exactly how to assemble a mosaic of vegetables that resembles Pennywise the Clown in Stephen King's It. Oh well you can figure it out. What I find so creatively horrible about Veggiewise is that he's made of all of people's least favorite vegetables--little hot peppers, fading cauliflower, olives, yellow squash; not a tangy tomato or crunchy bell pepper anywhere. At that party he was never nibbled down into harmlessness. He kept floating on the table, reminding people of a movie that was designed to put them off their feed for a week. A person who took this tray to a party would never be asked to bring a veggie tray again...the question is whether the person would be asked to attend a party again.

Sexuality and Mental Illness 

Y'know, although the point being illustrated here is about men who claim to be making or have made a "transition into womanhood," these three sorry excuses for humans are so similar to a certain type of men who want to make sure that the first and last thing everyone notices about them is their being heterosexual males. (I have C-cups, so I would know.) Having babies, or not having babies, really is an important choice to make, though one that normal people discuss only with their mates. Other than that, thinking that the state of your parts and hormones is the most important thing about you, or the most interesting thing, or of any interest at all to most of humankind, seems to be a symptom of fairly well advanced psychotic conditions. 


Spring Break 

Forty years ago I observed that, although Florida is a traditional destination for spring break and the beaches are packed with attractive people from other colleges, something--maybe it's only the crowding, maybe it's also the mosquito spray, likely both--makes those people show the worst sides of themselves to anyone on whom they are not actively hitting. The situation does not seem to have improved.


Some of the problem came from Black students, specifically. Stirring up bitterness and stereotypes and another occasion for me to observe that, in fact, at least one woman who was famous primarily for her beauty came from south of the Sahara Desert. P.J. O'Rourke went to a town in Somalia with some Army guys and reported that the streets were full of people who looked like models. A web search for "Somali-American woman" will show what he meant...I personally would not hire author Ayaan Hirsi Ali as a model. Most of the others whose photos have been published online, I would. Including US Representative Ilhan Omar, who I don't think is working out very well in Congress, but who does have a cute baby face. Not to mention supermodel Iman Bowie.

Anyway, if I wanted to go to Florida, I would avoid doing so during spring break. Usually the homicides are blamed on drunk driving, drunk sailing, and/or other recreational drugs rather than shooting, and get less attention in the commercial media because the People of the Burro aren't hoping to use them for yet another doomed, counterfactual attack on the Second Amendment. Spring break in Florida has always been dangerous. And prices are higher. And public beaches are nastier.

Virginia Legislature 

Our man. 


Meanwhile? Fellow Virginians, did you bother to go to the polls and vote for Our Winsome? How many lazy slacker voters did you drag along in the car pool? Those of you who did not bother to vote, voted for this mess, and deserve it.