Title: Yardbird Myers
Author: Martin L. Myers
Date: 1944
Publisher: Dorrance
ISBN: none
Length: 230 pages
Quote: “I have
learned...that a real Marine knows there is nothing on this earth as great as
being a ‘Leatherneck.’”
In 1944, this comic
novel about boot camp was part of the War Effort. Myers set out to communicate
to young people that, although the purpose of boot camp is to turn fun-loving
kids into tough soldiers by exposing them to as much of all kinds of stress as
can be arranged, the ones who complete Basic Training can be proud. He did this
with a reminiscence about the Basic Training experience of “Yardbird Myers, the
Fouled-Up Marine,” who among other things spends a whole afternoon re-cleaning
his rifle before it occurs to him to remove a dab of grease from the head of a
screw.
Part of the comic
effect comes from an early twentieth century tradition in which writers worked
hard to communicate that a character was using words that most publishers just
refused to print. Many early twentieth century speakers of English actually did use phrases like “son of a feminine
canine” to express a milder degree of anger, or anger defused with humor. Then again, part of the ongoing stress tolerance test in boot camp was having to listen to
a lot of fighting words from people the recruits weren’t allowed to fight.
In 1944 vaccination was
a less exact science than it is today. The risk-benefit analysis of some
vaccines that is still going on was still being applied to the whole idea of
vaccination. Some vaccines in use in 1944 are no longer in use because they
proved to do more harm than good. Children often weren’t vaccinated--for health reasons. Another
part of the stress of boot camp was that, whether a recruit had had any
vaccinations in childhood or none, he got all of them as a “boot.” “After each
‘shot,’ our [drill sergeant] gave us a nice work-out on the drill field for
an hour or two...On minute you were standing at attention just as ‘chipper’ as
could be and the next minute you would feel yourself swaying gently back and
forth and then the first thing you knew your face hit the ‘deck’” in a reaction
to this deliberate challenge of the immune system. Apart from the basic immune
reaction to each vaccination, most soldiers thought they were “good as new”
after the course. In historical fact, some of those vaccines did permanent
damage to some bodies.
Then of course there’s
the basic academic, mechanical, and physical training...As a child I remember
looking at my uncle’s boot camp “yearbook.” Dad hadn’t taken to Army life or
saved a photo album of his time in boot camp, but his younger brother was a
career recruiting sergeant. I saw pictures of Big Kids running, climbing, doing
stunts on structures of bars much more interesting than the little “monkey
bars” occasionally offered to children, and I remember thinking, “That looks
like fun! I want to do that, too, when I grow up.” The yearbook didn’t show the
frantic, preparation-for-mortal-combat pace at which the exercises were done,
or the supervisors watching the recruits with loaded weapons. It was a few
years before adults explained to me that, although in boot camp those Big Kids
learned to do all the stunts Little Kids like me were seldom even allowed to
try, the learning process was meant to be anything but fun.
That’s the point Myers
makes, repeatedly, for the middle school or high school boy readers to whom
this book was primarily addressed. “Drill,” a sort of sex-free alternative to
line dancing in which kids do synchronized body movements to march music, was
something Little Kids did for fun (and some still do). Marine boot camp drill
exercises were different, “an important part of the training for...when you get
into the thick of” trench warfare. “[S]ome guy...failed to execute the movement
and plunged headlong into the man in front of him... ‘Somebody is gonna get
killed doing ‘to the rear march’ before you guys get wise...I’m gonna have you
fix bayonets...if you don’t wake up then, you’ll get your blasted heads cut
off.’ The D.I. never carried out that threat...but...he sure had us plenty
scared.”
Some things Myers
describes were criticized, and changed, over the years. Because “Suzie Rotten,”
the prototypical disease-ridden hooker on a mission to infect enemy soldiers,
was a real threat, Myers says that the Real Marine “is respectful to good
women, but hates the fast and loose type with a vengeance.” I’ve read other
things about how Marines, especially, were trained to identify just about any
woman outside the immediate family of anyone present as Suzie Rotten, and how
deliberate training to detest Suzie and all her ways led to confusion when
young men realized that not only their wives and daughters but even their
mothers had probably thought about sex. One thing that made
changes necessary was the spread of AIDS in the 1980s; Suzie Rotten, our
military learned fast, could be male.
It seems necessary here
to mention something an editor got wrong with a book review I wrote for
Associated Content long ago. Reviewing a work of feminist humor that men
weren’t meant to like (Mary Daly’s Wickedary)
I’d mentioned that even in the 1960s homosexual men had been attracted to
military men. My Significant Other, a macho military type, said that was when
he was taught to turn homosexual admirers away, laughing, with the line
(uttered woefully) “I’m a lesbian trapped
in a man’s body!” A recognizably, not tediously, homosexual male e-friend
commented on that review, “I’d like to meet him.” I wasn’t sure what the
e-friend intended to say—that he liked being rejected? that he was persistent?
that he wanted to see whether a sixty-year-old man, however macho, still had
any use for that joke?—until I reread the article. The AC editor had changed a
joke into the cliché, “I’m a woman trapped in a man’s body,” which of course
was not what the U.S. Army found
useful to deflect homosexual admirers. Obviously the homosexual reader just
wanted to know how it might have been possible to make that line work as
described! I don’t believe any man I’ve ever dated has ever claimed to be a
woman trapped in a man’s body. Before Lyme Disease, however, my Significant
Other was competent at wearing “low
top” boots and at several other Things Lesbians Do.
Anyway—that line about
women is all Myers has to say about
sex. Really? A lot of males in their
twenties and late teens...don’t even talk about sex? If readers doubt that
that’s literally true, we can at least understand how it might be useful.
During any period of abstinence, the less you talk or think about what you’re
abstaining from, generally, the better.
Myers does, however,
talk about gender roles. In 1944 some people were still infatuated with the old
French Socialist notion that women might be conditioned to prefer being “angels
in the home” to having any civil rights or money of their own, although women
were already dismissing this notion as something that happens when people
ingest too much cheese and wine. Men were being told that cooking and cleaning
were beneath them. Spoiled sons of “career homemaker” mothers ran smack up
against military reality: soldiers do their own cleaning. “First, you fill your
bucket about three-fourths full of water. Then you dump your clothes in and let
them soak...pull out a piece of clothing, lay it flat on the cement rack, rub
the bar of soap over it a few times and then manhandle it with the brush.” One
of the boots says, “Some of the guys say that when they get out of here they’re
going to get a gallon of whiskey...the first thing I’m going to do is to hunt
me up a good laundry woman,” but they
all become independent, self-cleaning, Real Men in the end.
And in the end...here
we have a pleasant little book about a part of contemporary reality that was,
in reality, unpleasant. Every nation needs a well trained, well equipped army,
and although a sound biblical case
can be made that it’s immoral (and stupid) to send anyone into combat without
confirming that he’s willing to die for his country, a sound case can also be
made that all young people’s education should include some level of military
training. (Even if they don’t get into the actual military service, yes. The
U.S. Army doesn’t have to cater to food intolerances or work around odd
religious rules in order to defend the country. Let’s hope it never does. That
does not, however, mean that young people who have food intolerances or live
according to odd religious rules can’t benefit from some level of basic
training.)
The perennial question
arises: But when we-as-a-nation train and equip armed forces, doesn’t that
create pressure to justify the expense of those armed forces by fighting wars?
The answer: Switzerland
has had an army and avoided using its army to fight wars for hundreds of
years.We in these United States,too, have at least an ideal of “Don’t start a
fight, but don’t lose one.” But in 1944 nobody
wanted to pursue the question of how the United States might, in this one way,
be more like Switzerland.
No comments:
Post a Comment