Monday, September 14, 2026

Butterfly of the Week: Heraclides Caiguanabus

This week's butterfly is found in Cuba and is sometimes called the Cuban Swallowtail. It's also sometimes called Poey's Swallowtail, after the naturalist who first described it. He gave it the official name caiguanabus, from Caiguanabo, a place name meaning "big plantation." The place name is pronounced as spelled in Spanish so the butterfly's name should logically be Kye-gwah-NAH-boos.


This butterfly is hard to find even in Cuba, so its conservation status is unclear. We know there aren't many of H. caiguanabus; we don't know exactly how many there are, or whether there could be more. A few butterflies of this species have been seen in Florida or Mexico. 


Photo by Dayronbreto.Males often show more yellow and brown color, as above, while females are more likely to look white and black or even iridesce blue-green; in some lights their pale spots may look light blue. Females may be slightly larger than males and may have either longer or shorter tails.


Photo by Alex835. 

Tails, and parts of the hind wings, are sometimes missing.This may indicate that the individual survived an attack by a predator. Then again some females just don't have very long tails.


Photo by Alex835. 

The patterning on the neck, especially noticeable in the male, identifies this species. 

Flying adults are seen from April through September at altitudes lower than 1000 feet above sea level. They are often seen sipping nectar from flowers in the genera Lantana, Tournefortia, Ixora, and others. 

The caterpillar can look black from above, brown and white from the side, in what is probably its fifth caterpillar skin, just before pupation. The white markings do not meet across the top side to form a "saddle" or "girdle" as they do for some Swallowtail caterpillars. Caterpillars have been successfully reared on Securinega acidothamnus, a plant in the Euphorbia family, and on Zanthoxylum

Sunday, September 13, 2026

New Book Review: The Cyrene Conspiracy

Title: The Cyrene Conspiracy 

Author: Ali Kaden

Date: 2026

Publisher: Third Culture Soul Publishing

ISBN: 979-8-9976635-0-6 

Quote: "She claimed to have something connected to Jesus and ancient Christianity that she wanted me to investigate."

Amir Zane, a young Egyptian-American writer, is asked to investigate an old parchment on which is written, among other things, "not him but another." 

If you remember Holy Blood Holy Grail or The Da Vinci Code you may now have some idea what to expect Amir is about to learn. There were, in the ancient world, a lot of ideas about who Jesus was and what had become of him. 

What became the orthodox Roman Catholic view, derived from the epistles of Paul in our New Testament, was that the Holy One is a unity of (probably an infinite number of Persons actually, but Three that we think we know about for sure) Three Persons, and Jesus was the one of those Persons who chose to exist in human form for thirty-some years. He didn't exactly look forward to crucifixion, but chose to take human form at a period when publicly doing and saying even the nice things our Gospels record would offend enough "higher-up" people to result in crucifixion. In some cosmic way this willing self-sacrifice of a perfect man atoned for the sinfulness of humankind and allowed those who followed Him to be saved from the eternal destruction our sinfulness deserved. 

Many people find this hard to believe. How could the Holy One have created a universe where some part of God's self would need to be killed by torture to show love for humankind? Couldn't the real story have been something simpler? Maybe Jesus came to show people how to lead a virtuous life, was murdered in the ordinary way, and came back to tell us that the resurrection will set all of our inherently immortal souls free from really ceasing to exist, which some people seem to fear more than they fear the pain of death. Maybe he wasn't even murdered. A theory that the apostle Thomas, whose name means "twin," was Jesus' twin is hard to reconcile with the Gospels. Some people theorized that Jesus had a secret twin who either was the one who walked around Jerusalem after Jesus died, or died in Jesus' place. Maybe even the apostles didn't know about this twin...

Relatively few churches try to reenact the full "Passion" drama. "Passion" does not merely mean the emotional outburst Victorian writers meant by saying someone "flew into a passion" and presumably yelled or cried, nor does it merely mean the physical feelings modern writers usually have in mind. It means "suffering." Before being crucified the Gospels make it clear that Jesus chose to endure some additional torture. The crucificarii, an ancient Roman term of abuse meaning "men about to be crucified" and used as a general term of contempt, were forced to drag their crosses through the streets before they were hanged on them. All of them were thus displayed to the public as sweating, bleeding, miserable messes. Jesus, we are told, had been beaten thoroughly and lost a fair bit of blood before the crucifixion, and the people who came out to taunt and throw things at the crucificarii felt sorry for him. Along the way he collapsed on the ground. Some say the Roman soldiers dragooned someone else into carrying his cross, so that the mob could watch Jesus' final agony on the cross; some say a kind man  volunteered to do it, to spare Jesus some small part of the suffering he had chosen. Some have imagined that Jesus was given an extra-large cross that was meant for Barabbas and had been built by a relative of someone Barabbas had murdered. In any case, all the Gospel writers say about the man who actually carried the cross for the last part of the way was that he was called Simon of Cyrene. 

About the given name, what we know is that "Simon" was one of those names that become popular in multiethnic societies because they seem traditional in more than one language. Two of the apostles were called Simon, at least until Jesus gave one of them the nickname Peter. Many other men used the same name. It does not tell us whether this man was Greek or Jewish.

About the place he came from, history tells us a little more. Cyrene was in Libya but it was built into a city by Greeks; they might have moved away from one of the islands because of renewed volcanic activity. The official leader of the Greeks who settled there was their princess, the daughter of the king they had lost, and the place was named after her. It was dedicated to the sun god Apollo, who was said to be the father of a child to whom the princess gave birth. Several Jews settled there. Later many people in the city became Christians; it had a church, and bishops who are still on the list of obscure saints. Mark, the Gospel writer, was said to have been a Jew from Cyrene who became the city's first bishop. 


Photo of what's left of part of ancient Cyrene from Wikipedia. 


Photo posted on Facebook by Grigol Pheradze. At least the rich people who had their portraits painted or sculpted in ancient Cyrene look more like modern southern Europeans than like modern Africans. Then again, northern Africans don't look all that different from southern Europeans. Nevertheless, when Passion dramas are enacted, any Black man who attends the church is likely to be cast as Simon of Cyrene. Simon of Cyrene may have been Black but, even if he was, he would have been in Jerusalem to trade or to visit relatives, as a well-off gentleman from a wealthy city. He was not a fugitive slave, or if he was one he hadn't been enslaved in Cyrene; ex-slaves didn't claim the places they'd fled from as home. He might have been Jewish. He might have looked remarkably similar to Jesus. He might have been crucified in Jesus' place, while Jesus faded out of mortal view and, as some old texts say, laughed at the idea of mere men thinking they could crucify the Prophet who had become so virtuous as to be allowed to embody God. 

For all Muslims, Jesus is remembered as a prophet, sometimes called the greatest of prophets, a sinless teacher of peace and mercy. "We don't say 'Son of God,'" a Muslim once explained to me, "but 'Soul of God'. Anyone could choose to embody the Soul of God, but only Jesus did." Was he crucified because his enemies said he had claimed to be a Son of God, which Jews and Muslims agreed would have been blasphemy...or did it only appear that he was? Did he travel on to other places and teach peace and mercy to, e.g., the Persians, who had their own monotheistic religion in which he might have been seen as a fulfilment of prophecy? Could Mary Magdalene have received more ink in the Gospels than even Mother Mary, not because she was much older than the other women disciples, but because she was Jesus' wife; could they have had a child? 

If Christians seriously study the history of the Church, these ideas are familiar to them; they are some of the major heresies. In the Christian tradition the idea that Jesus was a natural man who earned the title "Son of God" by abstaining from all sin and fully embodying the Will of God is known as the Arian Heresy, which, as preached by Bishop Arius, annoyed Bishop Nicholas to the point of "slapping" Arius--whether literally, or with a book or sermon so scathing that it got Nicholas banned from the council of bishops voting whether or not to excommunicate Arius, as unable to hear the debate and vote with an unbiased mind. But most Christians don't bother studying these things, and to them The Cyrene Conspiracy, which is about Amir's discovery of the theory that Simon of Cyrene not only carried Jesus' cross but was crucified on it, may be new and shocking.

It is fiction but, as Kaden explains, it's written in aid of the people of Gaza. In order to investigate the parchment Amir doesn't go to a church or university library and study its history; he takes the parchment right back to the Middle East, where he meets some kind Christian priests and rescue workers, and a liberated modern Arab young lady whose fiance left her because he couldn't distract her from relief work in Gaza. He meets a woman who's been trying to nurse a baby, but her milk has failed due to starvation, and people with arms and legs blown off, and the familiar gallery of casualties of Modern War. He feels left out of conversations among Palestinians because they all introduce themselves to new acquaintances with tallies of the relatives they've lost, many of whom were women and children.

And he finds a ruined church where an heretical Christian sect seem to have met, centuries ago. He recognizes artistic motifs that lead him to begin to research the Manichaean Christian sect, of which the most thorough surviving descriptions were written by Augustine of Hippo after he left the group, and may have been written with prejudice. Exactly who the prophet Mani was, when and where he lived or died, and what he taught, may never be known but the woman Amir starts to fall in love with seems to see him as an intermediary link between Christian and Muslim thinking. In the ruined church his name appears under those of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Could he have been their son--or "spiritual son," a student--or in either sense their descendant? 

Muslims, like Christians, belong to different denominations. From the news media most Americans have heard that Sunnis were seen as more liberal than Shiites in some ways, but Sunnis persecuted Shiites, which doesn't sound so liberal. (That was only in Iran. The Sunni Muslims from India whom I've known were not inclined to persecute anybody, though they did accept that their leaders had a right to punish heretics against their religion: "Oh yes, if Salman Rushdie really did blaspheme and defame the Prophet, then of course he will have to die.") More recently we've heard of hard-line Wahhabis who take various phrases from the Koran more literally than most Muslims do. 

Relatively few Americans have heard of the Sufis, a liberal Muslim group who seemed to me, when I met them in Washington, to be trying to bridge the gaps between Islam and other religions toward the goal of converting everyone to a liberal, freethinking, New Agey form of Islam. In The Cyrene Conspiracy the heroine doesn't identify as a Sufi in so many words, but she seems close to being one. Sufis are, in my experience, profoundly likable people; they hate nobody, they invite Jews as well as Christians and Buddhists to chant and pray with them, they do not noticeably even disparage women even to the extent the Koran does. Some now say that their niceness is deployed by the evil, power-seeking Muslim political machine as a form of taqiyya, legitimized lying to gain social acceptability as a step toward political power. Those people probably also think the kind old priest in your neighborhood, the nice ladies at the Catholic school fundraising events, and President Kennedy were mere tools being used to restore the Papacy in the United States. Nice people and the nice things they do are sometimes exploited, but they are nice

The kind Christians Amir meets in Gaza are, of course, liberal and humanitarian people too. The Jews, on the other hand...There have been, in historical fact, Jews who volunteered to serve as bodyguards, blockades, and even hostages for their Palestinian neighbors in some past conflicts between Gaza and Israel. They said that human beings are human beings, however misguided, even hateful, some of them may be. That was before October 2022.

I did not write the Bible and have wondered, myself, why even before Moses' time people in the Old Testament treated rape as worse than murder. I can see why people emotionally feel that killing a baby is worse than killing a man, and I completely agree that a rapist has no reason to live, but if killing the murderer himself was enough of a deterrent to murder, why was it felt necessary to kill all the men in a rapist's tribe or town? Of course, Susan Brownmiller theorized that the perversion of sexuality that makes rape possible has to be a societal evil. That argument was credible and well argued, though not everyone is convinced that it's true. It does not sound like an argument Semitic tribesmen before Moses' time would have made. They seem to have seen rape as a peculiarly evil sin, not even so much against the victim as against the God of Life itself, that needed to be "put away from among you." Moses limited victims' families to demanding the execution of the rapist himself, Deborah celebrated that a woman was willing to stop with killing a war chief who was known to allow his army to rape other tribes' women, and David certainly had cause to encourage Absalom to stop with killing Ammon, but in the only other instance recorded in the Bible, where a gang of Benjamite youths raped a nameless and status-less woman, the other tribes joined in the slaughter of all the then able-bodied male adults in the tribe of Benjamin. Why? Because, as a crime, rape was seen as going beyond murder and needing to be punished accordingly. Murder can be, in the ancient world it probably often was, a crime of carelessness or emotionality. Rape has a blasphemous quality that some murders share, but most do not.

In October 2022 the men in the ruling party Gaza chose for itself raped Jewish women and murdered Jewish babies, and a great number of people, worldwide, said: "Let Gaza suffer whatever anyone in Israel cares to do to them," at least "...until the men who committed this crime are dead, buried under layers of dung and carrion, disowned by as many of their families as want to live." The result was Modern War. Even supporters of Israel asked, as did this web site: Really, Mr. Netanyahu, primary schools? And were told: Gazans have built their primary schools above tunnels where the evildoers are known to hide; therefore. That's Modern War. The only way to win a war against things that long ago ceased to be human is not to treat them like human beings again, even if they have taken human beings as hostages.

I believe there are alternatives, difficult and costly as they may be. Afghanistan had already been reduced to a desert before the US went in, but we could have gone as policemen and killed only known terrorists. (Actually I think, mostly, our army tried to do that.) The whole Middle East is already pretty much a desert, but Israel could have limited its violence to the Hamas goons. Maybe they tried. I am not the judge. I am a Christian reflecting on recent events from a religious and philosophical point of view.

Legitimate police work, finding and punishing violent criminals, can sometimes do a certain amount of collateral damage. In the US our big news story for this whole year has been how we had an unsustainable number of illegal immigrants who were contributing nothing good to society, from fraudulent recipients of business grants (who made a good snarky news story) to the usual drug dealers and violent fugitives from justice, and we as a nation said to all these people: Go home! And despite all the publicity given to armed federal agents arresting and deporting these immigrants, masses of them just peaceably recognized that their time was up, and left the US. And others chose to force our government to send armed men after them, and certain people who hardly deserved to be US citizens got in the way, and we had cases like that wretched woman screaming to her driver to run the car over a federal agent who, feeling threatened, shot the woman; and nobody who walks on US streets can blame him. In the same way, if Gazans support Hamas and interfere with the legitimate effort to punish the violence of October 2022, even most Arabs seem to think that missing legs and hungry babies are inevitable.

In The Cyrene Conspiracy, Amir realizes that he's going to have a very hard time staying near the woman he obviously wants to be near. He sympathizes too much with Palestinians. As an American he can't resist yelling "Leave them alone!" and otherwise interfering with Israeli military police who swagger around putting Palestinians in their place. He tries to tell himself that these Israelis--all the Israelis he meets seem hostile--are dealing with their own war zone emotional issues, but then he hears one with an American accent, determines that this particular Israeli soldier comes from Brooklyn, and tells the man off as if they were back in New York City. He realizes that the Israeli police are likely to leave an American visitor alone and then punish his local friends. He can't help it. Amir is a rich young man who grew up in the US. Self-control has not been a major subject in his education, as it has for his friends in the Middle East.

So, back in the US (readers will find out for themselves how the characters' relationships go), Amir writes a novel in which the characters conclude that Simon of Cyrene died in Jesus' place, and Jesus and Mary Magdalene became not the teachers or even the great-great-grandparents but the parents of Mani. It sells well. It seems to remind some American Christians that good relations with the children of Abraham involves good relations with the children of Ishmael too. Then a quiet, fanatical scholar he's met a few times in the course of his research breaks into his apartment and his computer, babbling about sacrificing red heifers to bring about the ultimate conflict with the Muslim world...There will be a sequel. Probably a series.

The Old Testament itself tells us that it's a mistake to take prophetic texts too literally. In Hebrew more than in other languages, most words may suggest visual images, which may or may not literally have anything to do with the fulfilment of the prophecy. Jesus is the Lion of Judah, the greatest and strongest of all the leaders foretold to come out of that tribe; he is not a wild animal with claws and a tail and a foul odor. Abraham's "children" are like the sands of the sea in number; not in size or color or consistency. A red heifer without white spots, like the virgin bride who was to conceive (people would have imagined) in the moment of losing her virginity, is rare but natural; whether God promised to do anything special when a red heifer was literally sacrificed, or when people's dedication reached a level that is rare but natural, remains to be learned. 

The Bible does not promise that Christians will never be forced into war, or forced to choose between warfare and abuse. It does teach us that we are not to choose war with any child of Abraham. For all practical purposes we might as well read "with any one." The children of Abraham include Jews who trace their physical descent to Isaac, Christians who are adoptive heirs of Isaac, Arabs who trace their physical descent to Ishmael, non-Arab Muslims who are adoptive heirs of Ishmael, and the descendants of Keturah, which seems to include most of Africa and India. Cases have been made for the claim that "Red" Russians, who rejected Christianity, were also physical descendants of Isaac through "Red" Esau/Edom and that at least some northern European and indigenous American groups were physical descendants of the scattered tribes of Israel. The Bible does say that God will bless those who bless a child of Abraham, and curse those who curse one. This is probably best interpreted as telling us that we should bless rather than curse all nations.  Egyptians were not Ishmaelites in Bible days but now, having become Muslims, they too should be blessed and not cursed.

What may come as surprising news to some American Christians is that Christianity did not originate in Rome or Ireland. Christianity came from the Middle East. The first Christians were Jews; the Christian message reached other Semitic tribes before it reached European tribes. There were and there still are Christian groups that never had much contact with Rome, that understand the teachings of Moses and Jesus differently due to not having had them filtered through the teachings of Augustine or Aquinas or, in some cases, even Paul. There are Christians who understand resurrection in terms of reincarnation, and accept some of those Lost Books of the  Bible as sacred scriptures, and imagine Jesus laughing at the idea that people thought they were crucifying him rather than weeping for the suffering of someone else who was crucified in his place, and all kinds of things that mainstream churches teach us not to  believe. There are schools of Christian thought that are close to Muslim thought on some points. 

Are these minority Christian groups right? Well...most of the major heresies and Lost Books of the Bible were pushed out of the mainstream, not by war, but by a consensus of people who had studied the Law and the Prophets and the Gospels, discussed these books and ideas, and found them incompatible with the canonical scriptures. Do they have a right to their beliefs? Of course they have.

Islam has been called, by Christian scholars and thinkers no less than C.S. Lewis, the greatest of all the Christian heresies. In the Quran and Hadith the difficult and mysterious parts of Christian doctrine are replaced with ideas easier to understand, and the complexities of ideas like "In Christ is neither male nor female" are replaced with ideas more popular at the time like "Since you [mortals] agree that some of you are of more value than others..." And also some teachings that Christians might want to forget have been preserved, even spelled out in detail: To prevent employers from delaying payment, taking risks with the money, and perhaps not paying employees at all, Muslim employers are specifically told to pay employees "while the sweat is on their faces." To prevent quibbling about a certain level of interest on debt, like the two-figure interest on credit card debt, being defined as usury, Muslims are told not to charge interest on debts at all; there can be flat fees on loans, but creditors are not allowed to make more money by making it harder for debtors to pay off debts. Every American has undoubtedly heard false friends warble that "A friend is someone who knows all about you and still loves you"; Muslims are told to defend their friends in battle and support their businesses in times of peace. We in the US have the right and duty to identify ourselves as a majority-Christian nation, enshrine Christian practices in our law, and deport anyone who wants to replace our constitutional system with sharia law. Nevertheless there are things we could benefit from learning from Muslims. 

We should not tolerate either the efforts some Muslims have made to impose sharia law over and above our own law, or the efforts some of their (weak and temporary) political allies have made to cover up those efforts. We should recognize that, if the Israelis deserve support and protection as children of Abraham, so do the Arabs, and most other nations; for the prophecy has been fulfilled that Abraham's heirs would be like the sands of the seas in numbers. Muslims who seek reconciliation with Christians should also seek reconciliation  with Jews...and I say the sooner the better. 

Not everyone has experienced the peace and good will of a Sufi prayer meeting. I have; The Cyrene Conspiracy recalled it to my mind, and I hope the book can bring something similar to all of your minds. May that peace and good will be with all of you, Gentle Readers.

Bad Poetry: A Fairy Tale Character

Explication below. First the poem:


[Photo from Disney Villains Wiki Fandom]

Ha ha ha ha! Ho ho ho ho!
I am the Villain, Jacques Lebeau!
Out trapping wildlife in the wood,
I found a dog, a very good
Sled dog, or hunting dog, or pet,
Or fighting dog that people bet
Will last five minutes with a bear
When forced a fighting ring to share.
I know where a young bear's asleep.
Around his den, my servant, creep
And set out meat that I have laced
With poison just enough to waste
The bear's strength so that you can haul
Him in to fight the dog, and all
The people who've come in to trade
To me will have their money paid
To watch the bear rip dog apart.
I have a chip of flint where heart
Would be if I were a real man;
I'm just part of a story's plan.
I drink as much as I can buy.
Some day soon I am sure to die;
No tear will fall from any eye,
And least of all regret will I.
I never heard in any text
A priest read, in this world or th'next,
Hope of good things for one like me.
I am a drunkard, don't you see.
My story in its first edition
Was written during Prohibition.
I've doped the dog, I've doped the bear,
So they'll feel fighting mad, and tear
Each other all to pieces, and
Then I'll get drunk. So I have planned
All winter long, around the fire,
Cursing my land, my luck, my sire--
But what is this that now I see?
The bear and dog are friends? Woe's me!
Can such a stroke of luck even be?--
And now the dog comes after me!

This week's Poets & Storytellers United prompt asked for poems from the point of view of a fairy tale character. 

Can anything new possibly be said about Cinderella, the Sleeping Beauty, or the Beauty and the Beast? 

I thought back to those old Disney movie souvenir books, and remembered that, when reviewers were sharing memories of fictional characters we didn't want to meet, I'd mentioned Jacques Lebeau as seeming like a fantasy character to me.

He was in a movie, acted out with real people and animals, about a brave Husky dog called Nikki who got separated from his humans when they were out in the woods. His humans were a father and son, both called Dupas; they had given names but they hardly came into the story. Winter was coming on. The dog stumbled about, having species-appropriate adventures, learning to survive. He made friends with Cree people (it was Disney, but the story was supposed to have happened in Quebec) and other animals, including a bear cub, Neewa. Then he smelled another French-Canadian's campfire and approached, but he soon realized he'd found a different kind of man. He was soon trapped by a man much nastier than the ones he'd known before. This was Jacques Lebeau, who figured that by keeping Nikki in a cage and treating him badly he could get Nikki to fight and make money off him. 

At the next big gathering, Lebeau tried to get Nikki to fight Neewa. Of course they acted like the old friends they were. Then he tried to get Nikki to fight Dupas. Of course that wasn't happening either. Nikki had missed Neewa and Dupas for months; being around both of them together, fighting was the last thing on his mind. So Lebeau tried to force the fight on which he was taking bets, threatening Dupas with a knife if Dupas didn't kick Nikki. Nikki, of course, surged out...to defend his human. In a Disney movie nice characters never kill nasty characters outright, so Lebeau just cringed away from Nikki in such a way that he fell on his own hunting knife. 

When I think about the story, I think that it might even have happened...but there was just something so Disney about it...and of course it is a Canadian variation on the classic fable of Androcles and the lion. 

Anyway. It's Sunday. This web site is supposed to bring you Christian content. So, although neither Disney nor twelve-step groups ever were exclusively for Christians as distinct from other people...We used to think that, in the case of genetic alcoholics, "First a man took a drink; then the drink took the man," and the alcoholic was just a dead loss to humankind. Now we know that it's possible for many alcoholics to transfer their addictions to fellowship with a group of other recovering addicts. Even Jacques Lebeau might have sobered up and come closer to being a decent human being if anyone had ever taken him to a twelve-step meeting.

People who take the twelve steps seriously are some of the most radical Christians, and most lovable human beings, in this world. 

Unfortunately Jacques Lebeau was just the villain of a fable, and the nicest thing anyone was ever destined to call him was "brutal Frenchman." 

Friday, September 11, 2026

Where Were You on This Day in 2001?

I was in "gorgeous" Prince Georges County, Maryland. It was a Tuesday. We had a Tuesday routine: drive up Route 1 to Laurel, stop and see a massage client, stop at some favorite stores, drive on to Columbia, change the library books, buy take-out meals on the mall, eat and walk around the Centennial Lake Park, stop at other favorite stores. It was an absolutely gorgeous day and I was looking forward to it. I called the massage client and heard, "I think I should cancel. I don't think you should come out today. Did you see the news? Somebody just crashed a plane into the World Trade Center."

"Was someone youall knew on the plane?" 

"I don't think so but they think it might have been some kind of act of war. We're all watching the news. We might want to get out of here."

I put down the phone and turned to my husband. "They don't even know who was on the plane, but they're all in mourning because a plane crashed in New York. Do you want to watch that on the news?"

"It'll be in the Post tomorrow. Let's go on as usual." I spent a lot of time at the library in Columbia because on Tuesdays my husband either took a continuing education course for tutors of disabled children, or tutored one of them, for a good part of the day. We loaded up the books we were taking back. It was not one of the days when I took the Practically Perfect Toshiba laptop. We stopped at the Amvets charity store, a very large store with a furniture showroom and some pay phones. In those days a local phone call cost a quarter, and long-distance calls could be made from a pay phone if you had a lot of coins to feed into it, by ones, or if you had a prepaid "calling card." I had a few of those cards in my pocket along with library cards and store membership cards and my Metrorail Farecard. I went into the store and browsed my way to the aisle where the yarn was, if they had any. They didn't. Behind that aisle was a glass pane enclosing the room with the TV, radio, and stereo sets. All of them were tuned to the news. 

By that time the second plane had hit the second tower and the third one had hit the Pentagon. The Pentagon was designed and built for security rather than as a show of hubris; the section of it that could be hit by the plane was a little-used storage section, but of course people had been on the plane, including Barbara Olson, an emerging author who'd become popular. 

I looked around and saw that I was one of a row of people staring at the row of TV sets. Some of them were making cell phone calls. English was not most of their first language--the Amvets store employed a lot of foreign-born military wives, and was the store where you couldn't always count on finding anyone who spoke even Spanish, but that was the attraction for other immigrants who spoke the other languages the staff used. I didn't yet have a cell phone so I power-walked to the front wall of the store and punched in the numbers from a "calling card." Mother needed to know that I was safe in rural Maryland and wouldn't come home unless civilians were evacuated, as in the Gulf War. So did Aunt Dotty. I didn't use up a lot of minutes but quite a long line had formed behind me when I put down the phone. I didn't buy anything.

"There were two more planes," I told my husband. "One of them hit the Pentagon. They think it's war."

"Don't panic," my husband said. People were rushing out of the store, with or without purchases, heading home to pack in case they had to evacuate. Since we had our separate homes outside the city, we didn't feel that urgent need to pack; I'd take the laptop, my knitting, and the new batch of library books I intended to check out, but clothes and toothbrushes were waiting at home. "We can go on with the day and hear the news tonight."

The library was closed; we dropped the books into the chute. We bought food, ate, and started walking around the lake as usual. About halfway around we met a couple of park rangers in an ATV. "We're sorry, but there was a fourth plane that crashed into a field. We don't know how many more planes these people may have hijacked. We're closing the park. Could you walk out with us please."

All the stores were closed. Outside a store a teenager was leaning on a wall, fiddling with a cell phone. "When I woke up," he felt a need to tell us, "I thought this was going to be the best day in America. I did not know it was going to be the worst day in America."

We went home and turned on the television. Months went by when nobody turned it on. That afternoon we sat in front of it, hoping for fresh news and not seeing any. "I see Stephanopoulos landed on his feet," my husband said, and I said, "Good for him. That takes care of the list of people I know in New York. You?"I was wrong, of course. A few friends and relatives had been there, and I hadn't heard. At least none of them was hurt in the fire. Everybody always knows a few people in New York City.

"I used to know lots of people in New York," my husband said. 

"Well that's the fifth time they've shown us that woman in the orange jacket, coughing," I said. "We can't do anything for those people but we could at least not watch them." 

"I can watch the little TV set upstairs," my husband said. "In case they start releasing names. I know it's early but I'd like to see the names."

I was starting to feel manipulated. The television set wasn't telling people anything new; only blaring fear, rage, and war. I thought the emotion might have been worth sitting through if the screen had been running a list of people known to have survived or not survived, but that was days away. The coughing woman was flashed on the screen in between images of children dancing in some Middle Eastern desert town. Could even Arabs have trained children to dance joyously, rather than angrily, in celebration of war? (Later we heard that they couldn't; what the children were celebrating was an annual town festival.) People who were normally in favor of peace were suddenly in favor of war. I did not want to be manipulated into supporting war, as were the people who'd always seemed civilized who were out on the streets, the next day, waving signs saying "Reduce Kabul to rubble." Clearly there would have to be some sort of reprisals. I hoped they could be done efficiently. Didn't we have firepower several hundred times greater than the Al-Qaeda fools had? Go in, get them out, and hang them high as Haman, I was praying our troops would do. No modern war. No blowing up hospitals, no incendiary bombs  dropped on babies. In 2001 baby-boomers' mental pictures of modern war included an old video of a little girl in Vietnam, running and screaming, her clothes burned away. She had survived, we'd been told. Not the kind of thing we wanted the young to see on the news.

News highlights of that evening included that generous Washingtonians had asked where to send the money, and embarrassed New Yorkers had declined offers of cash or blood, saying their city could take care of its own. I was glad. People would say awkwardly, off and on all winter, that they felt that "we were all New Yorkers or Washingtonians now," and I'd feel embarrassed for them. A lot of people had died; a lot of people were genuinely mourning. I felt something for them but I didn't think it would help to pretend that I, as a stranger, was feeling anything like their pain. I already knew what grief felt like. It was nice that people outside the family missed the person too, but trying to pretend they felt what the family felt merely made them sound stupid. 

Introverts do feel empathy, but those of us who haven't been taught that the empathy we feel is the "wrong" kind feel empathy for other introverts and express empathy as to other introverts. I felt no urge to hug strangers. I murmured soothingly, a few times, when massage clients found that relaxation released tears of real grief. 

Bland rich-boy W Bush suddenly became a trigger for intense emotions. In Washington we heard some things people in "the heartland" didn't hear. I heard W proclaiming that "they hate us because we are free," saw him signing the loathsome "P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act" (a law that violates everyone's right to privacy), thought he was a hypocrite in the service of the Evil Principle. I went home and heard people saying that he certainly had become a target but they thought he was coping rather well. Yes, Sir. Yes, Ma'am. Whatever. Saying what I thought of W Bush at the time would have been treason. Twenty-five years later I don't know what W was thinking or why he let enemies of the people have the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act, but I still want to see it extirpated from our law. I don't think Trump, or Cruz, or Vance, or Rubio, is the man to do that. Musk has the courage but not the ability to understand why it needs to be done. Massie, DeSantis, and Kennedy together might have enough fortitude and intelligence to do it. Maybe.

My husband listened to the "they hate us because we are free" speech and growled, "Yes, and there's a little matter of our support for Israel against the Palestinians. What about that?" I had no foreign policy. I said, "Hasn't he got the 'blond' act down, though!" 

I'll say this, now, with hindsight. If you or your family are involved with the oil industry, you know Arab-type people and you know Israeli-type people. You might know a few young ones as nephews, nieces, or cousins, on both sides. This causes acute ambivalence when conflicts among the Semitic nations are mentioned. I think W Bush  sincerely felt, as I did, that sense of "I hope this war won't harm my Arab-type friends who really are people of peace--not even defining peace as  'our nation dominant over yours'." It was not a question of loyalty. Bin Laden obviously needed what he eventually got, only maybe in an even more humiliating way; his goons needed to be locked up with a metal key, have the key recycled, and find out whether anybody cared to kick a bottle of water under the door. That had nothing to do with Halla or Feitan or Farouk or anyone else we knew. Most people in Washington in 2001, if they weren't bigots, had Muslim friends. I had an adoptive brother who had rallied the whole Islamic Centre crowd to support my business, and had often said, when asked why I didn't attend any church regularly, that the kind of fellowship that would justify attending church on a day of rest was something I'd only found among Muslims--their sex-phobic culture has encouraged them to take sex-free friendship very seriously--but I was still a Christian.

Anyway...nobody was asked to flee the city, as in the Gulf War, and I was glad. "Show no fear" was the order of the day. Tourists, however, did stop coming to Washington. The city seemed oddly vacant without them. You did not, in fact, hear a visitor squeal with surprise the first time the farecard machine sucked the card out of their hands, scanned it, and stamped the remaining value on it, every day. You did not think of that as something you'd ever miss...but early in the spring, when I finally heard that sound again, I was surprised by how much I'd missed it. 

W Bush had proposed, unsatisfactorily, that we could "be tourists in our own town," which showed it wasn't his town. His money came from oil. A lot of people's money came from our city's very own economy, which dived down in 2001. Cartoonists, at least, had fun with the idea of spending money to boost the economy. "What did you do in the Gulf War, Daddy?"--"I charged!"I paid cash, and that winter I didn't have much of it.

Scattered through the city were people going through real grief. Everyone was trying to respect those people and their feelings. I suppose I still am. I shed a few tears when I met the people who'd lost parents or children on those planes. Mostly I felt tired of the endless emoting in what passed for the news media, and the way it was being manipulated to drum up support for "modern war," and the grief piled on grief as the Post started to report young people being injured or killed in the war.

What I lost twenty-five years ago, what all of us lost, was a substantial chunk of our natural pre-constitutional right to privacy. We need to be demanding that back, while we still can.

The fire fighters running into the burning, crumbling buildings, to remove injured people if they found any alive...I think the best thing W said about the whole war was that we could direct some of the emotion toward supporting and encouraging fire fighters. That, at least, is a good thing. Most people are not built to be professional firemen or police officers but all of us could benefit from some training to be able to cope with emergencies when they are not available. All of us could appreciate the special skills and training the professionals have. 

Where were you on this day in 2001?

Web Log for 9.10.26

Cheers! Microsoft is now trying to peddle "extended service" for computers with internal storage drives. I think we should just say no. Keep up the pressure. When we've bought a thing, we've bought a thing, and the company must not be allowed to imagine that we're renting it. However, the corporations are recognizing that "the cloud" isn't going to fly. 

You did this good thing, Gentle Readers. We need to keep it going. Don't let anyone think "oh, this is just a 'setback,' we can have what we want next year," the way Verizon did when it destroyed the formerly useful cell phone network. NO. The corporations cannot have a "cloud-based" Internet as an excuse to build "data centers" in Ohio, or Georgia or North Carolina or any other place where people live. If the Internet can survive, it MUST be on cloud-free computers with internal AND external data storage. Our data belongs to us, not to Microsoft...and Microsoft must be put and kept on a very short leash, not allowed to snoop around our data, much less feed it into plagiarism-ware. 

I really think Microsoft needs to be broken up--allowed to exist, if at all, under all new management with a mission statement that includes things like "When people pay for computers, places to operate them, electrical and electronic connections for them, then those computers belong to those people and we must keep our hands and eyes to ourselves," and "The service must always wait on the customer's convenience; the service must never keep the customer waiting. If Microsoft slows down any computer's obedience to any keyboard command, this must be reported to the FCC and Microsoft must pay," and "One computer per person per lifetime," and "Individuals must be 'gatekeepers' for what corporations are allowed to do, NOT the other way round," and "The Internet must connect only people who want to connect with each other and transfer only the data people want to transfer. Privacy is a fundamental pre-constitutional human right, for which the Internet must maintain absolute respect OR BE SHUT DOWN."

We should tell Microsoft that if their "extended service plan" isn't FREE and AUTOMATIC, we can still go with Linux. The gold rush is over, Microsoft. You're not being paid to keep downgrading our computers. A second of wait time means you're a bad service and your corporate existence is in danger. All computers must obey all keyboard commands BEFORE THE FINGER LEAVES THE KEY. All third-party input, e.g. Microsoft's spyware and "updates," must WAIT. No third-party input should ever be receivable while a computer is in use. Microsoft should be paying us for the option of allowing Microsoft to protect its "security" by running "updates" when the computer is turned off or in "sleep mode."

And by the way, even a functional computer from before 2015 is only a machine, capable of "working," "running," or "reacting," but not a living creature that can ever "respond" to anything. If a computer displays any kind of "wait" message, it may report on what is malfunctioning, but it should never whine that the computer or a program or a page "is not responding." Of course it's not responding. It's not capable of responding. It will never respond to anything. It's not a living creature! It can never love us back! Computer owners can deal with this, Microsoft. If you can't, get help somewhere else and don't depend on us.

Actually, I think "wait" messages should consist of things like "[MICROSOFT] is probably the guilty party interfering with your computer. [MICROSOFT] owes you..." and a clock adding up $100 for the first second or fraction of a second and every second thereafter. Wait time is not acceptable. People who use computers every day may find themselves typing faster than the computer can process data and getting an occasional flash of a "wait" graphic after inputting more than 1000 characters in a minute, but even I didn't get that on an everyday basis...before Windows 10.

Animals 

A loveliness of ladybugs.


Music 

Bela Bartok.


Steppenwolf.


Droids.


Poems 

Everyone remembers (or should remember) General Lee's brave horse Traveller. Many remember Colonel Sheridan's horse Rienzi. War horses that survived wars deserve to be remembered--horses were the primary targets, so the surviving horses were smarter, tougher, and much luckier than most. But have we forgotten George Washington's horse Nelson?

Bad Poetry: Douglass Howard

A prompt at dVerse this week was a quote from the late Gloria Steinem: "When you're lucky enough to have lived a long life, as I have done, your role is to remind us how far we have come."

I thought of one of those ancestors people traditionally used to spend a lot of time and money to find out they can claim, and then even more to try to avoid having to claim. Talk about awful women...women who had the excuse of being denied legitimate opportunities to reach positions of power, but probably would have used illegitimate ones if they'd had legitimate ones, because they were awful. At one point, when her awfulness had been discovered, Douglass Howard pled insanity and spent a short time in a hospital; she was not insane, at least not in the legal sense, and soon got out again. What she had was the kind of tunnel vision that shut out considerations of ethics, or proprieties, or the possibility of getting caught, when she had devised a plan for getting what she wanted. 


Drawing from Wikipedia. 

Despite having a mannish name, apparently a mannish look, and a mannish thought process that got her into trouble, Douglass Howard was the mother of five children.

When she was only seventeen
She went to court to serve the Queen,
As, in that unenlightened day,
Was quite the most accepted way
For sons and daughters of the wealthy
To find mates who at least looked healthy.
Within a year fair Douglass wed
John, Baron Sheffield; shared his bed,
And, just five summers later on,
They had the necessary son.
But Douglass still hung round the court,
Apparently to be a sort 
Of  chaperone to her shameless sister,
And stole the young man who had kissed her.
His wife had died. So soon? The answer
May have involved a case of cancer,
But likely she was pushed--she fell
Down just an ordinary stairwell
And broke not hip, not even knee,
But neck. The husband was ambitious.
A richer prospect he could see.
Some said the wife's death looked suspicious,
Like many others, some did say--
But he'd always been far away
When "what really happened" did.
Douglass, bored with her spouse and kid,
Wrote to the man her sister chased
That it would suit her noble taste
If Baron Sheffield were to meet
The sort of accident, complete,
Though fatal, that had swept away
Those others, out of Leicester's way.

(Cut-off point for tired eyes--although the Bad Baroness is only warming up.)

This awful letter then was seen
And brought to court before the Queen.
"I must have been out of my mind!"
Douglass screamed. "Memory cannot find
Any basis for such a letter!
Send me to Bedlam till I'm better!"
And there, indeed, she found a room.
But not even postpartum gloom
Suggested she'd ever gone mad,
And so I doubt she ever had.
She had no conscience. Was she crazy?
No more than she was ever lazy...
Though languid luxury might have served
Her better than the schemes she nerved
Herself up to. Sheffield, meanwhile,
Drank water dirty folk defile,
Caught dysentery, passed away
While staying many and many a mile
Out of the Earl of Leicester's way.
Fair Douglass, widowed, hardly'd play
At mourning, but threw all her charms
(Such as they were) at Leicester's arms.
"I cannot marry you," he wrote,
"It would strike a discordant note
In my romance with England's Queen!"
No shame on either face was seen.
Douglass sighed, "Just a chance there may be
That you and I could have a baby."
So, Leicester: "All think it befits
The king to have his share of fitz,
But 'illegitimate' sons of others
Are persecuted, and their mothers.
I'll do the honorable thing,
A secret midnight marriage bring
To friends' house. Don't tell anyone!
Then you and I can have our fun,
But if the Queen will have me, I
The marriage publicly deny;
As king, I'll do right by my fitz,
And you, too, custom then acquits."
Likely they were a well matched pair,
Except their times were more unfair
To women. Douglass faced more shame
Though both were equally to blame.
The secret wedding, all benighted,
Produced a son. Both were delighted.
At christening, the little cuddly
Child was recorded "Robert Dudley,"
The same name Leicester had at birth.
Like every child of wealth and worth,
The boy called Robin was cared for
Mostly by servants, but given more
Advantages than other boys.
The Earl, whom Oxford now employs,
Made sure that Oxford took young Robin,
His heart with navigation throbbing.
Quite uninclined to leave her throne
For childbirth's hazards, so well known,
Elizabeth knew what her friends 
Were up to, though, for her own ends,
She seems to have tactfully ignored
Behavior otherwise deplored.
In any case, a rich knight offered;
Douglass ditched Leicester for Stafford.
He was Ambassador to France,
Where she was free to party, dance,
Spend Stafford's money as she'd like,
And Leicester's--though their little tyke
Lived in his father's house, adored
And pampered like a little lord,
And always absolutely free,
When she'd let him, to go and see
Douglass wherever she was staying,
Though she preferred to spend time playing
With Catherine de Medici.
Some ask: how horrible was she?
She was consort, not ruling Queen.
The Medici-Valois machine
Did its worst work before the hours
When Catherine had gained real powers,
But she had hardly taught her son
To do better than his father'd done.
In any case, Douglass's role
Was to encourage and console
The "Italian Serpent's" last few days;
Some say, in wicked witches' ways.
Back in England, Elizabeth,
Who feared childbirth as certain death,
Left Leicester to her plump cousin,
Set England's gossip mills to buzzing.
Now Robin's hurried off to college,
Quite young, though quick at gaining knowledge,
To hide him from the Countess Leicester.
From France now Douglass writes: "At Esher,
A house in Surrey, wintertide,
There Leicester made me his bride,
Though it was never my idea.
I only said yes out of fear..." 
Elizabeth and court all shout,
"Throw this liar and her letter out!"
At Oxford Robin had been styled
As Robert Leicester, the Earl's child;
Now, thanks to Douglass, ruled a bastard,
The art of navigation mastered.
He travelled, wrote, was married twice,
And found Italy's climate nice,
Compared with England's. He lived long
And well. The Stafford babes died young.
So did the Queen's first cousin's child,
Named Robert Leicester, from birth styled
The Earl of Denbigh, prone to fits
And never thought quite in right wits.
Catherine died old. Stafford confessed
Douglass always loved Leicester best.
The French sent Douglass back to Britain
To die. In Douglass' will was written:
Robin, "mine honourable son."
If he was, he's the only one
In this lot. Stafford also lied;
In England's court he testified
That Robin terrorized his mother
Into writing a statement other
Than all the facts they all knew well.
How Queen Bess managed not to yell,
"Ye pack of liars! Out the door
And never see my face, no more!"
Is unrecorded. She was strong.
And if this tale's run on too long,
So did the lives of all these rats
That England had for aristocrats.

(Cut-off point for those who duon't think poems should end in "morals")

Always prepared to fight and quarrel,
They seem to've hardly had one moral
Among them all. But if you want
A moral, have one: Women aren't
Improved by injustice and oppression,
Except they need not claim "depression"
As a pretext for awfulness;
We might as well have our redress--
Responsibilities and rights,
To use, as men do, by such lights
As conscience may give. If not all
Have consciences, then let them fall.
Some do have conscience; let those stand
As fittest to rule o'er the land.
As witch, as conspirator, liar,
Douglass prepared for judgment's fire.
If she'd lived when young women heard
They might stand out above the herd
By accomplishments instead of schemes,
She might have chased ambitious dreams
As diplomat, as  president,
In her own right and government,
Rather than using all those men
And children with them. She might then
Have done her job, and done it well;
Bigotry fitted her for Hell.

(I don't claim to know whether Douglass Howard really was a Christian, or repented of her sins, or may go to Heaven. But it would be a great surprise to all who knew her.)

Thursday, September 10, 2026

Web Log for 9.9.26

Music 

Lindsay Stirling.


Jesse Welles.


Glen Hansard.


Lee Child.


Ali Handal.


Infamous Stringdusters.


Undertones.


Bon Jovi.


Women's Issues 

The case for permanent confinement for males. One of the millions of cases. Warning: detailed memory of a murder.


Yes, women have been known to hunt down and kill their exes. Case in point: Jodi Arias. But that's very rare, every turn of the case made headlines because it was so bizarre, and nearly all women who become homicidally insane are on drugs. Nearly all of the handful of humankind who've been killed by women deserved it.

Wednesday, September 9, 2026

Ten Books About My Part of the World

0. First of all, The First Book of Bad Poetry (TM) by Priscilla King doesn't count, although most of the poems are about my part of the world. It's available through this web site (and it is locally printed, so you may specify the type size you want). It's a chapbook containing the poems that used to be available, free of charge, on my Substack and have now been sent out into the real world to earn their living.

Mention should also be made of some books, usually coffee table books, found in local gift boutiques that market their merchandise to visitors. I'm looking at a beautiful black-and-white photo collection, with memoirs and recipes, called Grazing Along the Crooked Road, on my own shelf now. There's the bookstore memoir, The Little Bookstore of Big Stone Gap, and something with terribly trendy recipes by a chef who married into the Carter Family, and What Would Dolly Do, and so on. These books aren't meant to be Great Literature but they are primary sources for the history books of the future. If you visit, I recommend buying them. Local people have probably already bought a few copies.

1. Rita Sims Quillen, who has also written a few books of poems (The Mad Farmer's Wife, Some Notes You Hold), really hit the ball out of the park with the novels Hiding Ezra and Wayland. These stories come from old family diaries and describe an otherwise scantly documented period in local history. The facts are true and full of adventure, suspense, and surprises. 

2. "Addington's History of Scott County, Virginia" most often refers to an old book by Robert Milford Addington, considered authoritative on our history from frontier days to the 1850s. There are newer books by that name, written by R.M. Addington's dscendants and some of their neighbors. If you're familiar with my home town, you may want to collect and compare other books with "History of Scott County" in their title as written by members of the Addington and Peters families. They agree on facts; each one just had more access to a different set of facts. 

3. Mark Zwonitzer's Will You Miss Me When I'm Gone is an insightful, well told history of country music as it was shaped by the Carter Family. It forms a sound track in local readers' minds. That sound track really ought to be available as a set of CDs. 

4. Joyce Dyer edited a collection of 35 "essays on place" by different Appalachian writers, including Jean Ritchie, Lisa Alther, Sharyn McCrumb, Rita Sims (not yet Quillen), and many more. It's called Bloodroot (not to be confused with a recent novel by that name) and was printed by the University of Kentucky. 

5. None of Jean Ritchie's songbooks was really complete! She gave readers a few songs here and a few songs there! Very frustrating to song collectors. However, she sang a lot of old pre-copyright songs (and she wrote some good new ones) that some local people still sing and love. Any of her songbooks that you find is worth having.

6. Sharyn McCrumb's novels, like She Walks These Hills and Saint Dale, are always a mix of tradition and history and suspense and falsehood. They have to be. In order to put fiction into real places you have to change those places--no murder was committed in the real restaurant local readers will think of when they read the story, no time warp was reported at the real building,and so on. It's frivolous genre fiction and great fun to read.

7. Lisa Alther, who has lived in and written about other places, wrote a novel called Kinflicks that used to work well as a guide to walking tours of Kingsport, Tennessee (Hullsport in the book)...and it was banned in Kingsport. In defense of the story Alther said that, like Flannery O'Connor, she wrote about "freaks not folks" and tried to make it obvious that her outrageous fictional plots and characters were not to be confused with any real people's real stories. Hullsport is Kingsport but the things that happen in it may never have happened anywhere. Among other things, what some consider the funniest scene involves lesbians wasting garden produce. (Hillbillies of that era did not waste food. There were people who needed that food, we were told.) At least that scene was set in the North, but still, in the 1970s many Kingsporters took the book as a personal insult. By the 1980s, when I had a Kingsport library card, they had lightened up about this.

Alther later wrote a book about the Melungeon tribe who used to live in Hawkins County, the border of which is straddled on one side by Kingsport, and called that book Kinfolks. As she noted in the book, anything about the Melungeons is still likely to be controversial. Alther identifies with the group and wrote about them with due respect. I'm no expert and can't endorse or refute any statements of fact. In my town, in 1910, some people with known Melungeon ancestry were ruled legally White and intermarried with White families, including mine. I grew up knowing these people as individuals, not knowing that there was a special name for them beyond the family names, Gibson and Collins. Kinfolks seems an appropriate title for a book that takes an appropriate tone.

8. Harriette Simpson Arnow wrote about Kentucky a long time ago. Well, different lengths of time ago, from frontier days in The Kentucky Trace to the 1930s in The Dollmaker and even the 1960s in The Weedkiller's Daughter. Between the Flowers, a sensitive study of where a marriage went wrong, was suppressed because it was about real Kentucky people of the author's generation and it didn't fit the ugly old stereotype of poverty, filth, and violence in "Appalachia." Arnow also wrote two historical studies, Seedtime on the Cumberland and Flowering of the Cumberland, that among other things gave a name to a town festival that is still celebrated today. 

9. I started to mention Adriana Trigiani's Big Stone Gap, which  was loved by the town in which the story is set, and down-rated by critics partly for that reason. It's not a badly written novel, as novels-for-adults go. It just fails to insult the bourgeoisie. But although I think his best books are nonfiction with a more general appeal, in which he refers to Kentucky mostly for anecdotes, I had to include Wendell Berry, one of the clearest-thinking men of our era. Berry's philosophy is based in love for The Gift of Good Land, and although flatter land seems easier to farm, mountain people have always been the ones who loved their land most.

10. Barbara Kingsolver's books are all well written, mostly set in my part of the world. I find some of them annoying and some delicious. Animal Mineral Vegetable is probably the most uncontroversially delightful book she's written. As documented at this web site, I liked Flight Behavior too; the science on which the fiction is based turned out to be wrong--sea level isn't rising fast, if at all, and butterfly populations have been decimated in the Blue Ridge Mountains--but the story's still well told.

Web Log for 9.6-8.26

I didn't spend most of these days online and the computer is showing that youall didn't either. We will have a Butterfly of the Week, though, and a Petfinder Post. 

Animals

Your daily cuteness overload. 


(I hope being shorn doesn't feel like an Alpacalypse to them...if the weather stays warm long-haired animals seem to like a haircut. Anyway, all that gorgeous, undyed, colored, fluffy yarn! Lens says the words were first added to the photo on Pinterest, and that on Reddit someone replied with a photo of llamas marked LLAMAGEDDON.)

Cartoons 

Like, one thing leads to the other...


From Dr. Malone's Substack. Lens traces the cartoon to Instagram but makes no guarantees that it was original when posted there.

For those who are not testerical young men and would like to break the let's-go-outside-and-fight thought cycle, this web site continues to attempt to cite Canadian content and give uneducated US residents a general sense of where e.g. Saskatchewan is, relative to e.g. New Brunswick, on a map. International cooperation and empathy are appreciated.

For young men, this web site observes that, of the two toons, the clean-shaven Canadian looks much better than the messy-faced bloke disgracing our flag, because as a general principle a man can look good with a full beard or no beard, but even a man we know and love cannot look his best with a three-day beard. Yes, men with certain kinds of ancestors are likely to have only a three-day beard if they let the mess alienate potential friends all winter long. Deal with it. (A phrase which, in this context, means "shave it.") Little or no facial hair is part of the Native American mystique.

Funding 

The basic problem is that decent people expect other people will be able to earn money all by themselves, whereas horrible people are in the habit of handing out money every time the daughters of the horseleech cry "give." (Whom do I mean by "daughters of the horseleech," someone asks in a place where they don't read the Old Testament much. According to the Book of Proverbs "The horseleech has two daughters, crying 'Give! Give!'" That's all we're told, though meditation on this proverb has led Americans to identify the horseleech with tax-and-spend politicians.)


We all know $42,000 is not going to pay for a lot of time in the burn unit at Johns Hopkins. So why didn't people shell out for Hero Mom the way they did for Mad Murderous Mom? 

The graphic comes from the Mirror. Lens says it's viral, but the photo of Hero Mom Emma Schols can be traced to Facebook, 2019, when the fire happened--in Sweden. Lens says her story has been documented. One thing Ms. Schols forgot to do was be in the United States, a big boost for fundraising sites.

Otherwise? Meh. Long black hair has a special appeal for men. Long blonde and red hair have, too, in different ways. Clancy's hair is not black but can look as if it were in digital photos; it certainly is long. Maybe Emma Schols needed a wig. 

People.

Music 

Tom Petty. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZm-qe4-EfY (Shared at the Meow, dedicated to kittens.)

Anna Calvi.


Matthew Halsall.



Joan As Police Woman.


Ludovico Einaudi.


Teddy Thompson.


Dolly Parton.


Florian Christl.


Mid Mod Music.


Jerry Lee Lewis.


Neil Young.


Newsboys.


Henry Mancini.


Probably the computer of "Meta Ronin" on Substack, with a song about Substackers' attempt to evolve a slang of their own, as Twitter did...Some language in the song is rude.


Traffic.


John Prine.


The Kingsmen.


Loretta Lynn.


The Sonics.



Names 

Some people have risen to the challenge of living with names like Clive Staples Lewis, Revilo Pendleton Oliver, Campbell Bascom Slemp, Hermione Ferdinanda Gingold, or Spiro Agnew. 

(You may have heard that Spiro changed his name; I heard that, too, but according to Wikipedia that was his father, Theophrastos Anagnostopoulos, who changed his name to Theodore Agnew and named his son Spiro Theodore Agnew. The first name means "I breathe" in Latin and is said to be a short form of Spiridon in Greek. The future Vice-President sometimes answered to "Ted" in youth but kept his odd given name as apparently his only tie with his ethnic-minority culture. In all other ways Spiro Agnew was remembered as a conformist's conformist, a 1950s "square" squared, a TV watcher before it was cool who liked Mantovani, Lawrence Welk, the Baltimore Colts, and Readers Digest--and didn't like baby-boomers.) 

Some people have been able to tweak names like Alisa Rosenbaum, Paul Harvey Aurandt, or Helen Mironoff into things the average American can pronounce--Ayn Rand, Paul Harvey, Helen Mirren. Then there are people who just collapse under their names...Richard Leroy Trickle coped, but Randon Sprinkle totally flaked out, letting himself be caught distributing what appeared to be child pornography. Whether actual children were harmed, or plagiarism-ware was  used, was unreported. 

Sprinkle was, of course, a Democratic Socialist. At least that may help him survive prison.

Pictures 

Someone e-mailed that her husband thought a drawing of a person sitting in a field, apparently conversing with crows, looked creepy. Everyone has different associations to pictures, but seriously?


Google traced this one to The Dodo.


This one came from Reddit.


This one was posted by the University of Washington; I think Pbird may have met the man. 

There's nothing creepy about the fact that some humans like and befriend crows. Some people even like and befriend vultures, the black species of which are often confused with crows. If you slowly and patiently share food with an animal, it will probably start to like you. 

There are different kinds and levels of affection for animals, as there are for humans. Crows don't have to like everyone whose attention they call either to good news, like food, or bad news, like something recently killed beside the road. They simply want other animals to break open the box of food that fell off the truck, or skin the dead animal, so they can get a bit of what the other animals leave. Crows and ravens have not generally been treated well by humans. Most of them don't like any of us. However, a few crows and ravens do bond with humans. They know one person from another and recognize friends (and enemies). They have been known to give humans shiny trinkets such as they like to play with, which have included keys and coins. They have brought food to human friends and guided hunters to game. 

They have also guided other predators...to join the hunt, thinking that, the more bigger, stronger predators are stalking one deer, the sooner the crows get a few bites of raw venison? Or in hopes of killing the hunters, who may have been conveniences rather than friends to the crows all along? Or in the belief that wolves and bears aren't usually interested in human meat when they can get deer, which is usually true, so why not watch them fight over the prey and let the best predator win. Who knows? Crows and ravens can learn to say words in human languages, even with some understanding--but we'll probably never really understand crows.

Crows also harass and may even bite people they have special reasons to dislike.The problem with making pets of crows is that, as Jean George described in a poignant novel, a crow who bonds with one human is likely to have lost its crow family--possibly to other humans, possibly to one of its human's friends and relatives. What happens if your crow knows you are its friend, knows your brother killed its brother, and so, when your brother visits, your crow goes for his eyes?

The corvid family of birds love fresh meat (unlike vultures, they can't eat rotting meat) but aren't built to be able to tear into a freshly killed animal unless someone with fangs or a knife removes the skin. So there is a reason why they're associated with death. If you think a wounded rabbit dead beside the road is bad news, the probability is high that a lone crow flapping, squawking, and calling to you beside the road is bringing you bad news. But they are natural animals, not spirits come to lead anyone to the grave. 

Poem 

Graybelle wasn't that bad--I suppose because she'd never actually lived with Her Human. Graybelle was the cat heir to a big house on a big farm on a big hill. When her mother's human died, Graybelle's mother disappeared into the woods. After chickens were restored to the farm by those remodelling it, and scraps of lunch were left out for the chickens, Graybelle and her sister started coming back to the house. The remodelling crew all set out food for "our ghost cat" or "our mythical cat"--cats, as it turned out--but Graybelle let herself be seen first by the big, loud bulldozer man, miffing the catpeople on the crew. (Possibly because he lived with a tomcat.) She only ever bonded with him. She and her sister allowed the rest of us to see them when he presented us to them--by ones. Both allowed me to touch them after a week or two; Graybelle moved away when she'd had enough, her sister bit, so we decided Graybelle had to be rescued and the sister left to her fate. I asked Graybelle, "Would you like to come home with me?" She jumped away. She was at her home, she nonverbally said. Poor kitty. Her chosen human said, "Will she sit in the truck with me?" She would, and he drove the truck to the Cat Sanctuary. And there Graybelle loyally stayed. And on days when I'd been on that job and ridden home in the bulldozer man's truck, she snuggled. She just kept putting her fore paws on my leg to be picked up, and after a few months I noticd that her fore paws weren't even reaching up to my belt any more, but up to my..bra band?! Graybelle was growing up to be one of those ancestral-size Manx cats. She was still a hollow-boned growing kitten but she looked, from a distance, like the atypical gray bobcats in the local nature park. She clearly thought I, and the Cat Sanctuary, and even the hill on which it sits, were small emergency backups for her human and her home. She was a nice, polite, patient cat but she never loved me.


Politics 

Cruz, Rubio, or Vance in 2028? I'm not happy about that line-up, frankly. Not because they're all used to being the smartest man in the room. Not because, even so, they lack Trump's peculiar extrovert genius--there will never be another Trump, and in 2028 he'll be too old to run, thank goodness, and people will just have to deal with that. Because I don't feel old enough to vote for a presidential candidate who is younger than I am. 

When there's a choice among qualified candidates, and I'm not voting on a single issue, which I probably still will be doing--anyway, assuming I consider the candidates qualified, my preference is to line'm up on the ticket by age, oldest first, on the premise that the younger ones are more likely to have a chance next time. There is a slight problem with this. The problem is not that all the likely Republican presidential candidates for 2028 are close enough to the same age that lining them up by birthdays is a technicality. (However they look, Cruz is only one year older than Rubio and DeSantis is actually younger.) The problem is that Cruz is the oldest and, on another technicality, he's ineligible to be President. Trump offered, but Canada doesn't want to be a State and, until it is one, we can't have a President Cruz. 

Trump is too old. Carson is too old. Ron Paul is too old. Rand Paul is the right age to be President but has failed, even as a US Senator, to become presidential. Rubio, DeSantis, and Vance are old enough to preside over a younger nation but, to a critical mass of US citizens, they're children. As Cruz's gray beard shows, this is not a matter of actual age. It's a matter of having grown up with television. 

I think we should probably move beyond the tendency to look at men as presidential candidates, in nay case. Conservatives desperately need to appeal to women voters. We can't advocate censorship for the morons squawking that the existence of Lindsay Clancy's supporters proves that women shouldn't be allowed to vote. But we can demonstrate distance from them by nominating and backing women candidates. 

Never mind that the charges of anything worse than ordinary adultery against Trump are about as credible as a three-dollar bill. Never mind that, when we sorted through the whining to find the facts in what Congressman Massie's ex-girlfriend said about him, she said he was a lousy lay but he was still the decent ethical young man she called on to protect her from the guy who really was a creepy stalker. Any male can be accused of sexual misconduct and there will be a high probabillity that he's guilty of some form of it. Never mind that, actually, a lot more men are guilty of not listening and not doing their household chores than are guilty of even ordinary adultery. They are male. Therefore there is a 99% chance that somewhere there is a woman they've mistreated in one way or another. They should get out of politics and go home and clean the bathroom floor.

Marsha Blackburn, Deb Fischer, and Susan Collins have senatorial experience. Young Oak Kim, who isn't really young but looks as if she might be, has congressional experience. Condoleezza Rice has experience, and class, but probably wouldn't run. Tulsi Gabbard was serious presidential timber, but doesn't have to go back to work by 2028. Kelly Loeffler and Linda McMahon have Cabinet experience. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Kay Ivey, and Kim Reynolds have experience as Governors. We should be looking harder at qualified women candidates...who were born before 1970.


Scams 

Familiar scam moved from writing sites to social media to Substack...Robert Reich joins Elon Musk and Mel Gibson as people scammers impersonate in pleas for private chat, usually using newer and less secure sites, asking for bank information. He should at least feel flattered. Reich is one D who knows that criticizing and questioning the Federal Reserve has nothing to do with hating Jews, is in fact something some Jews, including Reich, have been willing to do, and this demonstration of simple clearheadedness has won him friends Left and Right. He has enough credibility that creeps are trying to capitalize on it.

"
It has come to my attention that scammers are continuing to impersonate me online, preying on people in the comments of my posts here on Substack. Apparently, the fraudsters create fake profiles and suggest that the conversation move to a different messaging platform, such as Signal. And they use generative AI to craft very convincing text messages. Please know I will never ask you to chat back and forth with me in a one-on-one, personal capacity
"

Just because we would...I didn't like Bill Clinton and, for that reason, I still feel sympathy and good will for many of his staff. The King of Tacky used staff like toilet paper. Though it worked for them in the long run--the ones still looking for jobs did seem to get good jobs.