A Fair Trade Book (excellent!)
Title: The Doctor's Walking Book
Author: Fred A. Stutman
Date: 1980
Publisher: Ballantine
ISBN: 0-345-28764-9
Length: 111 pages
Illustrations: some black-and-white graphics
Quote: “We are under-exercised as a nation. We look
instead of play. We ride instead of walk. Our existence deprives us of the
minimum of physical activity essential for healthy living.”
President Kennedy said that. By 1964 few people seemed
to want to remember that he'd ever been a controversial politician—he had—but
everyone had had to admire his physical fortitude. Undoubtedly he'd be
disappointed today to see that, although “physical fitness” has grown from a
fad into an industry, masses of Americans are still couch potatoes. Ashamed to
be seen walking three blocks to the store, many consume food as conspicuously
as they do gasoline, and what conspicuous hiplines they develop.
Fred Stutman, reportedly a family doctor in Pennsylvania for 54 years and holding, tried to offer help, telling the public
how walking instead of driving could help them “Add years to your life; lose
weight and improve muscle tone; ease everyday tensions and stress; lower blood
pressure; increase energy and physical endurance; reduce risk of heart
disease.” And a few people did buy this book...but...
The reason why some simple, sensible ideas aren't more
popular than they are is that they lack sex and snob appeal. How do you live on
a lower income, even an impossibly low income? You just ignore all the items
and ideas that are being marketed so hard as having sex and snob appeal, and do
simple, sensible—boring--oldfashioned--dowdy things. Like walking
instead of driving. The actual walking can be a pleasure in its own right. You
still have to have a stronger than average personality to ignore the social pressure:
“Why are you walking? Did your car break down?”
To The Doctor's Walking Book I suspect we need
to add a campaign to add sex and snob appeal to walking, to get young people
asking, “Why are you driving...all by yourself, not hauling furniture or
anything? Do you have an injury? Are you...ill?”
Speaking as one of what P.J. O'Rourke conveniently
identified as “the freshman class of baby-boomers,” I cordially invite the
young to discover that driving to work or school is something for old people
to do. Pathetic, broken-down old people whose elephant ankles puff out
over the tops of their ugly pointy-toed shoes, who probably smoke, who
certainly eat a lot of saturated fats, very likely from pork, and whose idea of
conversation is blurting out what they believe to be their friends' secrets—as
if they had friends, as if the stories they repeat about their acquaintances
were secrets, or as if those things were even true. The “need” to drive three
blocks instead of walking is definitely part of the syndrome that contributes
to that kind of repulsive old age, so it deserves to be stereotyped with the
ugliest aspects of that syndrome.
Anyway: I was not aware of The Doctor's Walking Book
before 2015, but if I'd read it in 1979, even then it would have told me
absolutely nothing new. In 1969 my parents were telling people:
“When we walk,the skeletal and muscular systems perform
together.” (Oh, right, so they would have phrased it as “When we walk, our
bones and muscles work together to build each other up.”)
“Walking can lower blood pressure, thus reducing or
eliminating the need for drug therapy...Walking is one of the best ways to get
rid of hostilities and reduce tension.” (They would have said, “Walking clears
your head and helps you feel better.”)
“Walking increases the elasticity of the blood
vessels...” and is “one of the factors that...decrease the likelihood of clot
formation.” (They would have said, “Walking stirs up the circulation, keeps
blood from clotting and blood vessels from hardening.”)
“Walking is the body's built-in mechanism to slow or
retard the aging process.” (They might have said, “Look at poor old A who
doesn't walk or have a garden. Look at B, who walks, gardens, is twenty years
older than A, and looks twenty years younger. Which one do you want to grow up
like?” Even that, they would have said to their contemporaries not their
children...but somehow their children got the message just the same.)
“Walking is fun. You don't have to push your body until
every muscle aches and you're gasping for breath...you don't have to make an
appointment or book a special place to walk...you'll be relaxed by the sense of
being at peace (instead of constantly at odds) with the world around you.” (That
my parents might actually have said, at some time in the 1970s. They said
similar things.)
You've probably heard those things too. So why are you
still driving everywhere—or, if your spouse, children, or local traffic police
have absolutely forbidden you to drive, waiting for someone else to drive you
everywhere you go? Stutman does not address the real obstacles that keep many
Americans from walking: roads with narrow shoulders (sidewalks? what's that?),
hostile motorists, phony-friendly motorists who ever so sweetly ask if your car
broke down, the perception that dusty shoes and sweaty shirts aren't
“professional,” the tendency many people have to assume that any male
pedestrian is a drunkard and any female pedestrian is a prostitute.
Rarely, one celebrity steps forward to make a
public statement in favor of walking...I think what we need might be a phalanx
of celebrities. Michael Moore's web site has had a “Walk with Mike” web page,
that promised to share stories and pictures from people walking off their flab
all across North America. What happened to that page, Mike? We remember how
these celebrity statements go. President Carter did walk. He made that
statement. (I loved it.) And then in order to be able to keep his guards on
duty, he let it drop. Maybe Michael Moore also found out that he'd become too
rich and famous to be allowed to walk.
Because, really, in many parts of the United States anyone
who starts walking to work or school or the store...may not be rich, but
will certainly become locally famous, as in “that weirdo who walks instead of
driving everywhere.” In some neighborhoods people in search of “peace with the
world,” and also “narrow waists and hollow cheekbones,” and also time to
process the stress they're dealing with at work (or at home) in order to leave
it outside the door when they go home (or to work), and so on, find themselves
being reported to the police as suspicious characters. And baby-boomer women
made a fair bit of noise about “taking back the night” in the 1990s, but...did
we, really? Are we walking together at night, or are we still pressuring each
other to be home before dark?
New Yorkers walk. Londoners walk. The hipper, cooler
kind of Washingtonians walk. Unfortunately, in too many cities and small towns,
people who want to be considered for jobs, protected by their police, maybe
even covered by insurance, etc., are not allowed to walk.
With his white lab coat and “M.D.” degree on, Stutman
probably didn't feel qualified to address the blatant discrimination
against people who admit on job interviews that they want to be able to walk to
work, or the hostility—really small-scale terrorism—with which motorists throw
garbage at male pedestrians and solicit sex from female pedestrians (even if
they are, I've seen this firsthand, eighty years old and dressed like the grandmothers
they are, complete with white hair pinned up in a bun). And I suspect that even
in 1979 the reason why people weren't walking was not that they couldn't see
that walkers look and feel better, for longer, than non-walkers; it was that
they didn't feel prepared to cope with the harassment and discrimination.
What does it take to make walking...chic?
I wish I knew. Doctors recommending walking to prevent, relieve, or reverse
various diseases have not been enough. Maybe if corporations and government offices
adopt policies that give a positive preference to people who walk to work...
But that doesn't make The Doctor's Walking Book useless,
by any means. In fact, in my home town, it's actually been used. Thusly:
As those who made a formal vow never to support “the motorcar mania,” in the 1940s,
have died out, a few well preserved women have continued conscientiously
walking around my little town. In fact I've heard two of the younger ones call
their daily practice “street walking.” Some say that, whenever “beautiful
women” align with a cause, the cause is won. I suspect that the people I've
seen and heard saying that defined “beautiful women” as “girls, ages 18 to 25,”
but for any eyes that are satisfied with thick hair, thin thighs, narrow
waists, and positively craggy cheekbones, those we have. The one who is
now about 70 years old was the one who bought The Doctor's Walking Book,
used to carry it around like a shield, and handed it down to me. From a
distance, with only her figure, posture, and pace to go by, you could still
think she was 30 years old. (When she really was 30 years old, she was not a blonde.)
The Doctor's Walking Book is still an excellent book for a young woman to carry
around like a shield. Show it to the not necessarily so well-meaning people who
say “Aren't you afraid...?” Because, if you think in actuarial terms, there are
reasons to be afraid of every possible course of action. Driving, you're in
constant danger of being killed or of killing someone in a crash. Staying home,
you're a sitting duck for cardiovascular disease. Walking, despite the hate and
harassment, you're actually raising the probability that you'll avoid several
of the hazards—from mugging to broken hips—that people cite as excuses for not
walking: walkers build stronger hip bones, and mature, confident women scare
the livin' daylights out of rapists. Speaking of which, only a small minority
of men even want to commit rape, so the ratio of rapists to women is low, but
the supply of cases of brittle bones, hardened arteries, diabetes, heart
disease, and mental illness is close to one (each) to a non-walker. And you can cite The
Doctor's Walking Book when explaining to “friends” that you're walking to
protect yourself from the things that are most likely to harm you.
If you can't trust somebody who's been a family doctor for more than fifty years, whom can you trust? Buy a copy from this web site and, although we're sure he doesn't need the money for himself, out of the $5 per book, $5 per package, $1 per online payment, we'll send $1 to Stutman or the charity of his choice. At least eight, likely ten, copies of this slim book will fit into one $5 package and if you order eight copies, for $45 (or $46), Stutman or his charity will get $8.
No comments:
Post a Comment