Monday, August 24, 2026

Web Log for 8.23.26

Nothing's been badly wrong with me or with the laptop--we've just been preoccupied with off-blog things.

Animals 

Crude, rude cartoon some cat owner Out There needs to see. Of course Serena and her kittens would never do anything like this...hah. If pushed to it, by confinement with a neglected litter box and punishment when they protested, they could probably think of worse things! Your cat wants all solid bodywaste removed within a few hours, all clumps of soaked clay removed while there's still a dry patch somewhere. Your reward for doing this is that the cat will stop thinking of creatively annoying ways to soil your personal property. (Nothing from the litter box flushes well but your cat may let you recycle dried-out clay.) Cat just wants not to step in anything that makes cat's paws smell or feel nasty. If you can safely let cat go out and use a sand pit, cat will be delighted to keep all bodywastes there, unless of course it's overcome by the same sort of uncontrollable reaction humans sometimes have, in which case cat will at least make a much smaller mess than you would, yourself.


Cows.


Green 

Another cartoon some people need to see...suitable for framing.


History 

Virtual tour of Eatonville, for those of us who are allergic to Florida. If Florida ever stops spraying poison on itself, it will be a duty and a pleasure for everyone to visit Eatonville. I've been there--in no physical condition to get out and appreciate the place.


Joe Jackson salutes Desmond Doss of Lynchburg, possibly the best-known (in a good way) Seventh-Day Adventist in the church's history. (Lots of well-known people, from Warren G. Harding to Ozzy Osbourne, have been ex-Adventists.) 


Doss didn't write a book, though one was written about him (and the author was so impressed that he went on to write a book about the Adventist church). This web site is a posthumous fan project. Doss was a quiet, private man during his lifetime.


Microsoft, Self-Destructive Hubris of 

I don't do this every day, but in order to see where we had the most readers I peered below the cover of the statistics page Google generates for all Blogspot blogs. We had approximately 19,000 readers using Chrome and TWO, count them, two whole visits from people using Edge. Because Microsoft's efforts to push Edge and other Microsoft products are making all Microsoft products wix, that's why. Only three years ago, Edge seemed to be very similar to Chrome; the sister whose information was stored in Edge on this computer had no complaints. It was merely that Edge was her browser and Chrome was my browser. That was all! But friends don't let friends use Edge, now.

Opera was what the poor little Sickly Snail used to have. This web site officially cheers for everyone Out There who is still putting up with Opera. More than are putting up with Edge.

Music 

Dolly Parton.


It came up in a discusion. Since this web site did US patriotic songs last week, why not? Why shouldn't readers in other countries get to laugh at the versions of your songs Google chooses to offer us? National anthems: New Zealand's.(Rock'n'roll version!)


Great Britain's. (And Google felt a need to apologize for there not being a pop-type video. Hah. A commenter thought the tune was "lugubrious." I had no idea what commenter was talking about until I heard the tempo at which it has to be played to be recognizable in the vastness of St Paul's Cathedral.)


Canada's.


Greece's.


Cornwall's. (Cornwall is not, strictly speaking, a nation, but that doesn't stop them claiming a good old traditional song as their "unofficial national anthem.")


South Africa's.


That takes care of Ellen Hawley's commenters' national songs but why leave out our own readers? Love and peace to all readers who are human, and a quick clean death to those who are bots. Singapore's. (No, I'm not seeing enough visits from Singapore to suggest another bot army.)


Germany's.


(Pause for US Christians to sing the hymns, in English, that we sing to this tune, just to clear our minds. This web site will stay entirely out of any question about whether the tune properly begins with "Glorious things of thee are spoken..." or "Praise the Lord, ye heavens, adore Him.")

France's. 


Hong Kong is not, technically, a nation either but Google lists this as its anthem:


Brazil's.


The Netherlanda'.


Japan's.


India's.


Sweden's.


Spain's. (The Spanish Marcha Real doesn't have official lyrics. This doesn't stop Spanish people from singing it. Lots of people have written words to this song; an official choice has never been made. So what's linked is just one of seveeral Spanish songs written to the tune of their national anthem.)


Belgium's.


Bangladesh's.


Vietnam's.


Russia's. (I'm not saying people who feel attached to Ukraine need to click. Actually I wish both countries would just stop quarrelling. Actually I think watching these videos of what people in all these countries choose for emblems builds a feeling that all people have something to preserve--and not sacrifice to war.)


In fact, though Google is not showing Ukraine on our Top 20 list for this week, here's a version of their song, too, to spare people the trouble of complaining. I didn't choose a video knowing it would end with "We Are All Brothers And Sisters. THE WAR MUST END" on the screen, but I endorse the thought.


Argentina's.


Turkiye's.


There

The "All in the Family" song. 


Steeleye Span.


Neil Diamond.


Dee Dee Sharp.


Deana Carter.


The Drifters.


Don Henley.


Joe Cocker...I'll admit, I think (1) the video is full of anachronism and (2) Joe Cocker, being his real age, and all these images of people in their early teens, mix badly and really bring out the smutty quality of the song, which tends to be lost in nostalgia when we listen to the original version. I don't think he meant to make a video that might have been called "Dirty Old Man Who Can't Sing." I suspect the cavorting teenagers are meant to be memories of his younger self and friends. But that's not what comes to mind first.


The Jamies.


Keith Urban.


Red Clay Strays.


Cody Johnson.


Ella Langley.


Lainey Wilson.


Little Texas.


Graham Parker.


The Band. 


Weather 

Virginians will never forget Camille (even if we weren't in Virginia when "she" landed). New Orleanians will never forget Katrina. Floridians will never forget Andrew. Those used to be human names. Not any more. Though I do wish the Weather Service would stop wasting perfectly good human names on hurricanes.

Painful Death to Driscoll's

(No, this web site is not wishing to shorten the lives of any persons. We want Driscoll's, the nationwide distributors of poisoned berries, to have a painful corporate death. Land pronounced worthless and auctioned off for a dime an acre. Former employees selling umbrellas on street corners for food--or maybe trucked around the country to lecture on how much harm chemical "pesticides" do especially to a brand's image or a person's reputation, as they're refused tables at restaurants and their children aren't admitted to schools. Driscoll's are bitter clingers. Make examples of them!)

This e-mail came from one of the nonprofit MAHA-associated groups that are currently suing Driscoll's, GMO Free USA. It's a 501(c)(3) group; you can send it, rather than the federal government, some of your tax money if you file the full-length 1040.

"

PRESS RELEASE

Nonprofits Sue Driscoll’s For Deceptive Environmental and Sustainability Marketing Claims of Blueberries and Strawberries

View this press release on PR Newswire

Drsicolls_Consumer_Protection_Lawsuit.jpg

WASHINGTON D.C., August 24, 2026 — Nonprofits Toxin Free USA (TFUSA), Organic Consumers Association (OCA), and Beyond Pesticides (BP) filed a consumer protection lawsuit against Driscoll’s Inc. alleging deceptive marketing of its berries.

Driscoll’s is the world’s largest producer and marketer of blueberries, blackberries, raspberries, and strawberries and claims its growing practices are “in harmony with the environment.” The company also advertises that its berries “aren’t produced in a factory; they’re grown outside in a dynamic biological environment” and are “good for you and the planet.”

Driscoll’s is headquartered in Watsonville, California, where it has operations throughout the city. The majority of its production fields
are sited adjacent and extremely close to elementary and middle schools. State records show at least 12 different carcinogenic pesticides are used at Driscoll’s operations, including malathion and the fumigant 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D), banned in 34 countries including those in the EU. A state air monitor inside one school detected 1,3-D air concentration levels far above the state's official Prop 65 cancer risk threshold.

Watsonville's childhood cancer rates are 36% higher than the California average. Pajaro Valley residents have long complained and protested the company’s use of pesticides near schools and residential neighborhoods, even launching a hunger strike in 2025, but the company has responded with indifference.

“Driscoll’s is not ‘in harmony with the communities’ where its farms operate. A company cannot claim to respect its neighbors while applying carcinogenic pesticides beside schools and defending the practice simply because it is legal. Legal does not mean right. Exposing children to toxic pesticides may be permitted by law, but it is profoundly wrong—and morally indefensible,” said Diana Reeves, TFUSA Executive Director.

"Driscoll's can easily do the right thing," insisted Alexis Baden-Mayer, Research Director of the Organic Consumers Association. "They're already selling organic berries at a premium to customers who buy them with the expectation that this benefits human health and the environment."

Despite the advertising imagery of lush, green farms, many of Driscoll’s operations grow berries in plastic containers within facilities entirely covered in plastic. To prepare the land for this type of growing system, soil is compacted and plastic is laid down on the newly leveled ground. Rows of plastic pots are laid on top of the plastic-lined ground, and the plants grow in a coconut husk substrate. Plastic hood infrastructure is built over the crops to shield them from extreme weather conditions. Even in its more traditional outdoor growing fields, Driscoll’s berry plants are encased in plastic. Further, some of the company's operations are, in fact, factories where plants are grown without soil or sunlight.

As a result of its use of plastics in growing and packaging, plaintiffs allege that Driscoll’s berries contain harmful microplastics. Lab tests commissioned by plaintiffs revealed Driscoll’s blueberries are contaminated with polyethylene and polycarbonate particles. Microplastics are not “good for you.”

According to the complaint, contrary to Driscoll’s representations that its berries are grown “in harmony with the environment” and “good for the planet,” its agricultural practices pollute the environment with toxic synthetic pesticides and microplastics. The U.S. EPA has classified the waterways surrounding Driscoll’s operations as impaired, “largely because of the presence of bacteria and toxic chemicals.” Farmworkers and their families bear the brunt of this pollution.

Plaintiffs allege that instead of reducing its plastic use, Driscoll’s has chosen to greenwash. The company announced the goal of achieving “100% recycling of field plastics with a viable recycling market in all major producing regions by 2021.” It failed and then moved the goal post to 2025. It failed again and moved the goal post to 2030. Goals like these are so disconnected from what is realistic and technically achievable that stating them is inherently misleading, intended only to generate goodwill towards the company.

"Consumers are seeking to abate current existential threats to health, biodiversity, and climate with their purchasing decisions and do not want to be misled by Driscoll's false claims that its practices, which use polluting plastics and pesticides, are sustainable," said Jay Feldman, Executive Director of Beyond Pesticides. "Washington, DC's consumer law offers protection from the company's deceptive misrepresentations," Mr. Feldman continued.

The public interest nonprofits are seeking no monetary damages—only an end to the deceptive marketing and advertising of Driscoll’s berries.

The lawsuit was filed under the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Plaintiffs are represented by Richman Law & Policy.

Read the full Complaint HERE.

GMO/Toxin Free USA is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit advocating for a clean, healthy food system and environment, non-toxic consumer products, and educating consumers about the hazards of GMOs, pesticides and other toxins. toxinfreeusa.org

Organic Consumers Association is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit addressing crucial issues around food safety, industrial agriculture, genetic engineering, children’s health, corporate accountability, Fair Trade and environmental sustainability. www.organicconsumers.org

Beyond Pesticides is a national grassroots nonprofit organization that works with allies in protecting public health and the environment, through the identification of the hazards of toxicants in land, air, water, food, and consumer products and the advancement of meaningful solutions to the current existential health, biodiversity, and climate crises. www.beyondpesticides.org

Press inquiries contact:

Luan Van Le, Toxin Free USA
Phone: 347.921.1466
Email: info@gmofreeusa.org

Alexis Baden-Mayer, Organic Consumers Association
Phone: 202-744-0853
Email: Alexis@organicconsumers.org

Jay Feldman, Beyond Pesticides
Phone: 202.255.4296
Email:
JFeldman@beyondpesticides.org


You can send a link to this post, or paste the whole press release into a letter or e-mail and send that, to the stores where you've seen these poisoned berries for sale. Even if the berries you've seen were marked "organic"...federal standards for "organic" are too lax to mean that the food won't cause immediate chemical reactions, at best, and does anybody trust a corporation as evil as Driscoll's to use "organic" practices once they've claimed the badge? * 

Book Review: The Clarinet and Saxophone Book

Title: The Clarinet and Saxophone Book

Author: Melvin Berger

Date: 1975

Publisher: Lothrop Lee & Shepard

ISBN: 0-688-51708-0

Length: 126 pages

Illustrations: black and white photos


(Photo: Syos, on Google)  

Quote: "The clarino was the high-pitched trumpet of that time. [Johann Christoph Denner] chose the name [clarinet] because the new instrument sounded so much like the trumpet."

This is a first book about the single-reed musical instrument family, written for middle school readers. There's a chapter about the history of the clarinet and saxophone, and subsequent chapters about how they're built, how they make sounds, how reeds are grown and shaped, the music that's been written for these instruments, people who were playing them professionally in the 1970s, public school bands that featured these instruments in the 1970s, and what other people were doing with these instruments in the 1970s.

Obviously the section about "The Clarinet, the Saxophone, and You" is as out of date as the little girl's band uniform in the cover picture. Otherwise, this is still a good book of information about instruments that were developed for use in symphony orchestras only after much of the great orchestra music had been written, and have yet to find their place in folk and popular music. Clarinets were definitely part of the "German Band" fad, saxophones were part of early swing and jazz, and both instruments adapt well to modern performances of traditional tunes...but no current musical genre really features the clarinet or saxophone in the way orchestras feature violins, marching bands feature trumpets, or rock bands feature guitars.

It might be argued that both classical and popular music would be better off without the single-reed instruments, since playing these instruments regularly tends to push the upper teeth out at the same time that it erodes the enamel on the lower front teeth. Perhaps the challenge for musicians in the twenty-first century will be to design new woodwind instruments that preserve those nice mellow woody tones while vibrating the reed against something other than the player's teeth. And I say the sooner the better.

The Clarinet and Saxophone Book is recommended to anyone interested in learning to play the clarinet and saxophone as they are, or in designing ecologically sound, human-breath-powered improvements on these instruments.