This week Long & Short Reviews links up posts about the books reviewers would or wouldn't review, and why.
This question seems to invite generalizations.
Books I would reread, or at least re-skim? That would be most books I've read. I skim-read fast enough not to mind the time it takes if someone asks which volume in a series had a particular minor character in it, or whether a quote attributed to the author online sounds like even a rephrasing of anything the author said in...A day will probably come when I'm not able to do this any more, but it's true for now.
Books I would not reread? Not just the ones I've deleted from Kindle or Book Funnel to save space. If the blog says I enjoyed a book, or even that I didn't like it much but you might, it's probably not one that I want to keep and reread every year, but it's one that I'd skim-read if, say, I was reading a volume that came later in the series and wanted to remind myself of the story about how the characters met. The ones I would not reread are the ones that seemed to be completely dishonest, like a horrible novel that claimed to be Christian in which a family seemed impossibly nice and cheerful and sweet because they were all on drugs, or like the genre fiction that never even shows a seam where the author actually wrote a single scene without help from a chatbot, or like the bestseller of bygone years where the twelve-year-old seduced the grown-up. That's not merely bad; it's worse.
(Though of course everyone's definition of the very worst in books is subjective, and subject to cultural influence. Because my culture values the growing-and-learning time of life in ways most human cultures never did, I think fiction should not mention any sexuality characters might have before they're sixteen. This may seem arbitrary to some people...deal with it.)
Most books that are identified as classics are generally worth rereading but, for a change, let's encourage new writers with a list of ten recent books that are currently in my Kindle, that I intend to keep there until I get printed copies, because I'm likely to want to reread...
(This list is arbitrarily discriminating against new books that I received in formats other than Kindle. That's because I'm offline, and Kindle is working better than Book Funnel or PDF at the moment. If that's not the best reason why your book's not on the list, at least it helps me narrow the selection down to ten. These have all been reviewed at this web site recently, and should be in your favorite bookstore. They were selected by looking down the list of titles in the "recently accessed" view in the Kindle app.)
Isabel Allende, My Name is Emilia del Valle
Emily Dana Botrous, With Love Melody
London Clarke, The Neighbor
Sallie Cochren, Let the Purring Begin
Channelle Desamours, Needy Little Things
Carl Hiaasen, Fever Beach
Robert Malone, Lies My Govt Told Me
Neal Shusterman, All Better Now
Sharon Srock, For Mercie's Sake
Barbara Wright, Anny in Love
Re "Robert Malone, Lies My Govt Told Me"
ReplyDeleteLots of members of the corrupt "alternative" media's "truth movement" KEEP promoting the corrupt shill Malone as if he were trustworthy!
Malone is an establishment shill who sued a doctor, Peter Breggin, who had worked FOR DECADES TO REVEAL corruptions/frauds of the allopathic governmental-medical establishments while Malone has worked FOR DECADES TO SERVE the interests of the same criminal establishment. Guess whom you should trust?
Malone is an agent EVERYONE can see that just read the info at these sites:
https://rumble.com/v37bkkz-dr.-nagase-calls-out-agent-dr.-malone..html
https://archive.ph/UaeV7
https://archive.ph/or6e2
https://archive.org/details/dr.-robert-malone-dark-vaccine-wizard
https://archive.vn/BJlNd
https://archive.vn/eisHt
https://rumble.com/v2fbyxo-home-malone-with-george-webb.html
https://archive.ph/e1yMe
https://archive.ph/lyeua
https://archive.is/JXtUy
https://archive.md/4hhpc
https://archive.ph/5jyu6
Malone supposedly "suddenly saw the light" (=he was stupid all his former life yet he's now the entitled "enlightened" smart person everyone should trust/follow) and entered the public space out of nowhere, and then SELFISHLY presents HIMSELF as a "victim" of those ruling "bad guys" (https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html) he's been serving for decades (https://archive.ph/5RVCt & https://rumble.com/v2fbyxo-home-malone-with-george-webb.html), and wants you to believe he's on your side.
He knew in 2019 (!) that the “Spike Protein” is highly toxic yet he did nothing to prevent its inclusion in Covid jabs (https://rumble.com/v22nbhy-the-curious-case-of-dr.-robert-malone.html & https://archive.is/lwDYr). Since he knew at least since 2019 that the “Spike Protein” is highly toxic we can be certain that his publicized events of him getting a Covid "vaccine and a booster are fraudulent staged fake events. In fact, a partner of Malone revealed that Malone did NOT get a Covid jab in 2021 (https://archive.ph/HfOoi)!
"If I was able to figure out in May of 2021 that mRNA Vaccine Lipid Nanoparticles were bioweapons by reading ONE PATENT, how come the inventor of the ‘mRNA vaccine’ cationic liposome nanotechnology [ie, Dr. Robert Malone] still has not figured this out? [because Malone is an immoral shill for the criminal establishment!]" --- Karen Kingston, former Big Pharma employee, in 2023 (https://archive.md/GTmQ1) [bits in brackets got added]
If you have been injected with Covid jabs and are concerned verify what batch number you were injected with at https://howbadismybatch.com
Divisiveness is not good for any of us, but reasonable criticism of published work is welcome here. I think Google filtered this comment because it's so long and link-heavy. It would probably be more effective as a post on your own blog.
DeleteI think it's hard not to skim through previous books in a series, especially if that series is long. I sometimes find myself going back just to catch up or, as you say, to remind myself how characters met or to remind myself of the world.
ReplyDeleteI use that line sometimes as well, not for me, but maybe you will enjoy it. Love that you focused on new writers.
ReplyDeleteSomebody called Jenn called this web site "corrupt" for endorsing Robert Malone's book. I'm not saying Malone is a perfect person or that his book even claims he is one. Some people think his book doesn't go far enough. That may prove to be true. What I really don't want to endorse, though, is the idea that conflict between Malone and Peter Breggin (whose work I've respected for a long time) should be allowed to devalue either one's contribution to awakening people to the danger certain profitable products present to our health. I've not been hired to mediate between Malone and Breggin. I'm a bookseller and I recommend that EVERYBODY read BOTH of their books!
ReplyDeleteIn a grassroots movement as immense as even the Children's Health Defense organization itself, there will inevitably be disagreements. We need not to let these disagreements be used to divide and conquer the movement. Debate, yes. Hate, no. Jenn's welcome to point out where "Lies My Govt Told Me" may have been proved inaccurate or where it doesn't go far enough, relative to newer information...without defaming my character, or Malone's character, or Breggin's or even Fauci's.
(Does the Chief Beagle Torturer have a character that it would be possible to defame? Yes. He's known to have done some very bad things, but that doesn't mean we should be accusing him of bad things he's not known to have done...BECAUSE most readers of this web site dislike him enough to be willing to believe accusations that might be false.)