Sunday, August 16, 2026

Book Announcement: The Lost Books of the Bible

Title: The Lost Books of the Bible

Author/translator credited on the cover: R.H. Charles

Author/editor: Joel Fotinos

Date of original publication of most content: 1894

Date of publication of this book: August 18, 2026'

Publisher: St Martin's

Quote: "And Josias held the feast of the passover in Jerusalem..."

Fotinos doesn't add a lot of explanation to this book--or collection of books. It begins with "And Josias held the feast..." What else had come before the feast? You need to know your study Bible, the one with the Apocrypha in it. Most English translations emphasize the difference between the two Hebrew books ascribed to Ezra, and the two apocryphal books written in Greek and ascribed to Esdras, by spelling the names differently; there are 1 and 2 Ezra, and then there are 1 and 2 Esdras. Spanish and some other translations of the Bible emphasize their intended continuity. Ezra and Esdras are the same name. The books may not have been written by the same man, but the author of 1 Esdras wanted people to believe they were. The narrative in 1 Esdras picks up where 2 Ezra leaves off. Before reading The Lost Books of the Bible you need to know the actual Bible well enough to know what a lot of obscure Jewish and Christian writers, between 1500 and 2500 years ago, were adding their words to. 

It looks like fraud to us, and even ancient writers sometimes felt called to condemn anyone who changed their words, but in this period of history it was commonplace for secretaries and students to write in the names of their masters and teachers. Of course beginning writers sometimes selected as masters the books of writers who had been dead for a long time. Their goal was not to produce "original" work but to imitate their masters' work well enough that people would not know which were the master's own works and which were the student's. There is thus no real way of knowing whether the "real" Ezra suddenly switched to writing in Greek, which his Hebrew books don't sound as if he was likely to have done, or whether someone who worked for him felt moved to write the part of his autobiography he never had time to write, or whether--which seems more likely--some random Greek-speaker wrote down some fragments of history as 1 Esdras and the person's own vision as 2 Esdras. 

Historical perspective makes some aspects of these ancient books laugh-out-loud funny today. The author of the outrageous fiction called the Book of Adam and Eve claimed that God had told Adam, repeatedly, that this mortal world would end after 5500 years--500 years after Christ's time, according to the widespread belief that humankind had been created just 4000 years before Abraham's time. A little further along in the history of the early Church, we find Barnabas (was he the same Barnabas who travelled with Paul? Who knows?) explaining that as the world had been made in six days, so it would end in 6000 years. In the tale of Tobit a demon is exorcised, and a woman healed, by a bit of traditional magic involving a dead fish. In the wildly improbable Acts of Peter a talking dog plays a prominent role; we might want to read this "dog" as a priest in a sex cult, so we are specifically told that he is "a dumb animal," though he has a lot to say. 

The Book of the Twelve Patriarchs looks like what some early Christian writers defended as a "pious fiction," in which a Christian writer retells the stories of Jacob and his sons, emphasizing that each of the founders of the tribes of Israel supposedly had a Christian vision just before he died. The Book of Adam and Eve betrays a lack of familiarity with Old Testament history, but may redeem itself by a careful observation of a parent's interactions with a whiny, entitled, manipulative three-year-old, prone to tantrums, and his quiet enabler, his two-year-old sister. Adam and Eve are characterized as that kind of children. The author of this book should only have written a proper novel about an ordinary family...

Nevertheless, each of these books contains enough real religious thought that some people thought it ought to be printed in copies of the Bible. Some of the apocryphal Christian books clearly reflect the beliefs and personalities of real Christians. Barnabas, whoever he was, may have been omitted from the New Testament because he was more anti-Jewish than Paul's colleague could credibly have been. The Bible does not directly oppose abortion, although it existed; some of the apocryphal Christian writers condemn it in harsh and graphic language. The Old Testament never explains why rape seems to have been more severely punished than murder; the apocryphal writer lets Joseph, the son of Jacob who was sexually harassed by his master's wife, explain why sexual violation is not merely a violation of the victim, of the victim's family, or of social order generally, but a sin against Life itself. 

The Gospel of Thomas is particularly interesting to many baby-boomers. According to European and Indian literary tradition, Thomas was the apostle who went to India. He had known Jesus personally; he was the apostle who wanted to examine His scars. Did Jesus say all the things Thomas claims Jesus said, which neither Matthew, Mark, Luke, nor John ever mentioned? Was the author the same Thomas, or was he quoting the same Jesus? We may never know, but we can see clearly that this Thomas has been influenced by much study of both Christian and Buddhist thought. His book appeals to all of us who felt "seduced," to whatever extent, by "New Age" ideas in the 1980s. 

If you feel up to the challenge of spending time in fellowship with these long-ago writers, even though they were imperfect people, some of them bad writers, and some of them probably dishonest people, you may appreciate the work of the late, great Irish scholar R.H. Charles, who was best known for his translations of ancient literature, and his contemporary admirer Joel Fotinos.

This book is recommended only to people who know their Bibles well. To those interested in the history of the early church, however, it may be a real treasure.

Do you already have all of these books? Here is the complete list of the thirty books in this one-volume library:

1. 1 Esdras
2. 2 Esdras
3. Tobit
4. Judith
5. Wisdom of Solomon
6. Sirach
7. Baruch
8. Letter of Jeremy
9. Prayer of Manasseh
10. Additions to Daniel
11. Additions to Esther
12. Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs
13. Ascension of Isaiah
14. Apocalypse of Abraham
15. Baruch (Syriac)
16. Book of Adam and Eve
17. Gospel of Tomas
18. Gospel of Peter
19. Infancy Gospel of James
20. Infancy Gospel of Peter
21. Gospel of Nicodemus
22. Gospel of Mary
23. Acts of Paul and Thecla
24. Shepherd of Hermas
25. Didache
26. Epistle of Barnabas
27. Apocalypse of Peter
28. Odes of Solomon
29. Epistle to the Laodiceans
30. Acts of Peter

Friday, August 14, 2026

Morgan Griffith's Work Year Report

From US Representative Morgan Griffith, R-VA-9:

"

The 118th Congress served as a launching pad for numerous actions taken in the 119th Congress.

House Republicans reintroduced commonsense policies that first secured House passage in the 118th Congress.

One bill, the Laken Riley Act which I repeatedly voted for, makes it easier for law enforcement to arrest criminal illegal aliens for certain crimes. This bill received swift consideration and passage in both the House and Senate.

A second bill is the HALT Fentanyl Act. I was the proud House sponsor of this legislation to permanently designate lethal fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I drugs. The bill also made researching Schedule I drugs easier so that we can work to better understand the impacts of these substances on human health.

Like the Laken Riley Act, this bill received swift consideration in both chambers of Congress.

Both of these bills not only won support in the 119th Congress, but from the President as well. President Trump signed these bills into law to help protect American communities.

Some of my actions in the 118th Congress have influenced further action at the federal level.

During that time, I served as the Chairman of the Oversight & Investigations Subcommittee for the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Moreover, I was a leading Energy and Commerce member on the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.

During my leadership on these panels, I routinely participated in oversight of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), with particular interest in American public health agencies engaged in risky research and gain-of-function research projects.

Our investigative work demanded answers from public health officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci.

My findings led me to introduce the Risky Research Review Act. This bill outlines key reforms to make American-funded research more safe, more transparent and more accountable.

To continue momentum on this front, I reintroduced the bill in the 119th Congress with Senator Rand Paul. But the Trump Administration is actively responding to my concerns.

In July 2026, the Trump Administration announced a new government policy for stopping high-risk life sciences research.

The federal policy prohibits American funding of dangerous gain-of-function research in both domestic and foreign settings and aims to establish stronger oversight for life sciences research that could present significant risks to human health.

The Trump Administration further limits federal support for research in countries or institutions that lack appropriate biosafety, biosecurity and oversight standards.

While I will still push for my legislation to enshrine necessary guardrails into law for federally funded risky research, these federal actions are steps in the right direction.

A separate health care policy I investigated under my Chairmanship in the 118th Congress concerned the implementation and oversight of the organ donation and transplant system.

I led a hearing to spotlight issues with our organ transplant programs and discuss the failures of the groups responsible for the procurement of organs, Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs).

In particular, I highlighted alarming allegations that were previously raised to my Subcommittee’s attention.

We received reports that an OPO had planned to operate on prospective organ donors who showed signs of life!

Another allegation claimed that somebody mouthed the words “help me” just before doctors were ready to commence an organ harvesting procedure.

The patient survived, but this disturbing detail reinforced Congressional desires to make the organ transplant process more safe and less risky.

These reports reflected concerns about Network for Hope, one federally designated OPO, and its management and operating procedures.

Upon hearing these troubling allegations, my Oversight Subcommittee brought in medical experts to understand the organ transplant health care landscape and determine the frequency at which these incidents happen.

Following my investigation on the issue, the Trump Administration has worked to protect prospective organ donors and patients awaiting lifesaving treatments.

In August 2026, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services made steps to decertify Network for Hope! This means the OPO can no longer do business with the federal government, and it loses a primary source of income.

This action is another critical federal step in working to ensure the safety and integrity of organ donation and securing U.S. health care programs to better protect patients.

I am proud to have been an early advocate on these issues to help sway federal action. I will continue to shine a light on issues that deserve attention from Congress, the President and the American people.

If you have questions, concerns, or comments, feel free to contact my office.  You can call my Abingdon office at 276-525-1405 or my Christiansburg office at 540-381-5671. To reach my office via email, please visit my website at https://morgangriffith.house.gov/. Also on my website is the latest material from my office, including information on votes recently taken on the floor of the House of Representatives.