Title: Tales
of Tucson
Author: Anthony Randall
Date: 2021
Publisher: Koala T Publishing
Length: So far it’s an e-book; my copy prints to 125
pages in Word
Quote: “Fifteen hundred dollars was a cheap price
to pay for a vindictive little poke at your enemy and besides it wasn’t Saul’s
money he was paying with—it was never Saul’s money that he squandered.”
Well drat, blast, and bother...This is, as advertised, a laugh-out-loud comic novel
that sold well in the UK and might do well in the US.
But it contains adult content. Definitely R-rated content, if not X. The characters can hardly open their mouths without uttering a formerly unprintable word and nothing is hidden from the young about what Bright Young Things such as we were used to get up to in the 1980s.
Actually
the incidence of “parties” featuring sex, drugs, and rock-and-roll sounds
exaggerated and the consequences of such revels underplayed, but then again the
main characters are rockers trying to launch a hopeless-sounding band, so who
knows. The incidence of “jobs” where about all we did was hang out and
socialize is not exaggerated. The economy was booming, we had little but
youthful charm to offer anyway, and a lot of freshman-class baby-boomers really
were paid to hang around workplaces looking cute.
Aunts are not always averse to that kind of
thing. Most aunts did some of it at some point. Many aunts are happily married
to the men with whom we did it; this is how sisterless men become uncles and
some of our nieces and nephews acquire cousins.
But aunts are not supposed to recommend books with
explicit sex, and this book has a good half-dozen explicit scenes in which
procreative acts take place in the absence of committed monogamous
relationships. And, additional trigger warnings: lots of drinking, lots of
drugs, no hangovers or addictions.
Sort of a male equivalent to Eat Pray Love, this is the story of a nice, quiet, clean-living young Englishman whose girlfriend, obviously an extrovert, decided he was too quiet and clean. So, having a married sister in Tucson, he headed for warmer, drier fields and a life his ex would envy. Throughout the book he muddles through the life of a rock star, bemused but not too bewildered to make a decent show in a crisis. He even appreciates the scenery.
(At one point he admits doing something "like Arthur." I thought "Dent, who else?" but have been reminded...just before my movie-watching-and-snogging years began, there was also a movie called Arthur. Randall recommends the movie.)
In the eighties some of us could use the office as the place to do personal chores, errands, reading, knitting, shopping, phone-calling, letter-writing, long lunches and/or snack-grazing, and also work on novels or songs or software packages or other creative outlets, and generally prepare for evenings out (or evenings at home with the family), and still get and keep a job . Anyone could spare a few hours of office time to crank out enough actual work to satisfy, even impress, a normal 1980s employer. Well, in the US, anyway. In the UK the job situation was reported to be very different so it’s hard to blame Brits like Tom, the protagonist of Tales of Tucson, for rubbing it in and exaggerating his memories of “work” in the US for his ex’s benefit. Most employers did expect most employees to stay sober and keep our clothes, at least the button-down shirts and unnecessarily warming hosiery, in place during business hours. Padded-shoulder jackets and stiff 1980s shoes could, however, be left on and under the swivel chair most of the time, even in most of “conservatively dressed” Washington. I could believe that, further south, property maintenance staff might have gone to work in shorts.
Another running, perhaps overrunning, exaggerated
joke is inland Americans’ abject fascination with any foreigner (“Golly, I’ve
never seen anyone like you before”). The use of rude words does vary from place
to place (in Tales of Tucson the
Brits use the F-word to refer to everything but what it literally means, which usually
gets half a page of detailed description) and an unexpected vulgarity can raise
a laugh but, in real life, the audible “tone” of exotic swearing does convey
that it’s meant to express hostility. If US listeners can be deceived by a UK
intonation, so perhaps can UK visitors be deceived by US hosts’ willingness to
smooth over offenses and soothe bad tempers—not without judging the
bad-tempered person, of course. On the East Coast most of us may have
understood “bollix” to mean “make a mess” rather than, y’know, that, but the familiar word for that was close enough that we could
guess what the British meant.
Are American women really undone by any male voice with a British accent? Not the ones I’ve
observed. Personally I think some men have more appealing voices and accents
than others and the “’Ave a good night?”—“Corr, mate” accents of Tom and his
roommate aren’t on my Top Ten list, but it’s more about what they say, and what
they do while saying it...what’s a misplaced H when people love each other? We
do notice an unusual accent, usually ask where it came from. Some of us may be so distracted by the
resulting conversation that we forget to add the price of a tank of gas to the
price of a snack, though probably not the ones who keep jobs in convenience
stores very long. But I’ve not personally seen any woman, even in a small town,
act so overwhelmed by an appealing voice while
sober as the drinkers and druggies in Tales
of Tucson seem to be. That has got to be the substance abuse.
Of course, as Andrea Dworkin so pungently put it,
we don’t necessarily want to be
overwhelmed. Of course in the 1980s, and apparently still today, men managed to
miss the point: if we took off anything beyond overcoats or shoes on the first
date, it was because we’d planned to, which meant that whatever erotic acts
took place were all about our hormones
and indicated no special attraction and probably no respect for the man
involved. There were women who fantasized about going to a party and amusing
themselves, in senses beyond conversation or dancing, with half a dozen different
guys and leaving with a different one than they came in with; such fantasies
were mostly fuelled by vindictive thoughts but everyone had heard of someone who claimed she’d
actually done it. (I had one very “liberated” housemate of whom I could have
believed it, but that was not among the things she said she’d done.) But that,
like the male “playboy” routines, always had that “It’s all about me and my hormones and my pleasures” vibe. Tom and friends don’t seem to notice when
they’re being used with a certain degree of contempt. If those guys had actually
called the gals they said they were going to call, it would likely have been, “Have we met? Oh right, I remember you, James
wasn’t it, or Todd? Oh right, of course, you were Tom and the good-looking one
was Seamus. Oh well, whatever. But listen, Tom, Friday night was nothing, y’know what I did with a couple
dudes I met Saturday night?”
Nice quiet people who fall in love easily should stay sober on dates.
A happily-ever-after relationship that begins with premarital baby-making is
the sort of male fantasy in which I can suspend disbelief only in science
fiction, where one can postulate sex robots. Tom might learn something from the
way his longest-running relationship in Tucson involves Holly, who more or less
forces him to begin as “just friends,” but the lesson seems to be lost in the
hormones.
As a story, Tales
of Tucson may disappoint readers who expect it to form a conventional novel
with a plot. Randall gives it some suspense: will Tom’s primary employer get
into major trouble, as foreshadowed in the opening scene quoted above? Will that trouble have anything to do with his employment
of improperly documented foreigners, e.g. Tom and Seamus? Will he continue to
employ Tom and Seamus? If not, will Tom be forced to have some sort of sex with
a fat old woman who, his bandmates think, lusts after his body? If he does,
will this motivate her to give the band their big financial break (and, if so,
are they good enough to benefit from it?), or to have Tom deported? None of
these questions is answered by the end of the book. This is a book with a lot
more pot than plot, and the witticisms (and marijuana joints) keep rolling up
to the final “To Be Continued.” Expect to want the next volume at the end.
It’s possible, though, that you enjoyed the 1980s
(soberly) enough to appreciate a slightly rose-tinted nostalgia trip to the
fine long summer days of your twenties, or thirties or forties. The
frustrations that now seem funny; the difficulty of keeping a band together
long enough to attract a fan base to a distinctive sound, of continuing to
offer your reggae-inspired songs after your authentic Jamaican influence quits
the group, of fulfilling a contract to perform for a group when your Christian
influence refuses to endorse the group’s activities and, after praying about
it, decides he can’t endorse your activities either, of playing any kind of
rock when your drummer gets into or out of college...and that sneaking
suspicion that, at its very best, your band may not be all that great and the person who called you “the next Beatles” has
lost per credibility by saying that. The jobs people offer the young, and the
fact that you did them. The hormone surges, and the inevitable discovery that,
whatever you did, they would eventually satisfy themselves, and the discovery
that hormones also make a landscape
look more lovely, and make food taste better, and make it easy and satisfactory
to jam with any half-competent musician anywhere. The way Tom and Seamus are
always eating the best dish of something or other they’ve ever had and enjoying
something more than they’ve ever enjoyed it before, because when we’re young
and eupeptic all the good experiences in life do just keep getting better and better. If that’s what you’d like
to be reminded of, while laughing at the way memories tend to exaggerate
themselves, then Tales of Tucson is for
you.
There’s a salutary hint of self-parody in the exaggerations,
too. Tom and Seamus tell themselves all the women they flop into bed with,
except “Call me Sunshine,” are pretty and nice. Are they really? Did we tell
ourselves everyone we were dating was desirable? Were they really? What about
those employers whose expectations were so low that they were planning to
continue to employ us, while being pleasantly surprised if we painted over the
rude words we painted on the walls? How well did we really do the painting job?
What sort of influence would it have been on the music industry if our bands
had stayed together and been “the
next Beatles”? In the 1980s it was obligatory to describe our job experience
with a certain amount of “marketing” spin—but how much spin did our experience
need? It can be useful to meditate on the effects both the hormones of youth and the nostalgia of age have had on our
memories.
As for the smut: When I read it I was a little old
lady in quarantine for Delta COVID, 100% lustproof, and instead of being
tempted to the Deadly Sin I just laughed out loud. This was not the way real
Eighties dates went, at least on the East Coast. This was the way older people told us real dates had gone in the Sixties. We were exploring all the
alternatives to the pleasures that could transmit HIV. But I could imagine
someone who was single then, who is married now, who wants to share memories of
The Way We Weren’t, having a lot of
fun with this book.