Thursday, October 27, 2022
Status Update: Pause Between Hustles
Do the Hustle
Book Review: P.S. I Loathe You
Title: P.S. I Loathe You
Author: Lisi Harrison
Date: 2p09
Publisher; Little Brown
ISBN: 978-0-316-00680-11
Length: 208 pages
Quote: “We swore off boys for ten whole days, / But it didn’t work so well…Now we’re back in the groove. / Sisters, lock up your brothers!”
By this point in the Clique series, Lisi Harrison and her fans were getting to know all of the Clique girls, not only Massie, the obscenely rich and unfortunately pretty Queen Bee, and Claire, the awkward but teen-starlet-pretty Wannabee. There’s also Alicia, who not so secretly wants to displace Massie, and Kristen, who might actually like Claire’s other friend Layne better even if Massie has ruled her “Layme,” and Dylan, who’s really a better match for the boy Massie’s been “dating” grade-eight style. In this installment each girl is trying to stake her claim to one of the Briarwood boys and, though each girl likes a different boy, their relationships are all so nebulous, so grade eight, that each girl manages to feel jealous of at least one of the others as a possible rival for something that does not actually exist. But it might; the boys are sheltered little social climbers too, and the boys’ and girls’ prep schools do lots of official things together, so each girl can potentially end up chatting and swapping junkfood with her choice of the boys’ soccer team.
Meanwhile, for extra drama, the Pretty Committee decide to become a cheerleading squad. This allows them to recruit a few classmates to fill out the squad (Massie’s Rule #1: “Obey what I say”) and act out their relationship dramas, with the boys and with one another, in front of an audience for maximum comedy effect.
I will say that I’ve liked this series better since reading the volume where Harrison revealed that her original idea was to make fun of some adult co-workers who acted like a junior high school clique. So there is a point, and so, though Claire is the most relatable of these horrible children, she’s not meant to be a role model. Thank you for clarifying that, Lisi Harrison.
I still think middle schoolers in search of a fast-reading series are better off with the Baby-Sitters Club. Seriously. The Baby-Sitters’ relationships may take place on a Lost Planet of Nice where everyone is much nicer than humans normally are, but at least every volume of that series gave the characters a positive, useful tip for something real teenagers do.
This Is Not Today's Post
This is merely a notice that today's blog post has been delayed. It is expected to arrive here by 3 p.m.
Wednesday, October 26, 2022
The Professional Confusers
Here's a typical assortment of Dreaded Gyps, Lymantria dispar. Only during this presidential administration does anyone but me seem to have noticed that, although first and second instar caterpillars of this species are notorious hitchhikers, their traditional English name is a bit of an insult to the various European tribes who call themselves Gypsies. The best way to kill this pest species is to collect and destroy their eggs, which are laid in clumps that look like very small sponges with a lot of fur stuck to them. So the new name for the species is "spongy moths."
...and in places where Eastern Tent Caterpillars live, you'll find female gyps, or spongies, with blackish skin, ginger fur, and thin, pale imitations of the tent caterpillars' white dorsal stripe. These caterpillars are typically a little longer and considerably thicker than real Eastern Tent Caterpillars.
...except in place where they might benefit from confusion with tent caterpillars. In addition to the yellow-green form we know so well, there's a fluffy white form and a dark drab form...and then there's this confusion-seeking form:
Its genus, Hemileuca, has been tentatively divided into about two dozen species. Nobody seems too positive about how distinct these species really are. Hemileuca can look very different while they all seem to be the same sort of thing; conspicuous differences can appear among litter mates. All the caterpillars look nasty, and they are, and several other little animals get some survival benefit from looking like Hemileuca larvae, a.k.a. stingingworms.
Tuesday, October 25, 2022
Priscilla Wants to Go to the Dogs
Like many of the U.S. citizens of Puerto Rico, when she left the island (yesterday), she came to New York City. Priscilla Pup is thought to be one year old and mostly Labrador retriever, likely to grow bigger than she is now. She likes "kissing" humans. This is her first day on the mainland. Her web page is https://www.petfinder.com/dog/priscilla-58597224/nj/pittstown/lost-paws-animal-rescue-nj507/ .
When I opened Petfinder, the site took me directly to the page for pets called Priscilla in Georgia, but they said they didn't have one. How not? All popular given names for humans are given to shelter pets but it seems people in Atlanta don't usually leave pets in shelters for very long. This Priscilla was a problem pup so they sent her up to Maryland, to a ritzy suburb where it's hoped someone can afford to pay her vet bills. In addition to being spayed and vaccinated Priscilla Pit has had surgery on a leg. She is said to be a very clever, serious, responsible dog, the sort who wants to have a job. At the shelter she was left to choose her own way to show her work ethic. She chose to become a Shoe Manager. She likes to collect all the shoes and store them on and around her bed to make sure less responsible puppies don't try to eat them. Priscilla can't help it if her ancestors were dreaded Pit Bull Terriers. She has been brought up to be a cuddly pet, Her $350 "adoption fee" covers veterinary expenses, most of which are thought to be behind her. Her web page is https://www.petfinder.com/dog/priscilla-57745451/md/potomac/forever-changed-animal-rescue-md520/ .
Book Review: To the Far Blue Mountains
Title: To the Far Blue Mountains
Author: Louis L’Amour
Date: 1976
Publisher: Bantam
ISBN: 0-553-02757-3
Length: 287 pages
Quote: “It is a far land to which I’ll go. There be savages there, and forests such as you’ve never seen.”
So says Barnabas Sackett, planning his move to the wild frontier of Virginia. Sackett is the progenitor and prototype of other L’Amour heroes—always brave, usually right—though, unlike most of L’Amour’s novels, his story is a complete biography rather than a tragedy or comedy. A comedy usually ends with a wedding or some sort of small success; a tragedy usually ends with the tragic hero’s ruin, defeat, or untimely death; a fictional biography ends with a summary of what the protagonist left to his or her heirs, usually at the end of a long and admirable life.
So you have some idea how this book ends but, it being Louis L’Amour and any of his fictional Sackett clan, you know there’ll be plenty of adventures along the way. Enjoy.
My enjoyment was marred only slightly by the perennial problem of writing seventeenth-century English for twentieth-century readers. Most authors don’t even try, and most make it a little easier on themselves by telling the stories of seventeenth-century characters in the third person. L’Amour tries to pretend that what he has Barnabas Sackett saying is seventeenth-century English. It’s not, of course. L’Amour might have been able to write seventeenth-century English but, if he’d done it, his audience would have rejected his book. This book is written in twentieth-century English with an occasional seventeenth-century phrase thrown in. (I open the book at random: on page 101, in the first paragraph Sackett says “Show up here looking the way an officer on the poop deck should look, and you’ll keep the job,” and in the third paragraph he says “Aye, but I’ve no wish to displace you.” That low grinding noise I hear is cognitive dissonance. I’m not sure what John Smith or William Bradford would have said, in that context, but I’m sure it wouldn’t have been that.) Since the nineteenth century, where most L’Amour novels are set, the English language hasn’t changed much; people spoke differently than they speak now, but mostly in the sense that they had different things to talk about. Since the seventeenth century the basic grammar and vocabulary of English have changed significantly; we can still read Milton, Spenser, or Swift, but we’re constantly aware of how much our common language has changed, and have to wonder whether we’d be able to converse with them. We could converse with Barnabas Sackett—which raises the question whether any of his contemporaries in the real world could have conversed with him.
Louis L’Amour saw himself as a serious historian who read about many places and periods, then wrote the kind of adventure stories his audience bought. In this novel, he was celebrating the United States’ Bicentennial, a very successful marketing theme that some believe helped reunite a nation torn by economic trouble following an inexcusable war. It is possible that visions of TV mini-series, which were starting to call for strong heroines and multiethnic casts, danced in his head as he created Abigail the perfect bride, big tough Lila (recognizably based on some of America’s legendary lovable eccentrics), Thorvald the noble Norseman, Potaka the friendly native American (from a lost tribe), Sakim the Muslim scholar, Kane the loyal Irishman, and the rest of the many likable characters in this book. Yet the prospects for TV mini-series don’t affect the real history. At this period the better organized settlements of European immigrants in North America were tight-knit, gossipy little villages that could fairly call themselves things like “New London” or “New Amsterdam,” where most if not all the Europeans had come from the same place and lived in extended-family intimacy on the long journey across the sea. Most of the history was written in such places. Yet at the same time smaller groups of adventurers were forming, breaking up, and re-forming as people’s adventures had led them; nobody was ordering these people to send regular reports to anybody, and while carrying everything they owned through the forests few of them bothered to carry pens and paper; such groups were often multiethnic, and made up of heroically quirky individuals, not necessarily less heroic than Barnabas Sackett and his little band of friends. If your American genealogy goes back nine or ten generations, or more, your ancestors probably included a few characters like these.
Monday, October 24, 2022
Status Update: A Cheerful Little Whimper
Sunday, October 23, 2022
Book Review: These Were Victors
Title: These Were Victors
Author: Leslie Hardinge
Date: 1983
Publisher: Pacific Press
ISBN: none
Length: 96 pages
Quote: "These persons were not among the most famous or best known in Scripture. Inspiration has recorded only enough information to show us their road to triumph."
Do you read Sunday School lesson books from churches you don't attend? Many people never do. I recommend this exercise, though, to anyone who'd like to learn more about a denomination. When churches are big enough to have these little books officially published, they often give them to members and visitors free of charge, and studying the lesson books can teach you a lot.
I have a few "quarterlies" for sale in real life. They come from different denominations; many came in boxes of secondhand books, although These Were Victors was one I brought home from church--it's a Seventh-Day Adventist quarterly, and I attended that church faithfully from 1982 to 1987. I think the Seventh-Day Adventist quarterlies are among the "meatiest" daily Bible study guides. Seventh-Day Adventist "Sabbath Schools" really are schools of Bible study, the shuls where discussion and debate go on before people settle down in the sanctuary to hear the service. Each quarterly lesson book offers a full day's study, with triple spacing between paragraphs so readers can write out their answers to the questions discussed in the lesson (if they write small).Although the idea of a monthly or quarterly lesson book is for readers to meet and discuss what they've read on one specific day, the Bible doesn't change; a Bible study written for discussion in specific churches on April 21, 1983, is still just as informative now as it was then.
This one discusses thirteen Bible characters whose stories can be covered in one week each: Stephen, Lydia, Onesiphorus, Hannah, Onesimus, Ruth, Barnabas, Abigail, Eliezer, Dorcas, Caleb, Miriam, and Jonathan. "The victories gained by these persons were not seen as spectacular to men. Stephen was stoned as a martyr to his faith, while Jonathan's loyalty to his insane father cost him his life...Yet we believe that in the sight of [H]eaven each of these men and women were [sic] victors."
In the interpretation of these stories I detect some of the prejudice against introverts that I remember encountering among Seventh-Day Adventists in 1983. Hannah, we are told in 1 Samuel 1:7-10, was unhappy and was praying alone, apart from others, in the temple. (Temple services focussed on barbecues with plenty of wine, also featured shouting and dancing and singing and banging on cymbals, and probably had more in common with raves than with Seventh-Day Adventist church services.) Her silent, solitary prayer was a sign of passionate intensity. But Hardinge goes further to cast an unfavorable light on the fact that "she left to be by herself": "Hannah could stand the family pressures no longer...Perhaps in her anguish she felt that she might give way to anger or even revenge." And then again, perhaps she just had faith that if God could hear anything in the general commotion God could hear the prayer of someone who'd stepped aside from the clamorous mob...though poor old Eli was such an ineffectual religious leader that he thought someone not raving was more likely to be sick, or pass out, than to be praying, just as people in twentieth century churches that tried to normalize extroversion were likely to think a person bowed in prayer was dozing or suffering from a toothache.
Barnabas, on the other hand, we are told was "obviously a warm, outgoing, people-oriented person." The Bible does not positively affirm that Barnabas was an introvert, nor did he leave behind anything well enough written to prove that he was one. What we're told about Barnabas was that he was generous, that he was among the first to trust Paul, that he later championed his young cousin Mark against Paul, and that he wanted to avoid a direct confrontation about a point of doctrine. This could easily be the profile of an introvert. Introverts avoid confrontations about their beliefs because they don't feel ready to defend their beliefs in a perfect, winning yet conciliating way; extroverts, because they want to feel that people liiiike them more than they want to be right. (Likewise, Mark's terse writing style could be that of an introvert who thinks most people run on too long, or an extrovert who doesn't want to sit still and write down his thoughts.)
But these are the only ideological prejudices that leap out as I glance over this little book. On the whole it's a tiny treasure box of historical studies. "Barnabas" looks like a surname--bar meaning "son"--but how many commentaries bother to tell us what his given name was? How many mention that Lydia came from Turkey? (Yes, Turkey, and this web site devoutly hopes that our current multitude of Turkish readers are motivated by a spirit as good as Lydia's.) That the elaborate displays of friendship between David and Jonathan were political pageantry rather than same-sex courtship, and that, nevertheless, each of those men risked his life for the other--and for peace between their parties--more than once, is not such an unusual point for a Sunday School book to make. That Onesimus's apologies and pleas for forgiveness did not take the place of, but rather gained their credibility from, his willingness to make restitution used to be more often commented on than it is today.
Looking Back...
Friday, October 21, 2022
Mark Warner on Public Service Loan Forgiveness
From U.S. Senator Mark Warner (D-VA):
"
Hey folks,
I wanted to reach out to provide an important and exciting update for joint consolidation student loan holders and a reminder for anyone eligible for Public Service Loan Forgiveness! Earlier this month, President Biden officially signed into law my bill allowing borrowers trapped in joint student loans with a former partner or spouse to sever their consolidated debt.
Between 1993 and 2006, married couples could combine their individual student loan debt into a single joint Direct Consolidation Loan or joint Federal Consolidation Loan. But when this practice ended in 2006, there was no way for borrowers to sever the debt for any reason, including divorce, separation or abuse.
But this process did not only impact separated couples. For years, borrowers who would individually qualify for student loan relief programs, such as the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Program – which is available to those who have worked in public service, including teachers, state workers, and veterans – were ineligible due to the specific conditions of joint consolidation loans.
My legislation provided a fix for this problem, allowing borrowers to not only sever their debt, but also take advantage of debt relief programs like PSLF.
Now, it will take some time for the Department of Education (ED) to fully implement changes for borrowers to request separation of their joint consolidation loans, but with the limited PSLF waiver deadline approaching, the Education Department released a set of guidelines for those looking to apply for PSLF waivers.
By Oct. 31, 2022, public servants who currently hold consolidated loans will need to:
- Use the PSLF Help Tool to determine if your employer qualifies for this program.
- Print and sign a PSLF form, and then have your employer(s) sign it.
- Submit a Reconsideration Request by uploading a PDF of your PSLF form as an attachment to the reconsideration request submission with the description: “I am a borrower impacted by the Joint Consolidation Loan Separation Act."
Ultimately, I think public servants – especially those that have been trapped in consolidated loans – should have more time to apply, and that’s why I’m also publicly pushing to extend the waiver through next summer. For now, though, it is still looking like the expanded waiver will expire on Oct. 31, so I encourage all to look through this resource and learn more about your eligibility and options. You can get started on this process here.
If you ever want to share your thoughts about an issue that’s important to you, you can send me an email any time using the form on my Senate website. You can also follow me on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
" [that signature graphic Google doesn't like: Mark Warner]
Virginia has had varying amounts of funding to allow varying amounts of help with student loans, for people who serve the Commonwealth, for a long time. Typically loan forgiveness/reduction for teachers has, for example, been offered to people who teach math at very rough urban high schools or very poor rural ones, but not usually for most teachers. This letter reflects some expansion of a traditional program; it is not, as readers outside Virginia may assume, a new unprecedented thing. President Biden may be encouraging over-expansion but, historically, Virginia has been able to afford a little investment in people who take the jobs other qualified people don't want.
The amount of time I have for online reading varies from day to day. Congressman Boucher's newsletter is in the e-mail; it will show up here on Sunday or Monday.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)