Morgan Griffith on the EPA

I, the writer known as Priscilla King, have an apology to make. I don't always post all the e-mail this web site receives from elected officials. Some of it gets caught in the spam filter because some officials persist in using devices that try to confirm that correspondence is going to their districts, which is legitimate and reasonable but has to be classified as spyware. Sometimes I'm not online enough to find and post e-mails before they become outrageously outdated. This time, I read Congressman Griffith's E-Newsletter when it came in, thought "This needs to be posted with comments," and then failed to make the time to post it and append the comments.

Here's U.S. Representative Morgan Griffith's (R-VA-9) E-Newsletter from two weeks ago:

"
Friday, April 27, 2018 –
What a Diff’rence a Year Made
I’ve never met anyone who doesn’t want clean air and clean water. Protecting our environment is something we all desire. But there are grand ideas about refashioning (but damaging) our economy that offer theoretical benefits we may never see, or there are nuts-and-bolts approaches that can make positive differences in both our environment and our economy. For too long at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), there was more of the former and not enough of the latter.
Under the Obama Administration, EPA acted far beyond its statutory authority. As I have noted many times, EPA wrote regulations with little apparent regard for what the law actually permitted it to do or the damage it would inflict on jobs and livelihoods.
While EPA made up rules disconnected from the law, actual laws went unenforced.
You may recall the story of Flint, Michigan, where lead poisoned the city’s water. EPA’s regional administrator had information on lead in the city’s water for months without making it public, even ignoring dire warnings from an EPA field representative who was willing to spend his own money in order to get better data.
Ultimately, a team of Virginia Tech researchers led by professor Dr. Marc Edwards helped bring it to public attention. Their work showed the true scale of lead poisoning in Flint’s water, even as EPA and state officials minimized the problem.
Flint exemplified how EPA had lost its way. As a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over EPA, I saw firsthand how the agency forgot its core mission.
But, to paraphrase an American standard song made popular by Dinah Washington, “What a Diff’rence a Year Made.” Under the Trump Administration, the EPA has shown notable progress over the past year in addressing its core tasks of clean water, clean air, and environmental renewal.
As an example, let’s check back in with Dr. Edwards, who was recently awarded a grant of almost $2 million from EPA. The funds will support what he calls, as reported in the Roanoke Times, the “largest engineering citizen-science project in American history.”
With EPA’s grant, Dr. Edwards will apply what he learned in Flint to help other communities that may have water problems. He will also test home kits so others can gauge the purity of what comes out of their faucets. This type of research will identify where we have problems with the nation’s drinking water. It will most likely mean that we will have to spend local, state, and federal dollars to fix the problems discovered. But hopefully, we can solve the problems before they get as bad as Flint, Michigan.
I have also been pleased with developments in EPA’s Brownfields Program, which provides assistance to contaminated areas that are no longer usable.
EPA’s program offers help to communities that want to clean these areas up and make them fit for new economic activity. It’s a boon for economic development and environmental protection.
The Brownfields Program was recently reauthorized for the first time since 2002 based on language crafted by the Energy and Commerce Committee.
EPA recently announced a round of brownfield grants:

1. The Alleghany Highlands Economic Development Corporation received $600,000. Among the places they may use the money are Alleghany County, Covington, Clifton Forge, and Iron Gate.
2. The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) received $300,000 for Southwestern Virginia, which will be used in Bland, Carroll, Grayson, Smyth and Wythe Counties.
3. Virginia Tech received $300,000, which will be spent on environmental assessments in Honaker, Pocahontas, St. Paul, and Appalachia.
4. Wise County received $600,000 for properties in the Guest River Watershed.

That’s $1.8 million that will be spent in our communities to assess lands currently in disuse, restore them, and repurpose them.
Similarly, money I obtained for a pilot project is being used by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) to accelerate the cleanup of abandoned mine lands for economic development. I advocated for funding this project, called the AML Pilot Plus Program, and I recently visited a former mine site that would benefit from it in Russell County with DEQ and OSM officials. Other sites like it dot our landscape.
Projects like Dr. Edwards’ work on water quality, redeveloping brownfields and mine lands aren’t flashy. But they will lead to cleaner air, cleaner water, a better environment, and more jobs. That’s what we really need. The EPA is doing its core job. What a difference a year makes.

If you have questions, concerns, or comments, feel free to contact my office. You can call my Abingdon office at 276-525-1405 or my Christiansburg office at 540-381-5671. To reach my office via email, please visit my website at www.morgangriffith.house.gov.
"

Two comments:

1. Our Uncle Sam is known for his habit of throwing money about recklessly. If he has the money and is going to throw it, Appalachia is a nice little town and could use some free money. But I'd rather see Uncle Sam stop throwing money about and just enforce sensible laws. One that we need badly should say something like, "No person or corporation may spray any chemical pesticide on land within two miles of any residential property without a special permit, obtaining which must require the written consent of the property owner; and no permit shall authorize the use of chemical pesticides within two miles of the same property twice in fifty years." Most of the people in Gate City still don't realize that what caused all those "allergy" and "cold" symptoms, "flares" of chronic illnesses, sudden "aging" and miscellaneous weirdness among humans, illness and death of animal, around the time this e-mail was written, was glyphosate sprayed on the railroad in the middle of the night. Not everyone noticed a reaction or is willing to accept that it was a reaction to a chemical they want to believe does not affect them, but it was. The EPA needs to ban glyphosate, specifically, altogether and forever, because its unique interaction with the specifically Irish celiac gene amounts to genocide, but the EPA needs to be proactively banning most use of all 'cides because they all end up harming humans more than they affect pest species.

2. And about Flint...People up there are claiming they still don't have tap water they can drink, or use for bathing. (Dang, I always thought "dirty Yankees" was just a phrase.) Is there any truth in that? If so, why? Something is definitely rotten in Michigan.