Tuesday, March 28, 2023

Another Store to Avoid

Obviously this didn't happen today. I don't think I need to say when it happened, or where. The purpose of this post is not to embarrass a person for a situation that is probably temporary. It is to remind business owners to prevent shoppers having this kind of experience. The experience is becoming too common these days, and you need to take positive action to prevent it.

Well, for a start, I was feeling peckish and cranky. Grocery store owners need to be aware of this, and of what I can tell them about when to expect it.

It was some time this spring, while the tummybug was circulating in my part of the world. I wasn't sure what was going on. We'd been warned to expect a norovirus--the Norwalk Flu or "24-hour" tummybug. My quirky immune system does not build up resistance to those things. When they are circulating they usually just hit me like a train flying off a track. I spend a few hours just running from bathroom to bed, or maybe lying down on the bathroom floor waiting to recover the strength to get back to bed. But this time my symptoms felt milder, but they lasted much longer. I thought the whole experience might have started with a bacterial infection, since I'd bought Jif peanut butter. The company has really tried to keep Jif peanut butter gluten-, GMO-, and glyphosate-free and, I suspect as a result, has been sabotaged and had to recall batches of food products contaminated with different things. Salmonella normally infects humans or birds, not peanuts, but it's among the things that have turned up in sabotaged peanut butter. My quirky immune system usually deals with salmonella fast, but this time the gas and cramps and greenish froth didn't stop. At least once during the week I was around someone who had norovirus. I'd prepared for this by not eating for enough hours that there was nothing for the virus to purge upward, but I did feel a bit dizzy and sick at times, and the greenish froth continued to gush downward. The blog went off schedule due to time lost just lying back and feeling bad. What was going on? Why was my body not flushing out these tiresome tummybugs and getting back to work?

Finally I felt strong enough to take a walk around the neighborhood. I saw that, although the Professional Bad Neighbor has reportedly spent most of this year at home with "Long COVID," he'd made the effort to spray more poison around a Mountain Spring. The specific target was the Old English boxwood some long-gone neighbor had left behind. In some places this shrub is said to become invasive. Here it took much time and effort for the old lady to get a few shrubs growing, and for all my life they've been something for the rest of us to remember Miss Ethel by. Just because everyone else enjoyed their fragrance the Professional Bad Neighbor set out to kill the boxwood, and he may succeed. The glyphosate would undoubtedly be what aggravated the infection I had. 

Anyway a tiresome errand had to be done, putting an end to a prolonged bit of tiresome business I hope, and I trudged into town. I was low on groceries and thought I'd pick up a few little things in town before the next car pool to Kingsport or Norton. 

Theoretically the best bargains on groceries in my town are at Food Lion. That's if you don't think about how many cases of salmonella poisoning have been traced to Food Lion. That was the last thing I wanted to deal with. Food Lion was out of the question.

That currently leaves three other, smaller stores. One was off my route by a couple of city blocks; two were right along the way. I stopped at the first one of those two. 

Well, it's only a convenience store, not a real, small, independent grocery store like the Broadwater's, the Thriftway, or the Q.S.Q. stores used to be. I miss having a serious independent grocery store. In all three of the convenience stores most of the shelf space is devoted to "junkfood," with whole aisles for just candy bars, just potato chips, just soda pop, and just "energy drinks," and only one aisle for the whole selection of non-refrigerated foods normally eaten by adults. If they wanted to enjoy a small steady income these stores could stock a better selection of glyphosate-free canned vegetables like beans, peas, corn, and tomatoes, Zatarain's and Ben's rice mixes and plain Success Rice, Jif peanut butter, canned fish (but not salmon, which was my favorite fish before it became a horrible science experiment), canned chicken and turkey, cornmeal, basic kitchen supplies, and I could buy most of my groceries in my own town. They don't. They sell junkfood and then the staff go home and judge the adults who go in and buy junkfood, when that's what the stores have. How often I've gone in and looked for a can of beans or a pack of turkey baloney, and never even mind the onion, to go with my Fritos--but all they had in the store was the Fritos. Since Fritos have been 99% glyphosate-free lately and the potato chips have not, many's the time the store had sold out of Fritos and had nothing left but the potato chips, which is a pretty reliable sign that the people who prefer potato chips have tried them and been sick.

I went in to see what the store had. This is normally at least a nice way to rest my mind after doing tiresome errands and watching dangerous traffic. Come in off the street, out of the heat or the cold or the rain, and walk around quietly considering what to buy, and what else would go with it, and whether the price is reasonable or unreasonable or a good enough deal to make me consider buying something I usually don't buy. 

This was a good day to have hit this particular convenience store. Spring weather was back, redbuds and ornamental Prunus and beautiful dandelions and forsythia and one early azalea were all in bloom, I was shaking off the infection, it felt good. The store even had baloney. I don't normally consider paying as much for 4 ounces of beef baloney as I normally pay for 16 ounces of chicken baloney, but I did consider that the cats would be eating most or all of the baloney, anyway, since I'd be cooking it with beans and Fritos and the rest of the sack of onions I had at home.

And a horrible noise, like a low-range mosquito whining, rose above the pop music somebody was listening to. Some horrorcow was trying to chatter at me. "Are you finding everything you need?"  

For a minute, due no doubt to "spring fever," I actually forgot that this kind of noise never comes out of people one would ever want to speak to for any reason. I actually said, "Yeah," and continued shopping, ignoring tbe yap. 

This is a bad strategy. Pleasantly ignoring this kind of aggressive, bullying extrovert never works. One can't just make a polite noise, keep moving, and let them fade away. It would be pleasant if one could, but a word or a look encourages them, and they go into a sort of feeding frenzy, demanding more and more and more attention. Every time the mouth opens, more overt hostility will plop out. They really want to feel that they've set up some sort of battle and "won." They really need to feel that they have been, in an emotional sense, knocked down, trampled, and spread out on the bottom of a birdcage. The only way to keep them from making themselves unpleasant is to train them to expect that IF SOMEONE LOOKS AT THEM, THEY WILL BE PUNISHED. 

If a store employee keeps yapping at me long enough that I look at the face, the store owner is going to hear about it. And I want to know that I will never be seeing that face in that store again. Food Lion's spineless manager once promised me that a certain obnoxious employee would not be kept in a position where she has any contact with customers, but the last time I was there I found that person right at the front of the store with her bad attitude sticking out for the whole world to see. If an employee is bad enough that I look at the face, you need to print that face on a letter you send to the police, notifying them that the person is banned from your property.

Well, I didn't buy the baloney. I didn't like the price, and when the price tag on refrigerated foods is exorbitant you never know how long they've been sitting in the store's refrigerator, either. This was not the store where I picked up the allegedly "lunch-ready" turkey that had the big clumps of green mold showing through the back of the package, but that kind of thing can happen in any convenience store. Especially when people reach into the refrigerator, pick something up, and then put it back while moving away from an unpleasant YAP.

"But they're just trying to be friendly." Oh no they're not! Friendly people learn, normally around age two, to wait for someone to hold eye contact before they open their mouths. Up to about age six someone who starts chattering without eye contact being made may be just a spoiled little chatter-monkey, but that gets beaten out of children in schoolyards. When an adult's mouth starts making noises in the absence of eye contact, the person is looking for trouble. 

I've heard that whine about "Be friendly--start a conversation to make a sale," too, and seeing how people react to it was a good, firm, unequivocal reality check. How many times I've sat in a market, looked at someone until person stopped looking at merchandise and looked at me, and ruined a potential sale with a "Hey, hi, good to see you" line of...obnoxiousness. That is what it is. I honestly didn't intend to insult or belittle or intimidate anybody, or even push the person to buy more than person wanted to buy, but I was breaking the rule that THE CUSTOMER SPEAKS FIRST IF THE CUSTOMER WANTS TO SPEAK, so my prospective customers were quite right to stop shopping and move away from my booth when I chattered at them. Some store employees who speak before they're spoken to may actually suffer from extroversion. Others have only been told that they'd earn more money if they acted as if they had that condition, and have fully developed brains, but when nice people think they need to act like nasty people, who knows what they're going to do next. 

We need a good clear unequivocal rule. All store employees need to be told, when they're hired: "THE CUSTOMER SPEAKS FIRST IF THE CUSTOMER WANTS TO SPEAK." If they have normal healthy brains, all will go well after that. If they yap, after that, they need to become unemployed. They probably have no consciences and will fake disabilities and get on welfare, after which the example of Canada suggests that...hey, listen, maybe you know someone who can persuade them to go to Canada right now? 

This is not about any of the multitude of prejudices and preconceptions people have that may cause them to feel that they "like" or "dislike" other people on sight. It's about the fact that responsible adults remind ourselves, should we feel any tendencies to "like" or "dislike" people we don't know well, to avoid letting ourselves act on these emotional prejudices, which obviously have no rational basis and come from our memories of completely different people whom the new acquaintances resemble in some way. When we're mature enough to have grown-up jobs, we do our jobs without taking time to "like" or "dislike" customers. If I'd made the mistake of hiring a cashier who indulged in "feelings" about customers, I'd make person double-check the day's accounts "Just to remind you that your job's to make sure the numbers are correct, NOT to be looking at or thinking about or forming crazy emotional reactions to people!"

"But people are bound to react to the way other people treat them..." Yes, and when cashiers or stockers are allowed to indulge the fantasy that they're the featured attraction people come into a store to see, they're bound to feel disappointed most of the time! Nice people prefer not to receive a lot of attention, so they appreciate the nice, courteous customers who leave them to their work. It's the aggressive ones you need to keep away from the public. If they're married to someone to whom you owe a lot of money, you want to let them come in and clean the building at night, when there's no chance of their annoying people right out of buying merchandise.

Make them count, count, count until those emotional feelings go away. No matter how young they may be, numbers will entrain the left brain and put a damper on the misplaced emotions. Then the employees may be receptive to the truth: A grocery store, a convenience store, even a fabric store, is not a social opportunity for them to pretend they are celebrities that customers come to admire. It's a place where they are part of a mechanism of exchange that allows customers to feel satisfied about paying for merchandise. We like shopping in the real world, we prefer to hand our money to humans rather than unreliable machines, but at that point all social connection stops. Some store employees, not the ones of whom I complain, used to be my little school friends and some are my relatives, but we understand that when they're doing their jobs a raise of an eyebrow is as much as needs to be done to acknowledge the social connection. They are supposed to check the stock in the back, if necessary, and add up the purchases, when indicated, and make deliveries, if that is their job, and thank us for paying, exactly the same way they do people they don't know. No favoritism. No prejudice. Polite impersonal service for all.

After putting back the baloney, I moved to a different section of the store, further from the yap. That worked long enough for me to decide to buy the beans and the chips. Instead of the baloney, I could have bought some matches, the time to buy which is drawing near, or some other little snack, with the three dollars left in my pocket. I moved back toward the front of the store. 

Nobody was keeping what the Yap has for a brain occupied with anything other than that primal instinct to pick a fight, so the Yap started yapping again. I ignored the noise and put the beans and the chips on the counter. Noise continued to come out of the Yap but I resolutely watched the monitor, saw the prices add up accurately, pushed some bills through the slot and repacked my groceries.

"Did you find everything you needed?" came out of the Yap. ("Needed," as distinct from "wanted" or "were looking for," is a sneaky verbal attack.) I didn't find everything I wanted. I didn't even buy everything I would otherwise have bought, because the process of choosing between the conveniences of baloney, matches, or another snack was interrupted by the noise. Whichever of those things I buy, and whatever else I buy on the big shopping excursion, I will buy somewhere other than the store with that Yap in it. 

Every yapper always needs to be reminded: WHEN YOU'VE NOT BEEN "RECOGNIZED" WITH EYE CONTACT, ANY NOISES COMING OUT OF YOU ARE JUST NOISE. NOBODY IS LISTENING TO YOU. NOBODY LIKES YOU. NOBODY IS "SEEING YOU AS A HUMAN BEING." YOU ARE NOT ACTING LIKE A HUMAN BEING. YOU ARE ACTING LIKE A BADLY TRAINED DOG. 

Employers shouldn't have to deal with this kind of issues, but some employees really need to be taught: If you want to be seen as a human being who deserves any kind of respect, begin by respecting yourself enough to recognize what the back of someone's head is telling you. The angle of the back of the head does tell you what is more interesting than you are. Maybe it's the merchandise on the top shelf, the merchandise on the bottom shelf, maybe in a week like that week was it's the bathroom door. Wait your turn for the customer's attention. When people come into a convenience store to spend their pocket change on "convenient" food or kitchen stuff, the nature of the convenience store business is that they're going to be motivated by frugality not to buy much. It's in your interest to shut up and let their interaction with the merchandise motivate them to buy as much as they can possibly justify to themselves.

And purchases are not being made when customers just want to get out of the store and away from your stupid empty head and the obnoxious noises coming out of it. 

I'm not the young impulse-spending nest-builder Madison Avenue most wants to win over, but I am old enough, stable enough, set in my ways enough, that any storekeeper who makes a small effort to please me can count on me for a small steady income. All you have to do is stock things I buy, put a reasonable price on them--I'm willing to pay a little more at a convenience store than at Wal-Mart, but not twice as much--and instruct your employees that, unless I speak to them,. ALL they EVER need to say is "Thank you" when they take my money. That's it. That's all. I don't want to hear any gossip. I don't want to pretend your employees are my friends. I actually like stores that hire foreigners who don't try to speak English. All they need to know are the numbers and "Thank you." You can teach them the difference between "Sir" and "Ma'am" if you want to get fancy, but "Thank you" is quite enough--just make sure they don't try adding anything to it but "Sir" or "Ma'am." 

And you never want to let them interrupt the pleasant, restful, ruminative shopping mood. 

I didn't let myself get angry enough to look at the Yap, although the Yap was really pushing for it. I don't know what the repulsive thing looks like. It sounded female. I'd guess it was White, young enough to be my daughter, and it had probably spent some time on the uglier side of a city in the Upper Midwest, but I really try to ignore these things.

But the next time I want to pick up a few groceries in my own town, I'll be sure not to stop at the store where the shopping experience was ruined by that Yap. If I ever do feel a need to go into that store again, the next time I'll be braced for "battle" too, knowing that at that store I will not be allowed to enjoy spending a few dollars on a few groceries. For about forty years I've gone into that store with a reasonable expectation of enjoying shopping for a small convenient purchase. No more.

Storekeepers need to train all employees: IF THE CUSTOMER WANTS TO CHAT, THE CUSTOMER SPEAKS FIRST. No exceptions. No excuses. 

Monday, March 27, 2023

Book Review: The Happiness of a Dog with a Ball in Its Mouth

Title: The Happiness of a Dog with a Ball in Its Mouth 

Author: Bruce Handy

Illustrator: Hyewon Yum

Date: 2021

Publisher; Enchanted Lion

ISBN: 978-1-59270-351-7

Length: pages aren't numbered; I count 52 very decorative pages, some of which fold out, so some might count more

Quote: "The patience of a dog at the door. The happiness of a dog with a ball in its mouth."

This is a feel-good book. Each page or two-page illustrates, in color, one of the universal pleasures of life, with different combinations of people and animals. The author/illustrator team even consider "The distance of a journey. The happiness of getting there" from the viewpoint of ants raiding a sugar canister. 

Although the pictures are the point, and the text consists of captions for the pictures, adults can enjoy reading this book aloud to children until they memorize it. The pictures are clever, cute, and tasteful. Children who are still fascinated with their body processes can learn something from the illustrations of "holding in" and "letting go"...with no need to mention further details. Children who want more "story" could, as I remember doing around age five, make up their own series of stories or poems to go with the pictures...there's a word for that genre of stories and poems, "ekphrastic," and some children are quite good at it.

A really commercial web site would demand more words for a blog post. This web site generally takes the position that a book review should be shorter than the book itself.

Butterfly of the Week: Ceylon Rose

This week's butterfly is an endangered species: Pachliopta (or Atrophaneura) jophon (sometimes yophon), the Ceylon (or Malabar or Srilankan) Rose. "Malabar Rose," though often shown as an alternate nickname for P. jophon, is a better nickname for a similar-looking species found in India. "Bong Butterfly" is a nickname found online; due to heavy commercial interest in smoking pipes I wasn't able to learn whether this originated as a traditional Asian name, or a reference to a design or trademark, but it's been adopted as a screen name.


Photograph from the Swallowtail & Birdwing Butterfly Trust.

Once again, the rose swallowtail group were classified as Papilio, swallowtails, first, then given the separate genus name Atrophaneura, and then more recently given a more specific genus name, Pachliopta. More was written about Atrophaneura jophon; more recent documents were written about Pachliopta jophon. The genus names Menelaides and Tros have also been used, but not widely accepted. Google now recognizes all the genus names as synonyms and pulls up hits for all of them in one search.

The species name has consistently been jophon, sometimes spelled yophon. It comes from the early naturalists' tradition of naming plants and animals after characters in ancient literature, and naming species with "funereal" black coloration after characters associated with funerals. Jophon or Iophon was noted as the name of a Greek who died young. (If you're a hopeless word-nerd and search for definitions of words and names online, you'll find that, much later, the increase in childhood cancer generated a medical Journal Of Pediatric Hematological Oncological Nursing. The name is clunky but the acronym does seem to fit.)


Photo donated to Wikimonde by Nayana Wijetilaka. This photo also appears on the Sri Lanka government page discussing their effort to protect the butterflies' habitat from illegal logging.

Much has been written about this butterfly because it's endangered. It lives in the rain forests of the island country now called Sri Lanka. Web pages are devoted to it around the world, in every widely used language. It seems to be surviving only in what is believed to be "virgin," or at least very old growth, forest. Both Gray and Rothschild noted that it was rarely seen and able to fly high enough to escape naturalists' nets in the nineteenth century. Too many humans want to clear this land, and the butterflies may go extinct if they do. Web sites that discuss Pachliopta jophon often cite the IUCN Red List of endangered swallowtails. This helpful book is available in real and online bookstores and can be downloaded as a PDF file.

How much does this matter? people ask. When bills have to be paid and they have a claim to a special, expensive kind of wood, how badly will a few butterflies be missed? Are they even a really unique species? They used to be regarded as a sub-species of P. hector, but the butterflies look very different and it's not positively known that the caterpillars are identical (as some illustrators suggest). P. pandiyana looks very similar. There has been some question whether pandiyana and jophon are separate species or only sub-species, but since the 1980s many scientists have recognized them as distinct species. Anyway, some scientists argued, pandiyana is at some risk too.

As in many swallowtail species, individuals vary in size and color. The wingspan is normally about four inches. Females are generally a little larger than males, and males usually show more dark color. Like the other Atrophaneura, these big butterflies rely on warning coloration rather than camouflage. Black-white-and-red coloring, produced by mildly toxic phytochemicals in their food plants, warn predators that eating one of these butterflies will cause digestive distress. 

Even for sub-species, extinction is forever, and we never know how important a living thing's survival might be. Some people believe that, in giving humans "dominion" over the other animal species, God gave us responsibility for them; that it would be a sin to lose any of the kinds of creatures God created.

The Ceylon Rose seems to be numerous when, and where, it exists at all. It's still a wild animal, not known ever to have been reared in captivity. It seems to exist only in tropical rain forests where the weather is always warm and damp. Humans who get near its habitat tend to think in terms of clearing, or at least thinning, or cutting back, some of the big trees that maintain the green gloom. The wood is worth money and the air makes humans want to let a little sunshine in. The butterflies seem to need that continual green gloom. As the Red List describes it, the seasons the rest of the world call spring and autumn are a little wetter than the spring and summer months, but the southern part of Ceylon gets about 45 inches of rain a year and has no dry season. 

It is believed, though not officially "known," that jophon's life cycle is very similar to those of hector and the other Atrophaneura swallowtails'. Eggs like little round yellow beads are laid, probably by ones, probably on the undersides of young Aristolochia vine leaves. Mother butterflies use sight and smell to give each egg plenty of room for a very hungry caterpillar to eat lots of leaves without damaging the vine. Caterpillars are a dark "purplish" brown in which the red, black, and white pigments they absorb from the vine are not as vividly distinct as they will be in the adult butterfly. Caterpillars have a sweetish, fruity odor, especially in the thickened segments of the "humpback" where the bit of flesh called the osmeterium is normally concealed. Without making a real cocoon, the caterpillar forms a drab unattractive pupal shell that looks a bit like a withered leaf, then emerges as a big showy butterfly. So many swallowtail butterflies around the world, including our own Pipevine Swallowtails, have life stories that fit the same outline. Probably there are some differences between the life cycle of jophon and the life cycles of the other Pachliopta species, but there's no official record of what those differences may be.

"Collection" is believed to be a factor in this species' decline, although loss o forest habitat and "pesticide" vapor drift are bigger threats. Into the late twentieth century many of us grew up thinking that the way to learn about butterflies was to fill display cases with dead bodies. People who actually study butterflies will find dead bodies. The animals don't live long. After flying for a few weeks, one day they just drop out of the air. People used to glue the wings into pictures, or try to preserve the whole bodies, as souvenirs of hours spent observing nature. Scientists who seriously studied butterflies, rearing eggs to find out what caterpillars would eat, how long the growth phases lasted, etc., would have a lot of adult specimens and, if they had found the species to be even a potential nuisance in farms or gardens, they would be obliged to kill them. Even that, as a source of museum specimens, did not harm the species. But in the "developing" countries, as technological change produced adverse social changes like dislocation, unemployment, and poverty, people started killing butterflies just to sell their bodies to "collectors" in the developed countries where the Atrophaneura looked very exotic. Some species populations survived this depredation. Jophon, already endangered...

As late as the 1990s, this site documented, Europeans were giving dead jophon males a market value around US$100 for males, $200 for females. We should never pay for dead butterflies or parts of them. As with bird feathers, flower petals, and many other things, we may acquire beautiful specimens as a sort of gift from nature for watching how these creatures live and grow, but we should not encourage any commercial trade in inedible animal carcasses. Technological development now allows us to collect butterflies with cameras. Artists can get more lifelike effects from digital "models" than from fast-moving living butterflies or fast-fading dead ones, as this page proves. It is now illegal to "collect," buy, or sell endangered species without proof that they were reared indoors in the country where they are being traded or collected. Really old museum pieces, like the one shown here, may have been legitimately taken, but at best they're faded and difficult to maintain--why bother? 

At the bottom of that "collectors' secret" page someone criticizes governments' efforts to protect the threatened Atrophaneuras. The criticism of bureaucrats' efficiency and ability to enforce laws is valid, generally, worldwide. While I think some ex-colonial positions sound bitter or extreme (as with displays of ill feeling about the Queen's funeral), I think it's reasonable that poorer countries want to preserve scientific studies of their wildlife for their own scientists--or at least collect substantial payments from any foreigners they allow to participate in such studies. They have a publishing niche and a right to cling to it.

So, New Zealand, for example, now allows specimens of Pachliopta jophon or pandiyana to be imported only with "export permits from the country of origin," which aren't cheap. However well or badly the governments may use any money collected this way, at least the New Zealand government page offers a nice pithy comparison of these closely related butterflies at http://citesnz.pbworks.com/f/ID-Butterflies-PDF.pdf .

A British "Butterfly Farm" site has developed a printable coloring book that includes a Pachliopta jophon silhouette. https://www.butterflyfarm.co.uk/attraction/media/950e2c4f3834dcbb9e8c93369409ed60/ColouringBook.pdf . Parents and teachers can download and print the whole mini-book for only the expense of printing. 

Sunday, March 26, 2023

To the Confused Christian Pronouncing Judgment

Reclaimed from Blogjob...

To the confused Christian pronouncing judgment…in the supermarket yet…these Christian cliches, in the hope that s/he may think about them for the first time:

His sin’s not difficult to find;
it’s marred his body and his mind
but God alone can now foresee
nor will God show to you or me
what you, cocksure, presume to tell:
whether he’s bound for Heaven or Hell.
The measure with which you now mete
Christ said, at Heaven’s bar you’ll meet.
If your eye’s never lingered on
another’s mate, nor ever gone
aloft on your own fancy’s flight
while your mate murmured in the night,
then it may be you have some claim
to cry aloud another’s shame;
but I myself would hardly dare
to judge his sins: I say, beware;
the eyelash that you think you see
lodged in his eye may prove to be
but one small splinter from the limb
that renders all your vision dim;
if your heart was set on true love
you’d spare no time for thinking of
the sins in someone else’s past;
what right have you a stone to cast?

 

Book Review: Cries from the Heart

Title: Cries from the Heart 

Author: Johann Christoph Arnold

Date: 1999

Publisher: Plough

ISBN:  978-0-87486-227-0

Length: 219 e-pages

Quote: "Prayer gives us the opportunity to discern God’s will by coming into direct contact with him. It enables us to ask God for whatever we need, including judgment, mercy, and the grace to change our lives."

No doubt every pastor could write a book of the prayer stories people share with pastors. This is Johann Christoph Arnold's collection. People don't always get the results they want when they pray, but they feel that they get some benefit from praying. 

This is an evangelical book, given free for the asking to people who are interested in the faith that unites members of Bruderhof communes. The original Bruderhof consisted of people who pooled their living expenses in the economic mess of Germany between the wars. For a long time they could be described, as they were by Andrei Codrescu in Road Scholar, as a small group of German immigrants who survived by making and selling furniture. The group has expanded into several countries, and the different communes do other things to provide members with steady work for a decent living. Their Christian beliefs are in the general category of German Anabaptist; people must make individual commitments, even after being brought up by members, to become church members; the group oppose all war and require everyone to pardon everything even in the absence of real confession, repentance, forgiveness, and reconciliation; some communes' work involves caring for those who can't work, but people who are able to work are expected to do their jobs faithfully. 

This evangelical outreach, however, is not church-specific. One of the questions Christians debate is what happens to good people who never became Christians while living, in the Final Judgment. Some picture separate judgments and heavens for people of different beliefs. Catholics have traditionally placed all non-Catholics except a few pre-Christian saints from the Bible in the Inferno. Some Protestants have suggested that the unsaved are not resurrected. Unitarian Universalists, the church associated with Berea College, have pictured different ways everyone might go to Heaven, including the vision C.S. Lewis (who was not a Universalist) shared in The Great Divorce, where the unsaved muddle on in their unhappiness unless and until they forsake their sinful ways and can be admitted to Paradise. Others imagine even Christian-friendly people from other traditions being shut out of the pearly gates of Heaven: "'Almost' cannot avail! 'Almost' is but to fail! Sad, sad that bitter wail, 'Almost,' but lost!" 

"Even for our friends, even for Gandhi," my mother said, "the Bible says that Jesus is the Way of salvation. Those who go to Heaven will have to have confessed faith in Him."

"But the Bible also says that everyone will confess, on that day," I said, "and Jesus told us to expect surprises. Some will be saying, 'But, Lord, when did I...?' and will be told that what they did for other people, they did for Jesus without realizing it. Some will be saying, 'But, Lord, I did so much for You,' and will be told, 'I never knew you.'" 

I expect to meet in Heaven some people who never considered becoming Christians because they were so thoroughly dedicating to serving God, as they understood God, in some other tradition. I expect they will be about as surprised to find that Jesus is the Lord of Heaven as Christians will be to find out how mistaken we were about Him, and everyone will have a good laugh at the silly things we imagined when we had to do our thinking with mortal brains. I have thought a good deal about Christianity in my lifetime. What I've thought I have generally not tried to publish because, at best, it's only the thoughts of a mortal brain that is not capable of really understanding what it is thinking about.

We don't know that four-dimensional space exists or that spiritual things take place in it, but for my generation there was some benefit in thinking of the spiritual dimension of life as like a fourth dimension of space in one way. We can imagine that there might be some way we might be able to move that was not up or down, not forward or backward, not right or left, nor yet some sort of compromise among those, but along a different plane altogether. We can get that far, and then we stop; we cannot imagine what that other plane might look or feel like. So it is with spiritual things. We have to take it on faith that they exist; we are not able to understand how. 

The Bruderhof imagine, as do I, that some people's understanding of God may be such that God calls them to serve as something else rather than as Christians. There may be exceptions. There may be religious cults so vile, like the old Semitic cults that practiced child sacrifice, that nobody can be saved within them. But most of the other religions, including the "other" versions of Christianity, are not vile, so when people identify with those religions God wants them to be good whatever-else-they-are. As good whatever-else-they-are people even be able to accept the grace of God through the sacrifice of Jesus in some unorthodox way. Saladin reportedly did; Gandhi didn't, quite, but he came close; thousands of people are Messianic Jews. So let them work out what "Jesus as spiritual Messiah" or "the Prophet Issa" or some other phrase from their tradition means to them, and let God take matters from there. 

Accordingly, though Arnold's closest circle of friends belong to a Protestant group that practice a fairly strict discipline, his book shares prayer stories from Catholics, Jews, Muslims, and perhaps followers of other traditions too. 

 Along with being a Christian book about the Christian life that does not urge readers to reject other faith traditions and become Christians, Cries from the Heart has another pleasant surprise in store for readers. It is not a depressing study of all the forms of unhappiness. It recognizes that the emotional "heart" cries for joy beyond happiness as well as for relief from misery. People can pray for understanding, for virtue, for marriage and family love, too. This book does, of course, contain long sad chapters about prayers for healing. It even contains some nauseous natter about how people have tried to believe that God wanted or needed that someone be disabled. 

Hello? The Power that created the universe...needs for Jane Doe to be unable to walk? What heresy and blasphemy is this? 

Yes, Jesus did say that one man was born blind so that he could be healed. Right. You. You can see us now, can't you? And then Paul, who was not born blind, tradition tells us, but whose eyes gradually grew weaker and weaker, prayed three times for healing from his "thorn in the flesh," but wasn't healed, and finally received a message that Christ's "strength is made perfect in weakness." God can bring some special benefit out of the regrettable situations that exist in this world. God does not need the regrettable situations, though. God could bring about benefits without them. Conditions in this material world have material causes. Occasionally God may alter the effects of those material causes. Mostly God doesn't; especially when things have material remedies God expects us to provide for ourselves. God did not need any damage to anyone's vision, but Paul, who was among the strongest, boldest, and proudest heirs of a tradition that had barred people with disabilities from their priesthood, just might have needed to rely first on secretaries and eventually on guides. 

But while some of us need a little "weakness" as a check on our natural vanity, most of us have our "weaknesses" merely because material conditions caused them. In the absence of the message that Paul needed to lose his eyesight, we could only say that people in the Middle East tended to lose their eyesight with age because of the bright sun, dry wind, and blowing sand to which they were exposed. It was nobody's fault. It was what it was. 

Anyway, Cries from the Heart does discuss babies whose hearts never started to beat in a healthy rhythm and elders who weren't fit to do anything but pray for the world, but it also discusses prayers for stronger faith, for closer connections with loved ones and with God, for unity in the church, for a healthy marriage, for all sorts of things that recognize the spiritual needs of people who basically enjoy good lives. Overall this is a memorably cheerful collection of prayer stories.

This book is recommended to anyone who is interested in a wide-ranging, honest study of why people pray and what happens when they do.

Friday, March 24, 2023

Sulfoxaflor Needs Banning, Too

Fellow Americans, over the weekend you need to meander over to https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0889-0659 and tell them you want them to do their job and protect endangered bees, butterflies, and undoubtedly also humans from yet another "new" chemical poison spray. 

Sulfoxaflor is already banned in Europe, which some people seem to think might constitute a reason to ban it here. I don't agree with that. I do agree that we need to stop spraying anything but water outdoors, and force companies like Dow to work on mechanical, not chemical, solutions to farmers' pest problems. 

Why does this web site have a "Butterfly of the Week" feature? Because never before in human history have humans had so much information about butterflies...or recklessly endangered some of them to the verge of extinction. I wanted to write the butterfly book my brother and I wanted to read, as children, now that most of the information that book needs is available. I'm afraid it may become a requiem when it ought to be a big fat supplement to a field guide
.
My comment is long because it's an edited version of one some e-friends have circulated. You may recognize some of their words. You're free to copy and paste the comment below onto the page, but you can do better if you take a few minutes to think about it.

"

The EPA should cancel the registration for sulfoxaflor, a pesticide that poses too great a risk to bees, other pollinators, and endangered species.

American farmers need to be moving beyond "pesticides" of all sorts. As a start all pesticide sprays should be banned by now, with a focus on limiting the use of paints and dusts to prevent "vicious pesticide cycles" from boosting pest populations.

We don't need to follow Europe's recommendations, but in this case we have abundant scientific evidence that sulfoxaflor will aggravate losses to species that are already threatened or endangered. The American bumblebee population has plummeted by nearly 90% and has disappeared from 8 states. The rusty patched bumblebee has also experienced severe declines and was listed as endangered in 2017. The population of the already endangered eastern monarch butterfly dropped by 22% from 2022 to 2023, with the population east of the Rocky Mountains now down by around 90% since the mid-1990s.

Experts agree that insect declines are in large part due to exposure to pesticides, specifically insecticides and fungicides.

EPA’s own Endangered Species Biological Evaluation “finds that sulfoxaflor is likely to adversely affect certain listed species and designated critical habitats.”

We also have known for a long time that using poisons to fight nuisance plants or animals is a losing game. Nuisance species usually have shorter generations than their predators, so at best the next generation of the nuisance species will be even more numerous than the one humans tried to control. This is how species like corn earworms and codling moths became major pests despite being prey species that would not normally become serious nuisances. EPA's default decision should be to push industry toward mechanical rather than chemical control of all pest species, ban all new poisons, and move rapidly to phase out the old ones (what happened to that promise to get glyphosate off the market by 2022?). 

The science is clear. Sulfoxaflor must be banned, not given a pass for expanded use.

Too many of EPA’s decisions have been driven by corporate collusion. The agency needs to do its job to protect the environment, not chemical industry profits.

"

Bad Poetry: Darkness and Light


"I love light!" exclaims
one of Catherine Marshall's characters.
"I hate the darkness."
Sometimes people seem to guess
how their stories are going to end.

But I was born on the cusp of sun signs
and for years I lived in Maryland
so I have been accused, not without reason,
of habitually sitting on every available fence.

The electronics set up on the screen porch
exude a chilly moonlike glow
that obviates all need for an overhead light.
I work at night.
Sometimes I nod or nap.
I can watch the road from here
more efficiently than from my bedroom
though I spend parts of some nights there too.
The trespasser I have been watching for
can't be sure whether I'm here or there,
asleep or awake.
It all looks the same from the road.

I enjoy this
until I realize:
he's not just sitting in his truck 
hoping I've gone to sleep if the computer has.
It's someone else's property being damaged now.

There is a larger application 
of a principle, of which this is an illustration,
for those who really want one.

Book Review: The Green Ginger Jar

Title: The Green Ginger Jar

Author: Clara Ingram Judson

Date: 1949

Publisher: Houghton Mifflin

ISBN: none

Length: 211 pages

Illustrations: drawings by Paul Brown

Quote: “‘What have I done?’ she asked herself in a panic. ‘I don’t know whether that jar is valuable or not.’”

In the 1940s and 1950s, Clara Ingram Judson wrote a whole series of novels aimed at elementary school readers and based on the history of various ethnic groups in the United States. The Green Ginger Jar was her story about Chicago’s Chinatown—already an historical work since, although it was published in 1949, it’s set in 1935, at which time the children are required to go to school only until they’re fourteen, and they dodge streetcars on the way to Shirley Temple movies, and Lu’s big secret from the other boys is his part-time job (or even jobs) and his secret dream of saving money and going to college.

Aimei (or Amy) Chen, wanting to make an impression, “vex Old Grandmother, and get rid of one of the too-numerous things that had to be dusted every day” “in one clever stroke,” offers an old jar to a casual visitor. If her new acquaintance, Joanne, had been a Chinese middle school girl, she would have known not to ask whether Aimei was allowed to give her the jar, but to enjoy the jar for a few weeks and then re-gift it back to Aimei, and no harm would have been done. She knows neither of these things...and Old Grandmother punishes Aimei with a vague hint that, although Aimei and her brother Lu research the value of antique jars and assure Grandmother that the green jar is not one of the valuable types, there might be something special about it after all. This sends the children on a search through Chinatown, where they learn lots of historical information, eat Chinese meals a little more exotic than what readers have probably eaten on the shopping mall, persuade the elders that Lu and his buddies deserve a clubhouse and it won’t do any harm for Aimei to try curling her hair, and, of course, after plenty of adventures, find the jar.

In the first chapter, Lu and Aimei have rescued a stray dog who was hit by a car. How the dog rescues Lu and Aimei, in return, from two different scrapes “in one clever stroke,” may be a little too convenient a plot twist to give the book a happy ending, but the thinking at this historical period was that, if a novel meant for children moralized a bit about kindness to animals, it couldn’t do any harm.

Did actual children enjoy these books? I’m not sure why they wouldn’t, but the physical evidence in my hands shows that this book sat on the shelves in my home town library from 1958 to 2008 and was not checked out after 1970. Why didn’t I read it, as a little bookworm? I remember seeing it on the shelf several times and, each time, choosing to read some other book first. I read it for the first time after buying it at a used book sale. I think now that I might have enjoyed it at age ten.

Recommended to middle school readers in search of something to read on the bus, and to adults who don’t mind absorbing a few quick facts about Chicago and Chinatown. Only a few—the author’s period-appropriate intention was not to write a textbook, but (theoretically) to whet the child reader’s appetite for the few carefully selected, simply explained facts that might be in their school textbooks. As she reassures readers in the foreword, there are only a few Chinese words in the story, and they’ll be easy to say when the child has to read aloud to the class, because they’re spelled just the way they sound. Today’s child readers, who may be taking courses in Conversational Chinese, should get a good laugh by sharing these words with the class.


Morgan Griffith on a Parents' Bill of Rights

From U.S. Representative Morgan Griffith, R-VA-9:

"

Parents’ Bill of Rights

Over the past few years, there has an alarming trend of parents being forcibly shut out of their children’s education by certain school districts. 

I’ve recognized the urgency of correcting this issue.

Parents are the people primarily responsible for directing their children’s education and they have rights.

That’s why I voted in favor of H.R. 5, the Parents Bill of Rights Act, which passed the House of Representatives in a 213-208 vote. The legislation makes clear the rights of parents!

It also makes clear to schools their duty to parents and the limits to their authority when parents are making decisions for their children.

This legislation is critical for our families.

There has been a rise in divisive ideology, like critical race theory, and sexually explicit information being taught in our schools, many times without the approval of parents.

While it may take a village to give a child a well-rounded raising, it does not give the village a right to inculcate children with a world view in opposition to parental wishes.

One democratic lawmaker recently said that if parents haven’t completed their own high school education, they are unqualified to make education decisions for their children.

What an alarming, inappropriate, and classist sentiment. Parents have every right to decide if controversial information is to be taught to their children and at what age. Parents and/or legal guardians make medical decisions for their children every day without formal medical training, obviously they can make decisions on their children’s education.

Speaking of medical decisions, some schools have even gone so far as to shut parents out of decisions relating to their children’s health care and safety, ones that have life-long consequences. This is unacceptable.

Further, following the outbreak of COVID-19, school administrators made the decision to close many of our country’s schools, moving them online. These school closures dragged on and parents objected. It was to the detriment of our children.

According to the Institute of Education Sciences, roughly half of America’s students began the 2022 school year behind in at least one subject, 13% higher than the national average in a typical year prior to COVID-19.

There has also been a sharp rise in depression and anxiety in children from extended lockdowns and forced remote learning. In 2021 and 2022, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, and the Children’s Hospital Association, declared a “national state of emergency” in response to this troubling trend.

Many parents have understandably become upset by the way certain school systems have handled these issues, voicing their concerns at school board meetings.

Even this has been met with resistance.

In October 2021, the National School Boards Association called on President Joe Biden to use federal agencies to stop “threats and acts of violence” on school officials during school board meetings. Accordingly, Biden’s Attorney General Merrick Garland instructed to the FBI to investigate. Following, the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division created a “threat tag,” equating concerned parents to domestic terrorists. Outrageous!

Congress needed to act.

H.R. 5 recognizes and restores parents’ rights through five pillars: the right to know what’s being taught in schools and to see reading material; the right to be heard; the right to see school budget and spending; the right to protect their child’s privacy; and the right to be updated on any violent activity at school.

During the consideration of H.R. 5, I voted for an amendment for a Sense of Congress that the U.S. Department of Education eventually should be eliminated.

I believe taxpayer money is mostly wasted on bureaucrats in the Department of Education. In FY 2021 alone, they spent over $2.4 Billion on “salaries and expenses.” This money should be redirected to local schools.

In eliminating the Department, we can put in place protections to ensure existing education funding is dispersed appropriately around the country, through the states, while also maintaining protections for students.

Among these protections is ensuring that Title I funding remains, which provides critical funding for economically disadvantaged students, and for programs like free lunch and reduced lunch at schools.

Additionally, we must maintain protections for our physically and mentally impaired children under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.

These changes, and this bill, will create better options for students and parents.

If you have questions, concerns, or comments, feel free to contact my office. You can call my Abingdon office at 276-525-1405 or my Christiansburg office at 540-381-5671. To reach my office via email, please visit my website at www.morgangriffith.house.gov. On my website is the latest material from my office, including information on votes recently taken on the floor of the House of Representatives.

"