Showing posts with label Christian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christian. Show all posts

Sunday, October 11, 2026

Sunday Post: The Green Mile

One of the non-computer things I did over the weekend was to watch the movie version of Stephen King's Green Mile. It happened to be offered on somebody's streaming service this weekend, and I remembered that a departed friend had been moved by it, while living, and urged me to watch it. Watching the movie was like reading a last letter from this person--someone who was brave and strong, while living, but had to have been in pain even when the film was in theatres.

Horror fiction has traditionally justified itself by tapping into religious beliefs about the afterlife and the supernatural, even though this has meant that it's contradicted other religious beliefs about those topics. In some faith traditions people linger in between life and death as ghosts, so ghosts can be completely benign; in others people are either living or dead, and what appear to be ghosts of departed friends are deceiving spirits, so even if someone reports that the ghost of his old dog led him safely around the washed-out bridge, the deceiving spirit was only setting him up for confusion and temptation later in life. In some traditions Jesus was unique and it's blasphemous even to speculate about what might happen if some other person was able to emulate His love and sacrifice; in some traditions emulating Jesus in every way is what everyone is meant to do, and it might even be virtuous to imagine a contemporary man or woman who could be the "Christ figure" in a work of fiction.

The Green Mile is one of those stories where a contemporary character is a "Christ figure." If this offends your beliefs, don't read the book or watch the movie.

I'd read the book before watching the movie, so I don't think knowing the ending spoiled anything. 

The movie opens in a geriatric care home where a healthy, handsome man, apparently about sixty years old, goes out for a walk, comes in and watches a movie with his housemates, and runs out crying during a harmless dance scene. One of his housemates goes after him,guessing that there has to be a story to explain his reaction. There is, of course. 

In 1935, he says, he was a prison guard. The man who plays the senior prison guard, not young in 1935, doesn't look like the man who plays the protagonist in the care home in 1999, but movies traditionally use different actors to play the same person at different ages; let it pass. The passage from where a convict was imprisoned to where he was executed was traditionally called his last mile, irrespective of the actual distance. The prison's concrete floor was painted green so they called the corridor that led from the convicts' cells to the electric chair the Green Mile. A co-worker nobody liked, who kept his job because of family connections, led in a new convict squawking "Dead man walking!" The protagonist, Paul, told him to be quiet and try to help keep the convicts calm. The co-worker, Percy, had a hard time being quiet and calm; he was a classic coward-bully blend. The new convict was about eight feet tall and could speak, but not very well. He obviously wouldn't have been able to learn much at school if he'd ever attended one, which he probably hadn't. His name was John Coffey (there's a sort of tradition where fictional Christ figures' initials are J.C.). He had been found clutching the heads of two murdered children.

But somehow, as the main plot of the movie starts moving, Coffey doesn't seem the murderous type. Another convict has been making a pet of a mouse. Percy stomps on the mouse. Coffey takes the body in his hands, breathes on it, and coughs out a cloud of dust while the mouse scampers away, healthy as ever. The other men on death row shake their heads. Did they see what they thought they saw? Paul shakes Coffey's hand. Paul has had a painful illness all year. Coffey coughs, and Paul is well again. Another guard's wife has an inoperable tumor people have avoided telling her about. Coffey is smuggled out to the guard's home, inhales the woman's breath, coughs, and accepts a St Christopher medal she was wearing when she wakes up healthy.

The mouse's master's execution date approaches. To comfort the man, someone tells him the mouse can be sent to a special mouse circus in Florida where people will pay to watch his tricks. Percy, seeking promotion to a better paid job, wants to "be out front" during the execution, which is public. Being a jerk, he takes this opportunity to tell the convict that the mouse circus does not exist. Despite having been taught that, just before the electrodes are applied to the convict's scalp, the scalp must be wetted down with a sponge so the convict will be electrocuted rather than burned alive, Percy takes the sponge, reaches down into a bucket provided him, but places the sponge between the scalp and the electrodes completely dry. He claims he didn't know that the sponge needed to be wet. Nobody believes this. The guards don't file a complaint about Percy because they want him to be promoted to a job outside the prison.

Coffey has been completely non-judgmental about the other convicts--all but one. This one acts mouthy and obnoxious in prison. He might merely be young and scared, but no, Coffey says, he's a bad man. The man's badness disturbs Coffey so badly, for no obvious reason, that Paul ends up holding Coffey's hand through the bars and letting Coffey project a memory to him through telepathy. The young convict was a hired helper who murdered the two children. "He killed them with love," Coffey keeps mumbling, transmitting the memory of how the man told each child "Be quiet or I'll kill your sister instead of you." There is, Coffey says in his clumsy way, too much of that in the world. Too many people are killed by evildoers manipulating their love. 

In the book the other characters explain at length that Coffey's role as a Christ figure seems to require him to be a very slow thinker. He seems to feel so much empathy that, if he were able to think intelligently about it, he wouldn't be able to live with it. The movie manages better, I think, by not belaboring this point, though perhaps I feel that way because I already know that a room-temperature IQ score is part of Stephen King's vision of his character. Though Jesus was a rabbi and claimed royal blood, as a Jew He was part of a despised minority group in the Roman Empire. Coffey has a black-coffee complexion but, to get the "despised minority" vibe going in 1999, Stephen King had to throw in that the man can barely put a sentence together. One of those cases where gigantic size and intellectual deficiencies seem to be part of a genetic syndrome. I'm not sure why King believed that a person who was able to act as a Christ figure might not have been given the spiritual capacity to understand what he was doing, might not have been a genius; I suspect he just wanted to ensure that everyone in the audience has their face rubbed in the idea of the Christ figure being someone they'd find hard to like, trust, or respect. 

Coffey was found holding the children, trying his utmost, howling in the pain of his effort, to draw life back into their bodies, but he couldn't. That was why, on the few occasions when anyone asked him what had happened, he could only blubber that he was sorry he "couldn't put it back." He didn't know the name of the murderer; he didn't expect anyone would pay any attention to his testimony if he accused the murderer. He feels bad enough about being unable to revive the children that he's ready for his strange life to end, anyway. But he's glad the murderer was convicted of another murder and is on death row.

The plot proceeds to blow up in the sort of violent confrontation Stephen King's primary audience of young men demand, while its social and philosophical implications seem to be weighing on King's own mind. Paul realizes that, having encountered a Christ figure, he is going to be required to be "out front," in the presiding role, during the sacrifice of that Christ figure. He is going to be cast as Pontius Pilate. He won't have to throw the switch, but he will have to apply the sponge. He doesn't think he can do that with Coffey, no matter how many other convicts he's done it with before. So, like all Christians who believe that whatever harm we do or good we fail to do to others has been done to Christ, Paul has to seek guidance and consolation from Coffey himself. Maybe Coffey would like to escape from prison?

Coffey would not. He's spent his whole life roaming around "where God leads" him, channelling healing energy in a way that costs him pain, and he's eager for it to be over. 

Is there anything he would like?

Well, Coffey says, he never has seen a "flicker show." 

Which is why Paul can't watch that particular movie without crying. He leads his sympathetic housemate out for a short walk and explains that people Coffey healed have extra long lives. He chose that particular home because it's near to an abandoned house where he's still visiting the mouse. After Coffey's execution, Paul resigned from the prison and tried being a teacher, preventing crime, instead of punishing it...

Not even Stephen King could imagine how that might have been said to work but, at this point in the movie, I didn't care. I was thinking of friends who were ready for their mortal lives to be over, when the time came. I don't usually mourn for people who were ready to go so much as I do for people who die young. A school friend's father, a member of the community I hadn't known well but had respected, died just last week. I cried.

I don't know that real people ever have all of the traits of fictional "Christ figures." I know that real people do have the traits of what some Christian traditions call saints; I can easily imagine people whose faith tradition taught them such praying to the departed spirits of David Peters, or Mitch Snyder, or Zahara Heckscher, and the thought has crossed my mind that--oh no you don't, God, I am too old to be of any use as a martyr. I don't want Greta Thunberg or Rachel Parent or any other young person to be a martyr for Glyphosate Awareness, either. Movements benefit from martyrs but I hope we can succeed without one.

I do know that any person, perhaps especially a person you find hard to like or trust--someone with intellectual deficiencies, someone with a repulsive-looking disease, someone obese--can be the Christ figure in any scene in anyone's life, any day. 

Last week some social media discussion was about people who choose to have no contact with their parents. I do understand that in some cases that's the best either the parent or the child can do, and one reason why boarding schools exist--and why, before boarding schools were invented, in some cultures teenagers were "fostered out" to live in different families--is that some parents and children can't be in the same house. Occasional contact, greeting cards expressing a hope that things may get better, may be an optimal outcome. Sometimes things get better; sometimes addicts sober up, sometimes abusers at least notice when you become stronger than they are, sometimes the way you grow and change stops reminding them of someone else, sometimes your own independence stops parents trying to control your life and stops you mentally letting them. I think most families where parents and children are not friends can benefit from family counselling, and old books like Peoplemaking and The Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense can be worth more than their weight in gold. But some people were never meant to be close friends with their parents, or with one or some of their children. Sometimes, even where the family obligations are carried out in an exemplary way, even when separation is not caused by resentment so much as by personality difference, people aren't friends. I think that if more young people tried harder to love and stay close to their parents, this would be a better world; but it doesn't always happen. Well, when the parent who is not physically dangerous to the child but is irredeemably annoying starts to need the child's help, it may help the adult child to think of the parent as a Christ figure.

People who have less than you have are always such a drag. I know this because I'm probably one of them. People who might be willing to eat your food or ride in your car, once, but they're probably never going to invite you to eat their food or ride in their car, and if they did you might be inclined to refuse, may be even harder to take if we have talents you need or even looks you fancy. The Bible very specifically says that anyone who has less than you is likely to be a Christ figure in your life's story.

People whose ethnic identity turns you off...let's be anti-p.c. and consider White people, White men, Jewish White men. Jesus Himself did not try to persuade His disciples that foreigners were the Christ figures in their stories. For them it was enough of a step to imagine that a foreigner like the Roman centurion or the Samaritan woman at the well might be a fellow disciple. But when they had received the enlightenment of the Holy Spirit, then they welcomed foreigners into the new Christian movement. If you have a strong preference for one side or the other in an international or intertribal conflict, it is possible that someone from the side you don't favor may be a Christ figure for you..

The people who serve as Christ figures for us may offer us guidance, or consolation, or correction, or opportunities to practice mercy and charity, or any combination of these things. 

I think it undoubtedly added something to my experience of The Green Mile that it came as a posthumous message from a friend. Nevertheless I think it might be helpful for others to find a time to sit through all three hours of the movie, and reflect on the Christ figures in their personal stories.

Sunday, October 4, 2026

Book Review: A Divine Design

Title: A Divine Design

Author: Doug Batchelor et al.

Date: 2019
 
Publisher: Amazing Facts

Length: 48 pages

Quote: "What does the Bible uncover about this sanctuary?"

Seventh-Day Adventists don't try to build temples with sanctuaries as described in the book of Exodus, nor do they collectively observe the Jewish holidays, but they do find spiritual meaning in the discussion of the Temple (and its calendar) in the Bible. In this glossy, beautifully illustrated little book Batchelor explains that meaning from a Christian point of view. 

This book was part of a series that appeared at regular intervals. Though each short book was written mostly by one person about one topic, their regular appearance and glossy paper caused some to call them magazines. Both words seem to me to suggest something that looks different from A Divine Design. (Buy it and see which you'd call it.) It's a sort of hybrid between book and magazine. 

If you've always wondered what the descriptions of the tabernacle and temple, their furniture and decor, and the priests' vestments would have looked like or why it mattered, this book is for you.

Monday, September 28, 2026

New Book Review: Sons from Afar (Columba Booth)

This is a Sunday book; it contains an evangelical sermon with a major character making a commitment to Christ. It is not connected in any way to Cynthia Voigt's Sons from Afar. (I e-mailed the author about this; she had not been aware of the earlier book with the same name.) After a brief appearance here on a Monday, this review will be reposted on a Sunday, per site policy. 

Title: Sons from Afar 

Author: Columba Booth

Date: 2026

Quote: "God was about to hand us a miracle with this job in California."

When the Browns move to California to work for a church, they meet the Ropers, who aggressively "rope them in" to the Crossing the River  project. A little investigation reveals that the immigrants they're trying to help are illegal. A little more suggests that they're being illegally trafficked. Mrs. Brown, who didn't want to get involved in risky charity projects, soon finds herself in a car chase, leading cartel members into a police trap, while hauling a van load of children to a "safe house." 

I think the ending of this story is too good to be true, but it does give a picture--it'd make a good "moving picture"!--of the complexities of illegal immigration into the United States.The Ropers, who claim to think everyone's entitled to live in the US and spend money lavishly on the migrants in their care, privately refer to these people as "product" they sell. A child found hungry and dirty turns out to be the son of well-off parents, kidnapped by their political enemies. The question of whether to help people cross borders illegally, or help them earn more money where they are, has nothing to do with "race." This novel is obviously fiction but, if it provokes people to look up the facts behind it, it will be an eye opener. 

The title refers to a subplot in which a character whose foster parenting experience didn't end well reconnects with her foster son, and the idea that the risks of things like foster parenting are worth the rewards. 

Sunday, September 27, 2026

Book Review: My Cowboy Hero

Title: My Cowboy Hero

Author: Jordyn Duncan

Date: 2023

Publisher: Stone Hill

ISBN: "9781234567890"

Quote: "With over a million followers it's an average stream..."

Madison is a TikTok influencer, studying "marketing" at college at her family's business's expense. She likes going to parties and drinking a lot. At the beginning of this short romance she walks into boyfriend Brian's house to shoot a cooking video and finds Brian hugging someone else. Instantly her social media pages fill up with invitations from other guys.

Jacob is assigned to work with Madison on a school project. At first sight, she thinks he's too eager. Then the hormone tide rolls in and she even becomes a Christian, or thinks she does, to please him.

Can Madison really love anybody, even God? This is a sweet late-teen romance so we don't spend enough time with the characters for me to feel convinced. For the moment, she likes him. It helps her drink and party less, think and study more.Probably her story ends as well as it could end. Jacob, I suspect, could have done better.

Sunday, September 20, 2026

Book Review: Bullets

Title: Bullets 

Author: Terry Toler 

Date: 2026

Publisher: Beholdings

Quote: "That was the problem. He was too good at surviving."

Peter is a decorated veteran, the toughest of the tough, and he's tired of being one when he swims out into rough sea with the intention of drowning. But along comes a woman walking her German Shepherd, and the dog dives into the big, cold waves to rescue Peter. The woman knows something is wrong because he's swimming in jeans, and invites him to her house for breakfast.

Maggie is a veteran's daughter, pretty tough too, in her own way, but she has an Insane Admirer who's starting to give her the creeps. She tells Peter the call she rejected was a wrong number. He knew it wasn't by looking at her. Now he has a reason to live again: He will protect Maggie. He teaches Maggie, who has never been interested before, how to shoot. He can't resist showing her that, for him, shooting is an art form.

Local laws seem to protect the Insane Admirer more than they do Peter, Maggie, or the lovable rescue dog Bullet. When Peter and Bullet finally see the man face to face, he runs madly away, smashes his face on the curb, then fakes bite marks and tells the police they attacked him. The police reclaim Bullet. Maggie blames Peter and doesn't want to talk to him. Peter has nothing left to live for, but doesn't feel suicidal this time--yet.

In literary fiction, a happy ending to a story like this one is supposed to be caused by something the protagonists do. In Christian fiction, their alternatives include praying and catching a lucky break. This sweet romance ends with a wedding.

Toler (since this is a romance, I should probably mention: he/him) has written a lot of other novels. This one seems to stand alone, but it's actually #6 in a series of romances featuring rich, successful, dominant men. Maggie says more about what she doesn't like than the usual heroine of female-authored romance, because Peter is realistically damaged and Maggie is realistically tough enough to tell him what puts her off. We can tell it's True Love, though, because Peter listens and learns...as does Maggie. By the end of the book it's possible to imagine that their quarrels will become less frequent and less painful, over time, rather than the usual pattern of quarrels getting worse as each person locks into ego defense mode and refuses to listen or learn. Bullets is genre fiction, but in a small and generic way Toler has pulled off something few authors have even tried.

Sunday, September 13, 2026

New Book Review: The Cyrene Conspiracy

Title: The Cyrene Conspiracy 

Author: Ali Kaden

Date: 2026

Publisher: Third Culture Soul Publishing

ISBN: 979-8-9976635-0-6 

Quote: "She claimed to have something connected to Jesus and ancient Christianity that she wanted me to investigate."

Amir Zane, a young Egyptian-American writer, is asked to investigate an old parchment on which is written, among other things, "not him but another." 

If you remember Holy Blood Holy Grail or The Da Vinci Code you may now have some idea what to expect Amir is about to learn. There were, in the ancient world, a lot of ideas about who Jesus was and what had become of him. 

What became the orthodox Roman Catholic view, derived from the epistles of Paul in our New Testament, was that the Holy One is a unity of (probably an infinite number of Persons actually, but Three that we think we know about for sure) Three Persons, and Jesus was the one of those Persons who chose to exist in human form for thirty-some years. He didn't exactly look forward to crucifixion, but chose to take human form at a period when publicly doing and saying even the nice things our Gospels record would offend enough "higher-up" people to result in crucifixion. In some cosmic way this willing self-sacrifice of a perfect man atoned for the sinfulness of humankind and allowed those who followed Him to be saved from the eternal destruction our sinfulness deserved. 

Many people find this hard to believe. How could the Holy One have created a universe where some part of God's self would need to be killed by torture to show love for humankind? Couldn't the real story have been something simpler? Maybe Jesus came to show people how to lead a virtuous life, was murdered in the ordinary way, and came back to tell us that the resurrection will set all of our inherently immortal souls free from really ceasing to exist, which some people seem to fear more than they fear the pain of death. Maybe he wasn't even murdered. A theory that the apostle Thomas, whose name means "twin," was Jesus' twin is hard to reconcile with the Gospels. Some people theorized that Jesus had a secret twin who either was the one who walked around Jerusalem after Jesus died, or died in Jesus' place. Maybe even the apostles didn't know about this twin...

Relatively few churches try to reenact the full "Passion" drama. "Passion" does not merely mean the emotional outburst Victorian writers meant by saying someone "flew into a passion" and presumably yelled or cried, nor does it merely mean the physical feelings modern writers usually have in mind. It means "suffering." Before being crucified the Gospels make it clear that Jesus chose to endure some additional torture. The crucificarii, an ancient Roman term of abuse meaning "men about to be crucified" and used as a general term of contempt, were forced to drag their crosses through the streets before they were hanged on them. All of them were thus displayed to the public as sweating, bleeding, miserable messes. Jesus, we are told, had been beaten thoroughly and lost a fair bit of blood before the crucifixion, and the people who came out to taunt and throw things at the crucificarii felt sorry for him. Along the way he collapsed on the ground. Some say the Roman soldiers dragooned someone else into carrying his cross, so that the mob could watch Jesus' final agony on the cross; some say a kind man  volunteered to do it, to spare Jesus some small part of the suffering he had chosen. Some have imagined that Jesus was given an extra-large cross that was meant for Barabbas and had been built by a relative of someone Barabbas had murdered. In any case, all the Gospel writers say about the man who actually carried the cross for the last part of the way was that he was called Simon of Cyrene. 

About the given name, what we know is that "Simon" was one of those names that become popular in multiethnic societies because they seem traditional in more than one language. Two of the apostles were called Simon, at least until Jesus gave one of them the nickname Peter. Many other men used the same name. It does not tell us whether this man was Greek or Jewish.

About the place he came from, history tells us a little more. Cyrene was in Libya but it was built into a city by Greeks; they might have moved away from one of the islands because of renewed volcanic activity. The official leader of the Greeks who settled there was their princess, the daughter of the king they had lost, and the place was named after her. It was dedicated to the sun god Apollo, who was said to be the father of a child to whom the princess gave birth. Several Jews settled there. Later many people in the city became Christians; it had a church, and bishops who are still on the list of obscure saints. Mark, the Gospel writer, was said to have been a Jew from Cyrene who became the city's first bishop. 


Photo of what's left of part of ancient Cyrene from Wikipedia. 


Photo posted on Facebook by Grigol Pheradze. At least the rich people who had their portraits painted or sculpted in ancient Cyrene look more like modern southern Europeans than like modern Africans. Then again, northern Africans don't look all that different from southern Europeans. Nevertheless, when Passion dramas are enacted, any Black man who attends the church is likely to be cast as Simon of Cyrene. Simon of Cyrene may have been Black but, even if he was, he would have been in Jerusalem to trade or to visit relatives, as a well-off gentleman from a wealthy city. He was not a fugitive slave, or if he was one he hadn't been enslaved in Cyrene; ex-slaves didn't claim the places they'd fled from as home. He might have been Jewish. He might have looked remarkably similar to Jesus. He might have been crucified in Jesus' place, while Jesus faded out of mortal view and, as some old texts say, laughed at the idea of mere men thinking they could crucify the Prophet who had become so virtuous as to be allowed to embody God. 

For all Muslims, Jesus is remembered as a prophet, sometimes called the greatest of prophets, a sinless teacher of peace and mercy. "We don't say 'Son of God,'" a Muslim once explained to me, "but 'Soul of God'. Anyone could choose to embody the Soul of God, but only Jesus did." Was he crucified because his enemies said he had claimed to be a Son of God, which Jews and Muslims agreed would have been blasphemy...or did it only appear that he was? Did he travel on to other places and teach peace and mercy to, e.g., the Persians, who had their own monotheistic religion in which he might have been seen as a fulfilment of prophecy? Could Mary Magdalene have received more ink in the Gospels than even Mother Mary, not because she was much older than the other women disciples, but because she was Jesus' wife; could they have had a child? 

If Christians seriously study the history of the Church, these ideas are familiar to them; they are some of the major heresies. In the Christian tradition the idea that Jesus was a natural man who earned the title "Son of God" by abstaining from all sin and fully embodying the Will of God is known as the Arian Heresy, which, as preached by Bishop Arius, annoyed Bishop Nicholas to the point of "slapping" Arius--whether literally, or with a book or sermon so scathing that it got Nicholas banned from the council of bishops voting whether or not to excommunicate Arius, as unable to hear the debate and vote with an unbiased mind. But most Christians don't bother studying these things, and to them The Cyrene Conspiracy, which is about Amir's discovery of the theory that Simon of Cyrene not only carried Jesus' cross but was crucified on it, may be new and shocking.

It is fiction but, as Kaden explains, it's written in aid of the people of Gaza. In order to investigate the parchment Amir doesn't go to a church or university library and study its history; he takes the parchment right back to the Middle East, where he meets some kind Christian priests and rescue workers, and a liberated modern Arab young lady whose fiance left her because he couldn't distract her from relief work in Gaza. He meets a woman who's been trying to nurse a baby, but her milk has failed due to starvation, and people with arms and legs blown off, and the familiar gallery of casualties of Modern War. He feels left out of conversations among Palestinians because they all introduce themselves to new acquaintances with tallies of the relatives they've lost, many of whom were women and children.

And he finds a ruined church where an heretical Christian sect seem to have met, centuries ago. He recognizes artistic motifs that lead him to begin to research the Manichaean Christian sect, of which the most thorough surviving descriptions were written by Augustine of Hippo after he left the group, and may have been written with prejudice. Exactly who the prophet Mani was, when and where he lived or died, and what he taught, may never be known but the woman Amir starts to fall in love with seems to see him as an intermediary link between Christian and Muslim thinking. In the ruined church his name appears under those of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Could he have been their son--or "spiritual son," a student--or in either sense their descendant? 

Muslims, like Christians, belong to different denominations. From the news media most Americans have heard that Sunnis were seen as more liberal than Shiites in some ways, but Sunnis persecuted Shiites, which doesn't sound so liberal. (That was only in Iran. The Sunni Muslims from India whom I've known were not inclined to persecute anybody, though they did accept that their leaders had a right to punish heretics against their religion: "Oh yes, if Salman Rushdie really did blaspheme and defame the Prophet, then of course he will have to die.") More recently we've heard of hard-line Wahhabis who take various phrases from the Koran more literally than most Muslims do. 

Relatively few Americans have heard of the Sufis, a liberal Muslim group who seemed to me, when I met them in Washington, to be trying to bridge the gaps between Islam and other religions toward the goal of converting everyone to a liberal, freethinking, New Agey form of Islam. In The Cyrene Conspiracy the heroine doesn't identify as a Sufi in so many words, but she seems close to being one. Sufis are, in my experience, profoundly likable people; they hate nobody, they invite Jews as well as Christians and Buddhists to chant and pray with them, they do not noticeably even disparage women even to the extent the Koran does. Some now say that their niceness is deployed by the evil, power-seeking Muslim political machine as a form of taqiyya, legitimized lying to gain social acceptability as a step toward political power. Those people probably also think the kind old priest in your neighborhood, the nice ladies at the Catholic school fundraising events, and President Kennedy were mere tools being used to restore the Papacy in the United States. Nice people and the nice things they do are sometimes exploited, but they are nice. 

The kind Christians Amir meets in Gaza are, of course, liberal and humanitarian people too. The Jews, on the other hand...There have been, in historical fact, Jews who volunteered to serve as bodyguards, blockades, and even hostages for their Palestinian neighbors in some past conflicts between Gaza and Israel. They said that human beings are human beings, however misguided, even hateful, some of them may be. That was before October 2022.

I did not write the Bible and have wondered, myself, why even before Moses' time people in the Old Testament treated rape as worse than murder. I can see why people emotionally feel that killing a baby is worse than killing a man, and I completely agree that a rapist has no reason to live, but if killing the murderer himself was enough of a deterrent to murder, why was it felt necessary to kill all the men in a rapist's tribe or town? Of course, Susan Brownmiller theorized that the perversion of sexuality that makes rape possible has to be a societal evil. That argument was credible and well argued, though not everyone is convinced that it's true. It does not sound like an argument Semitic tribesmen before Moses' time would have made. They seem to have seen rape as a peculiarly evil sin, not even so much against the victim as against the God of Life itself, that needed to be "put away from among you." Moses limited victims' families to demanding the execution of the rapist himself, Deborah celebrated that a woman was willing to stop with killing a war chief who was known to allow his army to rape other tribes' women, and David certainly had cause to encourage Absalom to stop with killing Ammon, but in the only other instance recorded in the Bible, where a gang of Benjamite youths raped a nameless and status-less woman, the other tribes joined in the slaughter of all the then able-bodied male adults in the tribe of Benjamin. Why? Because, as a crime, rape was seen as going beyond murder and needing to be punished accordingly. Murder can be, in the ancient world it probably often was, a crime of carelessness or emotionality. Rape has a blasphemous quality that some murders share, but most do not.

In October 2022 the men in the ruling party Gaza chose for itself raped Jewish women and murdered Jewish babies, and a great number of people, worldwide, said: "Let Gaza suffer whatever anyone in Israel cares to do to them," at least "...until the men who committed this crime are dead, buried under layers of dung and carrion, disowned by as many of their families as want to live." The result was Modern War. Even supporters of Israel asked, as did this web site: Really, Mr. Netanyahu, primary schools? And were told: Gazans have built their primary schools above tunnels where the evildoers are known to hide; therefore. That's Modern War. The only way to win a war against things that long ago ceased to be human is not to treat them like human beings again, even if they have taken human beings as hostages.

I believe there are alternatives, difficult and costly as they may be. Afghanistan had already been reduced to a desert before the US went in, but we could have gone as policemen and killed only known terrorists. (Actually I think, mostly, our army tried to do that.) The whole Middle East is already pretty much a desert, but Israel could have limited its violence to the Hamas goons. Maybe they tried. I am not the judge. I am a Christian reflecting on recent events from a religious and philosophical point of view.

Legitimate police work, finding and punishing violent criminals, can sometimes do a certain amount of collateral damage. In the US our big news story for this whole year has been how we had an unsustainable number of illegal immigrants who were contributing nothing good to society, from fraudulent recipients of business grants (who made a good snarky news story) to the usual drug dealers and violent fugitives from justice, and we as a nation said to all these people: Go home! And despite all the publicity given to armed federal agents arresting and deporting these immigrants, masses of them just peaceably recognized that their time was up, and left the US. And others chose to force our government to send armed men after them, and certain people who hardly deserved to be US citizens got in the way, and we had cases like that wretched woman screaming to her driver to run the car over a federal agent who, feeling threatened, shot the woman; and nobody who walks on US streets can blame him. In the same way, if Gazans support Hamas and interfere with the legitimate effort to punish the violence of October 2022, even most Arabs seem to think that missing legs and hungry babies are inevitable.

In The Cyrene Conspiracy, Amir realizes that he's going to have a very hard time staying near the woman he obviously wants to be near. He sympathizes too much with Palestinians. As an American he can't resist yelling "Leave them alone!" and otherwise interfering with Israeli military police who swagger around putting Palestinians in their place. He tries to tell himself that these Israelis--all the Israelis he meets seem hostile--are dealing with their own war zone emotional issues, but then he hears one with an American accent, determines that this particular Israeli soldier comes from Brooklyn, and tells the man off as if they were back in New York City. He realizes that the Israeli police are likely to leave an American visitor alone and then punish his local friends. He can't help it. Amir is a rich young man who grew up in the US. Self-control has not been a major subject in his education, as it has for his friends in the Middle East.

So, back in the US (readers will find out for themselves how the characters' relationships go), Amir writes a novel in which the characters conclude that Simon of Cyrene died in Jesus' place, and Jesus and Mary Magdalene became not the teachers or even the great-great-grandparents but the parents of Mani. It sells well. It seems to remind some American Christians that good relations with the children of Abraham involves good relations with the children of Ishmael too. Then a quiet, fanatical scholar he's met a few times in the course of his research breaks into his apartment and his computer, babbling about sacrificing red heifers to bring about the ultimate conflict with the Muslim world...There will be a sequel. Probably a series.

The Old Testament itself tells us that it's a mistake to take prophetic texts too literally. In Hebrew more than in other languages, most words may suggest visual images, which may or may not literally have anything to do with the fulfilment of the prophecy. Jesus is the Lion of Judah, the greatest and strongest of all the leaders foretold to come out of that tribe; he is not a wild animal with claws and a tail and a foul odor. Abraham's "children" are like the sands of the sea in number; not in size or color or consistency. A red heifer without white spots, like the virgin bride who was to conceive (people would have imagined) in the moment of losing her virginity, is rare but natural; whether God promised to do anything special when a red heifer was literally sacrificed, or when people's dedication reached a level that is rare but natural, remains to be learned. 

The Bible does not promise that Christians will never be forced into war, or forced to choose between warfare and abuse. It does teach us that we are not to choose war with any child of Abraham. For all practical purposes we might as well read "with any one." The children of Abraham include Jews who trace their physical descent to Isaac, Christians who are adoptive heirs of Isaac, Arabs who trace their physical descent to Ishmael, non-Arab Muslims who are adoptive heirs of Ishmael, and the descendants of Keturah, which seems to include most of Africa and India. Cases have been made for the claim that "Red" Russians, who rejected Christianity, were also physical descendants of Isaac through "Red" Esau/Edom and that at least some northern European and indigenous American groups were physical descendants of the scattered tribes of Israel. The Bible does say that God will bless those who bless a child of Abraham, and curse those who curse one. This is probably best interpreted as telling us that we should bless rather than curse all nations.  Egyptians were not Ishmaelites in Bible days but now, having become Muslims, they too should be blessed and not cursed.

What may come as surprising news to some American Christians is that Christianity did not originate in Rome or Ireland. Christianity came from the Middle East. The first Christians were Jews; the Christian message reached other Semitic tribes before it reached European tribes. There were and there still are Christian groups that never had much contact with Rome, that understand the teachings of Moses and Jesus differently due to not having had them filtered through the teachings of Augustine or Aquinas or, in some cases, even Paul. There are Christians who understand resurrection in terms of reincarnation, and accept some of those Lost Books of the  Bible as sacred scriptures, and imagine Jesus laughing at the idea that people thought they were crucifying him rather than weeping for the suffering of someone else who was crucified in his place, and all kinds of things that mainstream churches teach us not to  believe. There are schools of Christian thought that are close to Muslim thought on some points. 

Are these minority Christian groups right? Well...most of the major heresies and Lost Books of the Bible were pushed out of the mainstream, not by war, but by a consensus of people who had studied the Law and the Prophets and the Gospels, discussed these books and ideas, and found them incompatible with the canonical scriptures. Do they have a right to their beliefs? Of course they have.

Islam has been called, by Christian scholars and thinkers no less than C.S. Lewis, the greatest of all the Christian heresies. In the Quran and Hadith the difficult and mysterious parts of Christian doctrine are replaced with ideas easier to understand, and the complexities of ideas like "In Christ is neither male nor female" are replaced with ideas more popular at the time like "Since you [mortals] agree that some of you are of more value than others..." And also some teachings that Christians might want to forget have been preserved, even spelled out in detail: To prevent employers from delaying payment, taking risks with the money, and perhaps not paying employees at all, Muslim employers are specifically told to pay employees "while the sweat is on their faces." To prevent quibbling about a certain level of interest on debt, like the two-figure interest on credit card debt, being defined as usury, Muslims are told not to charge interest on debts at all; there can be flat fees on loans, but creditors are not allowed to make more money by making it harder for debtors to pay off debts. Every American has undoubtedly heard false friends warble that "A friend is someone who knows all about you and still loves you"; Muslims are told to defend their friends in battle and support their businesses in times of peace. We in the US have the right and duty to identify ourselves as a majority-Christian nation, enshrine Christian practices in our law, and deport anyone who wants to replace our constitutional system with sharia law. Nevertheless there are things we could benefit from learning from Muslims. 

We should not tolerate either the efforts some Muslims have made to impose sharia law over and above our own law, or the efforts some of their (weak and temporary) political allies have made to cover up those efforts. We should recognize that, if the Israelis deserve support and protection as children of Abraham, so do the Arabs, and most other nations; for the prophecy has been fulfilled that Abraham's heirs would be like the sands of the seas in numbers. Muslims who seek reconciliation with Christians should also seek reconciliation  with Jews...and I say the sooner the better. 

Not everyone has experienced the peace and good will of a Sufi prayer meeting. I have; The Cyrene Conspiracy recalled it to my mind, and I hope the book can bring something similar to all of your minds. May that peace and good will be with all of you, Gentle Readers.

Sunday, August 23, 2026

Book Review: The Merry Widow

Title: The Merry Widow

Author: Grace Nies Fletcher

Date: 1970

Publisher: William Morrow & Company

ISBN: none

Length: 245 pages

Quote: "This title was thrust upon me involuntarily by a television MC in Baltimore who was introducing me as the author of my book, What's Right with Our Young People?"

The author of In My Father's House and Preacher's Kids goes on to say that the bumptious young man first said she "looked like a schoolteacher," and then, thinking that that didn't sound "pretty" enough," rushed on to report that her extensive travels after her husband's death made her a "merry widow." Mrs. Fletcher admitted that this phrase is a bit self-contradictory, but then, she always had believed in the healing benefits of merriment. She had travelled widely with her husband, and refused to stop travelling without him.

So she wrote this book, not as a straight travel guide nor as a straight memoir, but in hopes of amusing other senior citizens. Possibly, she thought, inciting them to enjoy their retirement more, whether they were coupled, widowed, or single.

Like Mrs. Fletcher's other books, this one is entertaining, with dry little jokes: "The saddle was wooden with a thin sheepskin thrown over it, and when I leaped astride and felt for the stirrups, there weren't any."

"After we'd wandered about shrine-hunting for a few hours, we finally took a taxi and discovered that the directions should have been exactly reversed. Polly, who had lived here before, shrugged. 'He had to tell us whether he knew the way or not. Otherwise he would have lost face.'"

"Even the mosquitoes at Penang are polite...They don't boast, as the Bangkok ones do, 'I'm going to bite, I'm going to bite, I'm going to bite!' The Penang mosquitoes simply do their stuff and fly away, and live to bite another day."

Writing The Merry Widow seems to have cheered Mrs. Fletcher up. On the Fletchers' last flight together, the plane bumped, and she tells us that, knowing her husband had only a few days left, she "thought how pleasant it would be to die together." Still, inevitably, those of us who are born with an inclination toward merriment find it on the other side of grief. The mishaps of travel become funny. The lighter sides of work, books, people, float back into consciousness. Eventually laughter even stops dissolving into tears every time we realize that someone is no longer here to share the joke. At which point, if you were Grace Nies Fletcher, you would write another book.

The readers Mrs. Fletcher had in mind for this book were probably senior citizens, mostly female, who would have found the Red Hat Society too brassy. By now, however, the ideal reader for The Merry Widow might be anyone who's interested in the tourist attractions of Europe and Asia and would enjoy comparing the way these places are now with the way they were in the 1960s

This book is becoming hard to find; when the review was first posted Amazon had pages for another book, and of course a music score, with the same title, but no page for this one. Now it has a page, but no guarantee that the actual book is in stock anywhere as many buyers and sellers are pulling away from Amazon.

Sunday, August 16, 2026

Book Announcement: The Lost Books of the Bible

Title: The Lost Books of the Bible

Author/translator credited on the cover: R.H. Charles

Author/editor: Joel Fotinos

Date of original publication of most content: 1894

Date of publication of this book: August 18, 2026'

Publisher: St Martin's

Quote: "And Josias held the feast of the passover in Jerusalem..."

Fotinos doesn't add a lot of explanation to this book--or collection of books. It begins with "And Josias held the feast..." What else had come before the feast? You need to know your study Bible, the one with the Apocrypha in it. Most English translations emphasize the difference between the two Hebrew books ascribed to Ezra, and the two apocryphal books written in Greek and ascribed to Esdras, by spelling the names differently; there are 1 and 2 Ezra, and then there are 1 and 2 Esdras. Spanish and some other translations of the Bible emphasize their intended continuity. Ezra and Esdras are the same name. The books may not have been written by the same man, but the author of 1 Esdras wanted people to believe they were. The narrative in 1 Esdras picks up where 2 Ezra leaves off. Before reading The Lost Books of the Bible you need to know the actual Bible well enough to know what a lot of obscure Jewish and Christian writers, between 1500 and 2500 years ago, were adding their words to. 

It looks like fraud to us, and even ancient writers sometimes felt called to condemn anyone who changed their words, but in this period of history it was commonplace for secretaries and students to write in the names of their masters and teachers. Of course beginning writers sometimes selected as masters the books of writers who had been dead for a long time. Their goal was not to produce "original" work but to imitate their masters' work well enough that people would not know which were the master's own works and which were the student's. There is thus no real way of knowing whether the "real" Ezra suddenly switched to writing in Greek, which his Hebrew books don't sound as if he was likely to have done, or whether someone who worked for him felt moved to write the part of his autobiography he never had time to write, or whether--which seems more likely--some random Greek-speaker wrote down some fragments of history as 1 Esdras and the person's own vision as 2 Esdras. 

Historical perspective makes some aspects of these ancient books laugh-out-loud funny today. The author of the outrageous fiction called the Book of Adam and Eve claimed that God had told Adam, repeatedly, that this mortal world would end after 5500 years--500 years after Christ's time, according to the widespread belief that humankind had been created just 4000 years before Abraham's time. A little further along in the history of the early Church, we find Barnabas (was he the same Barnabas who travelled with Paul? Who knows?) explaining that as the world had been made in six days, so it would end in 6000 years. In the tale of Tobit a demon is exorcised, and a woman healed, by a bit of traditional magic involving a dead fish. In the wildly improbable Acts of Peter a talking dog plays a prominent role; we might want to read this "dog" as a priest in a sex cult, so we are specifically told that he is "a dumb animal," though he has a lot to say. 

The Book of the Twelve Patriarchs looks like what some early Christian writers defended as a "pious fiction," in which a Christian writer retells the stories of Jacob and his sons, emphasizing that each of the founders of the tribes of Israel supposedly had a Christian vision just before he died. The Book of Adam and Eve betrays a lack of familiarity with Old Testament history, but may redeem itself by a careful observation of a parent's interactions with a whiny, entitled, manipulative three-year-old, prone to tantrums, and his quiet enabler, his two-year-old sister. Adam and Eve are characterized as that kind of children. The author of this book should only have written a proper novel about an ordinary family...

Nevertheless, each of these books contains enough real religious thought that some people thought it ought to be printed in copies of the Bible. Some of the apocryphal Christian books clearly reflect the beliefs and personalities of real Christians. Barnabas, whoever he was, may have been omitted from the New Testament because he was more anti-Jewish than Paul's colleague could credibly have been. The Bible does not directly oppose abortion, although it existed; some of the apocryphal Christian writers condemn it in harsh and graphic language. The Old Testament never explains why rape seems to have been more severely punished than murder; the apocryphal writer lets Joseph, the son of Jacob who was sexually harassed by his master's wife, explain why sexual violation is not merely a violation of the victim, of the victim's family, or of social order generally, but a sin against Life itself. 

The Gospel of Thomas is particularly interesting to many baby-boomers. According to European and Indian literary tradition, Thomas was the apostle who went to India. He had known Jesus personally; he was the apostle who wanted to examine His scars. Did Jesus say all the things Thomas claims Jesus said, which neither Matthew, Mark, Luke, nor John ever mentioned? Was the author the same Thomas, or was he quoting the same Jesus? We may never know, but we can see clearly that this Thomas has been influenced by much study of both Christian and Buddhist thought. His book appeals to all of us who felt "seduced," to whatever extent, by "New Age" ideas in the 1980s. 

If you feel up to the challenge of spending time in fellowship with these long-ago writers, even though they were imperfect people, some of them bad writers, and some of them probably dishonest people, you may appreciate the work of the late, great Irish scholar R.H. Charles, who was best known for his translations of ancient literature, and his contemporary admirer Joel Fotinos.

This book is recommended only to people who know their Bibles well. To those interested in the history of the early church, however, it may be a real treasure.

Do you already have all of these books? Here is the complete list of the thirty books in this one-volume library:

1. 1 Esdras
2. 2 Esdras
3. Tobit
4. Judith
5. Wisdom of Solomon
6. Sirach
7. Baruch
8. Letter of Jeremy
9. Prayer of Manasseh
10. Additions to Daniel
11. Additions to Esther
12. Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs
13. Ascension of Isaiah
14. Apocalypse of Abraham
15. Baruch (Syriac)
16. Book of Adam and Eve
17. Gospel of Tomas
18. Gospel of Peter
19. Infancy Gospel of James
20. Infancy Gospel of Peter
21. Gospel of Nicodemus
22. Gospel of Mary
23. Acts of Paul and Thecla
24. Shepherd of Hermas
25. Didache
26. Epistle of Barnabas
27. Apocalypse of Peter
28. Odes of Solomon
29. Epistle to the Laodiceans
30. Acts of Peter

Sunday, August 9, 2026

Book Preview: Doing Something New

(I received a review copy of this book through Net Galley. It's been discouraging for me and for many writers when picture books, graphic books, and art books either didn't come through my e-mail, or came through missing the illustrations that really make these books. I'm delighted to report that Net Galley's new E-Reader showed all the pictures in this picture book, in full color and charm. As regular readers know, review copies are often sent to reviewers  by publishers before books are available in stores, so that bookstores can launch new books by displaying reviews as soon as the books arrive. Doing Something New should be available in stores on Tuesday. If you want a Christian picture book for a primary school or even kindergarten child, perhaps one who seems apprehensive about starting school this fall, go ahead and order it now; it's that good.)

Title: Doing Something New

Author: Mitali Perkins

Illustrator: Andres Landazabal

Date: August 11, 2026

Publisher: InterVarsity

ISBN: 978-1-5140-1332-8 

Quote: "Jesus, now I come to you, at the start of something new."

This is a rhymed prayer for primary school children. The words are applicable to many situations. The pictures make it clear that it's about a brother and sister, probably of north Indian descent, starting a new school year. For the sister, who seems older, it may be a different school; for the brother what's new might be going to school at all. They face unnerving situations--being chosen for a team before a game, meeting a classmate whose eyes seem unfocussed (the brother), meeting a classmate who just doesn't want to be friendly at all (the sister), worrying that people will think they're odd if they say grace before meals. They ask Jesus to help them be bold, fair, and kind.

The pictures are excellent--lifelike, with readable "feelings," showing a diverse contemporary crowd at school and a first-century Judean setting in their memories of the life of Jesus. The Beatitudes are printed in some of the pictures.

One thing that jarred, on first reading, was an odd phrasing: "Help me be a bit as bold." In the US and UK we say that someone is "not a bit as..." (whatever) as someone or something else. Flipping this phrase into a positive sentence seems odd and foreign. (Perkins' afterword mentions a family of Bengali descent who lived in many places around the world.) This could become an illustration of the kind of behavior the characters model in the book. People in countries where other languages were traditionally spoken sometimes adopt English as an international language; sometimes they speak it in novel, unanticipated ways. Sometimes someone whose first language is not English uses words in ways that are clearly "wrong," like Andrei Codrescu's "buy this bus" when he meant "pay to ride this bus," and sometimes whole communities who have adopted English use words in ways that may be new, but make sense and may even have something to teach us. "Help me be a bit as bold" is worth sitting with for a few minutes. I can understand why the publisher allowed it.

Recommended to all Christian families, this book would make a nice gift to a family or a small church school where other needs may outweigh the need for shiny new picture books.

Monday, August 3, 2026

Sunday's Book Review: When God Doesn't Make Sense

Book Title: When God Doesn't Make Sense

Author: James Dobson

Author's web page: http://www.focusonthefamily.com/

Date: 1993

Publisher: Tyndale House

ISBN: 0-84323-8227-5

Length: 250 pages

Quote: "'Why would God permit this to happen to me?' is a question all believers--and many pagans--have struggled to answer."

When God Doesn't Make Sense is probably the least popular book the founder of "Focus on the Family" ever wrote. To some extent it deserves to be. For instance, the opposite of "believers" is "unbelievers," not "Pagans," who are, technically, subscribers to a different system of belief.

In the 1980s, Dave Hunt claimed that Christians had been "seduced" by the "positive thinking" movement. Not only did positive thinkers claim that people could simply tell ourselves how to feel (and cure diseases, including AIDS and cancer) by "choosing to be happy"; they also claimed that people needed to tell God how to smooth and straighten out our lives. Even if the focus of a positive thinker's prayer was trivial, positive thinkers preached that it would inevitably be granted if the positive thinker wished hard enough, or "visualized" in enough detail.

James Dobson wrote this book as a corrective. In his long active ministry, he said, he saw many situations in which prayers seemed to be miraculously answered. The book includes a color photo in which a partial rainbow appears oddly inverted in the sky, like a smile or like a cradle supporting the small airplane for which he hoped prayers were being answered with protection. On the other side of the page is a photo of Dobson in a group of four friends, taken shortly after all four friends died in a plane crash despite Dobson's prayers for their safety.

Dobson's reasoning about how God can allow good people to die young, while people who would never be missed live on and on, is biblical. People whose questions have to do with deaths and natural disasters may find some comfort in this book.

My objection to When God Doesn't Make Sense is that it barely touches on what I believe to be its more valuable theme. Most human suffering begins when humans violate a law of nature. The Bible teaches that we have been given the gift, and the burden, of consequentiality; things we do have consequences. We don't always know the consequences of an act. Marrying someone you love, in spite of the person's genetic physical quirks, and trying to raise a family ought to have better consequences than "hooking up" with strangers, but either choice can cause children to be born with horrible diseases. Not only does reality seem to ignore our prayers; often reality makes no moal sense whatsoever.

I wish Dobson had had more to say about this idea, and less in support of the positive thinkers' "crutch" argument that, if something wasn't going well, at least some good could be brought out of bad things if people would try hard enough.

I remember sitting in a Sunday School class where ignorant people were trying to convince themselves that everything was working for the good of two absent members of the class, sisters I'll call Rachel and Leah. Rachel was a beauty queen who had done well in college, found a good job, married well, and had two adorable babies. Leah had suffered damage to the skull and the brain during the birth process, had never gone to school, had never done a job, had never walked all the way across a room, could hardly speak, and had spasms of the facial muscles that continually distorted her face. Leah's parents had built her a wheelchair-accessible house of her own, with a large and luxurious room for entertaining friends, which she often used for church gatherings. "Maybe God needed for Leah to have cerebral palsy," a young man gushed, "so there'd be room in her house and life for our church!"

I've never gone back to that church; so far as I know Leah never did either. There may be times when it's easy to believe that God is a sadist who "needs" for people to suffer, but I've not observed any good results coming from anyone's attempt to love a Cosmic Sadist...or even to bond with "friends" who assume that able-bodied people never open their homes to the church.

I could wish, further, that Dobson had been more biblical about what we can sometimes do about suffering. We are never told to sit around, like Job's comforters, trying to defend God's honor by blaming the sufferers, or like the people James chastised, passively murmuring "Depart in peace, may you be warmed and fed [somewhere else]" to the homeless and hungry. We are specifically told that the first of these bad choices is a sin and the second is an exercise in futility.

When the Bible writers address people whose friends are suffering, they are less likely to offer any abstract "spiritual" thoughts than they are to use active verbs in the imperative mode. "Bear one another's burdens." "Divide your substance with" those in need. "Be a father to the fatherless, and in place of a husband to the widows." Or, in a modern paraphrase, "Give until it hurts."

In order for human suffering to become a means of grace, Christians need to rediscover what the Bible plainly tells us to do about human suffering. Not say--do. Those tempted to utter "positive thoughts" when they ought to be offering time, money, or labor to relieve suffering should go to someone who understands the Bible better than they do (click here to contact me) and request Duct Tape Therapy.

When God Doesn't Make Sense is recommended to those who may still be tempted by positive thinking. I think it's better read and absorbed before grief has caused a person to doubt his or her faith. The truth it contains may be too harsh for the sick, the recently bereaved, or the unjustly punished to read...if this book is handed to them by anyone who has not met their physical, material needs in humble silence first. Those who have seen Jesus living in their fellow believers will at least have something on which to base their faith when inappropriate verbiage threatens to blow away the remaining shreds of it.

There is a base for faith. Our prayers do change us. Other people's prayers, if sincere, change them. People who pray and believe are guided to help one another. There are even times, and some of us may live to see one of them, when the answers to prayers can be explained only as either supernatural, requiring direct intervention by God, or extraordinary coincidences. (Nor does this mean that God is not involved when what happens seems normal and natural.) But although there is a God, and there even used to be a Bishop Nicolas of Myra in whose memory people still give presents to children, there is not and never was a Santa Claus.

Thursday, July 30, 2026

Meet the Blog Roll: Cantos y Oraciones

Did I just forget about the "Meet the Blog Roll" series? I did not! I did, however, come to a blog that I've followed for a long time, that was going through one of several transitions. 

CantosYOraciones.blogspot.com is published in Spanish. Google will translate it if you give it a chance.

So far as we know I have no Spanish ancestry. My parents used to like Southern California, though; they wished they spoke Spanish and wanted their children to learn Spanish. Allowing children to grow up bilingual was the cutting-edge trend of the moment. None of us really became bilingual, but we had friends and relatives who were. My brother, natural sister, and adoptive brother could tell someone who spoke only Spanish that my adoptive sister and I speak Spanish better than they do. Though we speak it slowly, with accents. 

I think trying to have multiple official languages is a mess and the US government shouldn't go there, but I also think all good North Americans should at least be able to read all three of our European-origin languages, and should at least try to learn one indigenous language. If you have no indigenous ancestors, learn what people who were indigenous to your part of the continent spoke. 

Is learning foreign languages in school a mere bourgeois affectation? By no means. You never know whom you may be able to help by knowing even one isolated word of someone else's language. Three languages seems to be the number people can remember how to speak fluently at one time--if they start using a fourth language, they start to forget one of the first three. You might think that French and Spanish are similar enough to English that the brain could lump them together and have room left over for Chinese or Xhosa, but no. Still, any language learning we can manage to do is good.

Languages that people don't use, they tend to lose. I try to take every opportunity to read anything in Spanish. 

Cantos y Oraciones has gone through many changes over the years. It has never been a personal blog; it seems to have been maintained by different people, each of whom posted a different collection of Christian songs, prayers, Bible passages, and devotional messages. Gaps between each blogger's term of service have sometimes gone on for months. Nevertheless, this Blogspot has consistently delivered a Christian message in Spanish for more than fifteen years.

It has qualified for Google Ads, which has been a contributing factor in my not trying to get Google Ads on this site. I think Google is too lenient in allowing ads to become intrusive. Google Ads are guaranteed not to do permanent harm to computers, but they can be annoying and leave cookies behind them. 

Nevertheless, I've appreciated this blog's modesty and focus on its Christian message for more than a decade now. 

This post has been a favorite with readers since it first appeared...


I don't think my posting a snarky song that fits the same tune helped promote the blog very much, but I was one of the first bloggers who linked to this post...

Well. The proper words that you might sing in church begin:

Bienaventurados son los de limpio corazon,
que no aman el tesoro de aqui;
de tranquilidad y paz gozan cada dia mas,
y del cielo el gozo tienen ya en si.
Oh, cantemos aleluya!
Si, de todo corazon;
por amor al Salvador, a su nombre dad loor,
y por siempre cantaremos de su amor.

The rest of the words are at the post linked above.

The snarky words are about a corrupt preacher:

"Bienaventurados son los de limpio corazon,
que no aman el tesoro de aqui."
Con ternura y con amor, dando gracias al Senor,
traen lo que tienen y me dan a mi.
Con amor y alegria
me dan todo que han de bien,
y por compartir la fe con los que conocen, me
traen lo que sus amigos han tambien!

Some once popular posts have gone missing from this blog, but some more favorite cantos that are still available include




The current posts at this blog seem to be some person's spiritual thoughts, not illuminated by Bible texts, but this is only one of Cantos y Oraciones' many phases. Taken as a whole this web site is a rich source of material for Christian reflection. 

Sunday, July 26, 2026

Book Review: Hide and Seek

Title: Hide and Seek

Author: James Dobson

Date: 1974

Publisher: Fleming H. Revell

ISBN: 0-8007-0653-6

Length: 159 pages

Quote: “Our youngsters need not hide in shame; by applying the strategies I have outlined, we can give them the courage to seek the best.”

Credit or blame for our concern with children’s self-esteem does not belong to James Dobson. Several of the ideas found in Hide and Seek are updated restatements of ideas first credited to Alfred Adler. However, not everything in the original writings, either Dobson’s or Adler’s, seems to have been understood by the people whose obsession with their children’s self-esteem seems to others to be making monsters. If you think today’s children suffer from excessive self-esteem, you might appreciate a discussion on page 59 of how it’s “possible to create a spoiled brat by telling him his every move is wonderful.”

My concern about parents reading this book is that specific advice that seemed important to Dr. Dobson, perhaps in the families he was counselling, may not be relevant to every child. Should parents worry if a child forms a habit of self-deprecation, not just telling friends “You’re good at...” or “I wish I had...like yours,” but telling them “I’m so dumb” or “I’m so fat”? Not necessarily about the child’s inadequate self-esteem, or worse, so much as excessive self-esteem. Those who are winners in the beauty/talent/money competitions, and know it, may have become complacent by competing for too long in too small a group. “I’m so bad at math” may not be a way of saying “I’m an inadequate human being”; it might also be a way of saying “You don’t have to hate me because I’m so lucky in every other way,” and the child might benefit more from spending time around someone who is even luckier than from making a learning problem part of per identity.

Does playing with TV-character toys, many of whom are supposed to be teenagers or adults, hurt children’s self-esteem because they’re not teenagers or adults? I’d have to wonder what else was going on if a child’s self-esteem was all that brittle. Children have always imitated teenagers and adults; that’s what playing is all about. Even running, throwing balls, and climbing trees could be considered instinctive rehearsal for hunting and dodging predators in the jungle. I’d be more concerned with whether a child is able to make up his or her own ways to play with toys, or thinks he or she has to have all the pre-packaged accessories to act out only the pre-packaged stories.

One piece of advice in this book that I hope won’t reappear in Bringing Up Girls appears on page 88, where Dobson even tries to answer the question asked by an adult who begins by saying that a “little girl is sometimes sugar-sweet, and other times she is unbearably irritating. How can I get her out of a bad mood?” Dobson actually suggested, in 1974, that the adult should tell the child that she has two personalities, one “sweet and loving” and one “cranky and noisy and silly,” and she needs to stifle the less lovable part of her personality. Based on my experience of being a child, I’ve meticulously avoided saying things like that to children. I can say to adults that that’s about the most counterproductive thing that can be said to a child.

First of all, vague adjectives like “sweet” and “silly,” which can mean several different things to adults, don’t mean anything to a child, except that you, the adult they can’t possibly respect, are caught up in one of your mood swings again; if you’re flattering the child with words like “sweet” you can probably be manipulated, and if you’re attacking with words like “cranky” you’re probably dangerous; you are not saying anything about what you would like the child to do. If you want to see any difference in a child’s behavior, you need to state your wishes in exceedingly clear, concrete, objective terms. Never use any form of the word “be” when discussing the child’s behavior. Use nouns and verbs, not adjectives. Yes, it will take a long time to spell out all the details of what you mean by "be good" in a way that means anything to a child. Yes, do it anyway, because that's the only way to give a child a working definition of "good." “Don't hit people” and “Hang up your coat” are rational, intelligent things to say to a child; “Don’t be mean” or “Be neat” are counterproductive things to say, no matter how obvious and reasonable they seem to you. Constantly telling a child to “be” different than he or she is can do much more damage to the child’s self-esteem, and to per respect for your advice, than merely letting the child notice that, at a particular stage of development, the child’s face isn’t considered beautiful.

Secondly, human beings aren’t supposed to “be sweet”; nobody wants a child to be diabetic. They’re supposed to communicate what they mean in ways that don’t harm others. It may be helpful to try to guide a child to help adults monitor the child’s “bad moods.” Ask whether the child feels “bad” when doing certain things. Keep a logbook, over a few months, to see whether there are consistent correlations between “bad” feelings and physical factors like what the child eats, how much sleep the child gets, how much time the child spends around other children, what the weather is like, where the child has been. Paying attention to “bad moods” can save parents and children a lot of medical expenses. Trying to enforce a permanent “grinny mood” on yourself, the adult, or on a child can do a lot of damage. A permanent "grinny mood" is a sign of brain damage; if you’ve even thought that you wanted a “grinny” child, you were not ready to become a parent, and you need help. 

Because I feel that my own childhood learning experience was confused to the point of emotional abuse by adults who seemed unable to say whatever they really meant, and insisted on throwing meaningless words at me and other children, I’d even add a third caution to parents who are likely to read page 88 of this book. When you feel that a child is in a bad mood, and aren’t sure how to explain your perception in clear objective terms, it’s possible that your child has discovered the many ways to insert an implied insult into an ordinary sentence in English by using word emphasis. The child probably learned the “vaps” (verbal attack patterns) from you. If not, there are plenty of other places person could have learned them; it doesn’t matter. What you must not do is emote about “that tone of voice.” The child’s voice is not the problem, unless of course the problem is that you are feeling a need for quiet time. If, after prolonged consideration of the possibility that your unmet need for solitude may be harming your relationship with your children, you find that bad language habits like not really listening, interrupting inappropriately, judging and labelling, vapping, or nagging still exist in your family, then the whole family can profit from studying The Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense books. These books are especially valuable because they're not about labelling and judging emotions, but about building skills.

In an older book on what an older man was learning from fatherhood, Art Linkletter described his initial annoyance with a letter from a young fan asking "What are parents for?" His annoyance subsided as he realized that too many parents and teachers have only told children what they're against. To which I would add, "...and even then they've not explained what they do want." One reason for that is, of course, that often people who seem to be finding fault with something someone else does (or is or has) are merely expressing their own emotional problems. What difference does it make to you what sort of mood you imagine someone else to be in? Do you seriously imagine that you need to try to control someone else's moods? You can reasonably say "Don't slam the door so hard things fall off shelves" or "Even if you don't feel like speaking to anyone, your dog still needs his walk" or "We don't speak to other people unless they hold eye contact and smile," but there is no need to generate emotional problems by projecting your value judgments onto the moods growth hormones are going to continue to produce until the child is about 25 years old.

When he’s dealing with parents less obviously dysfunctional than that one, Dobson gives better advice. “Avoid overprotection.” “”Discussion is to be done without finger-wagging and accusations.” “[Be] very specific rather than general.”

Studies have shown that the majority of words many parents say to their children are directives. The more these directives tell children clearly what to do (and acknowledge when it has been done), and the less they try to judge any way the child might seem to “be,” the more effective the parent’s words can be in helping the child develop an adequate, realistic level of self-esteem...a sense that only God can judge what any living person “is,” but other people appreciate things the individual can do. 

Sunday, July 12, 2026

Book Review: Love Must Be Tough

Title: Love Must Be Tough

Author: James C. Dobson

Date: 1983

Publisher: Word

ISBN: 0-8499-0348-3

Length: 212 pages

Quote: “There would be fewer bitter divorces if young husbands and wives knew how to draw therir drifting partners toward them, rather than relentlessly drive them away.”

Dr. Dobson thinks the concept of tough love is “relevant to all human relationships...business and labor, guards and prisoners, Americans and Russians.” He doesn’t want readers to think he’s promising them more than he can deliver: “Genuine insights into human behavior are not everyday occurrences...if one stumbles into two or three fundamental principles in the course of a lifetime, he has done well. The pages that follow focus on one of my allotted few.”

His insight was that it takes two people to save a relationship. If the other person refuses to do anything to save it, your best chance is to toughen up, stand on your principles, get a life of your own, and let the other person come back around to you. Or not.

In the early 1980s, Dr. Dobson was actually offering a big improvement over what some Christian counsellors were telling people, which was to forgive everything, be a doormat, keep pleading for love and being rejected, and offer your misery up to God.

Now that we’ve all agreed that walking away from a relationship before it becomes toxic is more likely to work toward everyone’s Highest Good than enabling abuse is, however, there is a need for a next step. Christians who are not in twelve-step groups have yet to discover the power of community to help tough love work.

A young couple “fall in love,” get married, believe that making babies is the only way they can really “make love,” and do it often. After ten years, the husband notices that love is not exactly what he feels for his messy house, his five needy whiny children, and his fat, depressive, lactating wife. If he were a Real Man he’d get tough,. himself, and recognize that feelings are supposed to come and go, and plan on doing the decent thing for a few years until the children reach a more enjoyable stage of development and the wife recovers her health. Real Men, however, were always a minority; in his generation they’re an endangered species. So he makes excuses to move out—“on business”—and, since he has a good income and has moved into a low-rent neighborhood, very soon he’s sharing a house with a divorced woman. Then he’s sharing a bed. Then they have a baby. Then he’s genuinely torn for a while, because his wife is beautiful (apart from the temporary weight problem) and has Background, whereas the divorcee is frequently mistaken for a fat boy and is known among her people as White Trash, but in the end, the house with one infant seems more pleasant than the house with five. So he files for divorce.

Now, more than twenty-five years after Love Must Be Tough was first published, at least all the qualified and unqualified counsellors are telling the divorced mother the same thing. Give him tough love! Raise the babies alone! Show him that you’re a thoroughbred! Living well is the best revenge! Get a better job than he’s got, lose the surplus weight, put all five kids through college without him! Go, girl!

It all sounds good, and plays well on TV, but reality is that she's not qualified for a job that's going to put anybody through college. There are those who say, “What she needs to do is beg for handouts.” First of all, there’s a long line of people waiting for every handout our government can still afford to offer, and we all know our government is offering more than it can afford. Then, if she has any assets, such as her looks and Background, instead of feeling moved to help her, social workers probably feel inclined to gloat; they don't want to help her back up to the lifestyle to which she is accustomed, they want to push her further down into the mire. Maybe they can "help" her move into a housing project where she has to share a bathroom with a drug dealer.

Christians need to learn from the apostles’ example. The apostolic church was not content to sit around telling people how they were supposed to feel. The apostolic church understood “love” as an active verb. Although some apostolic church communities actually practiced voluntary communism, or communalism, for a while, no apostolic church community was foolish enough to offer handouts to people who were able to work. Even the “widows...taken into the number” of respectable ladies over age seventy still seem to have been expected to give something back to the community. Instead of doling out handouts and pauperizing people who wanted to be useful, the apostolic church put these people’s talents and energy to work. St. Paul ordered them to “Let him that stole steal no more, but let him labor...that he may have to give to him that needeth,” and, “If any will not work, neither let him eat.”

It would be pleasant if Dr. Dobson had written another book advising Christians how to help fat, depressive, heartbroken rejects practice Tough Love and be fascinatingly independent. That mother of five needs help on both practical and emotional levels if she is going to practice Tough Love. Women, particularly, need to rally around a woman who is in financial straits. This may be hard to do, especially when the lady in distress is still prettier than they’ll ever be, but if they don’t do it their husbands will. They need to keep this woman busy; they need to make sure her income is steady and her loyalty is to them rather than to their husbands.

Well...that’s the book I think Dobson needed to write. What about the book he did write? It’s still worth reading today. If you’ve already heard a lot about Tough Love, as it might be in a therapy or recovery group, you might feel that you no longer need to read all the examples of tough love Dobson shares. If the concept is relatively new to you, even today, then you might still need to read the whole book, with specific examples of how Tough Love can help people whose spouses have left them or cheated on them, families plagued by domestic violence, families of addicts, parents and teenagers, and so on.

Actually, although the first few chapters try to be inclusive, the first two-thirds of the book deal mostly with adultery...probably reflecting Dobson’s counselling experience; the book never discusses examples of Tough Love between “Americans and Russians.” Dobson had discussed Tough Love for parents and children rather thoroughly in Dare to Discipline and Preparing for Adolescence. The final third of this book discusses other family situations that call for Tough Love. Dobson was among the first Christian counsellors to advise wives to leave abusive husbands--not to remarry, just to go somewhere else for their own safety and that of the children.

Those interested in being counsellors probably need to read the whole book. Counsellees may skim over the sections that don’t apply to them.