Friday, July 10, 2026

Web Log Weekender for 7.3-4.26

I hope everyone had a great weekend...with an adequate supply of dihydrogen monoxide. 

Dihydrogen monoxide? Say what?

Spell it out: H2O. Water. Hard to drink enough of it during a heat wave when you're sweating it out almost as fast as you can drink it in. But it makes the difference between enjoying traditional, sultry July weather, and spending most of it in an expensive hospital. (Where people who have "good" insurance may have the opportunity to learn all about a hundred deadly diseases they don't have, yet, before anyone mentions boring old dehydration.)

Though it can also be deadly, of course.


BayerScience(TM) just loves the dihydrogen monoxide story. Greedheads like that implication that all the garbage they want to dump on us is as natural and healthy as pure water. Though that's even a sillier claim than the claim that dihydrogen monoxide should be banned.

Personally, I had typed that entry, had not decided whether it needed to be in a Category or at the top of the post, had noticed a storm coming close, had set the computers to "hibernate" and unplugged them, minutes before all the transformers started popping in a premature fireworks display on Saturday, the Fourth of July. 

The heat wave was tempered by frequent rain showers and aggravated by extreme humidity, all week long. 

I'm not sure what happened to the linemen. Someone said he'd seen some in the neighborhood. Apparently they got halfway up the ground wire, on the way from the public road to the Cat Sanctuary, and had to stop. Nobody's telling me anything, but a little tree that was not in the way of their work had obviously been spray-poisoned. 

Then again, a lot of transformers exploded during the half-hour storm. 

During most of the work week I sat around in a puddle of sweat wondering whether the company had had to rush a lineman to the hospital with an acute chemical reaction, or wait for more transformers to come in the mail, or maybe both. 

Between a writer prevented from meeting a writing schedule and a bear robbed of her whelps, some reasonable people might prefer to meet the bear. However, when I finally broke down, washed off the existing sweat, put on a clean dry dress, trudged out in search of a phone, and arrived dripping wet on a phone clinger's doorstep, all I actually said was "What happened to the people who were here on Monday? This was not Hurricane Helene. This was the kind of storm we get almost every week in summer." It was Thursday evening. The corporate agent was duly humble, so I didn't need to berate her further, and assured me that my electricity would be working by three o'clock in the morning.

I felt bad about linemen having to work until three o'clock in the morning in the rainforest the Bad Neighbor has allowed to grow around the power line, which had been thoroughly soaked again, not that it had actually dried out since Saturday, but it had been soaked on Thursday afternoon. Possibly that thought gave them an incentive to work efficiently. The lights came on right after midnight and the linemen went home--I hope, to bed. 

And yes, although the cat update below was typed a week ago, it's still true as written. Serena is still trying to produce enough milk for three kittens even though she has only one.

Americans Doing Well 

US-born blogger on Top 100 list of UK blogs:


Animals 

More than most reasonable adults ever wanted to know about sloths.


Cat Sanctuary Update 

Local lurkers, this is important...

My resident Queen Cat Serena, "Serena-Seralini" who has coped with glyphosate poisoning by giving birth to a few dozen kittens who just dropped dead at their first whiff of glyphosate vapors, gave birth to kittens last week. I didn't even bother to count them at birth, or note the colors. I was so sure they couldn't live. 

Well, of course, most of them didn't. Our Bad Neighbor is still exercising a "right to use" the property he signed over, which he'll claim includes a "right to spray." We need to define that "right to spray" by giving the verb "spray" a direct object. It's ethically acceptable when its direct object is: WATER. There is no such thing as a right to spray poison. Anyone who claims there is needs a long rest in a place with bars on all the windows, and if he can get a lawyer, the lawyer does too. Anyway, the first glyphosate poisoning incident brought the number of kittens down to two. The next one brought the number down to one. The one kitten is a flat "blue" grey, not especially pretty as Serena's kittens go, probably male. I'm like "Why why why couldn't it have been the calico kitten?" But anyway she has this one kitten, and it's a lively little thing; even before its eyes opened it was sniffing around the closet.

The Cat Sanctuary agreed to take another cat family in transition, if necessary. As so often happens in our part of the world, it's not been necessary. I was asked to take these cats if A had not already found a place for them and B refused to keep them until A did. So far what I know is that they've not arrived. In any case those kittens would be much too big to be good playmates for Serena's lonely only kitten.

He shows no Manx features. He may or may not show damage from or extra sensitivity to glyphosate vapors, later on, but he's likely to be a bouncy little boycat who needs a sibling, or siblings, to play with. 

Meanwhile...Serena is a large cat who produces large litters of kittens and lavish amounts of milk. Here she was with all this milk and only one small kitten. So...her family are social cats. Her grandkitten Drudge, now three years old, and kitten Silver, now seven years old, are now sharing her milk. 

I feel that they're doing this for a reason. Serena did not try to maintain a milk supply for multiple kittens when Zakitty's brothers died. I think something is telling her that this year a kitten, or kittens, will need the milk.

Orphaned baby kittens don't need rabies shots--yet--but I would like confirmation that the mother didn't have FIV. 

Immigration 

Jeanie from the Marmalade Gypsy blog shared a lovely rainbow-colored map of American ethnicity. I loved the way it blends a surface level at which people in the Blue Ridge Mountains will say their ancestry is "English I guess--we all speak English," until they look it up, and then they might try to identify with one lot of ancestors for a while, and finally they admit that on the Point of Virginia most of us are a mix of three to seven European tribes plus one or more indigenous tribes and it may or may not be possible to identify all of our ancestors and their identities...so what we are is American. If there is such a thing as a plain unhyphenated American we're it. We come from a place where small select groups of relatively civilized Europeans and a select group of relatively sophisticated indigenous people agreed that a multiethnic buffer zone might serve the Cherokee Nation's interests, if and because those people were all capable of living like neighbors, putting the tribal feuds behind them. Possibly we have evolved a step or two ahead of much of humankind.

The trouble is that the map's on nytimes.com, where it has a paywall so I'm not sure I would be able to link you to it. (For a while, at least, you can find it from the link at https://themarmeladegypsy.blogspot.com/2026/07/postcards-from-lake-reflections-on.html .) And it's part of an essay that draws on old, outdated arguments.

Fact: Americans, as we are today, are a nation of immigrants. Even indigenous Americans can often be shown, from archaeological evidence, to have moved into places where other people left, or died out.

Fact: From the sixteenth through the nineteenth centuries, Europeans caused a lot of indigenous people to abandon a lot of good land. They did not do this by force of numbers, technology, or personal superiority of any kind. They did it by bringing in filth and diseases. Indigenous people had evolved perfect herd immunity to several of these diseases, such that the diseases had ceased to exist here for a long time. When the pathogens came back, the people died. So the Europeans rushed in. Oh, how they poured in. We became the "trap" in the drainpipe of Europe. Europeans were totally fed up with living, or more precisely dying, in slums. They yearned for wide-open spaces created by the deaths of thousands, millions, of people from diseases to which Europe's herd immunity remained imperfect, so individuals still had high resistance. 

Fact: For a nation that was rebuilding itself on a mass of graves, wide-open immigration was a viable idea, and worked for everybody...as long as our population density remained generally low.

Fact: In the early twentieth century the plagues Europeans continued to bring in started to make a dent in our population. But something unprecedented happened: we discovered antibiotics, and other cures for the diseases that had thinned out the huddled masses in Europe. Our population started to become too dense. Like overcrowded animal populations we began to show patterns of decreasing fertility, increasing "sexual deviations" from the norm of simple reproductivity, first, with slower increases in infectious diseases, in loss of individual resistance to diseases, and in antisocial behavior--crowded individuals desperately lashing out in homicide-suicides.

Fact: Americans, as we are today, have to close our doors. Other people have to start controlling their own overpopulation. No other country can count on being able to send surplus young people to America any more. 

Fact: It has nothing to do with whether or not we like foreigners. Some people who want to end mass immigration are actively working to help this soldier's translator or this legal immigrant's husband qualify for one of a decreasing number of spaces for legal immigrants, and he's welcome to live in our town if he likes. But there's simply not enough room for them all. Rounding up and deporting the ones who have violated our laws, already, is a reasonable place to start.

I've liked the Mexican people I've known, and I've liked the Colombian people I've known, and I'm not even prejudiced against the people brought into Kingsport to give that city an instant slum, though I mind bitterly that the slum was plopped into the neighborhood where my mother should have had another ten years to live. That's another story. My point is: Rhythm is fine. Color is fine. Spanish is a delightfully minimalist language full of fascinating agglutinative verbs. Spanish-ness is not the problem. And I am poor as the proverbial church mouse myself, so it would be awfully hypocritical of me to mind other people being poor, although I do claim a right to hold opinions about what people do about being poor. And actually, although I speak Spanish slowly and with an accent, although I picked up the sound from acquaintances but learned the grammar and vocabulary from books, I have only pleasant memories of ever having spoken it, so when I hear people speak Spanish in shops and restaurants my feeling is like "Oh cool, she's One Of Us, she knows the special language I used to share with just a few out of my multitude of relatives." I have no problem whatsoever with Mexicans living in the neighborhood that was not, before about 2015, a slum, that had small but reasonably spaced houses a little closer to the factory than the bigger, pricier houses people saved up to retire to. A reasonable number of bodies, at a reasonable density, living reasonably clean healthy lives. 

That's not what the people screaming for more immigration want, and it's not what Kingsport got. What the screamers really want is to ruin the nice neighborhoods where it's possible, and in Kingsport it used to be visible, even in your face, to move up the economic ladder. Leftists want to believe in classes, a European phenomenon, where if you're a factory laborer living in a three-room house three blocks from the factory, you're never going to get a better job and you're never going to have friends who have better jobs and your children are never going to be allowed to marry the children of people with money and so on, because Europe had fallen into a dysfunctional thought pattern when Karl Marx was writing. What we actually have are economic tiers through which individuals move. If you're a laborer living in that three-room house three blocks from the factory, and you make frugal choices and have one child or none, by the time your child is old enough to need a room of its own you can afford to move into a four-room house. 

In Kingsport, the planned structure of "Snob Hill" meant that the laborer's child might be walking to the same school every day with the boss's child. The retired doctor drove his expensive car through the car wash where the laborers' teenaged children worked, to the same post office, the same library, the same selection of shops, the laborers used. Mother and her friends, mostly about halfway up the "upper" part of Snob Hill, had all started out as twenty-something entry-level "career girls" who might have thought they were doing well to afford a three-room house instead of a basement apartment, and all worked hard, married reasonably well, saved their money, and ended up in...Mother's house technically had eight rooms, but the bigger of the two big rooms on the ground floor had room for everything you'd find in a four-room house, easily. It was hard to overlook the way the social contract said that people weren't born into different "classes" because of their spiritual merits or whatever, but were on different economic tiers from which they could move up or down at will. 

Leftists hate that that kind of social contract exists. They want to break it up. So they yammered for more population density, replaced a good midrange shopping plaza with the horrible slum, stocked the slum with drug addicts out of Knoxville and Chattanooga, and watched the neighborhood people wanted to retire to turn--temporarily--into a neighborhood where people didn't want to roll down their car windows. Because tuberculosis.

One kind of opportunist does like it when drug addicts are packed into a new slum. You know what kind that is. They have organized gangs that run parts of Mexico and Colombia. They were there to keep the addicts slowly dying in their puddles of filth--many of them behind what was built, in the Eighties when I was young, as a shiny new upscale office building, especially the bank. 

So in due course, this spring, ICE moved in. Did they get all the drug dealers? I don't think so; the original pair were White and didn't sound as if ICE would have had any interest in them. They got some of them. Nobody likes a drug dealer. But nobody I knew received any of those panicky calls about how the only thing Jorge ever did wrong was live with Maria in between the expiration of his original green card and the issuance of his new authorization to seek citizenship. In Kingsport ICE didn't bother with Jorge. They had narcotraficantes to send back to Mexico and Colombia and, if they put those blighters on robot-controlled planes and programmed those planes to crash, that's fine by me. You can still be waited on by real Chinese waiters at the Chinese restaurant, real Mexicans at the Mexican restaurant, your real Pakistani doctor if you're one of that doctor's patients. The big corporations and the state university still have exchange programs. You still see different kinds of people in Kingsport. You see fewer of the ones most likely to harm you

Nice, ICE. 

I think we have to say no to any increase in existing levels of population density. No existing building is empty? No immigrant can move in. I think we can still afford a few immigrants, and I think being able to afford a few immigrants is a good thing, but we cannot afford to admit masses of immigrants any more. We have to recognize the 1950s-style "Don't be prejudiced against immigrants as people" line of  talk as irrelevant, a worn-out artefact of today's older generation's grandparents' time. 

I doubt very much that people my age and younger are prejudiced against any variety of people--except for the very young, some of whom seem to have been trained to hate their political opposition. Any debate about the amount of immigration we can afford needs to focus on the reality that there's no room for our population to keep growing. In fact we need a population decline--and I for one would rather see that decline come from a combination of fewer couples having fewer babies, and fewer immigrants being let in, rather than the historically more common combination of plagues and wars.

So, clue alert, NYTimes? The year is 2026, not 1956. Write for the audience that is still alive.

Men Behaving Well 

Vince Staten: 


Music 

Donovan.


Mitchell Feeney (John Mitchell and Jim Feeney).


Herbert Pixner.



John Coltrane.


Elijah Bossenbroek.



Olexandr Ignatov.


Stryper (see below).


Crosby, Stills, Nash, & Young.


Tom Petty.



Religious Differences 

Muslims traditionally throw stones at the Devil. A Christian pop group in the 1980s sang "To Hell with the Devil" (see above). This church...I don't know, there are good things to be said for encouraging kids to visualize spiritual warfare in post-Roman form, but let's just say that for most city churches this skit would have been unthinkable. Because you don't discharge a bullet in a place where it might break someone else's window, or worse.


Technology 

AOC calls for restrictions on Big Tech's price inflation and pushes for unsustainable "data centers." Go, girl! Even if her working together with Bernie Sanders on this one means she's going at it the wrong way...you know how, if you need to cut down a tree, you make a few cuts in the wrong direction to encourage the tree to fall in the right direction?


Travel 

Martha DeMeo went to Cherokee Town to see how the attractions have been rebuilt. It doesn't look like disaster tourism any more, although it is. What caught my eye were the tailless Tiger Swallowtails...not a new subspecies; they look like the survivors of some predators that have been feasting at a lek site. But MDeM is not a butterfly specialist, nor do you need to be. There are all kinds of other attractions.

Monday, July 6, 2026

Butterfly of the Week: Wallace's Jay

Passing over Graphium ucalegonides, which still appears on many lists but has been reclassified as a subspecies of Graphium fulleri at most science sites, we come to Graphium wallacei, Wallace's Graphium, or Wallace's Kite, or Wallace's Jay. 


Photo from Facebook. 

It was named for Alfred Russel Wallace, an intrepid naturalist who explored obscure places like New Guinea and collected specimens he sent to other scientists to identify, classify, and name. Wallace sent one male butterfly back to England; it was deemed unique and classified as a "new" species, formerly unknown to Europeans, named in Wallace's honor. 

Some other species in other genera were also named after Wallace for the same reason. This web site documents each of "Wallace's" species:


Although it's sometimes found in Indonesia and the Moluccas as well as New Guinea, photos of this butterfly, alive, are rare. While living it seems to be blackish or brownish, with white spots, blobs of lighter color, and some distinctive yellow-green or yellow spots at the overlapping edges of its wings. Collected specimens fade quickly to deep brown with cream-colored spots. 


Painting by Hewitson, who declared the butterfly a new species and named it after Wallace in 1858.

Though uncommon even in its limited range, it is not believed to be threatened. 

Nothing seems to have been published about this species' life history. 

  

Sunday, July 5, 2026

Book Review: Horses Heartaches and Hope

Title: Horses Heartaches and Hope

Author: Brooks Wright

Date: 2023

Quote: "Should've come back sooner."

When Jemma loses her parents and comes back to their ranch, she wishes she'd never left. The ranch can be made profitable enough that she doesn't need to bother with her job in the city. (Props to Wright for mentioning this extremely important factor in come-back-to-the-old-home-place stories.) She has old school friends here; she didn't have close friends in the city. And of course one of her old friends has grown up into an attractive man. Who admits, in the course of the story, that he was a pest at school because he had a crush on her. He got over his crush when Jemma went to the city, married a girl who stayed in their home town, and lost her and their baby. Now he and Jemma begin to bond because both of them feel angry at God, because of these untimely deaths. 

This is a sweet romance, so you know...but, along the way, the plot takes a more suspenseful twist when men begin harassing Jemma, demanding that she sell or leave her property. Kudos to Wright for adding a real storyline to a short genre romance; I think she could have handled it better, anyway.

It's a serious issue. We as a nation have yet to recover from a time when women weren't considered competent to manage their own property. We've mandated respect for women's bank accounts but we have yet to pound into the heads of too many people, even decent people who may believe their intentions toward female land owners are good, that women have the same legal right to own land that we have to own money. 

The weekend before writing this review, I aggravated a chemical reaction that I already knew was going to be nasty--and it's being nasty as I write--by commandeering someone's employers' flatphone and documenting illegal poison spraying around a mountain spring...which was done not to prevent the spring branch silting up, which has been prevented by me if at all since the guilty person acquired a claim to the spring, but purely and entirely to harm me. To my disgust, the person with the flatphone failed to provide any emotional support but went into a panic attack, yipping "Come back, let's go, let's get out of here," as I photographed the evidence of the crime. Person was obviously more afraid of the criminal than of failing to do per duty and help prosecute the crime. 

We need to be saying to those who don't unequivocally support women's property rights: Have you a beard and call yourself a man? 

We need to be demanding that politicians stop babbling about the so-called "right" to be done horrible wrong, through abortion, and take a firm stand in support of women's right to own real estate.

We need to be telling those who are still drivelling about "reparations" for the long-gone past that "reparations" need to be made first and foremost to women, and need to begin with all real estate being owned by women, with men as co-owners who may have a claim on profits but can't inherit land in their own right, for a few hundred years. After all, good men would not want to be seen out of their homes or job sites alone, lest they raise suspicion that they might be involved in hatecrimes against women. 

Well, for a start, "reparations" to the dead being a silly idea in any case, we can begin by telling men that it's our property, private and public, and if we live on it and know what's going on they should not try to take over what we do about crimes committed on it but should follow our directions, living in fear of giving any slightest suggestion that they think their testosterone poisoning makes them more competent than we are. We can begin by reminding men that although they are more likely to have the mechanical talents to work on cars, their testeria and twitchiness keep them from being more competent even to drive cars, as a class.

Reading this novel so soon after seeing an old friend flake out on me, I wished something would happen to Tate so that Jemma would have to manage the ranch by herself for a few years before she found a husband. Oh, nothing fatal--maybe his first wife wasn't dead yet, after all? Until women have resolved serious questions about our basic civil rights, even an appealing husband can be More Of The Problem. Tate shows the right attitude but he functions, in relation to Jemma's real story, as a crutch that's not going to be available to most people in her situation and is not part of a satisfactory solution. 

Fortunately or unfortunately, this novel's "story arc" follows the cheap-genre-romance timeline rather than the grand-sweeping-epic-romance timeline. Jemma solidifies her title to her own property by marrying a man. All very well for women who like men, who are of course the huge majority of all women, but it fails to make a much needed statement about women's right to own, manage, and occupy land all by ourselves.

Anyway, politics aside: sweet Christian romance, reasonably likable characters, spiritual enlightenment as a plot element. If you like a story that has those features, you'll like this book.

Saturday, July 4, 2026

Have a Happy Fourth of July

This web site does not usually display new content on Saturdays. Well, it's not being typed on a Saturday. This post was written on Friday, as some of our e-friends' commenters appeared to be gearing up to make the holiday weekend a source of bad memories, picking fights and spouting inflammatory comments. 

Here are some ways this web site would like to encourage everyone in the US to have a glorious Fourth of July. This is not an exhaustive list but this web site has tried to make it exhaustingly long. This web site hopes that the kind of people who want to pick fights will feel tired just by reading all these words, flop down near a television set, and fall asleep. 

1. Start the celebration by raising your main flag. This can be made into a ceremony if people want it to be. 

2. Make and drink lots of  the traditional Fourth of July beverage: lemonade. This is made by combining sugar, water, and lemons in any proportion that suits you. It will depend on the quality of your lemons. Tasting will be necessary. 

(In days of yore, our Founding Fathers sometimes ran short of lemons for the Fourth of July and had to stretch their lemonade by adding other ingredients. Limes won't change the color. Orange, grapefruit, or rhubarb (which grew well in the Northeastern States) juice will yield PINK lemonade. Pink lemonade was marketed as a special treat. Also, honey, molasses, and maple syrup were sometimes used to eke out supplies of sugar.)

3. Who wants to heat up the house on the Fourth of July? All cooking moves outdoors. Barbecuing meat, grilling corn, roasting potatoes in the ashes, and toasting marshmallows over the coals, are traditional ways to discourage mosquitoes too. Insects love to invite themselves to a picnic but will un-invite themselves if they smell smoke.

4. Read the Declaration of Independence aloud. At home, it can be fun to let the youngest person who is willing to try it lead the reading. Everyone else reads in unison.

5. Sing "The Star-Spangled Banner," all the verses if possible, and as many other patriotic songs as possible. 

6. If you have a town or neighborhood parade, or fireworks show, or other traditional festivity, go out and support it. Be neighborly. 

7. In 1976, when I dressed up for a Bicentennial pageant, all most people knew about what people were wearing in 1776 was that the women wore long skirts and the men wore knee-length coats, knee-length breeches, and knee-high stockings. I remember at least knowing that my costume needed a sunbonnet and an apron for authenticity, while being blithely unaware that paisley print (the one maxi-dress I owned was red paisley) hadn't been invented in 1776 and the fashionable colors were pale, dull pastels, to which darker colors tended to fade in those days anyway. I had not heard an actual song from the 1770s that described how fashions in the new United States differed from those in France and England: 

"Of economy boast! Let your pride be the most
To show clothes of your own weave and spinning.
No more ribbons wear, nor in rich silks appear.
Love your country much better than fine things."

Patriots rejected imported materials during the Revolutionary War years. If you don't have a white wig, sunbonnet, or pair of knee breeches, you can still dress in authentic Revolutionary War spirit. 

8. For reenactments, know your options regarding "race." All thirteen colonies allowed slavery before, during, and for varying lengths of time after the War. Not all slaves were Black. Not all free citizens were White. Regardless of your ancestry or complexion you can reasonably claim the right to impersonate one of the slaves who were skilled artisans. Or you can reasonably claim the right to impersonate a free person. If you want to upset some people you can even impersonate a free citizen who owned slaves whose complexion was lighter than the owners'; that actually happened. "Race" became part of the slavery question in the early nineteenth century. In 1776 people who paid any attention to how other people looked could be blunt and rude about it because nobody thought it mattered much anyway, but people's "condition"--enslaved, apprenticed, employed by other people, in business for themselves, land owners, rich land owners, male or female, over or under age 21, part of the oldest active generation in their family or a subsequent generation--was a separate and much more important consideration. Social segregation followed lines drawn around money.

9. In 1776 many people thought special occasions should be solemn, observed with loooonnnnggg lectures if not actual sermons. Charles Carroll of Carrollton actually considered it a character defect that he had been known to laugh. The ideal facial expression was "grave," no more prone to smile than to cry or scowl. Declaring independence was considered a very solemn, even awful, event, not to be marked by frivolity. Few doubted that the Bible, as interpreted by their faith tradition, was literally true. Between 1776 and at least 1846 there are solid historical precedents for celebrating the Fourth of July with long, detailed sermons and Bible studies. To the extent that a backlash existed it was what Founders like Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson called Deism. They never doubted that the world had been created by an Almighty God Who had given humankind specific instructions on how to serve their Maker. They merely questioned, seeing that people believed different things about what God wanted, how it was possible to know whether anyone was right. The idea of a separation of Church and State is something we owe to those Deists. There are historical precedents for keeping the Fourth of July a secular observance, too, thanks to them. But it's worth reading just what our founding Deists believed they ought to do. Franklin famously wrote that he at least wanted in "humility: [to] Emulate Jesus and Socrates." 

10. Some people celebrate and reenact what their ancestors or town founders contributed to the United States after 1776. How not? They should try, however, to celebrate what their ancestors really wanted, which was not a global socialist dictatorship. Individual life, liberty, and the pursuit of wealth or some alternative source of happiness, are what the United States are all about. If you don't like those things, please consider moving to a country whose historic values are closer to yours. Others will be glad to replace you here.

11. The United States is not about an individual leader you might love or hate. It is about a system that recognizes that every leader can and will be replaced. For the duration of this holiday, at least, consider not mentioning the name of any living President. 

12. There are historical precedents for celebrating the United States' prosperity with extravagant festivities, and for celebrating its frugal beginnings with frugal ones. For the benefit of perspective we probably need both. Consider celebrating early American life by unplugging and working on your self-sufficiency skills.

13. At least some family members should choose to stay inside and comfort dogs and cats who don't find the sound of fireworks entertaining. Animals who run away from what they believe is gunfire and bombing, in panic, are likely to get lost. Try to keep your four-footed friends in a safe, quiet room with any favorite toys, favorite cushions and blankets, and your snuggly reassuring self at their disposal.

14. If going to large family gatherings is not your favorite part of the holiday, consider acting on the assumption (which may or may not be true) that the stupid things some relatives say are the effects of jet lag, medication, and/or old age. Be charitable. Avoid arguments. Give politely cryptic answers to inappropriate questions while moving away into the crowd.

In some families political debates are part of the fun. Those families are not the people who need to avoid arguments. They know who they are. They can tell because they enjoy those debates.

15. Large family gatherings may work best in public or semi-public places that offer room for people to choose their own way to spend the afternoon. "Neurotypical" people can feel overloaded by travel, talk, food, and music too. Look for places where people can stroll down around the water when they've had enough conversation. Diversity and distance are American; they're what the "huddled masses" came here for.

16. Celebrating our natural environment is a patriotic thing to do, too. Why not visit scenic parks and waterfronts? 

17. Try to drink only lemonade (or "fizzy lemonade"--soda pop) and spring water all day, if possible. And don't drive, anyway. You know some formerly human creature with booze for brains is going to be out on the road, looking for a family whose holiday can be made into a tragedy. Let somebody else smash him.

18. Liberate a shelter animal. 

19. Celebrate our maritime history by spending the afternoon on a boat, or at least on a beach.

20. Make your own list of things you want to celebrate about being American: Ford cars, sarsaparilla, newspapers, football, stamp collecting, whooping cranes, Greyhound buses, redwood trees, junkyards, 
blueberries, whatever. Any thing that can be celebrated, thereby distracting you from quarrelling with and about persons, is good. 

Friday, July 3, 2026

Book Review: Gorgeous Knitted Afghans

Title: Gorgeous Knitted Afghans

Author: Fatema Habibur-Rahman

Date: 2004

Publisher: Lark

ISBN: 978-1579903534

Illustrations: full-color photos

“Gorgeous” is the word for this book. The influence of Indian art is conspicuous. Very bright, clear colors, jewel tones and actual jewels, tiny sewn-on mirrors, make Indian textiles “gorgeous”...and that’s the look of many of these afghans.

Not all of them are bright-colored. There are some subtle effects worked in soft-colored yarns too...but there are enough jewel tones, beads, mirrors, paisleys, and mandalas to make it clear that the three sisters from Bengal are celebrating their artistic heritage.

That’s not the only Islamic Indian influence I see in this book. Why afghans rather than sweaters or shawls? Two cultural factors are involved. One is that, when people learned to knit “in the old way,” they didn’t buy and store a lot of fancy pattern books; they memorized simple “rules” for knitting whatever they wanted to knit, and learned patterns from “samplers,” which might be used as blankets, table runners, rugs...or afghans. The other factor is Muslim modesty. You can recycle these patterns into shawls or sweaters if you want to, but nobody is demeaned by having to pose for a picture in this book. The photos show afghans draped across chairs.

Then there’s the way the sisters write. Their use of English words, including knitting terms, is not incorrect; it’s foreign. Gorgeous Knitted Afghans was edited by its American publisher so that the directions are easy for Americans to use, but some of the discussion is...well...easier to follow than Salman Rushdie. “Ply refers to the number of strands that make up the yarn’s thread”? Technically that’s an allowable way to use those words; it’s just not a way an American would ever use them. . 

There’s also the emphasis on family life. The sisters Habibur-Rahman tell us about their family, not about where they live, where they went to school, what they or even their husbands do (apart from knitting). Typical of Indian Muslims as distinct from Muslims in some other countries, however, they do use their own individual names rather than honorific “Mother of...” titles.

Perhaps easiest for some Americans to appreciate is the concept of afghans for all seasons. Some of these afghans are heavy snowproof blankets, and some of them are light and lacy. 

Others will love just looking at the ways the sisters play with colors and novelty yarns. A plain cable-stitch panel is framed in two shades of heathered “fun fur.” One afghan mixes five different hand-painted yarns. The cover pattern plays two different multicolor fleck yarns against bright contrasting solid colors. Mandalas are accented with tassels on page 59; paisleys are elaborated with mini-mirrors on page 145. You won’t be able to get the same novelty effects this year, but you’ll be inspired to mix up the current novelty yarns to make afghans that are uniquely your own.

What some Americans will love, and others will hate, is the extravagant use of cashmere yarn. Presumably this is less extravagant in Kashmir, or in Bengal, than it would be in the United States. One entire multicolor afghan is worked in nothing but cashmere. Good luck even finding cashmere yarn in that many colors at your local wool shop...in a good year they might be able to order it specially for you. Mohair and alpaca are easier to get and look gorgeous, too, but they just don’t feel the same.

You need to be a fairly skilled knitter to reproduce most of these afghans. This should not be a problem. Afghans don’t have to fit exactly, and people sweating out colds on the couch won’t even care if the panels aren’t perfectly matched. Afghans are the way knitters build those skills. Gorgeous Knitted Afghans will entice you to perfect knitting techniques that may have seemed too much of a challenge when you were trying to knit a sweater. 

Web Log for 7.2.26

What a lot of content I'm not likely to have read or listened to by October...

The day's "update" upheavals (four of them, for a total of about 2 hours wasted on "updates" made me wonder what kind of people think this is an acceptable way to run the computer network, anyway. Maybe reforms should include mandatory retirement for all who programmed "updates," into tiny houses that are gyroscopically destabilized. Approximately every six or eight hours, but never at the same time of day twice in a row, a siren should go off blaring "Update! Update!" and the buildings should make at least one complete rotation and two half-turns, never in the same direction twice in a row. They should have a general idea that if they fall asleep they're probably going to wake up somewhere other than the bed or couch, but no idea where! Sometimes if they put food on a plate they'll be eating food off a plate, and sometimes they'll be picking bits of plate out of food stuck to the ceiling! Sometimes their water-flush toilets will flush, and sometimes... For them that would probably be fun! The kind of "excitement" they craved all their lives! 

Anyway a lot of the "to listen to" was music...

Ludovico Einaudi.




Gotthard.


Tom Petty.



Chi Coltrane. (This song title, and the one by Gotthard, were linked at 
and, if you have a preference for one or the other, you're invited to go there and cast your vote.)


Jefferson Airplane.


Pentatonix. (If you're a strict traditionalist, bookmark this one and listen to it in December.)


Pearl Jam.


Paul Simon. (I'm struck by the resemblance between his tune and "O Sacred Head Now Wounded." Maybe it's just me...I hear "O Sacred Head" as a solemn, even intimidating hymn and don't really like its being...parodied?...as "an American Tune." It's a German tune and it goes with the words "Lord let me never, never outlive my love to Thee." So I'm not keen on this song, but some people are.)


The Beatles. (No controversy there. If you don't like the Beatles you might lose your membership in the baby-boom generation.)


Lot of soccer fans.


John Lennon.


James Taylor.


Parliament.


Mozart.


Silver Convention.


Pam Cavelcanti.


War (Charles William Miller and friends).


Improvisations on a theme by Manuel de Falla, the improviser not clearly identified.


Talking Heads.


Shostakovich.


Jefferson Starship.


Anton Dvorak.


Nick Drake.


R.E.M.


Paul McCartney.


Olexandr Ignatov.


The Incredible String Band.


Dorothy Moore. (I think the only way to sing this song without inducing snarky laughter is very understated, very traditional, NO "ornamentation." I can believe the words coming from a wistful, pensive state of mind; emoting makes them sound like mockery. So, soft 1960s pop, or country, but not "soul," please! Don't mind me. At least I laughed.)


The Beach Boys.


Mix of 1970s pop tunes. I did actually know one person who used to tune her radio to a station that played this kind of thing, all day, every day, when she was at home. I remember it as the sort of music that was piped into some shops and restaurants. Music to select 89-cent paperback books, 25-cent cans of veg, and $5.98 shirts by. 

Bad Poetry: Moche Shield

This week's Poets & Storytellers United prompt invites reactions to works of art. 


According to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, this artefact was molded of copper, decorated with gold, silver, turquoise, glass beads, and originally with woven fabric, by or for a Moche warrior in Peru in the first century CE. The owl image was made separately and attached in such a way that the head moved a bit and the wings fluttered when the shield moved. If nothing else, the complexity of the shield might have distracted enemies from throwing spears or shooting arrows to trying to steal the work of art. 

On his shield he put a night bird,
And it glittered in the sunshine,
And it shimmered in the moonlight,
And its wings flapped when he moved it,
And its head bobbed as if watching
Any who were watching him move.
Every bead and fold of fabric,
Every curve of onlaid metal
(It was all of precious metal),
Every wink of sun through beady
Night bird eyes over his shoulder,
Spoke to all who saw him walking:
"Here behold a famous warrior,
Much admired by all the Moche.
Who strikes him will fight a hundred
Moche warriors seeking vengeance."
And there were nights when a watchman
Told himself, "This is the Owl Man,
Chief among the Moche warriors,
Come to take our gold and silver.
Better not to see him coming
Better say: I saw a night bird
Shimmering in the summer moonlight
As if made of gold and silver.
Let him take what he came seeking.
None of us need fight the Owl Man."
And there were days when a warrior
Said: "Ho! I will fight the Owl Man!
I'll win honor, I'll win glory,
People bow when I step forward,
Hold my feet when I am seated,
Carry my things when I travel..."
And his spear bounced off the owl shield,
And Owl Man returned it to him
Straight and swift, with the curare 
Sinking where it gashed his shoulder,
And the warrior hurried homeward
Ere its poison could destroy him...
If he reached home, if he fell down
On the homeward path, the Owl Man
Never asked, but added his spear
To the Owl Man's own equipment
Honored was the mighty Owl Man
Till at last luck turned against him
And he fell down on the war path.
Then they gathered his equipment
And divided up his weapons,
But the owl shield buried with him.
Never would another Moche
Represent himself as Owl Man.
Owl Man's name was long remembered,
Stories told to younger Moche,
Spirit called on as companion;
Even hundreds of years later,
When the Moche sleep forgotten,
Owl shield says to all who see it:
I belonged to a great warrior,
Loved and feared by all my people.

Thursday, July 2, 2026

Web Log for 7.1.26

Once again...anything from the "to listen to" queue that has a beat may be linked below. 

This is not really a post. This has not really seemed like a day. I've been in the most unpleasant part of a glyphosate reaction. It mixes badly with a heat wave. All I've really wanted to do all day has been lie down and think of ways to produce these sensations in people who don't feel them as simple glyphosate reactions.

Glyphosate Awareness 

It's unfortunate that the Supreme Court upheld restrictions on the liability of corporations that sell poisons. Or is it? People who honestly didn't know glyphosate was making them ill filed their suits ten years ago. The ones still filing today are likely to be bitter clingers,

Time to consider the liability of people who have sprayed poison and thereby harmed other people. We are no longer talking about old farm laborers with cancer. We are talking about people who've deliberately ignored warnings and claimed they had a "right to spray." As those people react to blood tests suggesting they may indeed have cancer, they deserve to be hit with lawsuits from the neighbors they've harmed. They deserve to go into chemo knowing that people who know them are thinking, "If cancer must happen it couldn't happen to a more deserving blighter. I hope he swells up so that he can't even see his feet. I hope all the relatives of anyone put in the same hospital room with him complain because he's constantly covered in blood-flecked froth." They deserve to know that when they come out of the hospital their neighbors are going to own their homes and they should go straight to a homeless shelter, from which they can send the address if anyone feels charitable enough to send any of their personal paraphernalia through the mail.

Goops and How Not to Be Them

Predictably, someone answered ex-President Obama's interview with "Are the slave owners in the room with us now?" Meaning, of course, that although Islam teaches that freeing slaves is a righteous act every Muslim should do, Islam does not actually forbid some people trafficking in slaves in the first place. The usual argument. "Well, you know these people are generally a bit retarded and incompetent--some of them may have been kidnapped for ransom but most of them sold themselves, or their families sold them, so that someone could teach them how to work, which is the best thing for them really," and although many of the Arab countries have officially outlawed slavery, that is still what people know their "guest workers" are there for. Not to be exposed to the roots of their faith tradition.To be beaten and raped and trafficked around and treated worse than the "honest dust" of the earth. In a few parts of Africa people can actually be led out in chains and sold at auction.

Right. But I want to say this as a legally White person. We personally, we Anglo-Americans, have never owned a slave. (Maybe a follower who enjoyed being talked to and treated like one, maybe a college student who reenacted a slave auction as a fundraiser, but that's different. Those people were having fun.) Likely we have never even practiced race discrimination. We think segregation was stupid. We've corrected clerks who turned to us first when someone who looked different had been waiting first. We may have called people to tell them why they ought to hire our Adult Ed students. Some White people who may be reading this have legally Black grandchildren. And we want to help the young Black Americans making all the noise these days outgrow socialism, too. We think "reparations" for bygone generations is pretty stupid, especially when, if people trace their ancestors, some of them are going to come to a handful of Black and/or indigenous Americans who owned English-born slaves. But we would absolutely love to have dinner with Thomas Sowell or share a work space with Tim Scott. We voted for Ben Carson, would have voted for Condoleezza Rice, will be voting for Tim Scott if he ever seeks a promotion...

And. Still. Even though some of the "microtraumas" that perturb the young are "micro" indeed. Even though, considering a different minority pressure group, we think it would be good sadistic fun to watch today's college freshmen explain to Hillary Rodham Clinton exactly how having to ask for access to the computer with the voice recognition program (you know, because the older student working in the library didn't remember that they were the ones with the micro-disabilities) hurt them. Even though the idea of celebrating how slowly the news reached Texas in the 1860s would have seemed silly even if it hadn't been sponsored by Joe Biden.

Can we please, please, take a little time off from ego-defending and consider one way we personally can show good will to some member of some minority group today? Special good will, to help them see what's missing in what they've heard about White Americans being everyone else's enemies?

Music 

War, the band.


Steely Dan.


Aukai.



Headstones.


Matthew Halsall.



The Mamas and the Papas.


Robert Gromotka.


Luke Brogden.


Yeahman. 


Frenic.


Boogie Belgique.


Neil Young.


Emancipator.


Santana.


Ringo Starr.

Book Review: Cooking with Friends

Title: Cooking with Friends

Author: Amy Lyles Wilson

Date: 1995

Publisher: Rutledge Hill

ISBN: 1-55853-383-4

Length: 134 pages

Illustrations: color photos

Quote: “If your guests ask what’s that curry flavor, tell themto shut up and eat or go to their rooms.”

These were, according to food writer Jack Bishop, the recipes the cast cooked and ate on the “Friends” TV show. Bishop supplied the recipes; Amy Lyles Wilson supplied the summaries of the scenes in which each recipe was prepared, consumed, or reminisced about; the Warner Brothers corporation supplied the lines and full-color photos from the TV show.

This cookbook is recommended to fans of the “Friends” show for nostalgia value. Unfortunately, I can’t find much to recommend the recipes, unless you’re trying to help someone gain weight. The arrangement of recipes is clever—instead of the routine sequence of appetizers, soups, meat, fish, veg, bread, desserts, and drinks, these recipes are classified as appetizers, coffee and accompaniments, comfort foods, holiday foods, New York food, vegetarian entrees, and desserts—but the recipes themselves are basic foods with lots of added fat. One dozen muffins would normally be made with two tablespoons of butter or oil; Jack Bishop’s recipe for a dozen corn muffins calls for ten tablespoons of melted butter.

If you buy the book and want actually to eat any of the food, I'd ignore the amounts of fat Bishop recommends dumping into everything. Start with one tablespoon of butter or oil per two servings of anything made with vegetables, fruits, or grain, and just enough to coat the pan for anything made with milk, meat, or egg since these foods already contain more fat than most bodies really need. 

Another way to cut cost and improve quality, if you insist on trying to eat any of these recipes, is to realize that you don’t have to use a food processor to make everything. Actually, if you don’t enjoy wasting electricity while subjecting your friends and relatives to unpleasant noise, you could forget about the food processor altogether. The only foods discussed in this book for which a food processor really saves time and trouble are the “creamy” whipped-oil salad dressings. You could just pass oil and lemon juice on the side and forget about the mayonnaise-y stuff. Picky eaters would thank you.

Otherwise, eggs fluff up about as fast when beaten with an eggbeater, a small hand tool that’s ecologically sound and easy to clean. Vegetables can be chopped more evenly and efficiently with a good sharp knife, also ecologically sound and easy to clean. Mixing dough and batter with a big wooden spoon is one of the main reasons why people bake in the first place; if tennis elbow has put you out of touch with the primal pleasure of beating up food, let a child do it—children instinctively know that beating batter is a treat in its own right. You can save those kilowatts for the actual cooking and find something more enjoyable to do with the money.
 

Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Web Log for 6.30.26

Some cyberchores got done, at the expense of link hunting, e-mail, etc. But I did keep moving through that "to listen to" list, and quite a few of the things people thought I needed to hear were music.

Music 

Neil Young.


Bill Haley and what may be some of his original fans. (Fun fact: this is the first rock song I remember hearing.)


Crosby, and/or Stills, Nash, and Young.



A child called Leona. I'm not sure I believe this is unedited live video, but I've heard a two-year-old sing a simpler melody, almost this long, this close to being on key, many times before. My natural sister was the main attraction of "The Three Bigguns" before, at age six, she lost the ability to hear most of the notes in this treble range. 


Dave Brubeck.


Chet Baker.

Stevie Ray Vaughan.


OntWtf.


Joni Mitchell.


Bob Dylan.


George Harrison.


The Band.


Jesse Colin Young.


Chris Thomas King. 


Terry Reid.


Tom Petty.


Donovan.

Book Review: Seasoned Timber

Title: Seasoned Timber

Author: Dorothy Canfield (later Mrs. Fisher)

Date: 1939

Publisher: Harcourt Brace & Co.

ISBN: none

Length: 485 pages

Illustrations: color frontispiece by Paul Honoré

Quote: “Mr. Hulme...had self-indulgently picked up a magazine instead. It was a Manchester Guardian, a fortnight old, but newly arrived. What he saw in it was anything but inspiriting—an account of recent anti-Semitic brutalities under Hitler—but a familiar feeling of guilt over the passively accepted safety of his own life had made him ashamed not to go on reading.”

During the two school years Seasoned Timber spans, Timothy Hulme, principal of the Clifford Academy in Clifford, Vermont, does a number of things because he would be ashamed not to. Around his forty-fifth birthday, he falls in love with a younger woman. He gets over being ashamed of his eccentric aunt, who compulsively plays classical music to keep down panic, and confides in friends about what makes her so special. He recognizes his feeling for one of the older teachers as a kind of nonsexual love. He rescues a nephew from disgrace. He stands up to a frankly detestable member of the school board. He persuades the town of Clifford to vote against what seems to be their clear economic interest. He helps one of the students launch an idea that may be more profitable for the school. And he buys an old house, fixes it up, and nobly gives it away...but the house is made of native stone. Timothy is the “seasoned timber.”

Dorothy Canfield Fisher wrote one novel for children, Understood Betsy, that won a Newbery award. Understood Betsy is the only one of her novels you’re likely to find in most libraries today. It was not her only one. Nor was it her most interesting one. The first few chapters of Seasoned Timber drag a bit, and gave me the impression that the book was going to be a longwinded, boring, but clean romance. It’s not.  Halfway through the book I’d lost all preconceived notions of where this story was going and actually built up a sense of suspense.

Vermont’s “hillbillies” had a considerable image problem in Mrs. Fisher’s day; she wrote in defense of her people. With this as a goal, I’d say that she succeeded quite well. I nominate the characters in Seasoned Timber as superb examples of the fine art of describing fictional characters who aren’t meant to be perfect, but whom readers would have to like and respect if the characters were real anyway.

The main fault readers might find with this story is that, for too many chapters in the beginning, all Timothy does is passively admire a woman he knows is too young for him; the plot plods and Timothy starts to seem like an old fool. Bear with him. As the plot becomes more interesting, so does Timothy. One could wish that he’d find a woman his own age to love—he is, after all, still the active and healthy coach for all the school sports—but in 1939 middle-aged people were supposed to have put romance behind them.

Timothy’s period-perfect politics naturally add a great deal to the story. The language used in Timothy’s political discussions is authentic--meaning that it would be very offensive today. Educated adults talked very differently in 1939 than they do now.

This novel is recommended to mature readers. It would be no more offensive to high school students than The Rise of Silas Lapham or The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg but it may, like those classics, be over some high school students’ heads.

Web Sites I Wish Still Existed

This week's Long & Short Reviews prompt is "web sites I wish still existed." 

The web sites that I wish still existed are the ones that disappeared because bloggers died. 

Sometimes blogs are kept online as memorials. I like this; at least readers don't lose the whole archive when the blog stops being written.

Sometimes web sites just disappear. You click on a link to a web site you used to frequent and see a message that the site name is available for rent, if you want to set up a site with the same name.

Either way, the living web site is gone when its primary author is. Group blogs like Making Light, and like what this web site originally intended to be, do outlast one primary author as long as other bloggers survive. Too often the whole group are the same age, so the others don't outlive the primary blogger by very long. This web site did start out with the perspectives of two different generations; by now of course it represents only one.

I miss the living, growing Ozarque blog.

I miss Scott Adams' Dilbert Blog.

I miss Vivian Zems' Smell the Coffee Blog.

I miss Barbara Ehrenreich.

I miss Linda Lee Lyberg. 

I don't want to rush back to the "bright side"--facts first, feelings follow--but I will point out that, oddly enough, although I miss the blogs I followed twenty years ago, I still seem to find more worth reading online than I have time to read.

For one thing a lot of people who never used to blog are now blogging on Substack. Gene Weingarten, Dave Barry, Roy Blount, Garrison Keillor--many baby boomers' favorite comedians now have blogs. Poets like Rajani Radhakrishnan, literary novelists like Margaret Atwood, have blogs. These writers are not young. No worries--lots of younger writers are on Substack too. All I can say is, if you open a Substack account (even if you don't publish a'zine there), you'll be astonished at the number of people who you never thought would have blogs, who now have them, on Substack.

I don't look forward to having to starve the monster by pulling out of the Internet...but if that's what it takes to stop the plans for "data centers" to turn our Promised Land, North America, into the sort of toxic waste dump that is now known as Industrialized China, I''ll do it. And so will you. We'll just have to print our Substack'zines on paper and send them out by real mail.