Showing posts with label crowding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crowding. Show all posts

Thursday, December 8, 2016

Tepid Book Review, with Rant: Life Is Not a Stress Rehearsal

A Fair Trade Book


Title: Life Is Not a Stress Rehearsal

Author: Loretta LaRoche

Author's web page: http://www.lorettalaroche.com/

Date: 2001

Publisher: Broadway / Random House

ISBN: 0-7679-0665-9

Length: 219 pages plus 3 pages endnotes

Quote: “We wake up, probably in a room that has some sort of electronic climate control and enclosed windows, because who would dare take the risk that we might get an unscheduled breeze?”

Loretta LaRoche was blessed with good timing. She was a counsellor during the Age of Therapy. When the “health management” racket decided to replace counselling with instant prescriptions for feel-good pills (that unfortunately happen to induce violent insanity in three to ten percent of users), LaRoche had the credentials and the grandmotherly image she needed to shift into comedy, helping people fight the emotional effect of stress by laughing at it. Hence the jacket photo, in which her combat vest sports a phone, computer mouse, calculator, calendar, stopwatch, correction fluid, Swiss Army knife, assortment of writing tools,  tube of sunblock, and everything else she could stick onto it.

While the gadgets LaRoche wore for the jacket photo have gone out of style, the frantic pace with which some people approach life has not. If anything it’s become worse.

I blame this frazzle effect on the craze for increasing population density in the cities, where some people think everything needs to be happening. Normal people reflexively react to crowding by stepping away from other people. When stepping away from one person only puts us too close to another person, normal adults can tell ourselves to behave rationally, but we can’t be really comfortable until a healthy level of interpersonal distance has been achieved. While detaching our attention from our sense of stress, telling ourselves that the crowded situation is acceptable, helps us cope with crowded conditions, at the same time our reptilian brains continue to prepare to fight or flee. Often this preparedness generates flashes of emotion that we may rationalize in one way or another, but that are really about the fact that too many bodies are occupying too little space.

I think most of the “road rage” and miscellaneous frenzy we observe these days is the result of crowded conditions. It’s not natural for humans to stand still, or sit still, as long as they’re within touching distance of people they're not trying to touch. “Office building managers say that the reason windows don’t open is to protect people from jumping out…Maybe they should look at what’s going on inside that makes people feel that they want to jump out a window,” LaRoche says. She’s thinking of the obvious verbal abuse and backstabbing that go on in many corporate offices. I wonder, though, whether even that overt hostility toward co-workers is just another symptom of the same basic problem: too many people working in one building. Maybe Jack falsely claims credit for Joe’s idea and Jane deliberately delays the report Mary needs because they don’t like working in a “bullpen” or cubicle maze with those people; but maybe, too, when Joe and Mary aren’t in the office, the sensation of being trapped in between strangers upstairs and downstairs and out on the street still pushes Jack and Jane to want to jump out of windows.(Extroversion, a tendency to cope with chronic internal emotional conflicts by constantly, aggressively seeking to control others, is present in some extremely sick minds.)

LaRoche not only doesn’t reach this insight in Life Is Not a Stress Rehearsal; she deliberately clutches at “solutions” that, toward the end of this book, are dead wrong for at least half of humankind. The result is a very witty description of a problem that ends with an incredibly unhelpful attempt at a solution.

For much of the book, while she’s skewering the stunata or meshuggeneh or just plain duh in turn-of-the-new-century U.S. culture, she’s right on. Trying to be or seem just like other people (camouflage, for safety in a crowded environment) is a source of stress. Trying to convince ourselves that we’re important to a corporation (to which we’re not important, anyway) by dragging out jobs so that we can make sixteen hours a day “billable” is a source of stress. Paying three times as much for the fashionable brand of something (when the cheaper version may be better) is a source of stress. Trying to be available to everybody all the time by leaving cell phones connected and then programming them to go to voice mail is a source of stress…and mutual annoyance. Watching inane television instead of actually having fun is a source of stress. LaRoche is observing efficiently, in this part of her book, and reporting wisely and wittily. She doesn’t understand why so many of the people she sees are doing such stupid things, but she can’t miss the fact that they’re doing them, and she does a good job of channelling the grandmother who, she convinces us, would have told them just to stop the stupidity.

But then…tragically, LaRoche wants to stop where her grandmother stopped. She doesn’t raise the question whether, if her grandmother had been young in 2001, the influences that produced the stupidity of my generation would have made her grandmother stupid too. Or would Grandma Fran have defied those influences and, in 2001, actually been happy? LaRoche is funny, but she does not sound funny in a happy way. She sounds frazzled by other people’s frazzlement.

One part of her evident confusion seems to be the “Mars and Venus” blather with which our pop culture burdened itself in the 1990s. Human beings are not built in identical gender-types like Barbie and Ken dolls. We are individuals. Somewhere out there are a man whose nurturing underside is warmer and fuzzier than mine, and a man whose hunter-type skills are further below mine than his nurturer-type talents are—and I’m still a Real Woman, Strictly a Female Female, and both of them are still Real Men too. 

But the media gave us, just in case it might have been news to somebody somewhere, these reports that some people did not feel sexy when they were doing their jobs. Well, unless you’re a porn star, you’re not supposed to feel sexy on the job. You’re supposed to be sexy in your own private bedroom, and the rest of society is not obligated to listen to any further details. If some baby-boomers were not feeling sexy in their bedrooms, either, this might have been because, in 2001, people born in 1946 were reaching an age at which many people are postsexual.

Need it be mentioned that, although I’ve not been a great success at making money, I was more successful at making money than at making babies, and although my husband was very good at making money (and even at shooting targets) he was also very good at bonding with children. It’s probably true that HSPs compensate for being more shy as teenagers by having more fun in bed, longer, as adults. Left to ourselves HSPs would probably never have wanted to torture non-HSPs with this information but, whenever I’ve met an eighty-year-old who still had any noticeable sexuality, it was always a fellow HSP. What attracts me to people, as people, is being able to work with them as synergistic partners, which is what C.S. Lewis described as philia love. Gender polarity is involved in what Lewis called eros love, which is also interesting but which, in the absence of philia, I’ve always managed to ignore. 

I can imagine a few things that might be less sexy than John Gray’s descriptions of a “Mars and Venus” marriage...stomach flu? Root canals? Suffice it to say that, ridiculous as “Sensitive New Age Guys” used to be, and I say this as a woman who once waited six hours for a whiny little boy trapped in a 250-pound, 35-year-old body to turn up crying real tears because he’d failed to allow enough time for the usual volume of traffic, guys who think “I’m so different from you that I can’t possibly be your friend” is going to make a favorable impression are even worse. If you’re all that different from me, please find a member of your own species with which to mate.

But crowded living conditions are not helping anything. In animal populations, an early effect of overcrowding may be hyperfertility and hypersexuality, as individuals react to high doses of other individuals’ sex pheromones. Next, a more reliable effect is the appearance of behavior that tends to lower the birth rate: more sterility in individuals that mate normally, more asexuality, homosexuality, transference of sexual impulses toward anything and everything but reproducing more of the species.

If you are a reasonably humane animal raiser, the appearance of genuine homosexuality should indicate that it’s time to thin the herd now. Animals have a limited range of behavior displays that humans are able to recognize, so same-gender "courtship displays" that aren't really sexual are normal in some social animal species. Forced homosexuality, in which two animals forced to live celibate lives in the same space set up something resembling a “couple” relationship, is sometimes found in very social species. Real homosexuality is a natural animal reaction to conditions that are unsafe for the whole colony. That we currently have a loud, noisy minority of “gay” activists, in the human population, need not cause fear or hate toward the “gays” themselves but it should cause concern about our society.

Now that the baby-boomers are indisputably aging and a lot of young people are coming out as asexual, we need to think about what happens next when animals continue to live in crowded conditions, when sexual aberrations fail to thin the population fast enough. Two further developments are possible, and not mutually exclusive. Viciousness, violence, especially attacks by adults on the very young, and cannibalism are one possibility. Plagues and mass deaths are the other.

Postsexuality is normal for the generation that’s now between the ages of 50 and 75. Asexuality and homosexuality in the young are the non-species-specific reflections of the kind of stress whose human-specific reactions LaRoche has been describing and expressing in Life Is Not a Stress Rehearsal. If differences of temperament allow us to overlook the human-specific, individual-emotion-shaped reactions, my interpretation of the data is that wide-scale sexual aberrations should be ramming it into our brains by now: We need to reduce population density by every ethical means necessary, and we need to do it fast.

Young couples should be taking a pledge: One child or none. (If you want a big family, you can always adopt.)

Cities should be banning the construction of office buildings more than three storeys high or houses on lots smaller than one acre.

Immigration should be…not so much forbidden by laws that are expensive and dangerous to  enforce, but intensely, unrelentingly discouraged by all communities with any noticeable incidence of unemployment, road rage, suicide, abortion, or “sexual minorities.”

People should be abandoning cities, pulling down surplus buildings, living in houses with generous private green space and well-maintained fences that block out the sight and sound of their neighbors.

Business should be conducted primarily from home, taking advantage of technology to limit face-to-face meetings to once a week, or maybe once a month.

International organizations that have published “agenda” documents calling for an increase of population density, in any part of the United States, should be recognized as having committed subtle acts of war, and treated like the enemies these acts have shown them to be.

Why do I say that these are obvious solutions to the problems LaRoche has described so well in Life Is Not a Stress Rehearsal? Because I tried them, because in Washington a whole lot of us Bobos tried them, and to the extent individuals can do them, they work. You don’t even have to agree with them to feel them working. If you’re feeling stressed, spend more time alone, and you’ll feel less stressed. (Sometimes telling my coevals this is exactly like telling teenagers that, if they’re showing every possible symptom of sleep deprivation after sitting up late last night, they need just to lie down and relax, and they’ll feel less angry / restless / spacey / depressed / anxious / whatever.)

Nevertheless, LaRoche closes her book with a big display of active resistance to insight. “[A]mong many of the groups that tout spirituality…we are told…that we have to look inward, we have to heal ourselves, we have to become more self-aware and self-actualized. We’re told ‘you can’t love another until you learn to love yourself.’ I think…[t]he truth is often just the opposite: You can learn to love yourself by loving other people!” LaRoche rants on page 206. (Most psychologists would say that we learn to practice love by observing other people practice love.)

On page 208, in denial of actual scientific data, “It’s been proven that married people live longer than single people.” (Actually, the numbers proved that married men live longer than single men. Single women who don’t have a few specific diseases live not only longer, but healthier, lives than married women—on average. Older women who’ve been married only once are more likely to survive a first heart attack longer than older women who are single or divorced, but complications of childbirth, domestic abuse, and sexually transmitted diseases make celibacy seem obligatory for younger women to maintain good health…if they go by statistics.)

“[P]atients who are socially isolated are twice as likely to die than (sic) those with social interactions.”  (It’s true that, for almost any group of sick patients, the ones who receive and enjoy visitors are likely to live longer than the ones who don’t. This is a correlation, not a causation. While it’s hard to study this in any large-scale objective way, anyone who visits sick patients notices that the ones in the worst physical condition tend to be less interested in social interactions.)

“We’re missing real human connection…It seems to us that the way our grandparents lived lacked privacy,” LaRoche says on page 209. “Doors open all the time; people running in and out…” (She’s describing her grandparents, not mine. One thing that stands out when I consider the way my grandparents lived is how they balanced family intimacy with privacy. They had a whole set of rules of etiquette to offset the fact that they had more children than bedrooms.)

“But the fact that they had people around them all the time made their lives saner,” Laroche continues on page 210. Did it really? In the 1990s we all heard a lot about how much warmer and chummier Latin-American subcultures were, relative to Anglo-American subcultures. Latinos touched more often, stood close enough to smell each other’s breath, etc. etc. Hello? Was that really a point anyone wanted to emphasize if they wanted more touching and chumminess? Anglo-Americans consistently average longer healthier lives, higher test scores, and higher incomes…so we should be more like the demographic group that score lower? ??? The lifestyle of “The Sopranos” is saner than…what?

“We need to fill our lives with untidy, invasive, knock-on-the-door-unexpected relationships that help prove to us, every minute of the day, that we are cared for,” LaRoche gushes on page 212. (Thus showing that she’s never experienced an orderly, mutually respectful relationship that not only proved to her that she was cared for but also enriched her life. I have, and I’m not going back: that’s the only kind of relationship I want.)

On page 213 she vents the frustrations of an undisciplined, mentally-undiapered extrovert. “I…run into people who talk about ‘loving everyone unconditionally’—but never stop to say good morning!...I know of a major figure of new-age thinking, someone who preaches love and understanding, who has it written into his speaking contracts that the limo driver who picks him up at the airport is restricted from speaking to him.” (Yes, LaRoche…a way we build love and understanding is that we learn not to disturb others, to understand that the speaker needs time to focus on the speech he’s about to make, to recognize that the people at the convention need to reflect on what they just learned at the seminar more than they need to comfort your screaming inner infant.)

On page 214 LaRoche tries to add “Say ‘hello’ whenever you see someone you know. And if you dare, even when you see someone you don’t know” to a list of “basic rules of civility” that include things like “Wait your turn,” “be punctual,” and “If you take the last cup of coffee, make a fresh pot.” (This is so deeply wrong…the older rule of civility was, in fact, “Speak when you’re spoken to and not before,” and specific details included things like “In public places, unless it is really necessary to scream something like ‘Fire!’ or ‘Thief!’ that the whole town needs to hear, speak softly, don’t mention anyone’s name or discuss any personal matter, and don’t stop moving unless and until you agree to move to some place more suitable for conversation.” It is rude to interrupt anyone’s thoughts, much less an actual conversation, just to parrot-squawk “Hello” when you have nothing to say, merely because you need reassurance that you exist.)

So is LaRoche really that rarity, a natural-born extrovert whose brain has developed enough to be able to communicate with healthy, mature introvert minds? It’s hard to say. Many of those who joined the effort to normalize extroversion, in the twentieth century, were in fact self-hating introverts whose extrovert act was a classic Freudian coping mechanism used to suppress grief or other intense “problem” emotions. 

On page 217, LaRoche says, “Fight the urge toward privacy. It’s overrated! Privacy leads to isolation, and isolation leads to loneliness.” On pages 217-218, she expands, “[W]hen you get a group of people together…[y]ou see laughter, you see boisterous behavior, you see people having fun.” When people are so unhappy as to be incapable of having fun, they can mistake “boisterous behavior” for having fun. Probably only about one-third of humankind, and even within that group only the biggest and strongest individual involved in any given act of “boisterous behavior,” actually experience “boisterous behavior” as fun. Most of us, given the chance, would rather be doing something calmer, quieter, more orderly, more useful, and more beautiful. Genuine cases of extroversion—which the data suggests with increasing clarity is a form of brain damage—are not given the chance. Self-hating introverts have stopped giving the chance to themselves.

Solitude is a good thing. The loneliness of bereavement is not pleasant, but there is something worse…the compulsive attempt some people make to replace the person they’ve lost with any old body they can find. Widows who’ve imagined that any husband would be better than none, especially, have learned otherwise—sometimes when they’ve acquired AIDS, sometimes when they’ve been murdered outright.  

So I’m willing to sell Life Is Not a Stress Rehearsal, but only with a warning: If you consider yourself “lonely,” recognize LaRoche’s final chapter as channelling Where Grandma Went Wrong and Created All Those Other Problems. Pity poor old Loretta LaRoche, cut off from happiness with her real self by hoarding all that social clutter of unsatisfactory relationships, and don’t let yourself end up like her.


If you want to laugh at the stress factors and stressed-out behaviors LaRoche skewers in the first 87.5% of the book, and also buy it as a Fair Trade Book, send $5 per book + $5 per package + $1 per online payment to either address at the very bottom of the screen. (Actually, if you want to risk online payment, you'd ask Saloli the Message Squirrel to send you the correct Paypal address; I recommend U.S. postal money orders anyway, not least because I don't have to worry about collecting a surcharge for those.) 

"Fair Trade Book" means that when we sell a gently used book by a living author, we send 10%, typically $1 per book, to the author or a charity of her choice. Yes, we'll sell you new books by living authors at the full publisher's price, and for those we'll also send 10%, often $2 to $5, to the authors or their charities. You can even mix up Fair Trade Books by different living authors and we'll send the appropriate amount of money to each author or his/her charity. 

(Yes, I do think the number of different ways I've found to explain this web site's "Fair Trade Book" label is proof of my ability to write up fresh, original, non-spun content for clients' business sites...but what do you readers think? Should it go in a sidebar somewhere?)

Friday, November 25, 2016

Kylene Has Two Children

Because I promised to post it here (for copyright reasons), with an Amazon link to the founding father of its genre:


1

They did a great job with Dad’s Handscreen this time. With the latest upgrade you can actually feel the colors, or where the colors would be, when you zoom to certain degrees of focus: the images feel warmer if they’re closer to white in black-and-white view, or closer to red in red-to-violet. “Isn’t it a thing of beauty and a toy forever?” the guy at the shop wisecracked, showing it off, and it is. I could have spent an hour just looking around the shop with it.

But of course Dad wanted to hurry up and mount it on to his Wheels and go out for a spin. More excitement, I suppose. So we all got on our Wheels and followed him. It was a lovely day; we left all the walls up and enjoyed the cool air on our faces.

Even passing the energy plant, the air felt good. Nobody will ever say it smells good, though, no matter how many rows of pine trees and boxwood bushes and sweet-scented flowers they plant around it. That day the calendulas were positively shrieking their scent into the air but you still know, when you’re passing the energy plant, that they’re burning dung and carrion inside.

“They’re orange,” Mom said, “the calendulas! I can feel the orange! Can you feel it, Kyle?”

“I can’t even feel the calendulas,” Dad said. “It’s not the Handscreen. It’s my hands.”

He stopped walking and sat down. The Wheels kept rolling, of course, on the energy he’d generated. He kicked the brake so hard I could hear it, even behind Mother’s Wheels, even with our Wheels rolling.

“I’ve got a disability,” he said. “I’ve spent twenty years working to eradicate disabilities. I’ve got a disability.”

“You’ll have it eradicated in a week,” Sam told him.

Two weeks, tops, I thought. Dad’s good at that sort of thing.

He cheered up, though, back at the house, looking at Trevor’s latest picture on the Handscreen. He spent a long time looking at his grandson’s face, the way blind people look at things, with their hands.

2

When we got home I think Sam expected, just as I did, to find Trevor in a rotten mood. It really wasn’t fair that the day Mom and Dad picked up the Handscreen had to coincide with his day at school. We’d thought about asking whether he could trade school days with some other child, but that’s always a hassle and they say children need some practice coping with disappointment.

“When Mom and Dad were your age,” I’d told him, earlier that morning, “kids had to go to school half the days in the year.”

“Wotta waste,” he’d said. “What did they do there?”

“Some kind of theory, or experiment—they did all their lessons at school. The whole class. Together. Lockstep. Like they’d put all the six-year-olds in one room and tell them to learn to read, all at once, all the same way. Then the ones who didn’t learn to read that way were told they had disabilities,” Sam explained.

“Craaazy,” said Trevor, blinking up at Sam, who’s never seen such long, pale eyelashes on a kid. Trevor got Dad’s albinism but not his microphthalmia; he sees everything with either or both of his pale blue eyes, doesn’t even need glasses, any more than Sam did at his age. “How did they ever learn to read?”

“Some of them never did,” I said.

The Schoolwheels notification peeped and flashed across the TV screen. Trevor ran out to the porch, jumped on his Wheels, and ran out to hook on to the Schoolwheels with the other children. I wondered whether all twenty or thirty of them had thought of other things they’d rather do than go to school, that day, and whether any of them was not racing his or her own Wheels. They always pump enough energy into those things to coast their Wheels around the neighborhood for the rest of the week, little feet flying, bodies leaning over the sides, looking back and forth, shouting to each other. They always seem to have fun.

“What did you do at school?” I asked.

“Height, weight, finger stick,” he said with more than the usual disdain. “And I got stunned.”

Stoned?” Sam hollered.

“No, stunned,” Trevor explained. “’Cos Leelawadee O’Halloran said I was looking at her too long. So she Belted me.”

“Oh, dear love.” I went over and hugged him, which he tolerated.

He fingered his Belt. “Why do boys have to wear Belts anyway?” I looked at his father.

“Once upon a time,” said Sam, “boys and men didn’t have to wear Belts. For some of them, probably most of them, that worked just fine. Others, however, became violent. Some people said it wasn’t fair to girls to let boys go outside. It wouldn’t have been fair to boys to keep them inside all the time, either. So we men have agreed to wear Belts.”

“It hurts,” Trevor informed him, “being Belted. I couldn’t get up off the floor for fifteen minutes.”

“Not as much as it used to hurt in the bad old days if a guy looked at a girl too long, and her father hit him in the face and knocked his teeth out,” said Sam.

“What does it hurt to look at a person anyway?” said Trevor.

“It’s disrespectful,” I said. “It hurts the person’s feelings.”

“It’s because she had these new shoes that play Wossup Possum videos,” said Trevor. “If I did not want people looking at me I’d get shoes that didn’t play videos.”

I sat very still and waited for the thoughts of violent acts toward an eight-year-old child to leave my mind. When they left I said, “Leelawadee O’Halloran wasn’t showing the best judgment, was she?” I did not say, “What can you expect from a child whose mother named her after a type font?” I said, “Still, those were her shoes. She wore them just to look at them, herself, and not to share them with you. You should try not to look at her any more.”

“So what else did you do at school?” said Sam.

“Just the same sort of thing as last time,” said Trevor. “We ran. We sang songs. We did gymnastics. We looked at pictures of everybody’s projects. We ate corn on the cob and bean soup and the-last-watermelon-this-year, only it wasn’t very good.We started another batch of paper. I guess this is the paper we made last time,” he said, showing off a pad of the kind of coarse unbleached paper kids use at school. “And we did karate, and I flipped Albert Brenner over my shoulder.”

“Albert Brenner?” I said. Albert Brenner is thirteen.

“Sure,” said Trevor. “In karate size matters less than paying attention. That’s the point. I guess Brenner was sort of distracted because of this new pattern for shoes that he’d designed, that he wanted us to make, ’cos shop comes right after martial arts, and that was what we did in shop. We all did different versions of the pattern on the computer first, and then we voted which pattern to put on the shoes.”

The school Trevor attends was named for a wealthy donor, a Colonel Shoemaker, whose father spelled the name “Schumacher.” I’ve often wondered what the Colonel might have said if he’d ever imagined that students would actually make shoes.

Well, now that we have electronic communication systems for most of the things kids study at school and most of the jobs adults do, some people felt that students and teachers ought to see each other’s faces some times. Not too often, of course; turns out that most of the differences that made it hard for people to get along, in the past, were aggravated when people had to do everything in the same room, and smoothed right out when people were working on their own devices in their own homes. So we voted, and all the children at Shoemaker Elementary School go to school one day every two weeks. That’s enough for children like Trevor, or like his buddy, Marvin Kwok; I think any school is probably more than brats like Leelawadee O’Halloran deserve. Anyway, they go to school and do the things children actually did in groups in the olden days: sports, music, shop. The older ones, who’ve learned a bit about how not to waste food at home, cook the meals. It’s meant to be more like a social occasion, a party, even, rather than military service, or prison, or whatever school as we knew it was meant to be like.

3

After dinner Trevor read to us from one of his new books, after his fashion.

“‘Kyle McClintock, a Man Who Defied Disability.’ Like that’s Grandpa,” he said, as if we didn’t know. “Cool! ‘Kyle McClintock was born with only one eye. In those days, all the children the same age in a neighborhood had to go to school on the same day. The ones who failed to learn things as quickly as others did were considered disabled.’ Like you said, Dad. Now I’ll let the Tablet read itself, okay?” He touched a switch.

“Doctors warned Kyle that his one eye was likely to wear out fast,” the mechanical voice read. “In those days most children were taught to read only with their eyes and talk only with their mouths. Although some devices had been designed to help people read and talk with their hands, many of those people were still able to communicate easily only with one another. Computers had flat screens. Kyle bought a very expensive device that translated the letters on a flat screen into shapes that he could read with his hand. The shapes formed only letters in a strange, oldfashioned code. Because he could see the letters other people were reading with their eyes, as well as the images, Kyle McClintock knew how much information he would be unable to read with his hands unless he could invent a new kind of computer screen.”

It’s always a hoot to read what some writer has made out of something you remember. Yes, that was why Dad invented the first Handscreen. More or less. They left out the bits about my grandfather having grown up in an institution because my great-grandmother was blind, and about employers not even considering Dad for jobs, when he was younger, because his artificial eye looked so real that they thought its not actually focussing and seeing things made Dad’s face look strange or untrustworthy. They never do mention that Dad was forty years old before I was born.

By the time I came along, things were a bit different. It was always hard for me to imagine a time when people who had just a little sight, just a little hearing, could get into ordinary schools as long as they “passed as normal” but might be expelled if they admitted they had “disabilities.” In my world disabled students had power; they could demand all kinds of expensive adaptive devices. A real disability was still a real headache, though. Blind people had a way of reading with their hands, and deaf people had a way of talking with their hands—and those were two completely different languages.

Hence the Handscreens.

I remember the first few computer programs that made voice recognition a standard feature. “Epic fails” was a phrase people used. One of the better designed voice-based programs stored everything in the cloud, so even blind people didn’t trust it. Screens were still hard and flat; sound was either turned on or turned off, and most people who could see anything, at all, turned off the sound permanently.

Well, humanity had some evolving to do, that’s all I can say. I mean, I’m glad Trevor can’t remember what it was like. People had become accustomed to rolling around in massive gas-burning cars. Naturally no blind person could drive. So people actually wanted to go through the process of building self-driving cars—what a nightmare!—before they thought about building self-driving Wheels.

No device is perfect. Wheels have been known to fail to follow the courses their owners set for them. Most people don’t want every trip they take in a Wheel to be broadcast around the world in the cloud. However, Wheels are light enough and move slowly enough that, if they do crash, nobody’s likely to be killed. If children really want to see for themselves what it’s like ramming a Wheel into a brick wall, they may have a lot of extra chores to do to pay for repairs, but what it’s like is: your Wheel stops.

And a lot of people thought the only “right” way to make love was to make babies; Grandmother gave birth to five children. Now, of course, when you go to the hospital to have a baby, the Nip and the Tuck are part of the package. People have just had to learn that, if nine out of ten babies are going to live for seventy-five years or longer, there’s no need to keep on making babies just in case something happens to the first one. It’s not really an old saying, although the kids think it is: “If God wanted you to have two children, you would’ve given birth to twins.”

Trevor does know that he had what were called aunts and uncles. One of the aunts is still living. That detail wouldn’t be mentioned in a story written for children. It’s too personal; it’s nobody’s business that my grandparents, crowded though the world was becoming, produced five children.

I think our evolution, as a species, actually benefitted from the plague…

“Then Kyle’s friend and working partner, Rayvon Mathis, died from the plague,” the mechanical voice went on. “At first nobody understood why so many people were dying so suddenly. The human population was more than three times what it is now. Scientists working to solve the problem of how to feed so many humans had experimented with changing the genes of living creatures. When they modified the genes of hogs to make them grow bigger and faster, a virus, formerly harmless to humans, had mutated to adapt to the new population of hogs. The mutation made the virus fatal to humans who lived in crowded conditions. In cities like New York, Rio de Janeiro, and Hong Kong, fewer than one tenth of the population survived.”

Even cities like Baltimore, where we live, lost appalling numbers of people. I remember…

“Want me to skip, Mom?” Trevor asked. He touched the switch. “Now I’m reading to myself, okay?”

“It’s okay,” I assured him. “I can guess what it says, anyway. People who lived in less crowded conditions and kept more to themselves were the ones who survived the plague. After the plague had run its course, people voted to keep the human population nice and safe and sparse. Only one family lives on one hectare of land. A family might mean one person, or two people, or two people with a parent or a child.”

“That’s not what it says.” Trevor punched my arm. “There’s some more about how Grandpa paid for Aunt Bernice’s education, and then… ‘Although many people who had been considered disabled died during the plague, many who had been considered able-bodied were considered disabled as a result of the fever. Kyle himself was now considered blind. His project attracted other engineers who were now considered disabled, such as Charles Rolland and Wayne Gilmore, both deaf, Dave Stephens, a wheelchair user, and Zahavith Rubenstein, who had been diagnosed as autistic’…Now I want the Tablet to read…”

The Tablet went on with the story of the early Handscreens. It bogged down when it came to the contributions of Claudia—“Seidenspinner! Stupid computer,” Trevor said, taking over the narrative. Claudia’s voice is the sound the Tablet synthesizes; it pronounces some words with her accent. She’s a very shy person. I suspect she programmed the Tablet not to recognize her name.

“Handscreens display images of what they scan in a three-dimensional form, allowing users to see shapes with their hands.” The writer hadn’t even heard about the addition of color. “They can also read written words aloud, and translate hand-signed words into written words.”

4

“Look, Mom, a toothbrush!” Trevor tugged on my hand. “A green one, in the gutter.”

“Look with your eyes not your hands,” I said automatically.

We don’t often go to the library. In the olden days, I understand, librarians had to be in the library every day. Now that job, like most jobs, is basically done from home; live-chat screens blur the background while allowing people to see the body language, so I often talk to lonely patrons live from the field where Sam and I raise our vegetables. I can even talk to them live from the shower.

That particular day, I was walking at Trevor’s pace, not even using our Wheels, because it was such a lovely day and in order to create a delay. Someone had tried to remove a real book from the real library. When the Tattletape peeped, my Handscreen alerted me; I set it in live-chat mode, so my face popped up on the screen that swung out from the scannergate as it locked. I said, “Please re-scan the things you’re carrying,” and the person jumped over the scannergate and ran, not apparently aware that the Tattletape would continue peeping, louder and louder, from the book itself until it was properly checked out or properly reshelved. In this kind of situation it’s nice to give the police time to investigate the person’s background, to know what to brace for.

As we walked, the message from the police dispatcher popped up on the screen: Dianne Farbey, age 74, had a police record consisting of two inappropriate emergency calls, within the past three years, both resolved without charges, some minor traffic violations from the years before Wheels, and “trespassing” during a protest in the 1990s. Her official ID photo showed up, as did the snapshot where she was clutching two books and sputtering with indignation.

“Is that the bad person?” Trevor asked.

“Well, I don’t think she seems like such a bad person, on the whole,” I said, dictating the message to the arresting officer, “but I would like to talk to her family along with Ms. Farbey, if that can be arranged.”

It could, of course. Their Wheels reached the library just ahead of us, which was as I’d hoped. When Trevor and I walked in, a woman, obviously her daughter, was holding Ms. Farbey’s hand and trying to reprove a child, smaller than Trevor, who was trying to climb over the scannergate.

I couldn’t resist flicking on live-chat mode and saying sternly, “Please don’t climb on me!”

It worked; the child squeaked and scampered back to Mama.

After the introductions Dianne Farbey made things easy for everyone. “No one was there to check out the books, so I just took them with me, as I’m sure everyone else does! I am not a thief. I had my library card!”

“I’m so sorry,” said her daughter to me. “Mother,” she said to Dianne Farbey, “you run your card through the scanner, now, and then the books. Remember?”

“The what?” said Dianne Farbey. “I had my library card right on top of my book. I always do.”

“I’m very sorry,” I said, and I was. Now we’d spend another year or two debating whether we needed a holographic projection of a librarian standing behind the scanner. I showed her, as her daughter had obviously showed her several times, how the scanner works, and suggested that her daughter accompany her in the library, henceforward.

The officer wasn’t pleased to have come out and not been able to arrest anybody; they don’t have quotas any more, but he was obviously one of the old breed, more interested in some sort of video game he’d had going in his Wheel than in keeping the peace. I’m not too pleased that the Baltimore Police Department still finds jobs for that kind, myself.

“Did you ever see a real bad person?” Trevor piped up.

I blushed, but Officer Grouchy’s voice mellowed. “I sure did, buddy. Down Douglass Street, just Saturday night, we had a blood thief. You know what a blood thief is?”

Trevor knew. “A bad person who cuts somebody to get some blood to fake a finger stick.”  

“That’s right, that’s what they do. And when we find them, we Belt’em so hard they jump up in the air before they fall down!”

Some humans have more evolving to do than others. Anyway, if it helped Grouchy feel better about his interrupted game, it couldn’t be all bad.

“I’m not a bad person,” Dianne Farbey declared.

“Of course you’re not,” I said. “I look forward to serving youall again, the next time.” Dianne Farbey remembered the difference between “you” and “youall,” I’m sure, but she let it go.

On the way back Trevor showed me a dragonfly, a vermilion-red one, and a dogwood tree, a red-violet one, and a garden bordered with early asters, and a bird.

“A robin, a young one, I think a male. But something’s wrong with it; it’s trying to fly and it can’t. It’s old enough to know how to fly.”

“It looks as if it’s eaten a lot of pokeberries,” I said. Pokeberry pulp is messy and tasteless; it’s the seeds that damage the brain, even of a bird.

“Is that cat going to eat it?” my son asked next.

“Not while we’re on the street,” I promised. I could not, however, raise a signal from the cat’s collar.

“It hasn’t got a collar,” Trevor explained.

“What a pity.” The collars they make for cats these days are a treat to watch in action, putting out holographic displays to distract cats from doing things they shouldn’t do and lead them back to where they have some right to be. Still, some cats pull off their collars. Maybe fleas get under them.

“It hasn’t had a collar for a long time,” Trevor said. “See, the fur on its neck…”

“It must be lost,” I said. “Here, kitty, kitty.” I leaned over and wiggled my fingers to catch its attention. It was lost all right; it followed us home.

Before the plague people used to argue about things like whether animals had a right to roam outdoors. Nobody had wasted the city council’s time with that sort of silly argument for years. Nevertheless, two days after we published the news that we’d found the homeless tame cat, DaVernyn O’Halloran published a proposal to round up and sterilize homeless cats in the city. I couldn’t believe he was digging up the same old arguments from the olden days—in one paragraph the poor homeless cats couldn’t survive, in the next paragraph they were going to multiply like flies and wipe out entire bird species, as if there were birds in North America that hadn’t evolved the ability to coexist with cats for thousands of years. Really it was the kind of thing you’d expect from a man whose daughter is named after a type font, wears video-screen shoes to school, and Belts little boys for looking at her videos.

Let’s just say that that proposal never came up for discussion in the council.

5

Since there’s no penalty for having been the owners of a cat that decides to go feral on you, the way the majority of cats did during the plague years, our cat’s rightful heirs turned up later that week.

It was the usual story. Frisby was her mother’s cat, not theirs. He didn’t like their cat, also male, and therefore wanted nothing to do with them, so when the old lady died Frisby went missing. The collar was found, beeping wearily, its battery wearing down, early the next morning. Frisby was nowhere nearby. Cats are safer outdoors than they used to be, since Wheels stop short of any moving thing. Still, Frisby’s heirs had intended to continue feeding him, but they’d never seen him.

We hadn’t had a cat. We had had crickets. So there was no trouble about Frisby moving in with us, and of course the nights were quieter afterward, and I’m sure the rugs are safer.

“I am delighted,” Trevor said solemnly, “that someone in this family is smaller than I am.”

He was a mature cat, maybe all of ten years old, the vet said. He was a blotched tabby, not a mackerel tabby, Trevor said.

I’m not the one paying for a color-enhanced Handscreen. I inherited Dad’s microphthalmia, on both sides, as daughters of men who have it on one side usually do. My eyes, both fully artificial, have never seen colors. People don’t miss what they’ve never had. To me the screen that heats up to indicate white or a pale color felt confusing, disorienting. It would take me a long time to get used to that kind of Handscreen.

And I’ll admit I didn’t really look forward to getting used to having an animal about the house, either. Sighted people think of cats as creatures that purr and catch mice. Blind people think of cats as creatures that dart out under our feet, and if Frisby had tried that I was prepared to kick him so hard he’d fly up in the air before he fell down, whether he could land on his feet or not. But he never was that sort of cat.

“Do you think of yourself as blind?” Sam asked, one night after we were sure Trevor was asleep, when I’d mentioned the difference it makes in people’s attitude toward living with cats.

“Not often,” I said. “Dad would be disappointed…but sometimes I do. I am blind. Totally blind. What I was born with in the way of eyes never saw any difference between midnight and midday. I’ve only ever seen with my hands. It makes a difference when a quiet animal spends its life on a level my hands don’t feel. We never had a cat in the house.”

My parents wanted my childhood to be like Bernice Mathis’s childhood in every way. Dad wanted that so much that he seemed to deny the main differences between Bernice and me. I wouldn’t have wanted Bernice not to have had her eyes, any more than I would have wanted not to have had a father. If he’d thought about it I’m sure Dad would have understood that; he was, after all, the one who reminded me that Bernice had already had her turn to be the age I was, and one day it’d be my turn to be the age Bernice was. But he didn’t want things like beautiful strong eyes, or loving full-time fathers, to make more difference than age did. I think.

“People still tend to become more farsighted with age,” Sam said, later that night. “I wonder whether Frisby’s first human had trouble seeing him under her feet, too.”

Frisby said nothing.

I warned my parents that Frisby was living with us, when they came to visit. He stayed out of the room, though; apparently he was out in the garden with Trevor.

“DaVernyn O’Halloran,” Mom said. “Wasn’t he one of those children…they had Big Brothers and Big Sisters, and Bernice was a Big Sister?”

“The problem child,” Dad said. “The one who confessed that he’d made up those awful stories about Bernice because he was jealous that she was his sister’s Big Sister and not his.”

While dinner was in the oven we watched television. The television’s not hooked into the solar panels like the things we use every day. One person can generate enough energy to run it, but neither of my parents cared to sit around watching me pedal, nor did I care to watch them; I got out the backups, and we charged a few extra batteries while we watched the city council Preview. Anybody can go to the meetings—that’s encouraged here in Baltimore, almost as much by the council members themselves as by the after-business parties—but, in order to speak or vote, you have to have watched the Preview. Most times, after watching the Preview, you decide to let at least one of the council members speak for you. You can pre-vote for that.

This time looked like most times, at first. There was some discussion of changing the commuter train schedule between Washington and New York. None of us rides the train often, so we wouldn’t be voting on that. Someone had reported damaged pavement out toward Dundalk. Nobody expected fixing that to exceed the city’s street budget, so there wouldn’t be much discussion about that. It looked as if those who attended the meeting wouldn’t have long to wait for the party to begin.

Then our council member, Helen Hsiu, said: “I’m being challenged for my seat on this council by my constituent, DaVernyn O’Halloran. He’ll be presenting his campaign platform at the meeting. I find it rather off-putting…for one thing it’s very long.”

“We’ll be going to the meeting after all,” Dad reported, just as Trevor, Sam, and Frisby came in.

“Have you met our cat Frisby?” Trevor said. Frisby let Trevor pick him up and set him on the couch beside Mom. He sniffed at each of my parents’ hands.

“I used to like dogs myself,” Dad said, “when my eye still worked.”

“Oh Grandpa,” Trevor said, “can you see things on your Handscreen now?”

I hadn’t wanted to ask, and Dad hadn’t complained, but he said, “Much better, thanks. I think it was just a matter of getting accustomed to it but my doctor’s changed my supplements, temporarily, just to be sure. Trevor, do you think you can sit through a really long council meeting?”

“’Course I can,” Trevor said. “I can read.”

6

His eyes were still only six years old, of course. I checked to make sure his Tablet was set for large typefonts and loaded with fully illustrated books, just to be sure. I was tempted to check what kind of reading material Marvin had brought, when they sat down side by side, but restrained myself from being so rude to the Kwoks.

Anyway, they behaved themselves, and Helen wasn’t exaggerating when she’d said that O’Halloran’s “platform” was long. Twenty-five different things, the man wanted. The alarming thing was that he seemed to think other people would want any of them. He wanted all kinds of animals, not only cats, rounded up and kept off the streets—claimed it was too much trouble to run his Wheel through the cleaner before bringing it inside. He wanted a ban on hedges, because the Douglass Street blood thief had been hiding in a hedge. He wanted the city to put everyone back on a central electrical power grid, the way they were in the olden days, when if a storm knocked out one panel—well, the equivalent of one panel, whatever that would’ve been—it took out the whole neighborhood’s. He wanted one central instruction program for all the children in all the schools. I think, although my brain was reeling, he’d even said something about a central authority to approve of all publications, before he sat down.

“I’m speechless,” Dad muttered, but when the chair called for comments Dad stood up.

“Mr. O’Halloran may not have been fully aware of it at the time, but when he was born,” Dad said, “the city of Baltimore had many of these things that Mr. O’Halloran thinks he wants. I would never have expected that a younger person would want to go back to those times. My generation worked hard to move society past these bad ideas. But it’s not just the intergenerational insult that concerns me here. Neighbors, most of Mr. O’Halloran’s proposals have one thing in common. They are not grounded in respect for each individual’s freedom of choice. They are as rude, as disrespectful, as extending the traditional closing of meetings from ‘God save us all’ into a formal prayer; a prayer within one religious tradition, say, that petitions specifically for followers of other traditions to convert to the speaker’s own tradition.”

Helen Hsiu started shouting “Hear! Hear!” Of course we all joined in, afterward; even the non-voting section.

“Mr. O’Halloran,” said the chair, after several minutes of “Hear! Hear!”, “I think you’ve heard that?”

O’Halloran looked at the floor like a sulky child.

“Is there any other business?” There wasn’t. The chair rapped his gavel. “God save us all. The meeting is adjourned. Let the party begin.”

Weather not only permitted but encouraged the party to begin out in the street. (We still have wide, smooth streets from the days of huge, heavy vehicles.) As we walked out people started singing:

All Maryland is of one mind, oh Maryland, my Maryland:
Here peace and freedom all may find, in Maryland, my Maryland.
Toward true progress we’re inclined, and meddling will no longer bind
The liberty of humankind, in Maryland, my Maryland.

I suppose O’Halloran was born right around the time our state voted to add a verse people could actually sing, without feeling queasy, to the state song. Helen Hsiu walked up beside us. “It’s a disease, of course,” she said.

“Yes.” Mom knew what she meant. “Control mania.”

“The hard part is persuading people like that to get help in time,” she said. “It’s too bad that he has a child.”

I was scanning the crowd for Trevor; since he hadn’t led Marvin straight to us I guessed he must have followed Marvin to the Kwoks, which it turned out that he had. With them was a girl, bigger than they were, with a lot of very long thin braids.

“Mother, Dad, Grandma, Grandpa,” Trevor recited proudly, “this is Leelawadee O’Halloran from school. Lee, my parents are Mr. and Mrs. Aguilera, and my grandparents are Mr. and Mrs. McClintock.”

We all greeted her warmly, though I’ll admit that uncharitable thoughts came to my mind. I don’t call myself “Mrs. Aguilera,” and hardly recognize that name as meaning me—though it’s hardly likely to mean Sam’s mother, a casualty of the plague, and I do recognize “the Aguileras” as including me—but I didn’t feel like telling the O’Halloran child to call me “Kylene McClintock,” either. I noticed that Mom didn’t mention her name being Michi Hayazawa, either.

“Mr. and Mrs. Aguilera,” recited Leelawadee O’Halloran, “I’m sorry I Belted Trevor and Marvin at school that day, and I’d like to invite them to watch the whole Wossup Possum video on my Tablet. It was only fragments on those shoes, anyway.”

Needless to say we all watched the kids closely—the Kwoks, too—and what d’you think, they behaved perfectly. They watched the cartoon, they sang along when the adults sang, they danced when other people danced. Anybody would have thought Leelawadee O’Halloran was as nice a child as our two.

7

The funny thing, I mean the peculiar thing, was that she seemed to like our two.

“I wonder why?” I asked Trevor, after having seen Leelawadee O’Halloran five times in the next three weeks or so. “Don’t girls her own age play with her?”

“I don’t think there are any girls her age at school with us this year,” he said. “I’m not sure. There are some girls who come on the other Schoolwheels from other neighborhoods; I think they’re more like my age. Then there are three girls who are ten years old. They don’t like anyone who’s younger.”

I still thought it was peculiar for an eight-year-old child to want to play with other children as often as that one seemed to do. I wondered whether her father’s mental condition had anything to do with that.

Dad reported that he was getting better use from his colorized Handscreen by beginning with the unenhanced view, to which he was accustomed, and then checking for light-and-dark and then for color.

“Will there ever be a world without disabilities?” he said rhetorically. “As long as people get older, they’ll have to deal with increasing wear and tear on their faculties, year by year.”

“A world where people accept some disabilities, as they get older, is better than that other way some people wanted to build a world without disabilities,” Mom said.

It’s still mostly a Jewish tradition, but the library does observe a day of remembrance for that, every year; for one week the history material is on display, and some years people bring in pictures of the people who were murdered, some for having disabilities.

“And some things will always be hard to spot, at first,” I said, thinking of DaVernyn O’Halloran.

“Does that child…” Mom guessed what I was thinking.

“At least she seems to have a healthy taste for vegetables, as a snack,” I said as lightly as possible. “Once or twice a week she’s come out to buy some.”

“And lingered?”

“And lingered. At least there’ve been no more violent confrontations.”

“More than one child even living in a house used to be considered normal,” Mother said. “I don’t think it necessarily did all of them all that much harm. I think you and Bernice Mathis were actually good for each other.”

“I don’t think Marvin’s bad for Trevor at all,” I said, “but who knows about the O’Halloran child.”

What she’d told the boys was that her mother was ill.

“There’ll never be a world without colds,” Dad said. “There’ll never be a cure for colds, because the cold is the cure.”

8

I found out a good deal more about the O’Halloran child, not too long after that.

We were all, Sam and Trevor and I, and even Frisby, sailing down the bay to a farmers’ market to unload some vegetables. It was quiet, not much wind, and we weren’t talking or singing, and we heard something that must have sounded just a bit different from the usual seagull noise; different enough that we all concentrated on listening for it, and sure enough, it was a child. So we steered a little closer—and it was Leelawadee’s voice.

Then it stopped. None of us liked the sound of the silence after that child’s cry, “No, don’t,” had stopped.

Sam anchored the boat, quietly. We slipped over the side, quietly, carrying shoes and Handscreen around our necks, and waded onto the shore as quietly as possible. Trevor, as usual, held my hand. Sam didn’t; we lost sight of him. Frisby, having decided at the last moment to come ashore on Sam’s shoulder, bounded ahead of Trevor. I suppose, without meaning to, we let the cat guide us.

But we were the first to hear Leelawadee say, “Mrs. Aguilera’s out there on the bay. See her boat?” She sniffled.

“Wouldn’t matter if Mrs. Aguilera were right here,” O’Halloran said, as we tiptoed up on them. “Can’t you tell by looking at her? She’s blind.”

They were in some scrub bushes near the water. Sam, we found out later, had rushed further in to check a boathouse where he thought someone who was ashamed of what he intended to do might have gone.

“See the Aguileras’ cat,” said Leelawadee O’Halloran.

“See the Aguileras right here,” I said grimly, focussing the Handscreen on her.  “Hello, neighbor O’Halloran. Is everything all right?”

“Wossat on your face?” Trevor asked her. “It’s on your shirt, too. Have you got a cold?”

“I thought it sounded as if something were wrong,” I said, temporizing, thinking of something to say that wouldn’t sound too threatening. I meant to let him be dealt with properly by the authorities. I lied, “There’s a different kind of infection going around town. Not a cold. Treatable. Would you like to go in with us for a finger stick? You’d better come too, DaVernyn, since you’ve been exposed.”

“Is it a bad infection?” Trevor asked.

“It can get bad if it’s not treated,” I said. “If you see anything on her skin or clothes, don’t get close to her. Let the doctor…”

“Get out of here,” O’Halloran shouted at him.

He ran, and I was glad, because you can’t Belt one male and not another one standing within range. As a blind woman I have that switch on my Handscreen, too, as well as on my wrist watch.

“Don’t touch her,” I babbled, knowing exactly what he was trying to wipe off his daughter’s clothes and skin. Of course he ignored me. Of course I Belted him.

So did Leelawadee. Apparently his Belt registered both charges in just close enough succession that he really did jerk up into the air, a few inches, before he came down.

The switch that fires the electric current through the Belt also activates a siren. People are supposed to come to the rescue. Police come, if you’re close enough that they pick up the signal—but we don’t have as many of them as we once did, in Baltimore, and they don’t spend much time along the bay. In our case the person who came to the rescue was Sam.

“Can’t you shut those things off,” he screamed.

“They go for ten minutes,” Leelawadee howled back. “Even the police can’t shut them off.”

We put our fingers in our ears and waited, since it would be illegal as well as hateful to sail away before the police came. Nobody tried to find out where Frisby had gone, either; obviously as far from the horrible noise as he could get. I wondered whether the noise was meant to help incapacitate the victim.

When the sirens shut themselves off at last Sam asked Leelawadee O’Halloran, “Did someone else make that mess on your shirt?”

She nodded. “My father did. He’s the one who’s sick. Not me.”

“Has he done that before?” I asked.

She nodded again.

“Did he threaten to do something else if you Belted him?” Sam asked.

She nodded again. “He said he’d kill my dog. He’s hurt my dog, anyway. He’s probably,” she said, cold-blooded as children can be, “going to hurt Trevor.”

Trevor had sensibly gone back to the boat; but he wasn’t quite big enough to lift the anchor. O’Halloran was starting to pull himself together; he’d slithered several yards down toward the water, and seemed to be trying to get to the boat.

“He’s not going to hurt Trevor,” Sam said. “Why don’t you go and join Trevor in the boat now.”

“May I,” she said, sweet as children can be, “look for your cat first?”

“I don’t expect the cat will abandon Trevor for very long,” I said. “I think you’re safer in the boat.”

Both of us were still hoping to hear a police motorbike, being so far from a road on which a Wheel would roll. Neither of us heard one. I started, not running or dancing, exactly, but walking briskly around in circles, the Text Message Dance, trying to find a signal to send a message: Stunned pedophile on bay shore, help please.

Sam walked down toward O’Halloran. “You are not going to hurt Trevor. You are not going to have a chance. Don’t even think about it. Just sit down.”

O’Halloran turned around and told him, in the foulest terms I suppose he could think of, exactly how he was going to hurt Sam, and then me (“your blind very-rude-word”), and then Trevor, and Leelawadee, and her dog, and our cat, and if any police did show up…

So there was nothing else I could have done. “Sam! Leave him! Get clear!” I sidestepped so as not to point it in Trevor’s direction, either, and let O’Halloran have the charge from the watch. And then we all put our fingers in our ears and sat down again, except for O’Halloran, who was knee-deep in the Bay when he fell.

That time the police picked up the signal.

Sam asked Officer Brisk whether O’Halloran was still alive, not that it makes a great deal of difference to a convicted pedophile. Officer Brisk thought he might be alive; but he wasn’t. DaVernyn O’Halloran drowned in three feet of water.

9

They say it’s boys who never quite get over losing their fathers; girls, like Bernice Mathis, can survive without fathers if they have the other things they need. Lee’s mother, Olivia Brown, wasn’t good for much—her sickness turned out to be the kind that comes in bottles—but Lee wanted to stay with her, and we thought that would be the best way, having their own home while being part of our family; it had worked for Bernice.

I’ve become fond of Lee, over time. Of course you only ever have one child, unless you have some sort of multiple birth, and you never love another child the same way you love your own. Then again, don’t most adults love most children, if we get to know them? Anyway Lee has her own mother.

After we’d all searched and called for more than two hours, we found Frisby, and he let Trevor bring him back home.

I felt bad about O’Halloran, of course, but everyone agreed that I’d had no choice.


“I suppose,” Dad said, “there’s only one way to eradicate some kinds of disabilities.” 

Friday, November 18, 2016

Petition I Oppose (As It Reached Me) (But Perhaps You...)

I totally oppose this petition that came in my e-mail...because it was generated by a computer program that mashed up petitions and city names. "Protect Undocumented Immigrants in Gate City"? Well, duh...

1. In my lifetime I've known very few "immigrants"--neither "undocumented"--who found it possible to earn a living in Gate City. (Of the two men, one was from Lee County, one from Wise County. The others were women who married male landowners, and the most exotic one of them came from England.) If a socioeconomic niche exists, about forty local people are probably competing for it already.

2. There are ways I want any neighborhood in which I live to be inclusive, and ways in which I want it to be exclusive.

(a) I like biodiversity, in et per se. Most young people are always going to want to marry and have children; they can only marry members of neighboring families for so many generations before everybody in town is related to everybody else. Gate City is close enough to that point that I'm ready to go all the way back to our Cherokee ancestors' position: send the young people out as a welcoming committee to meet any newcomers, even if they meet and decide to marry people with less desirable genes; better they should marry any kind of foreigners than inbreed with relatives.

(b) I like linguistic diversity, too. Every day I walk past that parked vehicle with the sticker saying "Welcome to America, now speak English or leave." I think that idea is as dead as that vehicle appears to be. I've always been grateful that I was exposed to enough Spanish to be able to make conversation in that language, which I read; I've always envied my brother's being exposed to that much conversational French, which I also read but don't really speak. We need to stop cheating our children out of the cognitive advantage of learning to speak more than one language well.

(c) But when it comes down to which people should live here...er um...that's a question of voluntary behavior that needs to be decided on an individual basis. Mere "documentation" does not make people good neighbors, but it's a start, because it shows willingness to support the rule of law. There are also questions of how well people do at keeping quiet, respecting boundaries, looking the other way if they don't like the (deliberate yuppie-repellent) look of the neighbors' property, keeping taxes low, competing with better-funded schools, maintaining houses and farms as distinct from living in slummy little apartment blocks, and voting for...fiscal conservatives, anyway, if not always Republicans. We have plenty of native-born welfare cheats and need no more.

3. There are people in cyberspace who consider this web site right-wing, but relative to Gate City standards I'm a flaming liberal. Especially on the topic of immigration...my husband legally immigrated to the U.S. from Canada, a good long time before I met him, but I'll admit he looked more exotic than most Canadians do. When my family could afford to entertain, it's widely known that we even hosted "legal resident aliens" who weren't even trying to immigrate. Well, my family have a certain reputation for physical courage and fortitude, which let's just say some people do not share. The TV-consuming sector in my home town listen to all the blather about how "illegal aliens" commit all kinds of crimes...e.g. last winter's debacle in Germany. Y'ought've seen the signs outside the polls on Election Day. A lot of people voted for Trump because they want him to crack down on immigration.

4. Unfortunately those pusillanimous people do have a point.

(a) I am not saying that everybody fleeing from hardships in other countries is by nature a bad person. The danger with Muslim immigrants is that in some countries, if they're allowed to become significant demographic sectors even in neighborhoods within some cities, they start agitating to declare their neighborhoods "Islamic communities" and enforce sharia law. That's not what Christians want, nor what I want, but it's a far cry from the fears some TV shows have been feeding people.

(b) But what are desperately poor young people going to do if they're allowed to immigrate to a community that already doesn't have enough jobs to keep even one-tenth of our own local home-grown talent able to stay here, work, and support their children? Yes, any landowner should be able to offer food and shelter to a few short-term "refugees"--but we can't offer them the kind of future young people want, need, and deserve. Has Greisa Martinez completely forgotten how it feels to be twenty years old, already? When you're twenty years old, no sooner do you get inside a house and outside a meal than you start thinking about marriage, "career," and children...your future. Your instincts tell you that you're supposed to have a future. A life sentence to merely food and shelter, for young people, is what we-as-a-society offer by way of punishment to violent criminals. We cannot realistically invite more young, poor people to "immigrate" to Gate City. Even if they were naturally inclined to be honest and hardworking, we would--as an unintended consequence--make them a "new mafia."

So this petition, like several "personalized" e-mails I've received via Move On, struck me as...hysterically clueless. This is so not relevant to me or my town.

I do not, of course, support "harassment" of immigrants. (Gate City's population respect the rule of law, and don't overtly "harass" immigrants. We just never pay anyone well, or make it possible for a business to pay anyone well, even if it's a local person.) I do support accurately informing immigrants...The evolution of an isolated population lacking immunity to several common diseases led to mass deaths from plagues in the seventeenth century. The result of those plagues was a "New World of Opportunity" for the surplus population of Europe and, to a lesser extent, Africa and Asia, in the nineteenth century.

Then in the twentieth century people--mostly English-speaking, and largely American, people--discovered so many wonderful ways to allow more humans to enjoy longer lives that the global human population has exploded. Even North America has slowly filled up, and no longer offers endless opportunities to anyone who wants to come here. In the small towns there is no honest economic opportunity for immigrants; in the cities there's not much more. We can still offer temporary "refugees" food and shelter, but unless people take steps to bring the birth rate into line with the modern world--or unless another plague creates more mass deaths--it's no longer possible for any nation on Earth to welcome "immigrants" the way my ancestors welcomed  "immigrants" during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

I think the whole idea of "documenting" and deporting immigrants, en masse, should be better understood as an economic indicator. North America can no longer offer immigrants anything better than any other part of the world can offer them. We can and should offer "safety" from violence, but not from deportations of any would-be immigrants who don't meet criteria for legal immigration that will inevitably rise higher every year.

If you are an illegal "immigrant" in the United States, I recommend, in pure good will, that you go home now. If going home really is suicide, there are still a few people who can afford to sponsor or adopt you. (I wish I were one of them; I'm not. And if I were to become able to sponsor an illegal "immigrant," the position has been filled.) There aren't as many as there once were. There will be fewer every year. If the embassy of your home country can't get you in, legally...there are other countries to which legal immigration is easier. They tend to be the countries with less human-friendly climates, but people do live there. So should you. Modern technology is making it much easier to live and work in arctic or tropical countries than it used to be. Just commit to producing one child or none in your lifetime, and you'll probably be fine.

If you are a U.S. citizen, is the idea of "sanctuary cities" relevant to you and your city? You decide. I'm in no position to dictate whether cities like San Francisco can afford to shelter, perhaps sponsor, masses of undocumented "immigrants." That's entirely up to the residents of those cities.

"

Tell U.S. Mayors: Protect Undocumented Immigrants - Declare Your City a Sanctuary of Safety! #HereToStay

To be delivered to U.S. Mayors
Trump has said he will deport millions, and anti-immigrant harassment is already out of control. It is time to declare America’s cities as sanctuaries of safety and not allow local police to do the work of immigration agents. If your city is not already, declare it a sanctuary city. And if it is, commit to do everything in your power to maintain your sanctuary status and protect your undocumented residents from a Trump administration.
There are currently 81,862 signatures. NEW goal - We need 100,000 signatures!

PETITION BACKGROUND

Mayors across the country must stand with their undocumented immigrant residents in this moment of crisis.

Undocumented Immigrants like me are under attack: Donald Trump has already said that in the first 100 days of office he would cancel DACA, a program that provides undocumented youth with work permits and protection from deportation, and begin deporting 2 million undocumented immigrants. But we can change this if we pressure mayors to declare their cities as sanctuaries of safety.

In a sanctuary city, officials implement policies to restrict local police from turning immigrants over to federal immigration agents and declare in no uncertain terms that immigrants are welcome. Without them, undocumented immigrants like me and my family are left vulnerable to racial profiling, detention and deportation.

We salute the mayors of cities like Seattle, San Jose, San Francisco, and Oakland who have been quick to stand with their undocumented residents. 
  • Welcome the immigrants as our grandparents and parents were welcomed immigrants.
  • "

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Charles Battig on County Planning

Patricia Evans recommends Charles Battig's comments on the Albemarle County (Virginia) Comprehensive Plan as an example for other counties, in and beyond Virginia:

"
This critique of the Albemarle County Comprehensive Plan is required reading; the pattern should become evident to all:

"This Comprehensive Plan Draft (CPD) envisions an expanded role for County government via a mindboggling bureaucracy to measure, document, implement, monitor, regulate, and enforce new regulations on most every aspect of private property usage based on vague “biodiversity” mandates. The CPD has taken the legitimate need to lay out the accepted aspects of County government, and has bloated them into the proposed bureaucracy of a super “nanny state.” Albemarle County would be the grantor of citizens’ rights, thus turning our Constitution on its head, with the County telling its citizens what they might be permitted to do…literally."

Unmasked: Charles Battig deconstructs Albemarle County Comp Plan

By Schilling Show on Apr 22, 2013 http://www.schillingshow.com/2013/04/22/unmasked-charles-battig-deconstructs-albemarle-county-comp-plan/

Analysis of Comprehensive Plan Draft March 2013 Version

Prepared by Charles Battig March 23, 2013

(Sections of the original Comprehensive Plan Document (CPD) are copied together with my associated comments following my introductory General Comments)

Disclaimer: I have received no payment for preparing this analysis. However, my taxes have funded the salaries of those County and Federal employees who have prepared the CPD and who presume to speak for the “we” and for “Albemarle.”

General Comments

Enabling VA State Code VA Code 15.2-2223 specifies that comprehensive plans are to be “general in nature.” On this basis alone the proposed plan deserves to be rejected out-of-hand as it proposes to micromanage every aspect of the life of County citizens.

Chapter 5 of the CPD lists nine areas subject to analysis, evaluation, regulation, and monitoring. They include Natural Resources, Historic, Cultural, and Scenic Resources, Economic Development, Land Use for the Rural Areas, Land Use for the Development Areas, Housing, Transportation, Parks and Recreation, Greenways, Blueways, and Green Systems, and Community Services and Facilities. Why do these goals sound familiar? They mirror the U.N Treaty on Biodiversity of 1992 (UN Agenda 21Chapter 15: Conservation Of Biological Diversity: http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/a21-15.htm and http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=52&ArticleID=63 ), and land management proposals by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in 1981. The land use policies required by the UN treaty were also expressed in dozens of other UN documents and at other UN conferences, and incorporated into the agendas of NGOs for implementation through programs and legislation at the local, state, and federal levels. The U.S. Senate rejected ratification of the UN Biodiversity Treaty in 1994, but the TJPDC and Albemarle County planning staff have seemingly done an end-run and have coordinated efforts to place their “son-of-UN-biodiversity treaty” into the revised CPD. Also represented in the CPD are the 1991Wildness Project and The Rewilding Institute, originated by convicted eco-terrorist Dave Foreman, are similar objectives of legislating “diverse, interconnected areas of viable habitat for native wildlife” (page 5.4.9. CPD).

What aspect of a nominally free citizen’s life would be untouched by these imposed regulations? Who has decided that such regulations are needed? What happened to our Founding Fathers’ guiding principle of limited government? Have Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and John Adams just become local money-making tourist attractions, rather than the philosophical founders of our Country and County? The U.S. Constitution is based on the premise of enumerating the limited powers of the Federal government to those granted by the citizens.

This CPD envisions an expanded role for County government via a mindboggling bureaucracy to measure, document, implement, monitor, regulate, and enforce new regulations on most every aspect of private property usage based on vague “biodiversity” mandates. The CPD has taken the legitimate need to lay out the accepted aspects of County government, and has bloated them into the proposed bureaucracy of a super “nanny state.” Albemarle County would be the grantor of citizens’ rights, thus turning our Constitution on its head, with the County telling its citizens what they might be permitted to do…literally.

Any allusions to community input and approval of this plan ring hollow. Actual attendance at public comment meetings has been extremely sparse. Data from the Livability Project documented that less than 0.25% of County residents participated. By my personal observation most of those who attended these meetings were generally the same small group of people. That same survey included the finding that the number one and number two desires of County residents were “decrease regulations” and “protect private property rights.” These desires are trampled over by this CPD.

As one of a number of those who participated as a “community group” in the Livability Partnership (referenced in the CPD), I was required to sign an agreement authored by Mr. S. Williams, Executive Director, which included the statements: “Livability Partnership is not a decision making group. The group will not take votes or make recommendations…Livability Partnership is also not a consensus building group…we do not expect members of the Livability Partnership to agree with or express their support for the final recommendations in the Livability Implementation Plan.” In other words, participants could not expect their views to alter the pre-determined mindset of the TJPDC group.

The public has a right to understand how unelected bodies such as the TJPDC ( Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission ) and County Staff, funded by taxpayers, can propose to impose their views of what the public may and may not do. An examination of the language in the CPD documents the view of a socialistic Utopia. An all-encompassing, fuzzily-defined ‘biodiversity” is the new greater-good, and benchmark for all human activities.

Lastly, the CPD is also illustrative of the rule by technocracy. This assumes that if only the “experts” are put in charge, they will craft the “optimal” plan for the running of government. However, if all experts have been trained to analyze and resolve proposed problems in the same manner, then group-think and in-bred stagnation of imagination is the result. The American Planning Association (APA) is the parent organization for most planning “professionals” and their group-think. The APA produced PAS Report 556, Smart Codes: Model Land-Development Regulations, which includes 21 model codes on a variety of topics promoting Smart Growth Principles. APA Smart Codes provides an overview of the structure of land-development regulations and is a guide to the development of model smart growth ordinances, including models that may be adapted by local governments. Rather than save some room for ad hoc solving of unanticipated problems by traditional hearings, petitions, negotiations, and legal process, the County planners have delivered their pre-packaged protocols for all the problems of which they can conceive in the CPD. The running of Amtrak has not escaped their prevue.

Fredrick Hayak succinctly demonstrated the inherent reasons for the historical failure of such social planning in his book “The Fatal Conceit”in which he labels as the “fatal conceit” to “act on the belief that we possess the knowledge and the power which enable us to shape the processes of society entirely to our liking, knowledge which in fact we do not possess, is likely to make us do much harm.”

Analysis of Selected Portions of the CPD

CPD Chapter 2 (page 2.1.1):
2.1 Values and Vision:
#1. “Designated Development Areas”…
The desirable qualities of the County are early-on restricted to the designated development areas; the rural areas are not included.
#2Albemarle County values its:
· Mountains, valleys, streams, forests, farms, and meadows
· Excellent educational opportunities from our public and private schools, college, and university
· Economic drivers which are business, industry, and the University of Virginia
· Neighborhoods, places to shop, and places to worship
· Parks, greenway trails, and recreational areas
· Historic and cultural resources
· Community partner, the City of Charlottesville, as the area is considered One Community”
There is no mention of the people who actually live here in this list of “values,” only physical attributes.
Growth Management Policy:
Page 2.2.1
#3.“While the County does not endeavor to attract new residents…”
But the County encourages new businesses to locate here; someone forgot to tell the planners.
#4.“Resource protection is the basic theme behind the County’s policy.”
Why not “resource utilization” since resources are of little value if they are walled-off as untouchable. Protection from what? Why not prudent utilization in place of protection?
#5.“This preferred design, described as the Neighborhood Model in the Land Use.”
This is another name for “Smart Growth” with high population-density neighborhoods. A paper in the APA Journal (Journal of the American Planning Association, Spring 2012, Vol. 78, No. 2) has examined the premise of lower emissions and other presumed benefits of the Smart Growth model. The conclusions of the authors of this first scientific study of such claims: Smart Growth Policies: An Evaluation of Programs and Outcomes Conclusions:
“The current planning policy strategies for land use and transport have virtually no impact on the major long-term increases in resource and energy consumption. They generally tend to increase costs and reduce economic competitiveness… Smart growth principles should not unquestioningly promote increasing levels of compaction on the basis of reducing energy consumption without also considering its potential negative consequences. In many cases, the potential socioeconomic consequences of less housing choice, crowding, and congestion may outweigh its very modest CO2 reduction benefits.”
I have presented this finding to the Albemarle County Planning Commission, but no change in their devotion to Smart Growth has resulted from this new research.
#6.“The private sector also has not yet provided some of the services expected and desired by the community, and in the form desired in convenient and more accessible locations to residential neighborhoods in the Development Areas.”
The County Planners seem thwarted by the realities of the competitive market place which bases its decisions on cost-effective economic analysis of any potential market area.
Page 2.2:
#7. Encouraging residential development in the Rural Areas is not consistent with protecting the Rural Areas…In addition to directing growth to the Development Areas, planning efforts focus on ways to discourage new residential development in the Rural Areas (except where it directly supports agricultural uses…Encouraging residential development in the Rural Areas is not consistent with protecting the Rural Areas…giving road improvement preference in the Development Areas – is key in limiting rural residential development
The negative mindset of the planners regarding development in the Rural Area (95%) of the County flows from their devotion to Smart Growth. They will not accept the possibility that residential growth in the Rural Area can take place in an environmentally sound manner; they present an either/or false choice between “sprawl” and Smart Growth. People who freely choose to live in the Rural Area do so without the expectation of the same level of County services as in the Developed areas, but they do not deserve to be short-changed either in County benefits deserving from the property taxes they pay.
(February 15, 2012, Charlottesville-Tomorrow reports the TJPDC Livability findings: “Most of the 508 respondents ‘said they would prefer to live in the rural areas of Albemarle County if there were no barriers in choice of housing.’ Sixty-one percent said they commuted from outside the Charlottesville-Albemarle area because they found housing elsewhere more affordable or a better value.”)
Page 3.1
2013 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Comprehensive Planning in Albemarle County:
#8. “…establishes the County’s policy to help guide public and private activities…”
“Guide,” not micromanage.
#9. “…ensure that it is consistent with community views…”
Community views, not Planning Staff views.
Page 3.2
#10. Regional Planning PACC – Albemarle County – City of Charlottesville – UVA
Of all the organizations listed, how many are run by elected officials responsible to their constituents?
#11. Sustainability Council… The Thomas Jefferson Sustainability Council was created in 1994 by the TJPDC…was given the charge to “describe a future where our economic, human, social, and environmental health are assured.”
“Assured” is a synonym for “guaranteed.” This vision of the TJPDC is that of Rousseau and the socialists. Where in our Constitution, or in the writings of our local heroes (Jefferson, Adams, and Madison) is there a premise of a guarantee of other than of opportunity. This Marxist doctrine of guaranteed results adopted by the TJPDC and the County Planners must be repudiated and deleted. The 15 listed accords omit the companion “objectives” and “evaluations” present in the original document: http://www.tjpdc.org/pdf/sustainability%20accords.pdf These accords lay the foundation for an authoritative over-ride of personal liberty; China and Russia are examples of authoritarian rule resulting from socialism mandates. They are also examples of the misery inflicted on the poor by such policies.
Page 3.5
#12. “Albemarle County continues to want to meet the needs of the present without compromising future generations’ ability to meet their needs.”
The TJPDC and County Planners seem to be shy about their tie to United Nations dogma. Here I have copied the official United Nations definition of “Sustainability.” Our Common Future, also known as the Brundtland Report, from the United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) was published in 1987. It defined sustainability as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” Do you see a striking resemblance? At least the CPD should give the U.N. the credit.
Page 3.6
#13. Livability Project:
In 2011, the TJPDC began work with the City of Charlottesville, Albemarle County, and UVA on the Livability Implementation Plan for the Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) area. The process to develop this plan, referred to as the Livable Communities Planning Project, built upon the region’s 1998 Sustainability Accords…
This project was/is funded by a $999,000 Federal HUD grant to the TJPDC. The grant application was titled as a “Sustainability” grant, but the name was quickly changed soon after. Executive Director Mr. Stephen Williams was most reassuring regarding the concerns of citizens as to the objectives of the grant process. Charlottesville-Tomorrow quoted him: “We have no intention to dictate to people what they can do with their land, or to place any new requirements on them,” he added. “We are not in the business of telling people what to do. We are asking what can be done on a voluntary basis to increase sustainability in the region.” As I read through the CPD, the numerous headings beginning with “The County Shall” do not sound “voluntary” to me.
Continuing:
#14. The Livability Partnership Group was made up of more than 60 representatives of community organizations. The organizations ranged from neighborhood associations, political parties, environmental interest groups, housing advocacy organizations, hobby guilds, and more. All three of the project groups participated in the Livability Project.
Indeed. However, participation required members to sign an application in which Mr. Williams noted that it was not to be a consensus building effort, nor should members expect TJPDC policy to be influenced. Listing such “participation” does not mean approval of the final product by Community members, nor does it mean that their suggestions were adopted.
Continuing:
#15. The goal of the project was to develop:
1. A Performance Measurement System to analyze where the region stands with respect to transportation, the environment, housing, economic development, and energy use;
2. One map reflecting future land use designations and transportation projects for the City of Charlottesville and the County of Albemarle;
3. A list of recommended Livability policies to inform the Charlottesville and Albemarle Comprehensive Plans, and the MPO Long Range Transportation Plan;
4. Recommendations for code and ordinance changes to help implement recommended Livability policies; and,
5. Recommendations for voluntary individual and community-wide actions that will support livability within the community.
At the writing of this Plan, items 1 – 3 were completed and can be found in a report in the reference materials.
When I scroll down to see the referenced completed “Items 1-3,” I see the following message:
“Livability Report
This report is still under development by the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission.”
I consider County citizens fortunate that the TJPDC group did not make it to Item 4. Creating ordinance changes would seem to have been the goal all along.
#16. Pages 3.7 to Page 3.11
Note that each of these multitudes of wish lists of potential County control begins with “The County Shall.” Note that no considerations of taxpayer cost or of cost-effectiveness are listed for these regulatory and bureaucratic expansions.
Chapter 4 The People of Albemarle County
#17. Page 4.5
“With increased population, planning will continue to be important to ensure that natural resources continue in abundance and sufficient housing and jobs are available for future populations.”
Planners know how to ensure abundant natural resources; based on what? Which natural resources will be chosen?
Chapter 5: The Plan for Albemarle County
#18. Page 5.1.1
“Ecological functions are ways in which nature meets and fulfills human needs.”
Some planner is heavy into Gaia Earth Mother mysticism/teleological thinking.
#19. Page 5.1.2
Ecosystems
“These three levels (species diversity, genetic diversity, ecosystem diversity) interact in an extremely complex manner, and these interactions provide the life support of all species.”
Do the planners claim to understand these interactions? Is today’s snapshot of “biodiversity” the “best-of-all-worlds” version? The implication of all these measurements is an incomplete and static view of biodiversity. The chief scientist of the Nature Conservancy Peter Kareiva, who co-authored “Conservation in the Anthropocene,” notes that conservation’s task is no longer to “preserve the wild, but to domesticate nature more wisely…conservation must not fall back into the ideological and impractical fortress mentality, a mentality that is insensitive to humans with needs that might supersede biodiversity…” “Conservationists will have to jettison their idealized notions of nature, parks, and wilderness… and forge a more optimistic, human-friendly vision…”
Maybe not here in Albemarle County…
#18. Pages 5.1.2-5.1.12
“Biodiversity” is short for biological diversity – the variety of living organisms of all kinds – animals, plants, fungi and microorganisms – that inhabit a particular area or ecosystem.” “…In some cases, the species need large areas that may not correspond to any single recognized parcel of land or that connect via corridors that cross many parcels. A general pattern of large tracts of land and unbroken corridors is as important as the size of any individual parcel…Land development causes fragmentation of habitats and reductions in connectivity which has a major impact on biodiversity in a landscape. Fragmentation is the carving-up of habitats into ever-smaller areas, with the accompanying lack of connections, called “corridors.”
The planners seem unwilling to accept the views of the Nature Conservancy paper, and treat biological systems as extremely fragile, in need of their micromanaging and curtailment of private property rights of land owners. The U.N. influence in the County planning mind-set is illustrated by the “The Wildlands Project and UN Convention on Biological Diversity Plan to Restore Biodiversity in the United States.” The Wildlands Project would set up to one-half of America into core wilderness reserves and interconnecting corridors, all surrounded by interconnecting buffer zones. http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20091223.htm
It was defeated as a U.N. treaty by the U.S. Senate in 1994 when it was withdrawn from a vote. However, the TJPDC and County Planners have resurrected it here, and use “biodiversity” to justify their claim on all activities in the County.
PLAN FOR NATURAL RESOURCES:
#19. Page 5.1.13
The County, with the guidance of the Natural Heritage Committee, needs to develop systematic knowledge of the type and distribution of biological resources in the area.
At what cost; to what level of detail?
#20. Page 5.1.13
“The County should establish concrete goals for the Albemarle landscape, including targets for overall forest cover, the preservation of existing forest blocks, and the restoration or establishment of additional forest blocks. The County should also use the StreamWatch analysis of the relationship between land use (particularly forest cover and impervious surfaces) and water quality to classify stream health in the County’s watersheds, and to develop appropriate management approaches for them.”
This begins the ground work for a huge new governmental bureaucracy; who sets targets? Based on what valid scientific assumptions? At what cost? At what loss of private property rights or even human rights?
#21. Page 5.1.14
“The action plan should be based on a landscape-level analysis that incorporates data on the County’s landforms and on the location and quality of habitats (including fragmentation and connectivity, as well as their current level of biodiversity). Aquatic biodiversity should also be addressed through a sub-watershed analysis. The goal of these analyses would be to identify priority areas for conservation and restoration so that the County’s policies and resources could be used to protect biodiversity in the most effective manner.
Building on this analysis, the County should develop the action plan to focus on conserving ecological integrity at the scale of the landscape. The landscape approach focuses on a wide scale (square miles rather than square feet) and on the management of major land features (e.g., forest blocks, watersheds, urbanized areas) to both conserve ecological diversity and support sustainable economic uses of the land. Important landscape features can be prioritized for conservation measures (such as conservation easements) or for restoration efforts. This plan should also establish conservation approaches for aquatic conservation through land-management techniques designed for specific watershed.”
This is the UN Biodiversity Plan being introduced into Albemarle County. Biodiversity mandates trump private property rights and ignore financial and human costs. The “Objectives” and “Strategies” described in detail in the following pages of the CPD illustrate the level of micromanagement proposed.
#22. Page 5.1.14-15
“…existing list of important sites developed by the Biodiversity Work Group (link) can serve to identify sites in need of protection in the near term.”
This continues the planners’ obsession with “protection” as their excuse for intrusive regulations and role as environmental policemen.
#23. Page 5.1.5
“Other than the Shenandoah National Park and other publicly owned parks and school sites, almost all of the land in Albemarle County is privately owned.”
Not for long, if the ACE and similar Conservation Easement programs are expanded as is promoted in the CPD. Approximately 19% of the County is under such easements. When is enough, enough?
# 24. Page 5.1.14
“Strategy 4b.2: Hire staff to work in the Community Development Department on stream buffers and mitigation plans, restoration, credit programs and efforts and work with banks.”
Hire staff! Who pays?
#25. Page 5.1.18
Strategy 4c.1: Implement State requirements for new programs like total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) and continue to go beyond State requirements as currently done.
Who has authorized this overachievement policy? At what additional cost? Why?
#26. Page 5.1.19
“Strategy 4e.1: Provide information to decision-makers, residents and future residents on the limitations of the igneous and metamorphic stone formations to provide for a reliable well water supply to support residents of the Rural Areas”
The folks in the Rural areas already know this. That is why they drill test wells before purchase.
#27. Page 5.1.20
“Strategy 4e.2: Continue to follow growth management strategies to keep demand from Rural Area residential development from exceeding the available groundwater supply.”
Who has determined the “available” supply?
#28. Pages 5.23-30
Implementation of Natural Resource Strategies
What level of protection/control/monitoring has been determined to be sufficient, and at what cost? Is the endpoint when no one is allowed to live in the Rural Area? These proposed regulations and zoning changes might just accomplish that.
#29. Page 5.2.1
“Historic, Cultural, and Scenic Resources”
Albemarle is rich with historic resources that represent the County’s cultural heritage and establish a strong community identity. The resources include archeological sites from various time periods, such as 12,000-year-old hunting camps and former villages of the Monacan, to buildings and farms established early in this Country’s history, to post-World War II structures and sites.”
This entire section of 34 pages is focused on these and related physical attributes together with a multitude of ways devised to control everything in sight. I see little reference to the philosophical constructs which the people who lived there entrusted to us. Thomas Jefferson would likely be horrified by the private property controlling statues envisioned by the TJPDC herein. These designations are so worded that the whole County could be designated as a “Historic, Cultural, and Scenic Resource” and thereby reduced to museum status for the Tourist Trade enjoyment.
#30. Page 5.2.12
“Strategy 4a: The County should help to protect Monticello’s Viewshed using these measures:”
Protect it from whom or what? Who has decided that there is a problem? The listed strategies that follow all layer on more micromanagement impediments to private property use. The US Capitol seems to function in the middle of a built-out city without a problem to its “viewshed.”

#31. Page 5.2.22

“Strategy 2c: Update EC Design Guidelines to better reflect expectations of the Neighborhood Model for the Development Areas”
Is the Stonefield project an example of “better” or not? So far, the project seems designed according to the APA’s “new Urbanism” and “Form-Based Codes” which appear intended to make automobile usage inconvenient. The current layout gives the automobile driver the feel that he is driving through a “Roach-Motel” of Lego Cubes. Roach-Motel…you check in but you cannot check out, at least conveniently. The new-urbanists riding their bicycles, stuffed with a French baguette and bottle of wine, from the nearby clustered housing is the target audience.
#32. Page 5.3.1
Economic Development:
“The purpose of the County’s economic development policy is, first and foremost, to provide the local citizenry an improved standard of living and enhanced quality of life.”
Thomas Jefferson thought it was to provide equality of opportunity. It was the Socialists who wanted to provide for the citizenry equality-for-all in results.
#33. Page 5.4.9
Land Use for the Rural AreaObjective 1: Maintain a pattern of land uses defined by farms, forests and other natural elements, and traditional crossroads communities, rather than by large lot suburban development.
The single largest way to maintain the land use patterns in the Rural Area is to have the land used for rural uses and not for residential development. As mentioned earlier, the Rural Area is an attractive place for some new residents to build and live. The ability to build on an additional 45,000 lots without a subdivision review, or to subdivide by-right without a rezoning or legislative review and utilities, makes the Rural Area an easy alternative to building in the Development Areas. However, rural development often creates conflicts between residential uses and rural economic activities. For example, neighboring farm activities such as spreading manure or hunting, may seem a nuisance to new residents unfamiliar with rural landscapes.
The TJPDC and County Planners solution is to promote a variety of impediments to private property use and attempt to foresee all possible problems. The traditional ways of resolving disputes by interparty bargaining, compromise, mutual agreements, and legal recourse are ignored in favor of their intrusive planning protocols.
#34. Page 5.4.10
“Strategy 1b.1: Continue the viability of conservation easements in rural resource protection by:
· Assisting, promoting, and funding conservation easement programs;
· Promoting voluntary donations of conservation easements that prevent development and protect valued resources;
· Creating a stable, dedicated funding source for the ACE program;
· Increasing the County’s capacity to monitor the use of land under easement; and ensure adherence to the terms of easements.”
The concept of County funding of the ACE Program is unfair to the non-participating County taxpayers. County property taxes are used to provide a benefit to a “privileged” landowner who will reap a lower County property tax bill, and receive a State and Federal income tax deduction/benefit for voluntarily selling some development rights or otherwise limiting use of his property. The other property owners face higher property tax bills as the ACE beneficiary has reduced the tax-base of his property. Let the person wishing to benefit from a conservation easement find funding for his own tax haven; not at the additional tax burden expense of other County private property owners.
The purchasers and administrators of conservation easements have been known to sell the desirable properties to other insiders at an artificially cheap price. In addition, they often act as de facto middle men for the Federal government, managing the property according to Federal mandates.
What is the target percentage of County private property desired to be placed under conservation easements? Who has decided and by what authority the maximum amount? 50%,100%? How much is enough? It is about 19% already.
#35 Page 5.4.11 through 5.4.29
“Strategy 1c.1: Set a maximum lot size/acreage for development-right lots in subdivisions and RPDs.”
This and the following pages illustrate many examples of micromanagement by the planners which is designed to limit personal property rights and choice, all at the altar of UN Biodiversity. These pages convey the planners’ stated ambivalence of actually using our natural resources and incurring some sort of “eco-guilt.”
#36. Land Use for the Development Areas:
Page 5.5.1:
“The Land Use Plan provides direction for physical development in the County. It reflects the community’s vision as well as the County’s projections for economic, population, and housing demands. It balances these projections against growth management goals and emphasizes the preservation and responsible utilization of limited resources.”
Who has defined this “community’s vision”? What are these “limited resources” and who has defined them as such?
“Although the Rural Area comprise 95% of the County, residential, commercial, industrial, and mixed use development is not expected there.”
What is the validity of the arbitrary 5%/95% allocation between Development Areas and Rural Areas? The “back to the past” picture is one of a medieval walled city.
#37. Pages 5.5.2 and 5.5.3
“One of the key features for helping residents and visitors know when they are in the Rural Area is a visual boundary. A clear boundary helps to visually define where land development is expected and where it is not expected.”
It should be noted that, although the proportionality of Development Area land to Rural Area land has been around 5% to 95% for many years, the proportional relationship was never established by the Board of Supervisors as a goal or policy.
Are citizens in a quandary over not knowing where they are? The BOS never voted to establish the 5%/95% rule!
#38. Page 5.5.9
Development Area Land Area Density and Design: the Neighborhood Model”
Much of this is Smart Growth by another name; the benefits of which have been disputed in the APA paper mentioned earlier.
#39. Page 5.5.21
“It is natural for residents to fear the effects of change as the County makes efforts to create more dense and urban neighborhoods in the Development
Areas. Specific fears often expressed are more traffic, crime, overcrowding of schools, and a loss of privacy.”
These are the very faults of Smart Growth documented in the APA paper mentioned earlier. The residents are right to fear! They are being forced into a living mode which they do not want, just because the planners and “new urbanists” have decided what is best for them…rule by the elite class and a trademark of the socialists.
#40. Page 5.5.23
Strategy 3a: Plan and provide for necessary infrastructure improvements that are currently impediments to developing vacant sites.
Albemarle County can help to support development of infill lots as well as redevelopment by identifying needed improvements to infrastructure such as streets and utilities, funding, and constructing those improvements. It is also important that when public projects are proposed, planned infrastructure improvements are done in a timely fashion so that they may be incorporated into new developments as necessary.”
Are taxpayer funds to used to make a private development workable because of planning/zoning impediments?
#41. Pages 5.5.26-27-33
“This Comprehensive Plan recommends that the County begin studying ways in which the Zoning Ordinance might be amended in support of urban agriculture. It will be important to designate appropriate locations for urban agriculture. For example, keeping of farm animals within an apartment complex may not be suitable, but it might be acceptable on a single-family lot. Consideration will be needed on whether the County should align its regulations with the City’s. If not, then minimum standards will be needed for poultry, livestock, and bees, along with enforcement of those standards. At present, urban agriculture opportunities should not be extended to the keeping of pigs and cattle since these animals pose concerns for the safety, welfare, and protection of neighborhoods and residents.”
This gives birth to another massive new bureaucratic infrastructure, this one to regulate would-be City farmers, and brings visions of Third World living-in-poverty housing.
Housing:
#42. Page 5.6.2
“This change is due, in part, to the County’s Growth Management Policy and the high cost of raw land in the Charlottesville-Albemarle area. Recent surveys conducted for the Livability Project indicate a strong demand for single-family detached homes. Some of this demand is being met in surrounding counties, such as Augusta, Greene, Fluvanna, Louisa, and Nelson.”
Because of an active County policy of discouraging development in the 95% of the County, and pushing development into the other 5%, this is what one would expect. This Smart Growth policy makes housing more expensive, and encourages more vehicle use to escape the increased housing costs and property tax burden. The APA paper quoted earlier documents these negative outcomes.
#43. Page 5.6.4
“Affordability…Historically, housing in Albemarle County has been more expensive relative to the rest of the State”
See #42 above. This is just the law of supply and demand. Planning decisions have financial consequences.
#44. Page 5.6.6
“At present, however, there are no mechanisms to ensure that affordable units remain affordable.”
Will the planners next be advocating “rent control”?
#45. Page 5.6.6-7
“In Albemarle County, the majority of affordable housing should be provided in the Development Areas and should be well integrated within neighborhoods rather than in enclaves. Construction of affordable housing is expected from the development community.”
What will be the expected reaction of existing neighborhood residents to the imposition of the new “Affordable Housing” mix?
#46. Page 5.6.11
“One of the casualties of a loss in staff in the Housing Office has been loss of the ability to develop and maintain an inventory of sales or rentals of proffered units and whether or not those units remain affordable when they are sold. Research is needed on finding ways to have these units remain affordable. Staff time for this activity requires funding.”
Is using existing staff more efficiently not an option? Why not have Relators provide the data?
#47. Page 5.6.12
“Architectural design would need to be considered in a zoning amendment of this type as well as density. Exploration of ways to creatively add affordable units should be done and the zoning regulations changed as needed.”
The planners’ solution to all problems always seems to be more governmental control via regulations.
More property would be “affordable” if more attention were directed to encourage a more welcoming business environment, which would generate jobs and elevate incomes out of the “affordable housing” criteria.
#48. Page 5.6.15
“No less than 25% of units in the Development Areas are multi-family units and are townhouse/attached units”
Who has decided that 25% is the correct minimum? Is there a maximum?
Transportation:
#49. Page 5.7.1Transportation is one of the most important services provided by government. Not only does the transportation system provide for the mobility of people and goods, it also influences growth patterns by providing access to land. Transportation links people to their jobs, schools, shopping, community activities, and entertainment…Moving people and goods by way of the County’s road and highway network will continue to be the dominant method of travel in the near future
A frank admission of the obvious…
#50. Page 5.7.2
“A connected, mixed used community can improve health by reducing vehicle emissions which, in turn, reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by people. A reduction in VMT improves air quality by reducing the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by vehicles. Interconnected streets, as well as promoting alternatives to vehicular travel, like mass transit, walking or biking, has the potential to improve or mitigate air quality problems by also reducing VMT.”
The planners continue to refuse to consider the scientific study reported which found that the Smart Growth/Compact Development model does not deliver on this assumption. See earlier reference to APA paper.
#51. Page 5.7.2
“Cost-Efficient Use of Public Dollars…Benefits more travelers with the same amount of money (move more people, not vehicles)”\
The vast amount of data on public mass transit documents it as a “money loser” requiring large amounts of taxpayer subsidies.
#52. Page 5.7.2
More Transportation Choices. Not constrained to using auto to get around. Mode, time, location, and route choices”
At what taxpayer cost? Is it cost-effective?
#53. Page 5.7.2
Economic Vitality…“Less time lost; time = money”
Absolutely true, and that is why people love their cars. They can go where and when they wish, rather than being a slave to the bus schedule with its intermittent service. How many bicyclists to you see shopping in summer heat or winter cold? We do not have the population density to make public transit cost-effective ,except in a few limited areas.
#54. Page 5.7.3
“Concentrating growth in the Development Areas will continue to increase the efficiency and affordability of public infrastructure, including the transportation system. Focused growth will decrease the need for new and improved transportation facilities and infrastructure outside of growth areas, thereby providing more funding to invest in maintaining the existing system.”
All true, except the planners neglect the human factor, and that people have a variety of reasons to want to live where they chose to do so; not because some planner thinks that the cook-book solution to behavioral control is his area of expertise.
#55. Page 5.7.9
The major transportation goals for Albemarle County’s rural areas are to preserve rural character while improving safety and multimodal transportation choices. Residents suggested leaving the rural roads as they are, whenever possible, focusing on road safety improvements such as shoulders and guardrails, straightening curves, and increased regular maintenance, rather than paving and widening rural roads. Road improvements should support intended growth, and not encourage growth outside of the Development Areas, as well as provide access from farms to markets along strategic routes.
So roads should be left as they are except where they are not…so widening and paving are not safety improvements…a bit of muddled thinking here. However, the planners’ aim is to make the Rural areas less desirable for citizens, and to make automobile usage inconvenient.
#56. Pages 5.7.15-16
“Bicycling provides an alternative mode of transportation to vehicular travel. Bicycle travel is accommodated through use of on-road bicycle lanes that share lanes with vehicular traffic…”
Bicycle transportation is alternate, but it is not equivalent to car transportation. The local bicycle activists seem to have had a heavy hand throughout this Transportation section. Is the County preparing to require bicycle and bicycle operator licenses to ensure that this projected wave of bicyclists is qualified to operate in a safe and responsible manner, and observe all vehicular traffic laws?
Does sharing lanes with vehicular traffic mean that the number of vehicular lanes will be narrowed or eliminated? What about two-lane rural County roads?
#57. Page 5.7.24
“Strategy 4f: Except for agricultural and forestal purposes, limit construction of new roads in the Rural Area, especially where road building would impact or fragment natural habitats.
Strategy 4g: Require that new road projects and road improvement projects include measures that avoid degrading habitats or actively improve them (for example, wildlife tunnels where roads cross migration corridors, stream crossing designs that consider habitat connectivity as well as flood level impacts, etc.).”
This is part of the Biodiversity mindset being advocated by the planners. This gives an open-ended invitation to planners to restrict private property rights since “impact or fragment” can be construed as potential universal results of any construction project.
#58. Page 5.7.26
“The Albemarle–Charlottesville region has demonstrated that it is a profitable and growing marketplace for passenger rail. The 2013 General Assembly passed atransportation funding bill (HB2313) that includes more than $500 million over the next decade for intercity passenger rail.”
Do not make any plans based on HB2313 as the Virginia Attorney General has determined parts of it to be unconstitutional.
Parks and Recreation:
#59. Page 5.8.1“Greenways-blueways and green systems can add economic value by potentially increasing property values and increasing tourism and recreation-related revenues.”
Possibly true, except when such systems are carved out of private property by planning edicts and zoning, without monetary compensation to the property owner.
#60. Page 5.8.1
“The National Park Service maintains Shenandoah National Park, which is owned by the federal government and is located in the Rural…”
Are you at all familiar with how the NPS came to acquire this property? It is not a pretty tale.
#61. Page 5.8.3
“4. Provide an economic benefit – Greenways can promote the area’s economy while maintaining environmental assets directly in terms of eco-tourism and, indirectly, in terms of increased property values.”
Except when they are carved out of private property without just monetary compensation…
#62. Page 5.8.9
“The Greenway Map currently calls for building 52 miles of trails. The trail locations proposed on the Greenway Map are conceptual in nature.”
Do any of these trails cross private property? Will the permission of the owners be required and honored?
#63. Page 5.8.13
“The County’s Transportation Plan recognizes that a system of pedestrian and bicycle improvements is needed to provide for multimodal access throughout the County and, especially, throughout the Development Areas. Making connections to important centers in the Development Areas, as well as making connections to City parks and other County-owned parks, means that sidewalks and paths along streets will…”
Not all transportation modalities are appropriate or practical throughout the County.
#64. Page 5.8.13
“Propose recommendations to the County, such as amendments to current zoning and subdivision regulations to facilitate implementation.
Refer landowners to appropriate land trusts; be pro-active in acquiring right-of-way or donation of land for greenways”
Zoning and regulations to coerce the uncooperative land owner…? Donate or else…?
#65. Page 5.8.24
“Creating greenways and blueways, and constructing greenway trails and blueway improvements requires both money and volunteers.”
It may also require access to or across private property.
Community Facilities and Services:
#66. Page 5.9.16
Keep buildings and spaces at a human scale so that street views are attractive and pedestrian friendly.
“Building size and orientation on the site (and to the street and neighborhood) should be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood to the extent possible and appropriate. As a general rule, buildings should have their front entrance oriented to the street, with parking relegated internal to the site and away from the street.”
This represents Form-based design building codes:
http://www.a2gov.org/a2d2/designguidelines/Documents/Seminar2FormBasedCodes.pdf
By building to a formula, the architects tend to produce cookie-cutter designs with facades reminiscent of Disneyland or Potemkin-like facades seen in the “City Walk of Universal Studios,” or Stonepoint locally.
#67. Page 5.9.16
“Housing density is not directly related to facility development; however, when locating and building facilities, the expectation for residential density nearby should be taken into consideration to avoid sprawling site development, which under-utilizes sites and does not create or contribute to compact, walkable neighborhood development.
This presents the planner’s false choice between two “extremes. “Sprawl” is the emotionally charged word for planners who seem not to be able to consider a true mix of land use.
#68. Page 5.9.18
“Strategy 3a.4: Achieve U.S. Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) basic level certification on all new public buildings so long as planning and energy modeling determine that the upfront expense does not unreasonably exceed the long-term savings.”
Why do it at all if costs exceed long-term savings?
FACILITY STANDARDS FOR SCHOOLS:
#69. Page 5.9.23
“Provide physical facilities that enable the School Division to provide a high quality educational system for students in Albemarle County.”
There is no mention of consideration of unnecessary exposure of school children environmental harms. As the community has oft invoked the “precautionary principle,” it is surprising that there was no consideration by the County School Board of possible health risks associated with introducing Wi-Fi into the K-12 schools about a decade ago.. This health concern is readily resolved by using a wired connection for each computer and turning off the Wi-Fi microwave radio transmitters in the classrooms. http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/herbert-lausd/ I brought this health concern to the attention of the Albemarle School Board, and to the Albemarle BOS last year.
There are more points to critique in the CPD, but by now the pattern should be evident.


--
"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people. They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty." - Thomas Jefferson Virginia Tea Party Patriots www.virginiateapartypatriots.com Danville Patriots http://danvillepatriots.com/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyqTlje8RxQ
"