Title: Unfinished Tales
Author: J.R.R.
Tolkien with Christopher Tolkien
Date: 1980
Publisher: Allen
& Unwin (U.K.), Ballantyne (U.S.)
ISBN: 0-345-35711-6
Length: 493
pages
Quote: “I
now wish that no appendices had been promised...It is, I suppose, a tribute to
the curious effect that a story has, when based on very elaborate and detailed
workings, of geography, chronology, and langauge, that so many should clamour
for sheer ‘information,’ or ‘lore.’”
In the Lord of the Rings trilogy, Tolkien had
worked out an unusually complete and complex fictional world, with its own
history, literature, and languages. He had written some of these down, some in
the form of short stories, some in syllabic verse like Beowulf. For some readers, he understood, the trilogy with its companion
novel The Hobbit was quite enough. As
his son warns in a foreword that includes the quote from one of J.R.R.
Tolkien’s letters, above, many Rings fans
“do not wish to know how the Riders of the Mark of Rohan were organized, and
would leave the Wild Men of the Druadan Forest firmly where they found them.”
But others did, and though he hadn’t polished these supplementary tidbits of
the history of Middle-Earth for publication, Tolkien did intend to make them
available, a job he left for Christopher Tolkien to finish.
That’s what
you’ll like or not like about Unfinished
Tales. The stories are “finished” enough to be readable, but not polished
into the excellence Tolkien’s published fiction achieves. Sometimes blank lines
and changes of font, such as Blogger likes to insert into anything uploaded as
a Word document, are used to show where the last page of Tolkien’s draft ended
and Christopher Tolkien could fill in where the story was meant to end from his
father’s notes. Other stories seem to be complete but unpolished.
They’re not
great stories. They are long
historical and biographical footnotes on the Rings trilogy and The
Silmarillion.
We learn
that the Wild Men of the Druadan Forest are “a wholly different kind” of humans
than either Dwarves or Hobbits, though, like them, smaller than he humanoid
race most like ourselves. Though depicted with love and respect they seem based
on a generic Edwardian British impression of “primitive people” (or “natives”
in the colonies). Their
language seems Celtic. Their culture seems a conscious rejection of the
“civilizations” of Hobbits and Riders, recalling Native American cultural
purists, or European Gypsies. The other humans of Middle-Earth are nicer to
them than Tolkien’s generation of Englishmen were even to Irishmen, much less
“natives” in the colonies. I read them as expressing an attitude of Tolkien’s
that is not racism, although the young will probably assume from the inclusion
of mere words that it is racism, but is simply Ignorance.
For Tolkien all “primitive people” were evidently a
source of numinous wonderment. He knew nothing about any culture more
“primitive” than what mere poverty imposed on his Irish coevals. He respected
“natives” enough not to go out to the colonies and annoy them with sentimental
drivel about living among them. His Druedain, like the “Indians” in Peter Pan, have nothing to say about
colonialism’s oppression of “primitive” people, though they express the
consciousness of someone prepared to sympathize with “primitive” people when
“primitive” people started talking in English about that oppression. The
Druedain’s propensity for sitting on the ground in deep meditation for days is
not a reaction to loss or to exotic diseases. They do it because, while being
left in peace to remain “primitive” and having never built up the vulnerability
that is the long-term product of full “herd immunity” to diseases, they feel
like working out something in their minds and have no obligations to finish
jobs first. They are the kind of semi-feral tribe Edwardian children had in
mind when apparently almost all of them said, or thought, “I wish I was an
‘Indian,’ ancient Celt, Aborigine, etc., and didn’t have to wear shoes, go to
school, be on time, etc.”
In the Rings books Galadriel, though still
beautiful and in full command of the various powers, is white-haired and (Elves
being longer-lived than humans) several centuries old. There are hints of past
dramas in her youth. Tolkien had more than one try at writing those dramas and
wrote them in different, conflicting ways, none of which apparently satisfied
him.
Other
dramatic legends of Middle-Earth’s past are at least fully sketched, though not
in a fashion that would have satisfied Tolkien. There are cautionary legends,
the tragic results of a quarrel and the short unhappy lives of a couple who
inadvertently committed incest. There are lists of monarchs and court
histories. There are battles and hero tales. There are maps, too, and
etymological notes on words and names in the Elvish languages. If you like that
sort of thing you must have Unfinished
Tales and, if not, you’ve been warned.
No comments:
Post a Comment