Friday, August 31, 2018

Obamacare: Tim Kaine Gloats

From this web site, a prod with a sharp stick to certain squishy members of Congress whose mandate was to destroy Obamacare and, if possible, punish the insurance companies for allowing anyone even to suggest that Americans could be forced to buy into gambling rackets.

From U.S. Senator Tim Kaine, this bit of gloating:

"
I'm thrilled that we recently passed legislation in the Senate that supports health care priorities that are critical to Virginia. From funding cancer research, to protecting the Affordable Care Act, to helping states administer substance abuse treatment, to combatting Alzheimer's, the bill includes key wins that will help make Virginians healthier.

Specifically, the legislation fully funds the Gabriella Miller Kid's First Pediatric Research Program to work towards a cure for childhood diseases. In 2014, Congress passed bipartisan legislation I championed to create this program, named for 10-year-old Gabriella Miller of Loudoun County who passed away from cancer in October of 2013. We've now allocated $63 million for this important research that will help save lives. I'm grateful that my colleagues joined together again this year to honor Gabriella and her inspiring work as an advocate for pediatric disease research through passage of this legislation.

I'm also relieved that we were able to stop language from being included that could have further damaged the Affordable Care Act. Instead, the bill helps protect Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. These vital programs have been a lifeline for so many Virginians, and I'll keep doing everything I can to preserve them.

You can read more about the bill here >>
Health care is a right, and I remain committed to improving the health care system for all Virginians.
Sincerely,
"

Those who claim to have been representing me deserved this. And worse.

The Cats Have Seen Me (Almost) Naked, and Why

It's a meme! First, you might want to visit the sites from whence the questions came...

https://brianlageose.blog/2018/08/25/friday-night-clam-bake-20-philosophical-musings-about-nudity-and-unregulated-morality/

https://barbtaub.com/2018/08/28/who-has-seen-you-naked-humor-aboutme/

Selected questions and answers...I can't guarantee that mine will be as funny as Brian Lageose's and Barb Taub's.

1. I eat the licorice jellybeans. I eat the root beer jellybeans. I miss the jalapeno jellybeans. I would not miss the buttered-popcorn jellybeans. (I don't buy popcorn because, although I like it, I avoid the aisle that reeks of fake butter.)

2. Ohh. This was GBP's question. "Bio of an Active Vegetable"? "The Vegetable Activist"? "VegMin: A Vegetable Turned Minister"?

Thirty years ago I had no idea what my totem animal might be, and today I still don't know if I have a totem vegetable.

3. If I'm trying to solve the mystery, I backtrack and see whether any clues given early are turning out to be more relevant than I thought.

4. No way. I happened to decode English phonics and gain the ability to read ordinary-sized type before my fourth birthday. This made me a child prodigy at whom people were always thrusting things that I could read aloud, with occasional mispronunciations, just as glibly as if the words made any sense to me. I "read" the Bible, Shakespeare, and JAMA aloud correctly while the books I was actually reading were Little Golden Books and similar. But I do remember dissatisfaction with not being able to get the second grade teacher to share Girl Scouts at Camp with the class--she read other people's library books aloud, so why not mine?

5. I've been compared to Don Quixote. There's some truth in that, although I've not convinced myself that reality is merely a mystifying disguise cast over my illusions. I'm not going to win all the battles, or even all the ones I choose to join. I am going to support the cause I believe to be right, win or lose.

6. I didn't care about clothes enough to steal them, but when I was in junior high school there was a fad (a revival of an older fad) for wearing your parents' clothes at school. (Girls borrowed from both parents, boys from fathers only.) I wore one of Mother's dresses fairly often, and wore two or three of Dad's shirts before he complained.

7. Well...in a general way...it's in storage at my home.

8. Talk about a loaded moral question...especially when it's so unlikely that anybody would hurt my Significant Other in prison. You'd go, my dear. (To be fair, if this scenario were set up I'd go for you too.)

9. I salvaged lots of unshredded scrap paper, with former employers' knowledge and consent; have some manuscripts that at least two employers encouraged me to print out on the backs of their misprints.

10. Any competent woman can wait for the man to make the right decision (in the pop song context, anyway).

11. "Happy Birthday to You."

12. Exactly. Do you know how often you've been seen naked as an adult? My guess is that, for many of us, the unseen observers outnumber the ones who got naked with us. Even if our homes are clothing-optional.

But I promised to explain why all Cat Sanctuary animals--not only cats--are on the list: Animals do not add enough clothing to change their looks completely, and they don't instinctively realize that humans do. People who've formed the habit of looking closely at other humans' faces often laugh about the "dumb" animals who may not recognize the person who feeds them every day when person is dressed up to go into town--but from the animals' point of view there's nothing dumb about that.

Once I went out to feed someone's hens, who knew me and came when I called, only this time I was wearing a dress rather than jeans--and the hens scattered. Even after hearing my voice, they nonverbally told me that they had reasons to distrust someone else whom they'd seen wearing a dress. (I knew who it was.) So, happening to have work clothes in the car, I took off the dress and put on jeans and T-shirt, explaining that humans changed their clothes. No more trouble. They saw for themselves that the outline formed by clothing was not the best way to identify humans.

I remembered reading as a child that horses who were tended by stable workers who wore drab trousers were often frightened by skirts or bright colors. I remembered, too, that Joy Adamson had reared a leopard who seemed unsure whether Adamson was a friend or a predator when she saw Adamson in different clothes.

So, Cat Sanctuary animals see me strip down to underwear and change outer layers, so that they'll recognize me whether I'm wearing jeans, skirts, shorts, or an overcoat. Dogs, cats, and horses do recognize us by scent as well as sight and sound, but it's just as well for them to get accustomed to the different ways we may choose to look.

13. (E) Row back to the beach to which I came, if possible. (No incentive to stare at the nudists for a health care professional. I've seen all types of bodies in all types of condition.)

14. If I got to have a high school graduation, I'd get to relive my past and make different choices, so yes, I'd definitely go back that far.

15. How is that scenario set up? Person wants to be anonymous now, but reserves the right to out perself and demand the money back if I spend it? Or, person wants me to refrain from trying to find out who person is?

16. I'd rather be with loved ones who will at least interrupt, if not agree to turn off, the movies.

17. Broke. 

18. I'm a hack writer; therefore I'm going for both.

19. I've written lots of things I've never shared.

20. I don't spend a lot of time regretting anything.

21. Yes: God.

Screaming in Paris by [Lageose, Brian]

For Those Who Don't Want WiFi Homes, Thanks...

Posted so that it can be tweeted, here from the Stop Smart Meters group is a tipsheet you can use if you DO NOT want wi-fi frequencies bombarding your home. We don't yet know that constant wi-fi access is safe for humans and domestic animals--and we do know that it can be used for evil purposes, when and as evildoers figure out how to use it. Let your people in Washington know that you want wi-fi for McDonalds, but not for your home...

"
Contact Congress Now Regarding HR2 - Prioritize Wired over Wireless Communication in Rural America - Call the Leaders of the Joint Conference Committee Today.
H.R.2 is a Farm Bill that has passed both the Senate and the House. Next Wednesday, September 5th it will be reviewed by a Joint Conference Committee of both the House and the Senate to work out differences before forwarding it to the President.

We are asking for reliable and safer wired DSL and fiber optics connection to the home, not undependable and unhealthy wireless in rural communities.

WE WANT THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS TAKEN OUT OF THE FARM BILL:

House Joint Conference Committee
Wed, Sep 05, 2018
9:30 AM – SR-325
As listed on the agenda: Meeting of conferees on H.R.2, to provide for the reform and continuation of agricultural and other programs of the Department of Agriculture through fiscal year 2023.
Most Importantly, Please Call and/or Email the Following Chairmen and Ranking Members.

Ask that internet connections remain wired through fiber optics, landlines or ethernet to the home which is a much safer, faster and more cybersecure than wireless communication.

Agriculture Committee Chairmen & Ranking Members:
Chairman
Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kansas - 202-224-4774
Rep. K. Michael Conaway, R-Texas - 202-225-3605

Ranking Members
Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Michigan - 202-224-4822

Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minnesota - 202-225-2165
(We have listed the staff emails for the 4 ranking members of the Agricultural Committee - access by clicking on their names)
You can also contact the rest of the committee attendees.
There are 56 attendees in total, listed below.
Their telephone numbers and staff emails are listed in the
Password: 1620771415
Click HERE for instructions on how to use the Directory

Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kansas - See contact info above
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky - 202-224-2541
Senator John Boozman, R-Arkansas - (202) 224-4843
Senator John Hoeven, R-North Dakota - (202) 224-2551 Chief of Staff: Ryan Bernstein email: Ryan_Bernstein@Hoeven.Senate.Gov
Senator Joni Ernst, R-Iowa - (202) 224-3254
Ranking Member Debbie Stabenow, D-Michigan - See contact info above
Senator Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont - (202) 224-4242
Senator Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio- (202) 224-2315
Senator Heidi Heitkamp, D-North Dakota - (202) 224-2043
House Republican Conferees
House Agriculture Committee Conferees:
Chairman Mike Conaway (TX-11) - See contact info above
Glenn ‘GT’ Thompson (PA-05)
Bob Goodlatte (VA-06)
Frank Lucas (OK-03)
Mike Rogers (AL-03)
Austin Scott (GA-08)
Rick Crawford (AR-01)
Vicky Hartzler (MO-04)
Rodney Davis (IL-13)
Ted Yoho (FL-03)
David Rouzer (NC-07)
Roger Marshall (KS-01)
Jodey Arrington (TX-19)
House Education and the Workforce Committee Conferees:
1. Chairwoman Virginia Foxx (NC)
2. Rick Allen (GA-12)
House Energy and Commerce Committee Conferees:
1. John Shimkus (IL-15)
2. Kevin Cramer (ND-AL)
House Financial Services Committee Conferees:
1. Chairman Jeb Hensarling (TX-05)
2. Sean Duffy (WI-07)
House Foreign Affairs Committee Conferees:
1. Chairman Ed Royce (CA-39)
2. Steve Chabot (OH-01)
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Conferees:
1. Mark Walker (NC-06)
2. James Comer (KY-01)
House Natural Resources Committee Conferees:
1. Chairman Rob Bishop (UT-01)
2. Bruce Westerman (AR-04)
House Science, Space, and Technology Committee Conferees:
1. Ralph Abraham (LA-05)
2. Neal Dunn (FL-02)
House Transportation and Infrastructure Conferees:
1. Jeff Denham (CA-10)
2. Bob Gibbs (OH-0)
House Democrats Conferees
Agriculture Committee
Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) - See contact info
David Scott (D-Ga.)
Jim Costa (D-Calif.)
Tim Walz (D-Minn.)
Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio)
Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) Filemon Vela (D-Texas)
Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-N.M.) Ann Kuster (D-N.H.)
Tom O’Halleran (D-Ariz.)

Education and Workforce Committee
Alma Adams (D-N.C.)

Energy and Commerce Committee
Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.)

Financial Services Committee
Maxine Waters (D-Calif.)

Foreign Affairs
Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.)

Natural Resources
Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.)

Oversight and Government Reform
Stacey Plaskett (D-V.I.)

Science, Space and Technology
Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas)

Transportation and Infrastructure
Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.)

For more information please contact Brenda at brenschl@gmail.com
"

Correspondents' Choice: Book Links for August

I'm behind my online reading list. This is not a complete list of book recommendations that came in August, but it's likely to be the complete list of the ones I made time to read in August...

Multiple recommendations for Kim Brooks's Small Animals:



Sonja Cole, whom I don't know, has a lot of nerve. Her list of women illustrators of children's books didn't mention Trina Schart Hyman, Tasha Tudor, the Petershams, Lois Lenski, or any remotely comparable talents. The books she displays have illustrations signed with female-sounding names, but the illustrations are nothing special, generic, cartoonish. They look like the kind that are not meant to add any information to the story, but just to amuse adults. David Elliott's cheerful twist on a phrase that wasn't meant to be a jolly little nursery tale, but has spawned several, sounds like a fun read even if the illustrations are merely amusing:



Since the title is something I've often said, I'd like to read this book if it's ever printed:

I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist (Foreword by David Limbaugh) by [Geisler, Norman L., Turek, Frank]

From Mudpie's Human:

Click here.



Temple Grandin's Calling All Minds.



First link I received this month came via Paper.li, which shared the link to a messy, non-recommendable website where someone identified only as Erica recommended Lois Lowry's new funny story for middle school readers. I want it. When Lowry is funny she is very, very funny, comparable with Carl Hiaasen or even Dave Barry... If I do it right, this Amazon link will give Erica her due commissions.

Click here to give a commission to Erica. The Amazon link-builder button hovers: Don't I want to build a link that will give a commission to me? Maybe next month. This month, give Erica her due...even though I'm sure she's not the non-literary Erica-in-real-life I know.

If Albert Gallatin had been working for Thomas Jefferson, personally, would TJ have died solvent and emancipated Sally Hemings? Gregory May reviews Gallatin's role in history:



Norb Leahy posted a splendid review of Jordan Peterson's 12 Rules for Life, at http://ntlconsulting.blogspot.com/2018/08/12-rules-for-life.html :



Regnery (the publisher, yes) recommends Robbins' Erasing America:



Short story fanciers...I'm not sure why the Little Bookstore refuses to sell online through Amazon, possibly the immoral credit card racket, but whatever they do is working for them. Right. Order this one from the Little Bookstore, not Amazon.

breath
Here's a link you can follow to the Little Bookstore of Big Stone Gap, online.
Magaly Guerrero recommends Peter Wohlleben's Inner Life of Animals:

Thursday, August 30, 2018

Quora Warning

Time for a reminder about basic cybersecurity: We don't use the real names of private people on the Internet. Not ever. We don't use or trust web sites that fail to warn people: Your screen name can relate to your real-world name in some way, if you think that's clever, but it should not look or sound even similar to your real-world name. If the name on your birth certificate is "Jane Doe," "Mama Deer" might be a clever screen name, but don't use "Jayne Dough."

The Internet is safest when we think of ourselves and of each other as cyberspace entities, only loosely connected to human bodies. The cyberspace entity known as Priscilla King has so far been fully embodied in only one human, although that's not the one who created "her." The body that types the words of Priscilla King is the same gender, color, and approximate age* with which Priscilla King has consistently identified, lives in the same part of the world, and lives with the same cats**. Priscilla King does not have information relating to the legal individual identity of that body. It's theoretically possible that Priscilla King might at some future time become the "real" business identity of some other body.

* Give or take a few years--different birth years have been arbitrarily assigned to Priscilla King but, in order to have been born approximately forty years old in 2006, she must obviously have been born in the 1960s.

** I've used the real names of cats who live with me. I've not used the real names, or breed identification, of animals who lived with any other real person in any post where I've given any information about the person.

I inadvertently followed someone's recommendation and checked out a site called Quora.com, earlier this week. I even tweeted an alert to an underserved market...since I can't recommend that youall visit Quora, I'll say that the questioner claims to be a blind foreign student looking for English courses that don't rely on visual presentations. Plain text is obviously not a problem for the person but fancy interactive graphics are.

This morning, I was notified that my account was being blocked because somebody had complained that "Priscilla King" is not my real name. For all I know, by this time it's possible that one of the people who've claimed that it is their real-world, legal name has set up a web site and is using that name at Quora...but "Priscilla King" is in fact my real legal business name, registered with the IRS.

Quora might have the right to ask me to pick a different screen name if mine is already in use (I am, after all, only @5PriscillaKing on Twitter, and at one time Google identified over a hundred bloggers using "Priscilla King" with or without additional middle or family names, several using cat pictures, on Google-hosted blogs). That's not a problem.

Quora does not have a right to ask that people use their real-world names, or encourage them to do that, or even allow them to do that. Strict libertarians would argue that they have the right to display the real-world names of people who choose to post them...but in doing that Quora is setting up a trail that evildoers can follow in order to do harm to people, and Quora should be held legally liable if its users are stalked, bullied, or impersonated with criminal intentions.

So, my summary of the Quora experience: Don't go there.

Wednesday, August 29, 2018

Remembering Senator McCain

Everyone knows that funerals induce gushes of emotion. Sometimes the emotions people express still surprise me. 

I remember the year John Kennedy died...not the President who was murdered, whom I remember only from old news video, but his son, who was about my age and used to publish a cheerful little magazine that aimed to get ordinary people to think about public affairs. I boarded a commuter train, and a regular rider got on at the next station, crying real tears, saying to people she knew, "I was just thinking about that poor little Caroline Kennedy. Now all of her family's gone!" I thought that was unusual, and wondered whether the woman knew the family personally. I mentioned that to a Black friend who said, "That's why they say White people are coldhearted. I don't believe you ever cried about John Kennedy! He was one of your people!" 

He was, and a fine specimen at that; but, no, I didn't cry. Not real tears. I don't expect that Caroline Kennedy shed a tear when my brother died, either; in fact I would have been shocked if she had.

I didn't know U.S. Senator John McCain, either, personally. I first heard his name when George Peters called me and said, "Find out about the Republican candidates in the 2000 election. I think McCain is the one who wants to be the 'Voice of the Unborn' and, if so, we'll back McCain." Well, no; I read Faith of My Fathers on tape, all the way through, so GP could make an informed decision. He decided McCain was a tad too liberal for him, Ambassador Alan Keyes a hair too conservative. He backed W-for-Walking-Target Bush.

Still, Senator McCain's rise to national fame won respect from both of us and from most people. 

He said in Faith of My Fathers that, apart from supporting better funding for the Department of Defense than your average Democrat, he could be described as a moderate Democrat as accurately as a moderate Republican. I do not have a problem with that. I think it's the position that best represents the majority of this country. But the extremists on both sides, who admired McCain's image without having read his book, were surprised and disappointed.

A certain non-writer at this web site claims to have known John McCain personally from Vietnam, and I wished he would write the obligatory tribute to the late senator. They did, and do, have something in common: physical toughness. Extreme toughness. I don't know whether they ever met after Vietnam but I think they'd have had to salute each other for the ability to work harder, through more pain, than any two ordinary random men who've never had a worse pain than an impacted wisdom tooth. I think Ronald Reagan, who cracked jokes about the bullet in his lung, would have called them heroes. 

So I expected to read some lachrymose funeral pieces about how much people admired Senator McCain and regretted the nasty things they'd said about him in the course of their everyday partisan mudslinging, and yes, the e-mail contained some. 

I was surprised to receive e-mail from the individual who claimed the blame for having campaigned against McCain with ugly letters about his adoptive daughter. Fundraising, yet. I would have imagined that, for this week at least, that individual would be sitting at home with the curtains drawn. Of course, for all I know, he is, and some smartypants borrowed his name to ask people for money. Needless to say, that e-mail was promptly deleted.

Then there was the politics-to-the-end story about McCain having banned Trump from his funeral...I don't know whether the McCain family are chortling or crying about that. It's none of my business actually. 

And then some correspondent complained that, making his obligatory statement that mentioned Senator McCain having been a great American, Trump wouldn't be likely to say that about his U.S. Senator...some of you readers may have seen that e-mail too; for others, I won't mention which correspondent or which senator are involved. 

Not all U.S. Senators will be remembered as great Americans even in their funeral eulogies, but that is sort of the job description; it's just that many of them don't do very well at it. 

Maybe some readers think they'd do better. Maybe that's even true, for all I know. Try it and see. Read the bills your elected officials have to read. How would you balance the requirements of your constituency, while doing all that reading, and enough side research to do that reading intelligently, and also being on call to help your individual constituents with pensions and scholarships and all that? Many Congressmen give up the attempt. The ones I have now, like the ones they've replaced, do at least try to work consistently with their constituents on some of the major issues and balance that with the pension and scholarship things. Rick Boucher, the Democrat representing the mostly Republican Ninth District in Virginia before Morgan Griffith stepped forward, used to be well known for serving his constituents as individuals and mostly not voting on legislation where there was no hope of consensus. At that he was well above average. Some of them just vote the party line, drink heavily, and behave badly toward Bright Young Things. But McCain was one of the U.S. Senators who actually did a large part of the work in the job description. There are others (Ron and Rand Paul come to mind, and...and...there aren't all that many). They are great Americans. 

But last night, I fell asleep with a list of other great Americans who (so far as I know) have been overlooked by President Trump running through my head...I mean to say. Is Trump the one you want to give your funeral eulogy? Senator Dole (and President Kennedy), who showed Senator McCain how working through intense pain was done, and Aretha Franklin, and Mitch Snyder, and Sam Walton, and Israel Cohen, and so many other public and private people whose loss has been felt by the whole nation, would probably have been glad. Ron Paul, Jimmy Carter, the Bushes, Ben Carson, and anyone else in Washington who is old enough to worry about Trump being able to attend their funeral, should probably give thanks. Eulogies are not Mr. Trump's major talent.

They're not mine, either. When I do sincerely mourn, I have little to say. When I go online to write, I'm in the snarky sort of mood that composes a sentence like, "However disappointed the extremists in both parties were by his politics, John McCain was a real hero and a great American," and, although I believe this to be true, I immediately think: "Summarize in a Sentence! Eulogies While You Wait!" 

I wished he'd been more of a fiscal conservative, and a stronger one--nevertheless, I respect what I observed of what Senator McCain did in the Senate, as well as in Vietnam. He seemed to be one of our more sincere, less corrupt elected officials, according to his beliefs, which obviously were not the same beliefs held by a great number of political pundits. He did not necessarily represent everyone in Arizona, but he consistently represented the ones he did represent. His life history is a record of extraordinarily tough jobs, done extraordinarily well, in spite of pain and hate. We should all be a little braver and tougher for having known what we've known of John McCain.


Keep the faith, Gentle Readers.