Thursday, October 29, 2026

Web Log for 10.28.26

Beautiful weather continues, but I have to say this. My neighborhood contains a Professional Bad Neighbor. The growing season is over, but he's still riding around in his "smart truck" that notifies my computer when it's near, poisoning the air and land. If you are a local person who wants to live in this neighborhood, you need to know that fifty years of progress toward a clean, wholesome environment--still not achieved, as is shown by the lack of rock lettuce at the springs--have been reversed by one fool's intention to exploit corrupt laws to get away with murder. Literal murder. He'll not get away with it if he does succeed in committing it, and he must know that much, so he's only venting spite at this point, but he is doing damage. The land is not fit to pick morels or ginseng on, it won't yield crops, and it won't feed healthy animals, for another ten years or more. It's not worth a dime an acre--if that--for farming or homesteading purposes. And it will be worth too much, for those purposes, to be turned into parking lots or golf courses. Its only value for the next ten or twenty years will be as the home of those who love it and will work to restore its rightful value for organic farming. It will one day yield morels and ginseng and rock lettuce, probably even chinquapins, and I have seen a few actual butternuts not far from the Fabulous Feral Elberta Peach Tree, but for the time being the beautiful neighborhood where I grew up is a toxic waste land. Though if God ever made a prettier place, or one with more inherent value, God has yet to reveal that place to me.

And my cats all have acute obstructive pulmonary disorder, which is one reason why Silver is running around in the woods, courting neighbors' tomcats and trouble, and annoying a renter who frets about cats squatting in the yard where her children play. (That girl does not belong in this neighborhood; let us all help her find a place in town where she can be less miserable.) Silver has a right to look for another best buddy, even if she can't have kittens; she's always enjoyed the company of a male cat friend, neutered or not, and as that's about all she seems to ask for and she's certainly earned it, I say she has a right to it. Whether she brings him here, like Sommersburr, or moves in with him, like Trumpkin, or just encourages him to visit every few days, like Wild Thyme, is her prerogative. But it's absolutely reasonable of her to want to avoid the more toxic side of the hill, until rain washes some of the poison out of the air.

The wind blew a strong dose of "New Roundup" right across the screen porch around sundown. (I'm typing this on Friday morning, before posting.) I closed all the windows, lighted a candle to burn off the glyphosate vapors, took some charcoal, drank a bottle of water, and still felt my midsection puffing up, internal muscles locking down, voluntary muscles becoming so weak that I could hardly drag myself down the road leaning on a stick yesterday evening. So I stayed in town overnight. During the night I felt my waistline resurfacing, stiffness and soreness subsiding; this morning I walked in at my usual brisk healthy pace, having no use for the stick and wishing I'd been able to leave it at home. Glyphosate does wash out of the body quickly--though some other chemicals in "New Roundup" don't. But its effects really sink into some bodies and I sincerely hope that, for his sins, the Bad Neighbor finds himself spilling enough of his poison right into his face to keep him paralyzed for ninety-nine days. (I don't believe thirty-nine days is still the world's record but it is the longest-lasting glyphosate reaction that even Bayer-Monsanto have, so far, acknowledged. That record was set by a mere dumb laborer who probably didn't deserve it. The Bad Neighbor deserves to set an all-time record.)

Anyway, for visitors, leaf peeping is getting good, with chilly if not frosty nights and warm sunny afternoons, and the coming weekend is probably the optimal time this year to drive through the Point of Virginia. 

Books 

A new Scalzi? How the time does fly. Yes, Monsters of Ohio should reach a bookstore near you this week. If you don't see it, pre-ordering books always encourages writers.


Desperation 

I'm so glad that sponsors are keeping this from being me!


Found on the Mirror. The joke predates the Internet. 

Music 

The Beatles, together or separately. 


Porno for Pyros. (No, the song's not incendiary. Not even very hard rock.)


Velorith.


English Beats.


Tom Petty, with the Traveling Wilburys, Mudcrutch, Heartbreakers, or whomever else. 



Unknown group, video posted from China? But the song is in English.


Eric Clapton, with friends.



Buffy Sainte-Marie. 


Crosby, Stills, Nash, and/or Young.


Gims. 


Random background music for a pretty video.


John Coltrane.


Johannes Bornlof.


Roberto Cacciapaglia.


Florian Christl.


Politics 

Especially salient main entry on the Mirror:


Travel 

Marmelade Gypsy's human went to Stratford, Ontario, and among other things met a Great Blue Heron just like hers, back home:


Verbal Abuse Games 

Whew. Bradshannon walked right into this one.


The exchange should still be on X.

World Events 


This one was actually found at lifeafter50forwomen.com. Lens says it came from something called Appalachian Podcasts on F******k.

Book Review: Dachau Review (Volumes 1 and 2)

Apologies to those who think a dictatorship, pushed to cut population along the lines of hate it had been using for other purposes, is too real for Halloween. This Halloween, I think it's real enough that it should distract us from the cute little ghost and witch costumes. Not only do we have a party that overtly wants Socialism; that party has formed an alliance with a group who hate Jews. If ghosts can haunt, a lot of grandfathers are coming out after their grandchildren this Halloween.

Title: Dachau Review

Editor: Wolfgang Benz

Publisher: Comite Internal de Dachau, Brussels

Date: 1988

Length: 240 pages (v. 1), 206 pages (v. 2)

ISBN: 0854962697

Quote: "The Dachau Review is the first volume of a new periodical which contains in unabridged form in English the most important contributions of the previous three issues of the Dachauer Hefte."

These two cheaply produced, poorly bound paperbacks aren't fun to read. They weren't meant to be. They're a serious, scholarly collection of survivors' accounts and historians' studies of the German prison camps during the 1930s and early 1940s. Their purpose is to document the atrocities that really happened, and dispel the myths.

Although there's no reasonable doubt that the prison camps were the scenes of atrocities, one thing these reports confirm is the huge amount of concealment and deception that went on, the impossibility of knowing for sure whether some stories were true or false. Prisoners lied, for obvious reasons. Prison managers also lied, for reasons that may be less obvious. Bribery often worked, and the value of a bribe was completely unpredictable: a gold tooth might buy a prisoner a cup of dirty water, or a plausible English passport. Threats were used as discipline. Rumors abounded.

So, were prisoners' bodies used to manufacture household goods? After reviewing the evidence Benz, Barbara Distel, and others can't really say that that never happened; all they can say is that no such goods were found.

Were masses of prisoners gassed in shower rooms? In some other places--first in nursing homes for elderly and disabled "Aryans"--that happened. "In Dachau no gas chambers were used," our researchers report. In Dachau prisoners could be shot for any breach of discipline, for becoming unable to work, or just to intimidate other prisoners, but rumors about gas chambers seem to have been based solely on the existence of crematoria, which no living prisoner had actually entered. Poison gas cost money; both gas and money were in short supply. Guards and overseers could be vicious--there was no penalty for beating a prisoner to death. Still, starvation and infectious diseases killed far more prisoners than were either euthanized due to illness, executed according to what passed for due process of law, or murdered outright.

Were the majority of those imprisoned, or of those killed in the camps, Jewish? Not at Dachau.

Were individual guards kind enough to help individual prisoners escape? Sometimes, but not often or predictably. One informant describes having to thank for saving his brother's life the same guard he blamed for killing his mother.

In the end, how many people--Jewish or otherwise--did the Nazis kill? No true answer will ever be known. The number is certainly in the millions, but too much lying and destruction of evidence went on for any estimates to be accepted as facts. These books contain some eyewitness accounts of faked deaths that may or may not have allowed prisoners to escape.

Certainly faked deaths did allow several of the presumed dead to survive. In a family I know two teenaged boys, first cousins who had been friends, disappeared at about the same time. During the year each young man mourned the other's death, they were living within a mile of each other in London. Both enjoyed long and successful lives, and were able to recognize each other and share memories when one of those fifty-years-later TV programs featured one of the cousins.

Holocaust deniers have even cited the case of an entire town whose Jewish population, apparently decimated during the Holocaust, surged back almost to prewar levels between 1945 and 1946. And not many houses or businesses had been sold, either during or after the war, either. Apparently there was just a benign conspiracy to accept, for the duration of the war, that a few thousand individuals had never been Jewish--whom did people think they were talking about?--until it was safe for these people to identify themselves as Jewish again.

Unfortunately it wasn't always so easy, and while the species of contrarians known as Holocaust deniers were able to disprove some claims without much difficulty, the Nazi Holocaust was just too big to fake.

Meanwhile, people who view the Holocaust from a different historical perspective have exaggerated the sadism of the Third Reich and overlooked the profit motive. Dachau was built not to torture or kill men, but to profit from their labor as the (alleged) criminals "paid their debt to society." As long as it was profitable to keep prisoners healthy, most were well enough fed and sheltered, even medicated where possible, to keep them alive (as slaves) for years. That's why there were so many survivors. 

But why, now that most of the survivors have written out their memories and died of old age, do we need to go on reading about it? Certainly not for pleasure; and I for one don't think there's any comfort to be gained from comparing our own immediate misery with someone else's theoretically greater misery. If you're feeling sad because you didn't win the competition or the person you've had a crush on has asked someone else for a date, reading about how the victorious U.S. troops found one group of seventeen almost-survivors who were too sick and starved to digest food when they were fed may help you put your angst into perspective, but it's unlikely to make you feel good. (If it does, I don't want to know you.)

I don't get any particular jollies from thinking about "the triumph of the human spirit" in the survivors, either. My brother, adoptive sister, and I inherited the non-depressive gene along with the brown eyes and crooked teeth genes. My natural sister got the alternative genes. That humans can agree that some genetic traits are more pleasant to be around than others doesn't say anything particularly uplifting about the human spirit, to me.

Some survivors learned moral lessons in the prison camps, although that's not what you'll find in the Dachau Review. In one of Bob Schuller's books, reviewed here last week, a survivor shared the edifying story of how his camp usually offered two kinds of food to prisoners: bread, and soup. The bread was cold, coarse, and unflavored, and tasted vile, but did contain some fibre and nutrients from whole grains. The soup absorbed some flavor, but was usually just a cup of hot water with very little nutrient value. Some prisoners would trade their bread for other prisoners' soup rations...and at the end of the war, all the survivors turned out to be bread eaters; the soup sippers starved. Preachers have already publicized that kind of stories. The Dachau Review didn't need them, or use them.

So, what made this well-fed, non-Jewish American pay hard-earned cash for these books? Supporting the library that allows me to maintain this web site was one reason, but why choose the Dachau Review over the "westerns" and romances that had also been donated to the library's benefit sale? Obviously, I thought these books deserved resale; I do think this piece of history has some relevance to our time.

It's best stated, though oddly reversed, by Ralph Giordano in volume two: "I warn you young people of today: don't let anyone tell you that this undemocratically and un-humanly motivated anti-communism ever was, is or will be anything other than the belligerent brother of its own professed diametrical opponent."

Germany, a smaller country already impoverished by losing another idiot dictator's useless war, collapsed faster under National Socialism than Russia did under Soviet Socialism. In both countries, and in most other countries that have experimented with socialism, the socialist government collapsed and the result was chaos, wars, plagues, and mass deaths. A few countries that flirted with socialism, like Britain and China, have survived by learning from examples and giving up unsustainable socialist schemes. Either of those things could happen here.

German Jews, Lutherans, and "Communist" atheists had not exactly liked each other, but had coexisted peacefully, in times of prosperity. Religion became a cause of hate and war when the people felt poverty-stricken and desperate. Hitler whipped up hate of both minorities in order to unite the majority for his own self-aggrandizing purposes, while telling people he trusted how much he preferred the war and death cults of Pagan Germany to the Protestant churches he had to exploit. (What has survived of Germanic Pagan mythology was complex; there were "gods" and cults of love and peace, as well as war and death; Hitler had no use for the nice ones.) These United States have prospered as a nominally Christian, in practice predominantly Humanist, nation where all religions are tolerated...until what are still a minority of Americans have started to feel poverty-stricken, and although I doubt that most of these people know anything about poverty, immediately mistrust of all religions but one's own (including the pseudo-religion of atheism) sets in. Religious hate could happen here. Even the explosion of religious hate into mass violent insanity could happen here.

Hitler really owed his success, though, less to hate than to his Biggest Lie of All--the seductive lie that Germans could recover prosperity, rather than sinking into real plague-and-famine poverty, by giving their leaders total power over every aspect of life. The United Nations, once the trusted mediator between Europeans like Stalin and Hitler, has succumbed to this fantasy with its "Agenda 21" bid for total control over every aspect of life in every member nation. To the extent that the ostensibly civilized nations of the world cooperate with Agenda 21 or any of its successor schemes, the totalitarian government and the poverty it produces could very easily happen here...in the U.S., in the U.K., in any part of Europe or of any other continent, or, if the lunatics in the U.N. get their way, in all of them.

Probably everyone has, and should have, our own way of saying "Never Again." For me, as an American Christian, "Never Again" tends to blur into an older slogan: "Love all (never buy into collective hate as any kind of solution to anything), trust few (never entrust anyone with more power than is necessary to prevent violent crime), and always paddle your own canoe (make your own decisions based on what you observe where you are, which really is something about which you would know more than anyone else could)."

The Dachau Review is a good clear explanation of the alternative.

What to Name Your Raccoons (Celebrity Photo Edition)

Years ago, I wrote an Associated Content Top Ten List of raccoon names for someone who had run through Rocky, Rikki, Ringtail, Bandit, and was starting on color names. Let's face it: raccoons, unlike cats and dogs, don't show enough color variation to make color names really fit. I proposed naming raccoons after famous people known for looking good in sunglasses.

It occurs to me, now that JPGs are easier to find and browsers can handle lots of them, that that list really needed some fair-use photos. If your friends do not immediately grasp the reference, you can show them the picture of the celebrity in whose honor you named the raccoon. All photos from Google.


It is not thinking "Will you be my mother, snuggle me on your lap, and give me a cute name?" It is thinking "This is my property. All edible, shreddable, breakable, clawable, or sleepworthy things belong to me." It probably won't answer to its name but you might as well pick one that's good for a smile.


Jennifer Garbagecaniston 


Eraccoon Badu


Joan Diditagain


Amelia Earocorn (she always pushed them up on her head for photo-ops, but she wore them!)


Greta Garbagecans


Coonella Harris (Yes! Kamala Harris finally found some decent-looking jeans that fit! Cheers!)


Mapachita Nyongo


Rackie Onassis


Hillary Rodham Ringtail


Melania Rump (sorry, couldn't help it; she loves and wears her sunglasses so well, she's been known to wear them at night!)

And for the males, we have:


Harry Belacoontail


Chow Lean-Fat-Whatever-I-Want-It-All


George Hairyson


Raccoon James


Offmylawn Musk


Rick Naughty 


Rack Obama


Raccoon Petty


Bruce Springstraps

Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Web Log for 10.27.26

In Monday's "Music Moves Me" I mentioned merely toe-tapping to the music at the desk when I gather hours of music links from the to-listen-to list. Someone new to this web site thought that meant I'm one of those who go online from a wheelchair. I'm not part of that community and don't want to appropriate their culture. The "disability" that keeps me in the desk is a desire to download and copy as much as possible from the Internet, before ethical considerations force me out of it. My time here may be limited. 

Of course, the more of us say no to anything "cloud-based," the longer we'll be able to enjoy the Internet. Microsoft, even with that "extended service" foofarah? Gotta go. Can Linux keep us out of "the cloud"? If not, then I'm sorry, the Internet has got to go...until it can be rebuilt with stringent privacy policies, the virtual equivalent of the US Constitution, not one peek even at another person's search history unless you're paying for it or you've obtained a warrant based on evidence of criminal activity.

Animals 

From out of the Time Warp of the Slow-Slogging Blogger, some spring butterflies from England...still pretty aren't they?


Etiquette 

Three short poems on the general topic of etiquette prompt this thought: We all learn different rules for conversation, because we all grew up conversing with different people. How many words per minute should people utter? What can we assume that other people understand? Which languages do we speak, under which circumstances? The ideal of politeness would be to be able to recognize what everyone else considers polite and use that set of rules with that person. In practice this is possible only within very small close-knit groups. In a more general way, it helps if everyone understands that introverts' sense of etiquette is based on showing respect for everyone's boundaries, while extroverts' sense of etiquette is based on pushing the limits of boundaries to establish dominance. Extroverts whine that they don't "feel seen as persons" when their screams for attention are politely ignored, their pushes for dominance tactfully deflected. Right. Afaic youall may not be persons; you're certainly not polite persons with whom I enjoy conversation. Deal with it. Introverts' etiquette is in et per se better. Deal with it. These poems are clearly about introverts' etiquette, so megadittos to Russel Winick.

"Interrupting" is, technically, part of conversation in the sense that at some point one person finishes what person is saying and, usually nonverbally, invites another person to "interrupt." The invitation can take the form of a question, a long pause, a moment of eye contact. There is some room for different views of how long a pause needs to be before it's an invitation to someone else to start talking, what makes a sentence sound like a question, etc. Introverts tend to talk more softly and more slowly, and pause more often, than extroverts do. Extroverts tend to read this as a submissive display that invites extroverts to assert dominance. They are mistaken. We instinctively want to show respect to other people but we also instinctively want them to show respect to us. And in fact, if someone interrupts me too quickly or too often, or makes any other display of an unspoken belief that person is more important than I am--at some level I do "leave the conversation," right there. Person has just outed perself as SOMETHING TIRESOME, TO BE AVOIDED. If the atmosphere was "warm and friendly," it just iced over. I am not particularly shy. I'm cutting off conversation and moving away not because I'm afraid that you won't liiiike me but because I want to start avoiding even thinking about you right now.


Missing Persons 

The National Park Service is not so much political as time-serving, paper-pushing, and back-covering. As when a policy of allowing bears and wolves to roam around as if they were squirrels, implemented to satisfy some sentimental rich person's fantasy that conserving the "apex predators" equals conserving the whole ecology, leads to a "missing" hiker. Fellow Virginians, we need to spread the truth. A bear that can be seen by a human is a bear that needs to become a rug. A National Park Service that allows bears to roam and breed in parks is a National Park Service that needs to be completely defunded. The existence of evidence that a government employee even thought of allowing a bear to attack a human and whining that the attack was caused by budget cuts should call for an investigation that will send at least one employee to prison for life, shut down the office until it's restocked with a better quality of employees, and open discussion of whether the entire park has to be fully privatized, or can be made bear-free and reopened to the taxpayers who own it.


Music 

Ludovico Einaudi.


"Maggie the Afterlove Voice." 



Aukai. 



Kenny G.


Beatles, together and separately.




Nelung Tsering Topten.


Marcy Playground.


Ragini Rainu. 


Sufjan Stephens.


Folk Anatolia. (Fun to watch the video and see if you can do what they do!)


Chris Isaak.


Flute of the Andes.


J.J. Cale.


Sanctus Real. (Christian content.)


Authentic Unlimited. (They are authentic; this is the kind of "country" music I grew up with.)


Pete Townshend.


Black Keys.



Dr Hook.


Traffic.


Clarence Carter, who, you may or may not have heard, slipped away last spring. He was 90 years old.


Tom Petty.








Dara. (Yes, European.)


Yeah Man. 


Abba.


Crosby, Stills, Nash, and/or Young.


Katrina & the Waves.


Quicksilver Messenger Service. 


Little Big Town.


Roberto Cacciapaglia.


Kodaline.


Arthur Migliazza.


Dan & Shay.


Alan Parsons.


Need To Breathe.


Emerson, Lake, & Palmer.


Tommy James.







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6FkUwt88as (a different version of the same song)

Jack Bruce.


Bangles. (This link is to an individual's select playlist of songs about Mondays. No, I don't have a problem with people singing or talking about Mondays on a Tuesday.)


Ezio Bosso.


Random elevator music to go with a changing data video. "Data Is Beautiful." At least the video format makes it interesting--once.


Lotte Kestner.


Politics 

In spite of the kicking and screaming, simply getting the criminals off the streets works.

Book Review: Dorp Dead

Title: Dorp Dead

Author: Julia Cunningham

Date: 1965

Publisher: Pantheon / Random House

ISBN: none

Length: 88 pages

Illustrations: drawings by James Spanfeller

Quote: "Maybe I really did understand last night when I moved the five ladders from their places. I half-knew what it would do to this strange, time-controlled person who, for some reason I can't discover, gives me good shelter, clothes, food, an opportunity to learn, and a refuge from the disjointed, bonging world of the orphanage."

Gillford Ground is a gifted dyslexic who didn't fit in at the orphanage. So he was glad when Mr. Kobalt, the town eccentric, offered him a foster home. During the course of this short novel, however, Kobalt reveals himself to be more than merely eccentric. How much abuse--of himself or of the dog in the house--will Gilly take before he steps out on his own?

The dedication of this book to "Tuppy" links it to Tuppenny, a story even more unlikely than Dorp Dead, in which an orphan deliberately seeks out a whole series of abusive foster parents. In her published notes on the two short novels, Cunningham described the original Tuppy as a fine but self-destructive person. In Tuppenny, the heroine eventually reveals herself as a sort of angel, a super-kid who heals the wounds for some families, reveals the incurable insanity of the worst family, and returns after her apparent murder to let her friends know that she is "free...of what looked like death." (Odd, self-conscious word choices are characteristic of Cunningham characters.)

Gilly is more credible than Tuppenny at first, but when he considers moving out into the woods with a friend of his own choice, we realize that, at best, we're reading about a time long before 1965. Gilly is still supposed to be eleven years old.

Both stories leave one wanting to know more about who Julia Cunningham was, and what her experience with orphans and foster parents had been, than Cunningham seems ever to have wanted readers to know.

Though published as a children's story, Dorp Dead isn't one. The language is intended to interest adults, not tell a story for children. Real ten- and eleven-year-olds, even if their vocabulary is wider than Gilly's and they can relate to his quirks, may be unable to follow the story. I recommend this book for adults to read, and share with children at their discretion. I think Dorp Dead might be most useful to two kinds of readers: (1) adults who want to vent unhappy memories and avoid creating traumatic memories for children, and (2) people who've been piqued by Cunningham's few, short, unlikely, yet compelling books and want to read them all.

Some (More) Favorite Memories from My Childhood

This week's Long & Short Reviews prompt asks about favorite memories from reviewers' childhoods.

The trouble is that most of my childhood memories are pleasant. Even the ones that involve illness or school...I was cheerful by nature then, too, and found ways to have fun in spite of the amount of time I spent, as a child, being sick or being at school or both.

Well, let's see. I've reminisced about the year in Folsom, California, during which my brother was born and (before the fad) I had a pet rock called Pal. I've reminisced about the winter after that, when we rented a house far back in the hills. During the next summer we moved into a house just outside the edge of town, with a view of a paved road. 

This was not an ordinary house. I think it was featured in some photos of what terrible housing conditions we poor people in "Appalachia" (not the actual town) had to live with. It was a big bare barn perched precariously on the side of a steep hill. On one side its foundations were jammed against slabs of bare limestone that had to be sidestepped around or climbed over to walk around the house. On the other side it was perched on long poles, as seen in pictures of traditional indigenous houses in Venezuela. It had electric lights because, when it had been built and abandoned, government employees had come around offering everybody electric lights. It had glass windows. It had one big solid stone chimney. It had bare wooden boards for walls, floors, and ceilings, cut small and tongue-and-grooved together, and bigger bare wooden boards for siding, nailed on over the outsides. It had a metal roof. There were four rooms, but the back bedroom was set up for chickens to live in, not people. The main source of water for washing was tubs below the points where water ran off the roof. For drinking water, occupants of the house had access to a spring about half a city block away.

Contrary to what the social workers told the rest of the country, however, this was not a typical "Appalachian" home. It was not and had never been anybody's home. It had been built on a bet, with scrap wood, by a young man who built better houses for paying customers. What he won included the family's permission to court a respectable young lady. They were still married, and still living in a much nicer house aross the road from the house-built-on-a-bet. 

The man who had built the house was by now a disabled senior citizen. He was said to be some sort of distant relation to my grandmother from Tennessee. Her pedigree was not documented so nobody could be sure exactly how or whether her distant relatives were related to us, but we treated them as relatives. Anyway his children had grown up as neighbors to Dad and his cousins; some of them were still friends. One day in town the subject of how far Dad had to walk to work, or to visit his mother, had come up. If a house closer to town were as cheap as the one we were renting, he'd move, Dad said. The old house-built-on-a-bet would be even cheaper, the distant or honorary relative said. "I'll take it!" Dad said. The house was clean and dry and solid, its three rooms were large, and it would be easier for four people to fix up and live in comfortably than some houses in town that were renting for more money.

It would be a few years before housekeeping magazines started reporting on the trend for young couples to move into actual barns and refurbish them into nice houses. My parents never minded being on the cutting edge of trends. Nor did my brother and I, though we were too young to know that that was where we were. 

But life improved in many ways. Now Mother had hired help--two of Dad's younger cousins who came in and did chores, including amusing us, in the mornings. We loved them. We could go into town and visit Grandma often; Grandma was not the most interesting relative, but she enjoyed being visited so we liked visiting her. We could go to the library and check out books. More of those toys and books that had been shipped from the house in Folsom could be brought out of storage and played with. We had near neighbors who were relatives, who enjoyed being visited, who had interesting houses and gardens and animals. We had a safe place where the hens could be let out to pick and scratch, and we could get to know them. Next fall I could go to school! (I looked forward to that--right up to the first actual day of school, when I realized I'd been scammed.) 

I remember that the house-built-on-a-bet did look big and dark and empty when we moved in. All that wood was dark-colored, and stained darker, in a soot-dirt-and-mold-concealing way that was very popular during the builder's formative years. "You can see right out through the cracks in the walls in that kitchen!" Mother wailed. The cousins brought in some wallpaper. What you could see, when we moved in, was a big old pear tree, covered in white blooms. The tree had been planted far enough downhill that you could see right into the top of it. About the time it lost its blooms, the walls were covered--at least with pink paper with images of food and flowers printed on it, mid-century fashion. Outside the kitchen, a long porch rested on the ground at one end and fifteen feet above the ground on the other. The porch railing was a good place to pretend one was in an airplane, or a rocket, or a sailing ship. I remember one evening when the lights went off after a storm when I thought I would rather have been back in any of the last two or three houses we'd rented. One, not two. The house-built-on-a-bet was a great place to be a child. I especially liked the child-sized storage spaces built into the walls of the front room.

From the kitchen window I could still see my older cousins board and leave the school bus, watch for visitors approaching on the highway below...but not watch birds in the pear tree. These were still the DDT years and all birds were becoming rare. 

In this set of memories, I'm not big enough to carry buckets of water from the spring, or even from the tubs under the eaves. I'm allowed to walk along when a parent goes to the spring, carry a glass and scoop up a drink for myself. This is fun. I'm not mature enough to think what a chore the parents have to do, until one day--this summer, or another summer?--when I'm visiting one of the cousins who visit us in the mornings, and she lets me carry a five-gallon bucket of water. On that day I remember something I read in one of those old science books: Water is heavy. But I'm still a child. Parents can do anything. Parents don't admit weakness, at least mine don't, so in spite of some evidence I don't think any task is ever too hard for my parents. 

At this house being shooed out to play in the sunshine is actually fun. The battleship makes its last voyage down the branch creek below the spring. I have a slingshot, which I never learn to use very well. I have two big plastic baby dolls, one of which was some older relative's baby, long ago, and one of which came from a store in Folsom; they become interesting when I discover that their arms, legs, and heads can be screwed on to each other, like my "Pop-it" beads; I have motherly protective feelings about my brother, the young cousins as they come along, the baby chickens when they come along, but never about those big hard plastic dolls, the un-babies. The baby dolls are made of the same stuff as the battleship so, after someone crossing the creek runs over the battleship, I float the dolls down the creek. 

My favorite playthings are still the books I drag outside to read in the sunshine, and what nature has already put outside to look at. Strawberry plants in the garden above the house have pretty flowers, then delicious fruit. Cleavers cleaves to my bare legs with its prickly little hairs, in a way that startles me at first, then becomes amusing. Poison ivy grows on the steep slopes above the path from the road to the house, to encourage everyone to keep on the path and not cause soil erosion. The pear tree doesn't bear fruit, but mulberry trees along the road between this house and the helpful cousins' house bear fruit; there are "red," "white," and "black" mulberries and that summer we pick and preserve all of them. I learn about cherry trees, too, and peach trees that the poets in a World Literature book I like compare to little girls, and peas in pods, and corn on the cob, and tomatoes. I learn to recognize and avoid all the muck all those free-range animals leave on the ground, and to recognize each animal's tracks, and know most of the animals by name--if they have names. Animals reared for slaughter don't have names. All horses, dogs, and goats, and most cats, cows, and chickens, have names. No one in the neighborhood keeps sheep or pigs.

I learn about tobacco. Everyone in the neighborhood has a tobacco patch. Dad tells them they should give it up because it's so bad for the land; tobacco has to be sprayed with poison, and even then it still has to be walked around carefully to protect the leaves from any bruise, and still the plant always grows blue mold. When the leaves are cut and dried there's a system for grading them and a process for packing them for sale; this happens in late fall. Some kids get to stay home from school and help with the tobacco, but I don't, because the stuff that's sprayed on tobacco makes my nose run.

Pretty flowers don't grow around this house, because it was never anybody's home. What was planted around it was useful, even the poison ivy. Grandma, however, has a house full of flower pots and a yard lined with flower pots. She doesn't raise potted flowers to sell, only to show off to people. They are her favorite thing. She has great success with flowers she calls "Sweet William." William is what Dad calls one of the men in the neighborhood; not a bad man, but I never see anything sweet about him. 

Honeysuckle, however, does grow around this house. Once it was useful--to help prevent soil erosion after the trees had been cut. Now that native plants and trees are holding down the soil, honeysuckle can be pulled up and played with. After being played with for a day or two it dries out and burns well. 

All the chickens in the neighborhood are free-range. Most of them have learned to follow one human around the vicinity of one house, so they don't often stray. There is, however, a young rooster, a long-legged Old English Game and White Leghorn crossbreed, who strays around, challenging bigger and older roosters to fight. He always wins, without doing any permanent harm to the other birds. He's nicknamed Old Faithful. Noticing that he seems especially attracted to our alpha hen, Linda, Dad buys him. People expect a heavy sack will be needed to move this big aggressive bird. "He knows where he wants to be," Dad says. One evening after the chickens have gone to roost Dad scoops Old Faithful off his perch in a neighbor's barn and carries him home in his arms. Old Faithful rides along as if he'd always been Dad's pet. He does indeed know who Linda's humans are. Once taken to Linda's home and told it's now his home, Old Faithful makes it his home. He could go on straying if he wanted to. He never wants to. Other than following Linda and us when we move to another house in the neighborhood, next summer, he's never out of sight from our house again. No White Leghorn is even rumored to have that much sense, but it's not unusual for Old English Game chickens, who have not had all the intelligence bred out of their little bird brains.

Linda, however, does not go broody in this first year. She leaves that to the little bantam hens, Sarah and Shirley. We don't want any more bantams this year. My first lesson in raising chickens is how to discourage a hen from trying to brood. Sarah and Shirley are so silly that although they don't have any eggs to sit on, they sit on the corners of boxes in the shed and parade around telling everyone they're brooding. When shut out of the shed altogether, Sarah is so determined to find a nest and sit on it that she goes and hides in a neighbor's shed. No one realizes she's there; she's trapped, and later found dead. 

Brown Leghorn bantams love to rear babies, I'm told. They'll adopt any kind of baby birds, and love them as their own babies, but Sarah and Shirley aren't intelligent enough to be good mothers. I accept this judgment. It certainly seems true for Sarah.

I've already written about Linda's family life. It comes later in time than this season, anyway. 

I learn about dogs. At this age I don't like dogs at all. Things look different before you are four feet tall. Dogs are likely to push you over backward and drool on your face. I flee from most dogs, knowing that they don't want to bite me, because I don't want to be knocked down either. One of Mother's helpers introduces me, this summer, to her household's three dogs, Bud, Red, and Tippy. Red, the setter, doesn't have much time left to live. Bud is officially an old dog, a collie, who is not inclined to jump up at anybody. Bud is the first dog I like. Tippy, a black and tan hound, is young and bouncy enough that the cousins wisely keep him away from me, this year. Later, when Bud's gone, I will love Tippy too--but not this year.

I learn about bacon. Earlier in childhood I ate bacon and liked it. Now it's explained to me that bacon comes from hogs like those that made the neighbors' place, near our previous house, smell so bad. Do I still want to eat pieces of a dead animal that smelled like that while it was alive? I do not. I never feel any desire to eat bacon again. 

I meet other horses. Relations with them go better than relations with Maude at the previous house, though I never will be very horsey. Blackie lives on one side of the hill, Suzy on the other side. Suzy's foal is Star; I get to name him and everyone says it's a good name for him. Suzy dies old--I seem to remember hearing that she was thirty years old--before Star reaches his full size, but after he's able to live on his own. Suzy's human goes into town, buys a pregnant mare called Dolly, and leads her home, one of the last horses allowed to walk down Jackson Street without an official parade permit and arrangements to keep any droppings away from the delicate eyes of town dwellers. Dolly really is as friendly as Maude was said to be; accustomed to children, apparently even fond of children, she's the first horse most children in the neighborhood ride and the one I learn to drive. Dolly's foal turns out to be a mule, called Jack; he's never friendly and it's his kick--"One inch to either side would have killed you"--that pushes his man into the Modern Age of Tractors, but that, also, is a few years after this season.

I'm less attracted to cows. Partly it's prejudice; I've been mentally classifying people as Horse people who move and think at Dad's and my pace, or Cow people who shuffle through life at what's become Mother's pace for years now. Cow people are to be pitied not blamed; they can be loved, but they are to be avoided when anyone wants to get anything done. Partly, also, it's experience. Cows do not approve of me, at this age. They can't think I'm big enough to harm their calves, so maybe they think I'm a bad example. In any case they always seem to moo and shake their heads in a threatening way. Learning to milk cows, and like those cows, comes much later in my life story.

Cats avoid me, at this age, too. I like them in theory because they don't knock people down, but I can't say they purr or cuddle, either. The neighborhood cats are all under a bit of a cloud in this season. They seem to know that they're being blamed, unfairly, for the loss of birds and for their inability to exterminate the entire biological category of small rodents. I never see anyone in real life petting a cat, as people do in books. My parents say they hate cats. They mean the idea; in practice they're not haters of any creature, but they make noises like cat haters. Cats kill birds and carry diseases and soil furniture and so on and so forth. 

Chickens are close enough to my size that I relate to some of them as neighbors' pets. The ones who have names and are pets, anyway. It bothers me that my neighbors and relatives will rear a young rooster as if he were going to be a pet, though his not getting a name other than a description of his size or color might be a giveaway, and then one Sunday afternoon they'll go out in the yard, lure him to their hand with a food treat, kill him, and fry him up for dinner. It takes me years to learn that most of the chicken people eat comes from factory farm roosters who wouldn't have enough brain to become pets if they were treated like pets. In my childhood, eating chicken means eating Little Red or some other friendly foolish bird like him--and I don't eat chicken.

Hens, however, often earn names and recognition as pets, and though most of them aren't very interesting they are friendly. I'm invited to name a pet hen, and name her Thurley, after a school friend my mother remembers mostly for her odd given name, to go with our Shirley. One neighbor's alpha hen is Speckles, a big Barred Rock, and one is Spangles, a showy Ancona, and one's only hen is an off-breed bantam I call Tamara, because I'm told that that's a "weird" name and I think the hen looks a bit weird. Most bantams are Brown Leghorns with dark brown bodies and golden heads; Tamara has a dark gray body and silvery-white head, and a different kind of crest, too. Pretty, and I'd like to have her for a pet, but strange. 

I meet wild animals, too, at this house. It doesn't have squirrels but the garden does attract insects. I don't yet like paper wasps, having been stung by one. I meet a fritillary butterfly in the garden, a big Manduca sphinx moth who perches menacingly on the screen door. "How can anyone be so stupid as to be afraid of a moth? Moths cannot bite, they cannot sting; the worst they can do is tickle," Drill Sergeant Dad pontificates. I don't want to be tickled by a moth of that size! Sometimes we see rabbits, which I like better, and sometimes in the garden we see toads. I don't touch toads, or want to, but I learn that they're friends.

I've been reading The Young Folks' Shelf of Books, with its stories written mostly for boys, and liking the idea of flares--fireworks used for signalling in the War--one afternoon I remember particularly. From comic books I have some mental picture of throwing a long object up into the air and having it form a firework in the sky. I tie a repurposed Fisher-Price toy, part of a "Rock-a-Stack" used to teach children to stack plastic rings in order of size, to a string, and run up and down the garden path, throwing it up in the air. In the story I've read the character was running through some sort of enemy camp signalling for reinforcements; what's in my little-kid brain is the fantasy of the little plastic spindle exploding up in a trail of red or green sparks. I'm running, trailing the spindle, visualizing fireworks, when my Aunt Dotty walks up the path. 

"Dotty" is not her name. It's a word for the way she's become, recently, by taking medication for what's believed at the time to be cancer. Aunt Dotty does not look or act like a person with cancer. She has auburn hair, still quite bright for a person in her fifties, and warm brown eyes, and freckles galore. She knows exactly what's going on; it's just that the medication has given her a lot of ideas about other things that most people don't agree are going on, too, at the same time. Aunt Dotty has never been considered a Beauty; that was always Mother's role. In black-and-white photographs the clothing styles they wear are the easiest way to tell which of them is which. Aunt Dotty's face looks tired rather than classically beautiful, in real life. So her role has been to be the one who's fun to know, in spite of being the one who has migraines and the one whose doctor says she has cancer. 

This visit is no exception. A visit from Aunt Dotty is fun fun fun all the way, even though she's here to help the adults with their project, refurbishing the old house, and I'm excluded from that. I drop my "flare" and run to meet her and help her carry in her load of presents and food treats, but that's the time stamp for this memory. The load of presents includes dresses and tights for me to wear to school. It's later than midsummer. It might be August. 

(All that can really be known about Aunt Dotty's cancer is that she had a swelling in a place where fatal cancers often grow, and had the most radical treatment for it, in her early fifties. People who actually have the kind of cancer she had treatment for are considered lucky if they live for another five years. Aunt Dotty was active and fairly healthy for more than thirty years. So who knows. She was a celiac; she spent a fair bit of her time lying about and wailing about how bad she felt, and a fair bit working in a factory and building houses as a hobby, like a man and better than some, five feet two.)

I like the ideas of dresses, tights, and school. One dress is pink gingham, with white felt poodles on the skirt. I don't think that it makes me look fat; rather, when I see a child wearing a red gingham Raggedy Andy doll's shirt at school, I think it makes him look fat. The pink gingham dress is too big, but it can be taken in now and then let out and worn again all the way through the next three years. Then there's the winter dress, turquoise and teal, which is roomy and warm and quite flattering...so much so that, after we've spent the winter in Florida, Mother decides it'll be too short for me to wear next winter and remodels it into a shirt for herself. I may have set a record for the earliest age at which a baby-boomer started complaining that her mother raided her closet.

As for the tights: for all my life I'll prefer tights that fashion considers too big. The ones that fit the way they're supposed to fit have a nasty way of sliding down when I move. I like tights that bag at the ankles.

In this season I eat more garden produce than anything else. I also eat peanut butter, sandwiched between Ritz crackers or slices of Roman Meal bread. I like graham crackers in milk but don't get to eat them as often as I'd like. I'm being encouraged to read a lot of new books my parents are ordering, as recommended by Prevention magazine, to which Mother now subscribes. J.I. Rodale still edits Prevention and it still recommends a fairly strict granola regimen, which isn't bad at all if you live in farm country and are surrounded with fresh fruit and vegetables, as we do and are. We make whole meals of corn on the cob, fresh tomatoes with or without cornbread to soak up the juice, fresh cucumbers. We drink mugs of mulberry juice freshly pressed for jelly making.

We still get generous shares of the "USDA" food the poor people don't bother to collect. Food must not be wasted but some of it really is more fit for other animals' consumption than humans. Complaining about food is discouraged. Taking a dish of really vile food outside and giving it a decent burial is ignored, and there's nice soft dry ground in the crawl space, actually a high-ceilinged walk-through space, below the house. This is the season when Mother tries a recipe for flavoring boring USDA pasta with horrible, stale nutritional yeast, as recommended in Prevention magazine. Will it be a blessing to all the poor people? Will it motivate them to come into town and get their pasta? We all sit down and take one hopeful bite. Dad, the fount of scathing sermons against any expectations that food not be boring, is the first to walk out. We all walk out and scrape our plates onto the ground for the chickens. The chickens all take one hopeful bite, make startled chicken noises, and wipe their beaks on the grass, silently asking us what we were trying to do to them. This is the unforgettable all-time low, of course. Most of the recipes Mother tries for "fortifying" that USDA possum-food-grade food turn out much less bad. 

In this season we don't get a lot of news. There is a war. My parents don't care to hear the war news. A few of the cousins are still in the Army and have to be overseas fighting in this war. Sometimes we make fudge to send to them, which is fun, although I don't get to eat a lot of fudge on these occasions. The cousins get large batches of fudge because, of course, they have to hand pieces around to all the other soldiers. Around the time school starts a radio will be dug out of storage, but not yet.

Do I discover new books in this season? Literature of the World, the most advanced reading textbook I've read so far, comes some time in this year but I'm not sure when. I reread the old books, making better sense of some stories after having read other stories, still putting together a sense of what each set of words means. Sometimes Dad brings in a newspaper. I'm not encouraged to read newspapers yet and don't remember reading any. I'm allowed to read Readers Digest and am horrified by all those wholesome, uplifting, informative articles about body parts, things that go wrong with them, and treatments that save them. I like the jokes, though, and bits of articles and Book Sections about children and animals.

I never have been especially attached to a soft toy, but Aunt Dotty's load of presents also includes two of a set of pillows designed for children with more or less realistic animal shapes and colors printed on the cotton fabric, which was then cut out, sewn together, and stuffed. Aunt Dotty thinks the pillows are cute enough to have names, so we give them names. Mine is a raccoon I call Malarky. My brother's is a lion he calls Charlie; later he'll change this to Charlie Dale, commemorating two of the boys in my class at school. (He will never meet either Charlie or Dale. They just have good boy names that none of our cousins has claimed.) Neither of us ever mistakes these pillows for real pets but we do get accustomed to sleeping on them. We carry them through miles of moves and road trips, replacing the stuffing when they start to smell musty, and the fabric will wear out before we let Mother put them on the garden, with our worn-out clothes, as mulch.

Later, much later, I'll look back and realize that although I'm not nearly as big (for my age) or energetic or mischievous as a favorite cousin who's only months older than I am, I could be considered a tomboy. I figure I came by it honestly, between having a "house-husband" instead of a housewife while Mother had a busines, being expected to play with my brother, and always being sent out to play in the sunshine. Aunt Dotty is trying to nurture whatever nurturing tendencies I have, which are the late-blooming kind. Once the celiac gene gets going I'll no longer have enough energy that anyone expects me to identify with Caddie more than Clara Woodlawn, Laura more than Mary Ingalls, Jo more than Beth March--but I do so identify. I don't want to be a boy but I want to be active and energetic, enough to keep up with boys. I think of it as immaturity, rather than lack of femininity, that at age five I'd rather run around reenacting war stories than sit down and sew dolls' dresses. Sewing and drawing and other ladylike accomplishments will come later, with better hand coordination and all that. Forty years later I'll fall madly in midlife love with a man who invites me to run and climb and throw things on a job. 

In books people always worry about the tomboys. In my family that doesn't seem to happen. Farm girls get to ride horses and drive tractors and that sort of thing. When adults seem to worry more is when I stop being a tomboy. For the cousins, who don't stop being tomboys and or being taller than other children the same age, it's perfectly all right if they tinker with their own pickup trucks. Not all of my elders would be so crass as to say it but I think they all agree with the rule: If you want to know whether you're a Virginia Lady or a Virginia Gentleman, look down and count the bumps on your anterior surface. If you're one of our family, after about age twelve you will have either one or two. Which you see will take care of what you are. That settled, you may proceed to do whatever seems useful and worthwhile to you. The fact that you do it means that it is something a Virginia Lady, or Gentleman, as the case may be, does. Obviously. No further questions. Nobody's going to argue about those bumps. My body will form adequate bumps on schedule.

Meanwhile, at this age, I'm also aware that what I'm going to be is a writer, whatever fantasies I may enjoy about being a teacher or dancer or bus driver. Most writers do other jobs, just to have things to write about. Writers make up stories and before I go to sleep at night I'm always making up stories, always adventure stories at this age, races and rescues and shipwrecks and whatever else. I don't write down these stories or tell them to anyone else. I'm aware that they're silly little-kid stories. They bubble up through my mind, anyway. And I enjoy them.

I don't yet learn to do anything useful. I spend a lot of time standing in windows or doorways, watching adults at work. Later on I will learn that Mother, who started cooking before she was five years old, thought I was old enough to help make jam and wash dishes, and Dad insisted I be allowed to enjoy this last summer of complete irresponsibility. Meh. I would probably have enjoyed learning to do more useful things with Mother, more than complete irresponsibility, if Mother''s hypothyroidism hadn't been growing into the real disability it would soon become. She was to be pitied rather than blamed for it, even a child could see, but during most of my childhood my mother was a kind of person I've always hated to work with on any kind of project, the not very competent leader who drags everyone back down to per own level. In theory school could have offered some relief; in practice Mrs. Fatso, Mrs. Ratfink, Miss Mean, Mrs. Smelly, and Mrs. Dunce were all much worse, and none of my other primary school teachers was a great deal less bad. Mother was merely sick. I think some of those teachers never were very intelligent. Before age twenty I'll rate Mother the best teacher I ever had, and the only competition she'll ever have for that title will be my husband--but she is becoming more of a Cow person every day, this summer.

Mother has lost ground, but not all that much, in this season. Day by day the house-built-on-a-bet looks more like the sort of house people live in now, more than halfway through the century. It acquires a refrigerator, smaller than most refrigerators but effective. Food is cooked on a little wood stove in the kitchen. Rugs and linoleum cover the floor. White wallpaper relieves the dimness of the big front room. Windows get curtains and beds get quilts. Mother has a sewing machine. I like watching the sewing machine whir and flash, but usually I'm told to go out and play in the sunshine. It's a sunny summer.