Friday, October 30, 2026
Web Log for 10.29.26
Book Review: The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Original Title: Man Som Hatar Kvinnor
Author: Stieg Larsson
Author memorial web site: http://www.stieglarsson.com/
Translator: Reg Keeland
Publisher: Vintage (English), Norstedts (Swedish)
Date: 2005 (Norstedts), 2008 (Vintage)
Length: 644 pages
ISBN: 0307949486
Quote: "Ninety-two percent of women in Sweden who have been subjected to sexual assault have not reported the most recent violent incident to the police."
Stieg Larsson was a journalist whose primary field of research, during his active career, was neo-Nazi organizations. Shortly before he died, however, he wrote three long blockbuster novels about an odd couple of detectives, the successful yuppie Blomkvist and the punker genius Salander, on the trail of a murderer whose Nazi father taught him to hate and kill women. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is volume one. The theme of these novels is hatecrimes against women; section headings provide statistics on hatecrimes against women in Sweden.
What's to say about The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo? It's been a worldwide bestseller. Other translations available on Amazon have titles that literally translate Larsson's original title ("some men who hated women"). And its popularity says something very nasty about the state of our world....this is one ugly, hateful, gross-out-packed novel.
That Glamour described it as a "sexy, addictive thriller" disturbs me. All the characters do seem to have a lot of sex. Most of the consensual sex involves Blomkvist, who has the unexplained peculiarity of apparently inspiring women of many different ages and backgrounds with identical urges to tear off his shirt. Most of the sex is non-consensual and sadistic. The most detailed sex scene involves Salander, who has been misdiagnosed as autistic and assigned to the care of an evil-minded male guardian. Arguably she's justified in finding at least half a dozen different ways to violate this lousy creep's body, in one day, but did we really need for the narration of this scene to occupy ten pages?
Yes, of course she has the excuse of abuse (four more pages in this volume, and the guarantee, given the behavior that's caused her to be misdiagnosed as autistic, of revelations of more heinous abuse further back in her past). There again, it's possible for novelists to mention that a thing happened without lingering on every detail.
And yes, studies have shown that, although simply reading or watching pornography does not inevitably create an emotional addiction that eventually craves sadistic violence, reading or watching sadistic pornography does tend to feed an addiction that eventually craves more realistic, sometimes real-life, sadistic violence.
So in a way this trilogy is addictive...to people with very sick minds. And it seems to me that there has to have been a way of drawing attention to the problem without feeding it quite so, well, gluttonously. If Larsson was trying to appeal to people who enjoy detailed sex scenes, couldn't he at least have tried to think of different things for all those women to do after taking off Blomkvist's shirt?
When this review first went live (by reader request I might add), I added links to some sites that offered more updated, less inflammatory, information about the incidence of violent crime. Six links from the original list still worked at the time of rescheduling. Not all have been updated.
United States: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/ucr
Sweden: http://www.scb.se/Pages/List____139369.aspx (Swedish language)
Scotland: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Statistics/Browse/Crime-Justice
Canada: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/85-002-x2007005-eng.pdf
Australia: http://www.abs.gov.au/
India: http://indiafacts.in/statistics/crime-statistics-in-india/
I don't agree that this book is the way Ingmar Bergman would have done Silence of the Lambs. I think both Bergman and Silence of the Lambs were more tasteful--though if we're considering strictly the fascination with violent gross-outs, the comparison is reasonable.
Bad Poetry: The Life and Love of a Cellar Spider
Cellar spiders are harmless. Their favorite thing is those fungus gnats that like to zoom, as if on dares, into other animals' eyes, ears, mouths, and noses. If you see cellar spiders in the house you probably need them in the house. However this photo was supplied to Google by Xceptional Wildlife Removal. If you can't enjoy having cellar spiders in the house, at least treat them as wildlife to be carefully removed. (They'll usually stay outside if they're put outside--unlike wasps, who tend and defend their nests.)
Thursday, October 29, 2026
Web Log for 10.28.26
Book Review: Dachau Review (Volumes 1 and 2)
Editor: Wolfgang Benz
Publisher: Comite Internal de Dachau, Brussels
Date: 1988
Length: 240 pages (v. 1), 206 pages (v. 2)
ISBN: 0854962697
Quote: "The Dachau Review is the first volume of a new periodical which contains in unabridged form in English the most important contributions of the previous three issues of the Dachauer Hefte."
These two cheaply produced, poorly bound paperbacks aren't fun to read. They weren't meant to be. They're a serious, scholarly collection of survivors' accounts and historians' studies of the German prison camps during the 1930s and early 1940s. Their purpose is to document the atrocities that really happened, and dispel the myths.
Although there's no reasonable doubt that the prison camps were the scenes of atrocities, one thing these reports confirm is the huge amount of concealment and deception that went on, the impossibility of knowing for sure whether some stories were true or false. Prisoners lied, for obvious reasons. Prison managers also lied, for reasons that may be less obvious. Bribery often worked, and the value of a bribe was completely unpredictable: a gold tooth might buy a prisoner a cup of dirty water, or a plausible English passport. Threats were used as discipline. Rumors abounded.
So, were prisoners' bodies used to manufacture household goods? After reviewing the evidence Benz, Barbara Distel, and others can't really say that that never happened; all they can say is that no such goods were found.
Were masses of prisoners gassed in shower rooms? In some other places--first in nursing homes for elderly and disabled "Aryans"--that happened. "In Dachau no gas chambers were used," our researchers report. In Dachau prisoners could be shot for any breach of discipline, for becoming unable to work, or just to intimidate other prisoners, but rumors about gas chambers seem to have been based solely on the existence of crematoria, which no living prisoner had actually entered. Poison gas cost money; both gas and money were in short supply. Guards and overseers could be vicious--there was no penalty for beating a prisoner to death. Still, starvation and infectious diseases killed far more prisoners than were either euthanized due to illness, executed according to what passed for due process of law, or murdered outright.
Were the majority of those imprisoned, or of those killed in the camps, Jewish? Not at Dachau.
Were individual guards kind enough to help individual prisoners escape? Sometimes, but not often or predictably. One informant describes having to thank for saving his brother's life the same guard he blamed for killing his mother.
In the end, how many people--Jewish or otherwise--did the Nazis kill? No true answer will ever be known. The number is certainly in the millions, but too much lying and destruction of evidence went on for any estimates to be accepted as facts. These books contain some eyewitness accounts of faked deaths that may or may not have allowed prisoners to escape.
Certainly faked deaths did allow several of the presumed dead to survive. In a family I know two teenaged boys, first cousins who had been friends, disappeared at about the same time. During the year each young man mourned the other's death, they were living within a mile of each other in London. Both enjoyed long and successful lives, and were able to recognize each other and share memories when one of those fifty-years-later TV programs featured one of the cousins.
Holocaust deniers have even cited the case of an entire town whose Jewish population, apparently decimated during the Holocaust, surged back almost to prewar levels between 1945 and 1946. And not many houses or businesses had been sold, either during or after the war, either. Apparently there was just a benign conspiracy to accept, for the duration of the war, that a few thousand individuals had never been Jewish--whom did people think they were talking about?--until it was safe for these people to identify themselves as Jewish again.
Unfortunately it wasn't always so easy, and while the species of contrarians known as Holocaust deniers were able to disprove some claims without much difficulty, the Nazi Holocaust was just too big to fake.
Meanwhile, people who view the Holocaust from a different historical perspective have exaggerated the sadism of the Third Reich and overlooked the profit motive. Dachau was built not to torture or kill men, but to profit from their labor as the (alleged) criminals "paid their debt to society." As long as it was profitable to keep prisoners healthy, most were well enough fed and sheltered, even medicated where possible, to keep them alive (as slaves) for years. That's why there were so many survivors.
But why, now that most of the survivors have written out their memories and died of old age, do we need to go on reading about it? Certainly not for pleasure; and I for one don't think there's any comfort to be gained from comparing our own immediate misery with someone else's theoretically greater misery. If you're feeling sad because you didn't win the competition or the person you've had a crush on has asked someone else for a date, reading about how the victorious U.S. troops found one group of seventeen almost-survivors who were too sick and starved to digest food when they were fed may help you put your angst into perspective, but it's unlikely to make you feel good. (If it does, I don't want to know you.)
I don't get any particular jollies from thinking about "the triumph of the human spirit" in the survivors, either. My brother, adoptive sister, and I inherited the non-depressive gene along with the brown eyes and crooked teeth genes. My natural sister got the alternative genes. That humans can agree that some genetic traits are more pleasant to be around than others doesn't say anything particularly uplifting about the human spirit, to me.
Some survivors learned moral lessons in the prison camps, although that's not what you'll find in the Dachau Review. In one of Bob Schuller's books, reviewed here last week, a survivor shared the edifying story of how his camp usually offered two kinds of food to prisoners: bread, and soup. The bread was cold, coarse, and unflavored, and tasted vile, but did contain some fibre and nutrients from whole grains. The soup absorbed some flavor, but was usually just a cup of hot water with very little nutrient value. Some prisoners would trade their bread for other prisoners' soup rations...and at the end of the war, all the survivors turned out to be bread eaters; the soup sippers starved. Preachers have already publicized that kind of stories. The Dachau Review didn't need them, or use them.
So, what made this well-fed, non-Jewish American pay hard-earned cash for these books? Supporting the library that allows me to maintain this web site was one reason, but why choose the Dachau Review over the "westerns" and romances that had also been donated to the library's benefit sale? Obviously, I thought these books deserved resale; I do think this piece of history has some relevance to our time.
It's best stated, though oddly reversed, by Ralph Giordano in volume two: "I warn you young people of today: don't let anyone tell you that this undemocratically and un-humanly motivated anti-communism ever was, is or will be anything other than the belligerent brother of its own professed diametrical opponent."
Germany, a smaller country already impoverished by losing another idiot dictator's useless war, collapsed faster under National Socialism than Russia did under Soviet Socialism. In both countries, and in most other countries that have experimented with socialism, the socialist government collapsed and the result was chaos, wars, plagues, and mass deaths. A few countries that flirted with socialism, like Britain and China, have survived by learning from examples and giving up unsustainable socialist schemes. Either of those things could happen here.
German Jews, Lutherans, and "Communist" atheists had not exactly liked each other, but had coexisted peacefully, in times of prosperity. Religion became a cause of hate and war when the people felt poverty-stricken and desperate. Hitler whipped up hate of both minorities in order to unite the majority for his own self-aggrandizing purposes, while telling people he trusted how much he preferred the war and death cults of Pagan Germany to the Protestant churches he had to exploit. (What has survived of Germanic Pagan mythology was complex; there were "gods" and cults of love and peace, as well as war and death; Hitler had no use for the nice ones.) These United States have prospered as a nominally Christian, in practice predominantly Humanist, nation where all religions are tolerated...until what are still a minority of Americans have started to feel poverty-stricken, and although I doubt that most of these people know anything about poverty, immediately mistrust of all religions but one's own (including the pseudo-religion of atheism) sets in. Religious hate could happen here. Even the explosion of religious hate into mass violent insanity could happen here.
Hitler really owed his success, though, less to hate than to his Biggest Lie of All--the seductive lie that Germans could recover prosperity, rather than sinking into real plague-and-famine poverty, by giving their leaders total power over every aspect of life. The United Nations, once the trusted mediator between Europeans like Stalin and Hitler, has succumbed to this fantasy with its "Agenda 21" bid for total control over every aspect of life in every member nation. To the extent that the ostensibly civilized nations of the world cooperate with Agenda 21 or any of its successor schemes, the totalitarian government and the poverty it produces could very easily happen here...in the U.S., in the U.K., in any part of Europe or of any other continent, or, if the lunatics in the U.N. get their way, in all of them.
Probably everyone has, and should have, our own way of saying "Never Again." For me, as an American Christian, "Never Again" tends to blur into an older slogan: "Love all (never buy into collective hate as any kind of solution to anything), trust few (never entrust anyone with more power than is necessary to prevent violent crime), and always paddle your own canoe (make your own decisions based on what you observe where you are, which really is something about which you would know more than anyone else could)."
The Dachau Review is a good clear explanation of the alternative.
What to Name Your Raccoons (Celebrity Photo Edition)
It is not thinking "Will you be my mother, snuggle me on your lap, and give me a cute name?" It is thinking "This is my property. All edible, shreddable, breakable, clawable, or sleepworthy things belong to me." It probably won't answer to its name but you might as well pick one that's good for a smile.
Melania Rump (sorry, couldn't help it; she loves and wears her sunglasses so well, she's been known to wear them at night!)
Wednesday, October 28, 2026
Web Log for 10.27.26
Book Review: Dorp Dead
Title: Dorp Dead
Author: Julia Cunningham
Date: 1965
Publisher: Pantheon / Random House
ISBN: none
Length: 88 pages
Illustrations: drawings by James Spanfeller
Quote: "Maybe I really did understand last night when I moved the five ladders from their places. I half-knew what it would do to this strange, time-controlled person who, for some reason I can't discover, gives me good shelter, clothes, food, an opportunity to learn, and a refuge from the disjointed, bonging world of the orphanage."
Gillford Ground is a gifted dyslexic who didn't fit in at the orphanage. So he was glad when Mr. Kobalt, the town eccentric, offered him a foster home. During the course of this short novel, however, Kobalt reveals himself to be more than merely eccentric. How much abuse--of himself or of the dog in the house--will Gilly take before he steps out on his own?
The dedication of this book to "Tuppy" links it to Tuppenny, a story even more unlikely than Dorp Dead, in which an orphan deliberately seeks out a whole series of abusive foster parents. In her published notes on the two short novels, Cunningham described the original Tuppy as a fine but self-destructive person. In Tuppenny, the heroine eventually reveals herself as a sort of angel, a super-kid who heals the wounds for some families, reveals the incurable insanity of the worst family, and returns after her apparent murder to let her friends know that she is "free...of what looked like death." (Odd, self-conscious word choices are characteristic of Cunningham characters.)
Gilly is more credible than Tuppenny at first, but when he considers moving out into the woods with a friend of his own choice, we realize that, at best, we're reading about a time long before 1965. Gilly is still supposed to be eleven years old.
Both stories leave one wanting to know more about who Julia Cunningham was, and what her experience with orphans and foster parents had been, than Cunningham seems ever to have wanted readers to know.
Though published as a children's story, Dorp Dead isn't one. The language is intended to interest adults, not tell a story for children. Real ten- and eleven-year-olds, even if their vocabulary is wider than Gilly's and they can relate to his quirks, may be unable to follow the story. I recommend this book for adults to read, and share with children at their discretion. I think Dorp Dead might be most useful to two kinds of readers: (1) adults who want to vent unhappy memories and avoid creating traumatic memories for children, and (2) people who've been piqued by Cunningham's few, short, unlikely, yet compelling books and want to read them all.























