Friday, April 2, 2021

Morgan Griffith's Holiday Message

From U.S. Representative Morgan Griffith (R-VA-9):

"
"

And So It Goes: Writing and Reviewing

You know someone who is about to have a book published. You are thrilled for this person; you want to share her or his excitement. The call goes out for obscure writers to review the new book. These writers get to see the book weeks before other people do, so their reviews can be in the papers, if possible, when the new book is displayed in the stores. You agree to be one. Happily sharing your friend's excitement, you watch the mail until the book arrives--or even agree to read it as an "e-book," which is basically a bad idea. You rush home and curl up with this book. It is not just another book. It is Tracy's book. It is "for you, from me." It is your chance to help the world discover what a wonderful person and writer Tracy is.

Not much can be said for the experience of reading an "e-book" unless the book itself happens to be great, so let's say that the publisher and author have invested the money to send you a real book, free of charge. The book probably cost ten or twenty dollars just to print, let alone start rewarding Tracy's work and the local booksellers' work, but for you it's a gift, because you are one of the obscure writers who will be boosting their own name recognition by writing clever, insightful things about Tracy's book.

So you savor this evening with Tracy's book, don't you? You sniff appreciatively at the paper and wonder whether to mention the scent of new books as one of life's pleasures. (Probably not in the version you plan to send to the literary magazine; for that audience it's a cliche.) You take time to admire the type font and any illustrations. Publishing crews need love too so, although there's no room for it on Amazon, in reviews that leave more room to ramble it's nice to warble about the beauty of a new book's design.

What kind of book is it, anyway? If it's the sort of "genre fiction" that sells steadily and well, detective stories or romantic comedies or Gothic horrors, probably the best way to read it is to dive in and read for the story alone. Genre readers want to know whether a novel delivers the kind of experience they like, so you want to note: "The plot kept me guessing." "I couldn't put it down." "I loved the heroine and I could just see the quaint little town she grows to love in the course of the story, too." You would not say these things if they weren't true. The fact that many people say them when they're not true does not, however, need to keep you from saying them when they are. 

If it's a more challenging read, you might give it multiple readings to check for nuances and symbolism and other fun stuff. It's worth doing this even with what appears to be a romance that doesn't quite fit the pattern. When fictional romances don't fit their patterns there is a reason. Often that reason involves extra layers of meaning you can enjoy discovering. 

How long do you normally take to read a book? For your first reading of Tracy's book, plan about twice that much time. You are not reading just to make sure that Jack and Jill resolve their differences. You want to savor the details that are now becoming part of your friendship with Tracy. Why did that sort of dog cross Jack's path? Why did Jill choose that color...

For about a week, anyway, Tracy's book is the guest of honor in your house. If you finish it in less than a week, see whether other family members can read it, too, and what they think of it. 

Meanwhile, of course, you're writing those reviews. Knowing that each of the major review venues markets books in a different way to a different audience, you will probably write different ones. Amazon likes them short and pithy, enough to give buyers the information they need on a small computer screen. Goodreads is chattier and offers room to ramble and quote. Literary 'zines tend to like "long form" reviews, 1500 to 2000 words, with lots of quotes and some references to other books. Your own blog is whatever you've made it; your social media will of course need to be condensed--one good sentence from a review is ideal for Twitter. You want each review to be a gem of its kind, of course, but from the publisher's point of view what's really crucial is that you get'em up where people can see them before they walk into a bookstore and see the book. 

Sometimes you might feel that haste hurts a book review. I consider my experience reviewing Wayland and Hiding Ezra, about a year ago. Hiding Ezra had been on my wish list for years but I hadn't bought and read it yet, and then suddenly a storekeeper wanted to throw a book party and wanted reviews of both books up, like yesterday. She thrust the books into my hands. "Read them! You'll not be disappointed! And review them in time for the party!" That was on a Tuesday; the party was on the Saturday. I got those books back to their owner and those reviews online in time for the party, all right. Every time I revisit those reviews I think the books deserved more thoughtful reviews that would have taken more time to write. 

Publishers and booksellers do not share your concern about writing a flawed book review. They want a bulletin board covered with different reviews that put the author's name and title in front of prospective buyers. They like star ratings but mainly they like a lot of attention at the right time.

This is not to say that you can't get into interesting and review-enriching discussions of books with publishers. Daniel Yeo's Impermanence of Lilies is that sort of book. I like it, Jee Leong Koh liked it, Kendrick Loo liked it, but dang if any of us could say exactly why other people would like it. It's historical, but the history is scrambled. Its plot is basically a sweet romantic comedy, but in the course of that sweet romance the characters witness some of the great tragedies of history. It's whimsical and funny, except in a few spots where it may cause some readers to cry. It's an interesting book on many levels. Read it yourself and see. 

Whatever you end up saying about a book, you must get those reviews of Tracy's book in front of readers in time. Anything less than that is STEALING. You got the book in exchange for those reviews, just as you get gas in exchange for money. Unless you can truthfully say that you were taken to the emergency room on the way back to the post office and never had a chance to read the book, there is no way you can pay the publisher for that book, now, other than writing reviews that will sell copies--to somebody, however different from you those somebodies may be. You will write those reviews. If the book disappointed you, you will read and reread until you come up with a plausible way of telling readers what their expectations of it ought to be, to avoid disappointment. You will get that information to those readers on the day appointed for each venue. Come flood come fire.

--That, at least, is my approach to reviewing e-friends' books. I had assumed it was everybody's. At least, the people who tweeted for review copies of Iris Yang's novels seemed to get reasonably good and timely reviews of them up...I'm still waiting to collect the money with which I've promised to buy the third book in the trilogy. I expect it to be a hard sell because, currently, China's ruling political party is about as popular in the United States as rabid skunks are, but people need and deserve to be reminded that China was our ally in the 1940s. But I will get that book and I will post those reviews. For those who've not read Yang's first two books, the two of them are good enough that you jollywell ought to pay for the third one. 

But apparently writers further up the sales hierarchy than Iris Yang are encountering less ethical would-be reviewers. Hope Clark recently shared with everyone on her list that she sent out review copies of one of her detective novels to 44 e-friends, and of the 44, only 22 actually wrote reviews. 

I read those words and wanted to take a few people by the collar and shake them. I personally do not happen to be a huge fan of detective stories, other than Dorothy Sayers', which are serious novels with plots like detective stories, and Rita Mae Brown's, which are deliberately laugh-out-loud goofy. Clark's novels seem to be selling steadily without my help. I'm pleased. I read and review detective stories but, as readers may have noticed, my reviews of them tend to be tepid. But a lot of people Out There like to "solve a mystery" (my husband was one) and they deserve to know when there's a new, good one that has the Carolina coast in it, and what other delights it contains besides the Carolina coast. 

Some people who would never go into Wal-Mart, fill a cart, load the whole cart into their van, and drive away without paying for anything, did the moral equivalent of that to Clark.

I hit "reply." I hit the exclamation mark key, rather hard. I typed a hasty, harsh reply explaining that I don't do credit cards, so Amazon is out, and I'm not famous enough to get into the Washington Post Magazine, but if I say I'll write a review, at least on Goodreads, on Twitter, here, and in that Tuesday Revue newsletter I'm launching er um next week, I will write that review if I am alive. 

Clark replied promptly, too, making excuses for her friends who just let other things crowd her book out of their consciousness...

You don't LET other things crowd your friend's book out of your consciousness when that review copy is the guest of honor in your home, dingbats!

She thought Amazon was now limiting reviews based on how much money people had spent there recently, rather than whether or not they used credit cards. Amazon doesn't work with Paypal so you might ask what other way anybody managed to spend money there. The answer is giftcards. I used to have recurring gigs that paid in Amazon giftcards, and this led to enough purchases to get some of my Amazon reviews live on Amazon, where several people voted them helpful. Then those reviews all disappeared, just when a deserving publisher was looking for some more of them, because we hadn't used the wretched credit cards. If Amazon has gone back to the only question that makes sense--"Do we know that this reviewer bought this particular book, or the publisher did?"--that would be good news. I've not heard that they have. 

But the most interesting thing she had to tell me was why publishers do not drop the thieves from their lists of potential reviewers and reach out to more conscientious people. Amazon is the biggest venue, she said, therefore the one they consider first. If obscure writers don't do Amazon, they need to have large followings on Goodreads, the social media, and their blogs. "Thousands of daily page views" were required...

This web site determined, some time ago, that "It's All Right to Be Little-Bitty." We like high numbers of page views but we don't want to pursue them at the cost of anything else, and so, although some posts here get thousands of views, most get hundreds. Or dozens.

Well, if publishers don't want to bother with really obscure writers who are conscientious about writing reviews on time, and prefer to throw away money on (oh all right, if they're Clark's friends I'll say slackers, but if they had been claiming to be friends of mine I'd say thieves), that is their problem in a nutshell. 

Meanwhile, Gentle Readers, I'm glad I started out at Associated Content because that site built in a system that encouraged writers to boost one another's signals. I'm always glad to boost anyone else's signal if they deserve it. So, I hope, are you. If you don't want to buy a bot army, the honest way to raise your page-view count is to get more views and referrals from your friends' friends, and their friends.

Thursday, April 1, 2021

Tree (Poem? Whatever)

Everything I remember of Mississippi has a surreal feeling.
Everything seemed alien down there
partly, of course, because I was in a kind of shock:
I have a life, and this is not it.
Farms still had slaves' quarters.
We were renting one.
A pileated woodpecker woke us, mornings, drumming on its tin roof.
Things grew out of season: in April there were
horned-devil caterpillars in the cotton stubble.
Water came rusty and oily from the pump.
The creek flowed either way, following the wind.
In town one street was still lined with impossibly tall elms
that met and formed a vaulted roof, fifty feet high,
and one of those houses where the black soot inside
jars the eye against the bright white paint outside
what's left from a fire, like Merricat's castle, at the end of the row.
On the farm we could walk through a pine thicket 
and see a big, tall, tree of unknown kind 
towering over an old barn. 
We walked through the pines to see the base,
and that tree seemed to have none. It began 
about three feet off the ground, and grew straight up.
On second glance, it grew from a sort of stalk
that grew parallel with the ground, about three feet up,
and led...inside the barn. 
The tree had sprouted in the barn's earth floor
three feet straight up, fifteen feet straight along,
till it found room to reach its splendid height.
That was the first paulownia tree we'd seen.
I've mostly lived in woods, and trees do funny things,
but I've never seen another tree grow like that.

Status update: Of course it's not a poem. Y'think that on Day Nine of Salmonella Torture my brain's together enough to write poems? It's a memory, here shared with the Poets and Storytellers United.

Wednesday, March 31, 2021

Morgan Griffith on Energy Policy

 From U.S. Representative Morgan Griffith (R-Va-9), editorial comment below:

"
"

The position of this web site is that, while Congress may have to agree on ways to power big expensive things like Washington's Metrorail, most of us could already come close to energy independence ("going off the grid") and thus reduce the need for those suspected carcinogens, the high-voltage power lines. If you can get down to one electrical circuit or none, you can tell both sides of the debate in this congressional committee "Not in my name do you have to pollute anything, raise any rates or taxes, build any more high-voltage towers or cables, or anything of the kind." This is fun, Gentle Readers. 

Belated Tortie Tuesday Post: The Care and Feeding of Sick Humans

Serena: “Why d’you want to call our post that? Nobody fed you. You weren’t eating.”

PK: “Of course not. Eating food when you know it won’t stay down and nourish you is wasteful. The feeding of the Very Sick Human is easy. You just don’t.”

Serena: “Well. What a time we have had this week. After eight days of grumbling about being sick our human suddenly progressed into being Very Sick.”

PK: “On Monday, the fifteenth of March, the first poison spraying of the railroad occurred. As usual, people were given no warning, so on Monday I hauled the laptop out to that parking lot on the edge of town to go online. I wondered why the laptop seemed so much heavier and the road so much longer on the way back. At one point I sat down on a log beside the road to rest and suddenly felt faint; had to lie down on the gravel beside the log so that I wouldn’t fall off it. Fortunately there wasn’t much traffic and no one seemed to notice. The faintness eventually passed. I got up and went home.

On Tuesday, the sixteenth, early in the morning I felt that surge of otherwise unprovoked anger that has always been the prodrome of my celiac reactions. I used to worry that it was a serious emotional problem; I learned that, since the anger fades away as soon as I recognize what it is, it’s a valuable warning, (1) that I’m about to have a celiac reaction, and (2) that all our emotional feelings need to be considered as physical reactions to body processes rather than any kind of guide to how we ought to live!

I walked out again. Now I could see the poisoned plants beside the railroad. Very foolishly, I used the Internet while waiting to meet someone who I knew is irresponsible and likely not to keep appointments. The person didn’t keep that one. About halfway home a neighbor offered me a lift, so I got home without fainting.

But the celiac reaction lasted all the rest of the week. Basically the celiac reaction consists of acute damage to the interior lining of the digestive tract. Little temporary bleeding ulcers can pop up inside the mouth and anywhere further down. Damage to the bowels can cause a very specific pattern of irregularity that may or may not be complete or follow the same time schedule every time. Usually the reaction lasts only two or three days, but with heavier exposure the spastic colon can fail to resume its job for several days. However long it takes for the cause of the reaction to be expelled from the body, I have less strength and energy than I normally have.

That’s why I say that, when it’s possible for celiacs to avoid the cause of our reactions, which is normally wheat gluten, the celiac trait is not a disease but a super-power. Most celiacs grew up pushing ourselves to work through that chronic fatigue, so when we don’t have the chronic fatigue, we’ve overtrained and have tremendous strength and energy.

But when the cause is glyphosate, which we can’t avoid, the superpower turns into a disease again. And I feel very, very bad about the way our government allows other people to make me sick without even having to pay me damages, just because those people are too lazy to pull up their own weeds.

In the U.S. the top-selling glyphosate product, Roundup spray, was pulled off the market for individual gardeners. That’s a big step in the right direction but other products, some of which combine glyphosate with other chemicals that may make their effects on humans even worse, are still available to the irresponsible gardener. Meanwhile big corporations like the railroad company, which buy their poisons in bulk, are still free to torture people.”

Serena: “And kill kittens.” (Image not shown, out of kindness: stillborn, defective kitten that turned up in the yard while PK was sick.)

PK: “And songbirds. And honeybees. Don’t get me started. Anyway on Monday, the twenty-second, bowel activity seemed to be resuming. I thought I’d soon be well. I made plans to meet someone in town on Wednesday. Then on Wednesday I woke up in pain that kept me awake for hours. When I looked at the clock it was exactly 3:00 a.m. The pain was coming from the whole “core” of my body, the abdominal area. During a celiac reaction I usually bloat up enough that only the ‘fat pants’ fit, but suddenly the swelling had increased by two or three times. Even at the back of my waist, the soft tissue was rigid and tender. I was breathing in a strange pattern where my bloated abdomen expanded when I breathed out. The diaphragm muscle was having to work hard to keep that bloating from expanding up into my lungs. All the muscles in that part of my body were cramping; when I moved in a way that bent or twisted the core, the pain became enough to block any other movement I’d been trying to make.

Serena: “Were you delirious, like I was last fall?”

PK: “Not delirious, actually. I could see and recognize and remember things. However, my thoughts were—distracted. In the time it would normally take to edit a chapter of my book manuscript I’d be occupied with the new mental challenge this new disability presented, like ‘What is the least painful way to move six inches up or down in bed?’

At first I hoped the bloating and pain would subside when I’d been to the bathroom. Surprisingly, although standing up was difficult and painful, once I was standing up I could walk—but not make any use of the bathroom. I was very weak and felt faint after exertions like walking across the bedroom to get another pillow out of the closet. But nothing was moving in those bloated tissues. Glyphosate can cause paralysis. My colon was paralyzed.

I began to worry that some part of my damaged digestive tract had ruptured. My father lived with an intestinal hernia for years. It ruptured in the week before he died. Blood poisoning, in addition to bloating, set in. My natural sister, who didn’t check on either of our parents as often as I would have done, went to his flat and found him too feverish to talk. So she rushed him to the nearest hospital. Without asking questions about his background or history, the hospital staff rushed to give Dad a total anesthetic, clean up the mess in his abdomen, and stitch up the hernia. Irish people can have very different reactions to several things than English people have. One of those reactions is that upon coming out of a full anesthetic, people of Irish descent may have a fatal stroke. This is why we might say “The operation was a great success, but the patient died.” Dad’s operation seemed to be a great success, but he died. He wasn’t even seventy-five years old.

It occurred to me that if something had ruptured, it might be a good idea to start the surgery with a local anesthetic while I was able to explain these things.

I called our local EMT service, the Scott County Life Saving Crew, a fine organization that belongs on everybody’s charity list. They sent out a nurse and EMT to determine whether I needed immediate surgery. Since my pulse, blood pressure, and temperature were normal for a healthy person and I wasn’t vomiting, they said it was up to me whether I wanted to go to the hospital.

I could think of some possible benefit from going to the hospital. A hospital might be able to determine whether this glyphosate reaction was being complicated by salmonella (which it now seems to have been). If so, an antibiotic might clean it right out. I’ve never liked the idea of possibly aggravating damage to the colon by adding even a simple saline solution, but this bloating and blockage were horrible enough to make me willing to reconsider having an enema, in a hospital setting where damage to the colon could be repaired.

I could also think of the expenses. Hospitals tend to like to keep people in beds “for observation” for several hours before anything is done about a condition that is not life-threatening. This allows doctors to treat life-threatening conditions first, allows nurses to observe symptoms the patient may not have mentioned, and allows the hospital to start billing with a thousand dollars a day for that hospital bed. I could think of ways to pay for an antibiotic or an enema but not for a day in a hospital bed.

I decided to suffer through this episode in my own bed, where at least I had books to read and would not be exposed to other people’s germs.

But after I’d gone inside, surrounding myself with paperback books and a plastic jug I could use for a bedpan, I did begin vomiting. Several times during the next three days, whether my stomach contained water or nothing at all, it heaved. A bowel movement brought only partial relief. I made five or six tries to get up and feed the cats before I was finally able, right after vomiting, to drag myself to the porch. Then I felt faint and lay down.”

Serena: “You seemed glad to see me, but you didn’t even try to touch or kiss me or hold out a hand for me to sniff. I thought about sitting on you and purring, but you didn’t seem to want that.”

PK: “No! I suppose you might have curled up on my arm or shoulder, the way Heather used to do, but even my chest was sore from that laborious double-breathing process. I thought your sitting on me would hurt more than help.”

Serena: “Okay, right, keep your fur on, as we say. I know where I’m not wanted. I didn’t even let Silver ask. But we were concerned about you.”

PK: “I had heard Sommersburr calling you. It was Friday. I had not had the energy to feed you dinner on Wednesday after the nurse left, nor breakfast nor dinner on Thursday. I thought, ‘He’s inviting you to his house, and people who like cats enough to adopt an old ugly tomcat like Sommersburr will probably want to keep you two. Will I ever see you again?’ I looked out the window and didn’t see you and thought, ‘Now by the time I get to the kibble bin, they’ll be too far away even to hear me.’”

Silver: “No such! Sommersburr was inviting us to his house, but we told him to go home. We knew you weren’t dead. We wanted to see you.”

PK: “Seeing you right at the door brought tears to my eyes. Most cats do not have a noticeable capacity for love of any other creature but themselves. Social cats do, which is what makes you special, but although there’s no doubt that Serena loves you, Silver, I have wondered whether she even likes me.”

Serena: “Well I’m not the soppy sentimental type. Never was. And you’ve done some things I really did not like. But I suppose the bottom line is, given a choice between dinner with a stranger or sitting hungrily outside the door watching for you, I choose you.”

PK: “I love you, too, Serena. As soon as I was able to stand up I fed you and Silver. And Sommersburr, but he didn’t eat.”

Silver: “He is a cat who loves, like us. He knew we needed every kibble we could snap up!”

PK: “Then I went back to bed and stayed there. A routine chore like giving you two your breakfast had suddenly become a full day’s work, even though the cramps and bloating did seem to be subsiding. I kept sipping water. My mouth stayed so dry I could hardly speak but, eventually, most of the water stayed down. I read paperback books and thought about things. I dozed a lot, after the first few horrible hours; every time I woke up from a dream I’d been dreaming about the writing I wasn’t doing. On Friday night I made three or four tries to go out and dump the bedpan and give you your dinner. Eventually I did get the bedpan dumped but did not get back to the kibble bin.

It's lasted a full week and it's not over yet. I've felt that I've been making some very small amount of progress every day. Bowel movements did eventually appear; they had the look of salmonella. This afternoon, the thirty-first of March, when I finally got my Internet back, I sat up for four hours, the longest time I've lasted all week. One of the more convenient genes I inherited is for resistance to bacteria like salmonella, so I expect to make a full recovery without having to pay for professional help.

One reason why older people seldom talk to counsellors is that young counsellors don’t understand what the change of life is all about. For young people, mental health means wanting to stay alive at any cost. For older people, mental health means accepting that we can’t always stay alive, in any meaningful way, and accepting that our lives are going to end. Young people always think we’re talking about suicidal depression. No such. We may appreciate the good things of this life more than the young do—I remember noticing, several times, the pretty new flowers and green leaves of spring, from my bedroom window, and wondering whether I’ll be here to enjoy them next year. For me, if I can have another fifty years to live on my own, with or without any new mates or young that might come along, I’d still take every one of those years. But I don’t want even one year of pain or being dependent on other people.

That’s what my blog buddy and mentor and best friend for life, Grandma Bonnie Peters, was thinking when she did the Last Road Trip while she was weakened by liver cancer. She might have preferred to have the stroke after spending more time with those relatives, rather than before, but the goal was to have that stroke before she got to the really horrible stage of liver cancer.

People didn’t want to let her go. I can certainly relate to that. It was GBP’s nature, as a nurse and a mentor for people living with health problems, that made people feel dependent on her, and she hated to be depended on. She always told people, no matter how much they liked a friend, never to depend on a friend for anything. She loved George Peters but, when he felt the need to be in an assisted living project, she refused to stay there more than a few hours at a time. She didn’t want to raise ‘mother’s girls.’ Of her two daughters she chose to spend her declining years with the one who was less responsible and less emotionally involved with her. She liked the independence of having time to clean up her own mess, even after she’d seen how that could mean lying on the floor for thirty-some hours instead of being rushed right off to the hospital. As a friend she would push people away, even hurt and disappoint them, if she thought they were getting too close. I think she wanted people to be able to accept that she was gone, when she was gone.

Nevertheless a lot of them weren’t, and I get that, now, too. ‘How could you have let her go on that trip?’ Well, for one thing, as her husband knew, when GBP wanted to do a thing, you could offer alternatives; she’d ignore them. You could sit on her; she’d bite, and eventually you’d have to get up and she’d go right back to Plan A. If you did not fully agree with her plan, your best chance was to go along with her and try for damage control.

Do I miss GBP? Often. Lots of women love to play “mommy,” and I suppose we should let them feed their prolactin cycles, though I wish more of them would just adopt babies and stop oozing their prolactin into adult conversations. And I have some older friends—I suppose it’s the way they feel they need to define a relationship with someone younger—who’ve said “I could be your mentor.” And frankly, if there’s anything GBP and Suzette Haden Elgin and Bonnie Prudden failed to teach me, as mentors, I am probably hopeless and never going to learn it; not that I mind watching other people for pointers. I’ve not felt a need for mentoring or mothering since GBP’s died. I’ve been profoundly blessed; I’ve been the student who becomes the teacher’s peer and friend. She would ask me for tips as easily as I would ask her, but mostly, when I spent time with her, we strategized. Reminisced, too, and cooked, and walked. I miss that.

None of The Nephews has been dependent on me for anything but auntly love. They’re old enough to get by without that, by now. I suppose it’s possible that some people may miss the friendships they’ve had with me, too—but adults have to live with that kind of loss.

I worry about people bothering their heads about me being Very Sick “all alo-o-one.” If I become sick enough to feel that I need to be in a hospital, I suppose I could force myself to go to one, but when I’m sick I prefer to be all alone. Having someone else watch does nothing whatsoever to improve the experience of vomiting. Nobody else really had to know that I’m the sort of patient who, however long it takes and however much of a challenge it feels, will sponge-dry and disinfect the spot where a little vomit splashed on the bed, before I lie down again. That was Thursday’s big achievement. I vomited, I splattered, I bloodywell cleaned the spot and lay down in a sanitary bed. Nobody needed to watch that. Nobody needed to “help.” Maybe I needed to know that, even with my new disability, I could still be myself.

Maybe another time, if not this time, I’ll get sicker and die, “all alo-o-one.” If so, the most important thing for other people to know is that I preferred to be all alone, in my favorite place, with some of my favorite living people (even if they happen to be cats—real good will matters more than species does).

Anyone who feels inclined to fret about my being sick, ill, injured, “all alo-o-one”…well, first of all, I’m not really, even when all of The Nephews are with their own parents or at their own schools or generally living their own lives. It’d be nice if one of them turned out to be a congenial housemate for me, but Gate City has turned a lot of people off the idea of living with me, and no young person should have to try to start a career in Gate City because they think I’m “all alo-o-one.” Emotionally? I have the cats. For security? I have the neighbors; we’ve seen that even the Bad Neighbor would feel it a blot on his honor if he didn’t summon help for someone who was ill. I think, if like our poor friend Oogesti I’d collapsed beside the road, I’d rather just die than be picked up and ministered to by the Bad Neighbor; still, the Bad Neighbor did stay beside Oogesti until the ambulance came. For emergency medical help? I have the Life Saving Crew. I now have two cell phones.

But please—for Heaven’s sake, for your sake, for my sake, for all of our sakes!—don’t fret about the possibility that I might manage to have the dignity to die alone, in my own home, without calling for help. It’s generally agreed that a good death is a quick death in which the person doesn’t have time to call for help.

Fret, instead, about the fact that the only reason why I’ve been sick, or am likely to die, is that in these United States the law still allows people to poison the air their neighbors have to breathe—to poison me—to make me sick. Me today, you tomorrow. Meditate on that fact, and let it make you angry. Fighting mad.

Glyphosate Awareness.

Carry it on.”

Serena: “For us cats, too.”

Silver: “And the songbirds, the butterflies, and the honeybees.”

Tuesday, March 2, 2021

Morgan Griffith on the Possible Vaccine Surplus

Is that going to be a problem? If we have more COVID-19 vaccines than we need, can we just send them to some place that doesn't? I only report these things but I'm glad to report that this web site is back on Congressman Griffith's e-mail list.

"

Sunday, February 28, 2021 –

Could We Have a Vaccine Surplus?

The headline on February 27 was a story that seems to be both old news and extraordinary: the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for emergency use a COVID-19 vaccine produced by Johnson & Johnson after finding it to be safe and effective.

It could be considered old news because Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine is the third COVID-19 vaccine to be authorized since December 2020, following those from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

Nevertheless, the successful creation of these vaccines, with possibly more on the way, remains a remarkable accomplishment. A U.S. Government Accountability Office report found that vaccines typically result from a process that takes ten years from the exploratory stage to large-scale manufacturing and FDA review and licensure.

In contrast, the FDA approved the first two COVID-19 vaccines only eleven months after our country recorded its first case of the coronavirus. Each vaccine dose today being administered to Americans represents a great scientific and logistical accomplishment.

As of February 26, more than 68 million doses have been administered, resulting in 13.9 percent of the total U.S. population receiving at least one dose. The United States is well ahead of President Biden’s goal of administering one million doses a day for the first one hundred days of his presidency. In fact, the country had already met that goal on at least three days before he took office.

The Trump Administration’s Operation Warp Speed, which brought together government, the private sector, and the scientific community to achieve the unprecedented feat of creating a coronavirus vaccine within a year, supported the manufacture of promising vaccines before they met with final FDA approval. As a result, as soon as the FDA signed off on a candidate, doses of it were available for distribution. Pfizer began shipping its vaccine within 24 hours of the FDA’s approval.

Operation Warp Speed offered a head start, but manufacturers now are focused on increasing capacity to keep up with demand. Vaccinating the entire eligible population of Americans, currently estimated at 260 million people, presents a great challenge. The eligible population is less than our total population because no vaccine is currently authorized for children or pregnant mothers. Also, there are people who do not want to be vaccinated, and that is their right.

During a recent Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations hearing, we heard testimony from representatives of the companies developing vaccines that have been approved or are promising candidates. In addition to Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca may be approved in March or early April, and Novavax currently has a vaccine candidate far advanced into clinical trials.

I came away from the hearing with optimism that they would meet that challenge.

Pfizer is on track to deliver all 300 million doses that it has been contracted to deliver by Operation Warp Speed by the end of July. So is Moderna. Both of these vaccines require two doses, so that means 150 million people would be covered by each of these manufacturers.

At the time of the hearing, Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine had not yet received emergency use authorization, but it nevertheless is set to deliver 100 million doses by the end of June. This vaccine only requires one shot.

Taking these three vaccine manufacturers together, enough doses have been pledged by the end of July to cover 400 million people, well over the 260 million Americans eligible for vaccination.

When I asked the panel of witnesses whether this meant the United States would have a vaccine surplus in the summer, all five agreed that it was plausible.

With a vaccine surplus after eligible Americans are vaccinated, the remainder could be distributed for use in other countries.

That will not be the end of the work. Mutations of the coronavirus threaten to prolong the pandemic, as the current vaccines may not provide as much effective protection against them. Fortunately, both the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines apparently do defend individuals against emerging variants, but the companies are nevertheless studying the possibility of booster shots to maintain their efficacy.

Children are not currently eligible to receive these vaccines, so pediatric trials are under way to see whether a separate vaccine for children would be necessary.

Vaccines offer the best path to a restoration of normalcy in our lives. I appreciated the update from the vaccine manufacturers and was encouraged by their reports of progress in our effort against the coronavirus. I am hopeful that better days are on the way. Too many vaccine doses is a problem I would like to have.

If you have questions, concerns, or comments, feel free to contact my office.  You can call my Abingdon office at 276-525-1405 or my Christiansburg office at 540-381-5671. To reach my office via email, please visit my website at www.morgangriffith.house.gov.

"