Friday, April 30, 2021
Book Review: Life of a Useless Man
Thursday, April 29, 2021
Book Review: Flint
Wednesday, April 28, 2021
Book Review: The Hotpoint Food Freezer Instruction and Recipe Book
Tuesday, April 27, 2021
Book Review: Vanna Speaks
Monday, April 26, 2021
Book Review: The Poisoned Needle (short form)
Friday, April 23, 2021
Book Review: Tucker
Thursday, April 22, 2021
Book Review: The Tall Woman
Wednesday, April 21, 2021
Book Review: Night Over the Solomons
Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Book Review: The Spicy Cookbook
Monday, April 19, 2021
Morgan Griffith on D.C. Statehood
| |
Retrocession, Not Statehood, for D.C. The U.S. House of Representatives will soon vote on statehood for the District of Columbia. Proponents have offered many reasons in support of the cause, some of these arguments having stronger justification than others, but they have yet to satisfactorily address what I believe to be the greatest counterargument against D.C. statehood: the Constitution of the United States. Among the powers granted to Congress by Article I Section 8 is “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States.” The purpose of this clause was wise. In a federal union, allowing one state to contain the seat of government would create the potential for that state to dominate it. James Madison wrote in The Federalist that “a dependence of the members of the general government on the State . . . might bring on the national councils an imputation of awe or influence, equally dishonorable to the government and dissatisfactory to” other states. Madison had been a member of the Continental Congress in 1783 when it had fled Philadelphia after Pennsylvania’s state government refused to defend it from mutinous soldiers. That episode weighed on the minds of the Framers. A 2020 Wall Street Journal opinion piece written by lawyers David B. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A. Casey noted that the late Robert F. Kennedy, a bust of whom now resides in Joe Biden’s Oval Office, understood well the reasoning of the Founding Fathers. “It was indispensably necessary to the independence and the very existence of the new Federal Government to have a seat of government which was not subject to the jurisdiction or control of any State,” then-Attorney General Kennedy wrote in the 1960s. A famous compromise over dinner between rivals Alexander Hamilton on one side and Thomas Jefferson and Madison on the other led to the creation of Washington, D.C. along the Potomac River, and Maryland and Virginia each ceded land for the purpose. Ultimately, the land west of the Potomac was returned to Virginia in 1846. Further affirming the District of Columbia’s distinct status was the 23rd Amendment to the Constitution, giving it votes for president and vice president in the Electoral College. Any measure giving the District statehood would need to go through the process of amending the Constitution. H.R. 51, the statehood bill the House will consider, does not do so. Instead, it shrinks the seat of the U.S. government to an area around the Mall, the White House, the Capitol, the Supreme Court, and other federal buildings, and admits the rest of the District as a state. This approach suffers from an additional flaw beyond its constitutionality. The 23rd Amendment grants electoral votes to the “seat of Government of the United States,” not the District of Columbia specifically, meaning that the handful of residents in this area, presumably including the president and his family, would have as much weight in the Electoral College as some states. Giving the residents of the District of Columbia a voice in the Federal Government is a worthy goal, but it must be done constitutionally. I have introduced a bill that meets this standard. H.R. 2614, the Compact Federal District Act, recognizes the right of D.C. residents to be represented in Congress by returning most of the District to Maryland. Residents could then vote for a U.S. Representative and Senators from Maryland. Maryland would gain by the transaction. It would pick up a U.S. Representative and thus more political clout. The District has enjoyed solid economic growth in the 21st century, and Maryland could expect to benefit from this trend. Further, the District and its Maryland suburbs share similar voting patterns, and the bill provides for a smooth transition of administration, minimizing any political upheaval. A smaller seat of the Federal Government would remain, preventing it from falling within Maryland and potentially being dependent on that state. Its residents would be required to vote by absentee ballot, however, removing their outsized representation in the Electoral College that would otherwise be created by the 23rd Amendment. I believe this solution fairly addresses the desire to grant D.C. residents voting representation in the Federal Government while respecting our oath to uphold the Constitution. If these are the goals of the House Democrat majority, I would welcome their support for the Compact Federal District Act. If House Democrats continue to pursue H.R. 51, they indicate that the Constitution and fair representation are subservient to their political goals, and they will have my opposition. You can call my Abingdon office at 276-525-1405 or my Christiansburg office at 540-381-5671. To reach my office via email, please visit my website at www.morgangriffith.house.gov |
Book Review: The Rider of Lost Creek
Sunday, April 18, 2021
Petfinder Features Return, But Not Here
Book Review: A Study into the Meaning of the Word Gentile As Used in the Bible
Friday, April 16, 2021
Book Review: Rally Round the Flag Boys
Morgan Griffith on New Technology
Technological Advances in the Ninth District
Technology has the ability to deliver new opportunities for rural areas like ours. New and exciting innovations can increase the availability of services which previously were sparsely provided or nonexistent.
Some of these innovations are not only being deployed here but are being developed and tested here.
Drones
Southwest Virginia has been the setting for major achievements in drone technology. In fact, the vehicles that completed America’s first drone delivery at the Remote Area Medical clinic in Wise on July 17, 2015 and the country’s first commercial drone delivery in Christiansburg on October 18, 2019 already belong to the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum, artifacts in the same collection as the first plane flown by the Wright Brothers and the command module from Apollo 11.
I learned firsthand during a recent visit to Radford University about further pioneering efforts in drone technology. The demonstration I witnessed was a product of work at the university’s Department of Geology. Drones can be used in the place of geological field visits, solving the problems of limited time or reaching inaccessible locations. Applications for this use of drones include preparations for road construction and evaluating mines and quarries.
Universities in our area, including Radford and Virginia Tech, will continue to lead the way in adapting drones for new, practical uses that can improve our lives.
In the future, we may increasingly look to the skies and see drones. Look further beyond them and we may also see a solution to the problem of broadband connectivity – low orbit satellites.
Broadband/Low Earth Orbit
The digital divide between rural and urban areas is a serious public policy challenge. Engaging in almost any aspect of modern life, from the economy to education to leisure to health care, demands reliable internet access. Isolated and remote regions, however, often lack this access, in part due to the expense and difficulty of laying fiber line in these areas.
One creative solution around this problem is to use low orbit satellites to provide broadband access. Companies developing this technology include SpaceX and Amazon.
SpaceX’s project, called Starlink, has been deployed to Wise County as part of a pilot project. I learned more about this endeavor during a briefing in Wise organized by County Clerk of Court Jack Kennedy and featuring school officials and parents.
The partnership between Wise County Public Schools and SpaceX addressed the need for better service in the county, a need which became urgent as the coronavirus pandemic forced students into remote learning. According to the schools’ Director of Technology, Scott Kiser, at the outset of the pandemic, a survey found that 25 percent of student households lacked adequate internet access. Remote learning revealed the real number of student households lacking adequate access to be closer to 40 percent. Students had to find hot spots simply to do their schoolwork.
Starlink’s pilot project in Wise County includes 45 homes, and for them, the parents at the briefing testified that it has been a great asset. The change has not just been from going without service to being served. The service has proven to be good, with speeds above 100 megabits per second comparing well to the Federal Communications Commission standard of 25 megabits per second. The briefing offered positive signals about the pilot project so far.
At present, fiber remains the best option, but low orbit satellites offer quality service now, while completing the buildout of fiber networks would still take years. Choosing “all of the above” for connecting people to the internet offers hope for closing the digital divide. In this effort, competition and innovation in the private sector should be encouraged, and regulation by the government should stimulate deployment.
I came away from the visit to Radford University and the briefing in Wise optimistic about the benefits of these technological tools. The people of our region are hard at work developing, applying, and advocating for new ways to solve longtime problems.
If you have questions, concerns, or comments, feel free to contact my office. You can call my Abingdon office at 276-525-1405 or my Christiansburg office at 540-381-5671. To reach my office via email, please visit my website at www.morgangriffith.house.gov. Also on my website is the latest material from my office, including information on votes recently taken on the floor of the House of Representatives.