(Just too late to be A Fair Trade Book. Sad.)
Title: The Farthest Shore
Author: Ursula K.
LeGuin
Date: 1972
Publisher: Atheneum
ISBN: 0-689-30054-9
Length: 223 pages
Quote: “Then...my
father named the wizard Root to say the spells of increase over the lambs...but
he could say only, ‘I have forgotten the words’...and indeed there’s trouble
among the flocks this spring, the ewes dying in birth, and many lambs born dead.”
The late Ursula Kroeber
LeGuin was not a Christian. The Farthest
Shore is a non-Christian, arguably even anti-Christian, parable. (There are actually Protestant churches that might use the view of Life and Death this book presents, but Le Guin's version is non-theistic, and those churches are a minority.) It was
both hailed as a classic and purged from public libraries for that reason. Some
people believe that children should not have the opportunity to read how
non-Christians explain the balance of Life and Death.
The position of this
web site is that public libraries, if they should exist, should not censor
books like The Farthest Shore—but
adults should be cautious about recommending them to children, or calling them
children’s books. Because the Earthsea novels are told in classic
fairy-tale-and-fantasy manner, and feature wizard, dragons, and a youthful
protagonist, they’ve been marketed to children. They’re not for children. The Farthest Shore is not a book even
children who’ve enjoyed both the parable-fantasy in A Wrinkle in Time and the bleakness in Anne Frank's Diary are necessarily mature enough to
appreciate. Though sex-free, with minimal violence and no foul language, a
novel whose basic plot is about the necessity of death is a novel for adults.
Some teenagers may like Earthsea; for children I think Old Yeller and Little Women did
enough to expose children to mortality.
So this is a parable
for adults, in which the senior magician Ged and the student prince Arren sail
around the islands of Earthsea, confirming that the wizardry on which their
fictional world depends is dying out. Without magic, artisans do sloppy work
and whole communities seek refuge in a particularly horrid, addictive drug. Some
of the saddest, craziest people in Earthsea are the ones who spout lines that
were popular with real people in 1972, about not wanting to escape from
“reality” into “lies” about things like magic.
Of course readers
already know that Ged and Arren, with help from the friendly dragon, will save their world—in this kind of story this kind of mission always succeeds—and readers can probably
guess that Ged, the advocate of death, won’t live very long after seeing that
he’s succeeded. They may as well know, also, that LeGuin wrote the Earthsea
books before she’d identified as a feminist; although Arren isn’t positive
about the dragon’s gender, all the major human characters in the entire trilogy
are male. In this book two women get one speaking part in one scene apiece,
which was the sort of thing LeGuin would later do so much to change.
The Farthest Shore may appeal to some adults who like Tolkien, some
who liked Grendel...only some, not
all, people who like Anne McCaffrey and/or Jane Yolen and/or Suzette Haden
Elgin and/or Piers Anthony and/or Frank
Peretti like the Earthsea books. Even some people who liked LeGuin’s science
fiction or her occasional mainstream fiction don’t like her fantasy-parable
books. Time may help. I remember reading the Earthsea trilogy in college and
not appreciating it at all. I was probably patient enough and educated enough
to appreciate this book before age 50, but between ages 17 and 50 I left it
alone. Then again, time may not help; a lot of middle-aged people will say that
they already knew death is inevitable, and didn’t need to read 223 pages of
fiction that makes that point.
On the other hand,
people who just want to read a well-told adventure story may like Earthsea.
LeGuin was a fine writer. Earthsea is a world of big and small islands, like
the Philippines, in a mostly temperate climate, like the northern Pacific
islands off North America only without a mainland. It has a Pacific Coast feeling. If you enjoy visualizing a
whole world covered larger and smaller, more northerly or southerly-lying, versions
of Vancouver, then Earthsea is for you. LeGuin gave her characters a vividly
imagined world that’s worth saving.
Personally, I might
have preferred for LeGuin to have written more nonfiction and realistic stories
(like Very Far Away from Anywhere Else),
more provocative science fiction
about what humans would do with new technology if we got it to work (like The Word for World Is Forest), and, if
she’d wanted to write fantasies, cute, simple ones like Catwings.
I can say that because there’s no reason why it should
affect your decision to read The Farthest
Shore or not. Plenty of people have loved the Earthsea books. It’s because
so many other people raved over this series that I’m free to say I consider it overrated;
if LeGuin were a new writer I’d probably feel a need to review The Farthest Shore with more faint
praise for the dragon. (In 1972 this was a new, unusual dragon. It is now the
prototypical fantasy-world dragon, but Le Guin’s dragons were not clichés when written.) People
are drawn into other people’s fantasy fiction by individual tastes in common. I
don’t happen to have enough for Earthsea to be my very favorite, favorite
fantasy world, or even to make my top ten list—but that doesn’t mean it’s not a
well written fantasy adventure story, or even that it won’t be your favorite. It might be.
No comments:
Post a Comment